240°

Top 10 Series That Began on PlayStation 1 - Debut titles that achieved greatness

The original PlayStation took gamers by surprise as it featured one phenomenal library of games. In this list, I'll take a look at the ten most influential series that began on Sony's debut console. Let's get to it; greatness awaits!

Read Full Story >>
videochums.com
PhoenixUp2885d ago

It's still a cheat how Metal Gear Solid is on this list

naruga2885d ago (Edited 2885d ago )

MGS defined what it really is with MGS1 on PS1 ..previously was just a stereotypic 2D isometric game with less shooting in it it was like it born that exact time and Kojima himself has repeated it numerous times.........

also Resident Evil was literally imo the most impactfull game of the era ...as it not only invented surrvival horror but invented crucial 3D mechanics which helped all 3D games (especially prerendered backgrounds with polygonal chars) of that era JRPGs , Survival Hor , Action etc etc

darthv722885d ago

You could say that while "Metal Gear" originated on the MSX... it was a new take on the stealth series that debuted on the PS1 as Metal Gear Solid.

As to your second part, I agree that RE was truly a game among games and still stands the test of time.

Segata2885d ago

RE has it's roots on NES with Sweet home. RE is also on Saturn. Same with SOTN and Tomb Raider. Also Tomb Raider began on PC.

andrewsquall2885d ago

@Segata We know that. The article is about games debuting on PS1 and pretty much becoming massive hits helped by massive sales. Resident Evil did indeed come to Saturn but a year later and probably sold one tenth the units on that console too.
Wrong, Tomb Raider actually launched on the Saturn first but was rushed by a timed exclusive deal by Sega. The game released much better a month later on the PS1 and PC and of course went on to sell millions on the former.

PhoenixUp2885d ago

MGS is still part of the preexisting Metal Gear franchise that had already been established in 1987 on MSX, so it still shouldn't be on this list.

Why dafuq you bring up RE when I didn't even say anything about it?

naruga2885d ago (Edited 2885d ago )

^^ man i replied to your comment ....and then i just continued writing a my opinion about the article , RE comment is not addressing to you ....what would you like me to do ? ...reply to you ..and then make a 2nd comment for the article?

darthv722885d ago

The first part of his post was directed at your post. The second was his own thought in regards to the list of games and their impact. Not directed at you specifically.

PhoenixUp2885d ago

@ naruga

Yeah since that would make things simpler.

@ darth

I get that

AspiringProGenji2885d ago

Not a cheat really...

It was on PS1 where Metar Gear started to finally take shape and become known. Even Kojima himself credits PlayStation a lot for it. You could say that Metal Gear "Solid" was a new start, and it started on PS1

PhoenixUp2885d ago

It doesn't matter where it "took shape", the series had already been on MSX and NES before reaching the PS1.

If this article were about series that became popular on PS1 then you'd have a point.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2885d ago
darthv722885d ago

I'd add in Tomb Raider as an honorable mention. Otherwise it's a solid list of great titles.

PhoenixUp2885d ago

Tomb Raider began on Sega Saturn

darthv722885d ago (Edited 2885d ago )

Resident Evil was on Saturn too. I believe the nature of the piece is about games that began on PS1 as I don't recall TR being on Genesis or SNES or any other platform. It launched in the 32bit era and began its rise to fame on PS1. Just like RE.

PhoenixUp2885d ago

Resident Evil came to Saturn after it started on PS1.

Tomb Raider began on Saturn then came to PS1.

Segata2885d ago

It began on PC and was on Saturn.

AspiringProGenji2885d ago

After playing Persona 5 and discovering such amazing series, I feel like I have failed humanity for not knowing about this series before.

Thanks PlayStation <3

InKnight7s2885d ago

I dont blame you man we were are trapped and fooled by waiting proper FF and KH thats why we missed this great series.

Imalwaysright2885d ago

You´ll fail humanity even more if you don´t play at least P3 and P4.

Segata2885d ago

What a crap list. Persona is a spinoff of SMT which began on NES.
Namco Museum is just collection of existing games by that logic Mario All Stars was a new series on SNES.
RE was also on Saturn. The real roots of RE are in Sweet Home on Famicom.
MGS is part of an existing series called Metal Gear from the 80s on MSX. Hell Snatcher had a Robot buddy similar to MGS4 and it's name was Metal Gear.

PhoenixUp2885d ago

Resident Evil 1 came to Saturn 1 year after it released on PS1.

AspiringProGenji2885d ago

Persona is its own game despite being a Spinoff, and it began on PS1

acidflare2884d ago

MG was on MSX, GB, and NES.
Persona is actually a spin-off of Shin Megami the original series not Shin Megami tensei.

I completely agree with you on the fact that 60% of the list is garbage. Where's the mention of Tom Clancy's rainbow 6? Rayman? 3D versions of FF? Imo this list is utter bullshit

Segata2884d ago

Rayman technically began on SNES as there was a game nearly finished for it but cancelled.

DivineAssault 2885d ago

Most of those series' are still great today..

Show all comments (32)
50°

XR Gaming is Shaping the Military, Could Consumers Also Benefit?

With VR pioneer Palmer Luckey collaborating with Mark Zuckerberg again, these XR gaming veterans are reshaping military hardware.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
140°

Introducing Project Defiant, the first wireless fight stick designed by Sony

First look at the upcoming controller, which uses PlayStation Link technology to deliver wireless connectivity with ultra-low latency for fighting games.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
darthv7219h ago

Interesting.... I'll get one.

16h ago
Babadook716h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Great for Marvel Tokon Fighting
Souls (which looked amazing).

Disccordia11h ago

It can also be used wired which is fairly important to note. Anybody using this thing competitively won't go anywhere near wireless.

170°

CD Projekt RED History Suggests The Witcher 4 Demo May Be More Marketing Than Gameplay

The history of CD Projekt RED suggests that the recently shown demo for The Witcher 4 may be more marketing than actual gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Sonyslave31d 2h ago

Not only CDPR but Epic Games as well i still haven't seen any game with that fidelty of that Ps5 tech demo .. that was 2020

VenomUK18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Digital Foundry in its reaction video said they believe the demo reflects real performance, as overstating it’s competence on PS5 could bring significant risks to Epic Games’ shareholders and legal risks.

https://youtu.be/5PIyPpB83V...

Eonjay3h ago

Actually Horizon Forbidden West exceeds this in image quality. So it seems very plausible. Intergalactic is actually beyond this presntation in IQ, RT and resolution and thats locked 60FPS as well. As far as the usage of hardware RT in UE, they were able to reduce the CPU overhead.

This was a tech demo for UE 5.6. That was clearly stated and is evident by the presentation itself where several of the new features of UE are highlighted

This article title is inaccurate because this was not a demo for Witcher 4. It was a technical demonstration of Unreal Engine 5.6.

Christopher1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

***Cyberpunk 2077’s gameplay features that were showcased in initial footage but never made it into the final game***

They literally made a big deal of telling everyone that they changed the gameplay of CP2077 during development and then did a new demo of the game with the new gameplay. There was no hiding this to the public. CP2077's problem with the buggy as heck and obviously too early release.

This is really bad journalism to promote this line of thinking. It's an attempt to rewrite history. You can definitely say you preferred the initial demo, but they were very open and clear when they moved from third-person to first-person that it would include major changes in gameplay and showed those off multiple times a year prior to the game's release.

---

As to the point of this article? Yeah, the whole event is a marketing event. I don't trust anything until it's released, tbh. No matter who is making it. I can still be excited by what I see, but it's not going to get me to pre-order a game or get me to go out there and sell what I saw as if it will be just like that in the full release.

neutralgamer199220h ago

What about the fact CDPR showed gameplay behind closed doors which wasn't real? They dusnt allow anyone to bring their phones or any tech so once media came out of that gameplay reveal CP2077 was hyped to the moon and back. CDPR didn't show console gameplay so let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game

Christopher19h ago

You mean rumors? You want me to comment on rumors from Bloomberg? We arguing the belief of rumors now and not news?

Here's that fake demo - https://www.youtube.com/wat...

If you've played the game, you know how much that lines up with the final product. That's what I know.

***let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game***

They literally re-demoed the game with the change, so they were transparent. You're just acting like they weren't when in 2018 they literally demoed the new gameplay. That's 2 years prior to release.

I don't know what they 'lied at launch of the game' is supposed to mean.

-

This game had enough wrong with it at release that we don't need to be arguing rumors and online hatred of the gameplay changes shown in 2018.

neutralgamer199219h ago

Christopher, just to clarify — I'm not trying to be overly negative or dismissive. I fully acknowledge that CD Projekt Red was transparent when they switched from third-person to first-person and even re-demoed the game to reflect that. Credit where it’s due — they did show that change publicly.

But the real issue for me is how the game launched. Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions and still charged full price for something that was nowhere near ready. That’s where trust was broken. The game was released in a clearly unfinished and broken state, and it took years to get it into a playable condition. That goes beyond mistakes — that’s a serious failure in leadership and consumer respect.

So when I see something like the Witcher 4 tech demo — and yes, I understand it’s Epic showcasing Unreal Engine 5 — I can’t help but approach it with caution. It’s not blind skepticism, but earned skepticism. A lot of the original developers have left CDPR, so we can’t assume this next game will automatically reach Witcher 3 levels of excellence.

I want it to be amazing. We all do. But I’m not going to fully believe the hype until independent gamers and trusted content creators — people with a reputation for honesty and not being paid off — get their hands on it and say, “Yes, this is great.” Until then, it’s just marketing.

They built up enormous goodwill after The Witcher 3 and the free DLCs — but they lost much of that with Cyberpunk's release. Even platform holders like PlayStation and Xbox, who once trusted CDPR to self-certify, don’t anymore. That alone speaks volumes.

Again, it’s not hate — it’s caution born from experience

CrimsonIdol18h ago

"Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions"
It was a multiplatform release, and yes they botched it, but clearly consoles weren't lead development platform, PC was. They clearly were hoping that they could get everything together by launch, and this was a mistake. I think them showing this running on a PS5 is a clear indicator that they've learnt from this.

But there are plenty of reasons not to get too excited about this, and it's not hidden behind any lies, it's right there watermarked on the footage. this is a technical presentation of the Unreal 5 engine, running on the PS5 at 60fps. This is technology that may be in the Witcher, this is not the Witcher.

Lightning771d 1h ago

Because it is marketing. Epic did the flying sand girl in 2020 now this with Witcher. I still wanna see what games shows the original showing of Unreal 5? It's been 5 years exactly.

Michiel198920h ago

ofc it is, no real gameplay suddenly xrays a horse to show how its muscles are moving realistically.

CrimsonIdol18h ago

It literally had text telling you it wasn't gameplay.

Extermin8or3_43m ago

They were literally showing off the fact it seamlessly can transition from gameplay to ctsceme those aspects of presentation were clear cutscenes....

Show all comments (23)