100°

The Decades-long Quest to Make Dragon Quest a Hit in America

It’s unlikely Dragon Quest will ever be as popular in the US as it is in Japan, where an urban legend persists that new entries are released on Sundays so that kids won’t skip school to buy them. But the hope is that by increasing the visibility of the series — through releasing a combination of ports and spinoffs, in addition to the main DQ games — Square Enix will be able to make Dragon Quest a more globally prominent franchise.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Gemmol2541d ago

it was successful on the DS in America, if anything article should talk about why Sony struggle to make it relevant, when the DS, 3DS line bring so many sales to Dragon Quest series.....that the whole series can be played on the 3ds from 1 to 11

Last_Boss2541d ago (Edited 2541d ago )

DQ VIII made the series relevant across the world. If they would have stuck with that from VII on up, it would've have been huge. Besides the DQ sales in Japan eclipse those in NA & EU. If anything the remakes and all the way from 1 to 9 should've have started on PSP to Vita. DQ VIII is the FFVII of the series, and both debuted on PSX 1st.

Gemmol2541d ago (Edited 2541d ago )

Why you say psp to vita, i love dq 9 i would of missed out on it if that happen ☹ it was the first dragon quest game i beat even tho i had the others i was too young to finish those

Last_Boss2541d ago (Edited 2541d ago )

I didn't mean for it to skip DS. Lol I meant it would have been great to also get it on psp to vita like the FF remakes. The series is long overdue for full recognition . I wish they localized the Lotto trilogy on the Wii.

PhoenixUp2541d ago

Wtf are you talking about?

Dragon Quest became more well known in the west after DQVIII on the PS2. After that Square Enix started putting Dragon Quest games exclusively on Nintendo platforms for many years until Dragon Quest Heroes came out.

Gemmol2541d ago

dragon quest 9 on the DS sold more in the west than ps2 version which had more consoles sold than the DS at the time......yes it was the first to make a dent in the West......but DQ9 made a bigger hit and sold way more than DQ8........so I am right again, Nintendo handheld sold the most of it in all territory and this is why Square remake all the Dragon Quest for Nintendo handheld and this is why the 3DS is the only system that can play Dragon Quest 1 all the way up to Dragon Quest 11

PhoenixUp2541d ago

And DQ8 sold more in the west than any Dragon Quest game prior. DQIX built off that newfound appeal.

Besides that if Square Enix isn't developing a game on a PlayStation platform then there's not much Sony can do about it. So you are wrong in saying that Sony struggled in making this franchise more relavant in western territories when the their console was the reason the franchise became more well known in the first place.

It should be obvious how that Square Enix remade many Dragon Quest games on Nintendo handhelds because it's much more cost and time effective than making HD remakes on Sony consoles.

Dragon Quest 1-3 aren't playable on 3DS. However Dragon Quest I-VIII are playable on iOS and Android though, so I wouldn't be surprised if Square Enix ported DQIX to those platforms as well along with DQX & DQXI in the future.

Last_Boss2541d ago (Edited 2541d ago )

@Gemmol
The point was the fact that DQ finally was truly noticed on PlayStation and it took 8 games for that. So who is to blame for that?!! If they had remasterd the old games like they did Final Fantasy on PSP to vita, it would have been a double hit for them. Dragon Quest IX was not even on PS2. If DQ was redone like it should have been for an actual console then the sales I garuantee the sales would have been much better.

The 10th Rider2541d ago

I've been a fan since it was known as Dragon Warrior over here. One of my favorite games from my childhood.

3-4-52541d ago

* I love Dragon Quest. DQ 9 was the game that got me hooked on Dragon Quest and rpgs.

I'm really looking forward to playing Dragon Quest XI, and it's my most wanted game to come over to the U.S. that at the moment is still Japan only.

If we got DQ Heroes 1 & 2, which are spin-off side games of the DQ series, then I'm pretty sure we have a good chance of getting DQXI state side.

We just got DQ 7&8 as well.

2539d ago
150°

With Larian Out Of The Picture, Will The Baldur's Gate IP Be In Safe Hands?

Huzaifah from eXputer: "With Larian Studios washing their hands of the IP, what is the ultimate fate of the legendary Baldur's Gate series?"

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

If anybody's gonna mention BioWare, then look at Archetype Entertainment, they're the new BioWare
or else
Obsidian is still a good choice but not independent anymore.

anast1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

No, WoTC is pivoting to mobile. They can use Larian's work to justify DnD Go and everyone will accept it.

RiseNShine1d 7h ago

Short answer, nope. Long answer, f*ck nope.

robtion14h ago

Correct answer. Most people don't realise that the companies that are still making good games using common sense and a customer focus are generally not American. They are from Poland, Belgium, Japan, or other countries that have not yet become completely corrupted by 'extreme capitalism'.

Before you down vote me into oblivion I am not anti-american. I just don't like greed and corruption which unfortunately seems to correlate with power.

I would guess the next Baldurs gate will probably be filled with GaaS.

Christopher1d 7h ago

Honestly, we're talking completely new engine and none of Larian's built-in stuff with regard to environments and the like that they had from their past divinity game. No one is going to have that just ready to go. So, they need to shop for a dev studio that has a past game that shows what they want.

Obsidian doesn't have that, maybe the closest being Dungeon Siege 3 or Pillars of Eternity, but those are very basic, not as open, very little environment related and altering capabilities. So, we're talking a step way back on what Larian delivered. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Okay conversation tree designs, but still needs more complexity.

inXile has Wasteland 3 as a base model engine, and I think that's better than Pillars of Eternity from Obsidian. But, still needs to be more open world, more environmental effects, and a much heavier rules set adaptation. But, not a bad overall engine as a base, but still a ton of work. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Needs a ton of work on that entirely.

Tactical Adventure did the Solasta game. Really good and more accurate as far as 5e rules than BG3. But, again, if the expectation is similar to what made BG3 a big hit, engine isn't designed for moving the camera, is a bit outdated in graphics, doesn't have in-game scene elements, and needs much better writers/voice actors.

Owlcat of pathfinder games is another choice, even though they've recently moved on to WH40k licensed games. Again, though, the engine is the biggest issue here to match up, but it's a much better option overall than Tactical Adventure. Another question is writers/story telling, as much of their overall story telling bits are very limited with a lot of random worldbuilding elements that are just +\- of some attributes.

TBH, no matter who takes over, it's just not going to be like BG3 much like how BG3 isn't at all like BG1/2. And BG3 was so successful because of how much Larian was able to put in with their engine and how focused they were on players having ridiculous control over the story being told. I just don't see the next BG being the same and depending on what it is, it might be good but I'm not as big of a reach as BG3. It's way more likely players are going to go into BG4 (or its spiritual successor if it moves away from Baldur's Gate and into Neverwinter or something like Plansescape) expecting much of what is in BG3 with more options, new and older characters, and the same level of control over what they're doing. If it doesn't have that, regardless of who makes it, it won't be as successful, IMHO.

exputers14h ago

Yes, I completely concur.

As good and talented as inXile and Obsidian are in their own specific way of making their particular games, none of them have Larian's attention to detail, dynamic worlds, and reactivity, so even if they end up making a new Baldur's Gate, it's going to be a significant step-down in terms of gameplay if not narrative.

CrimsonWing691d 6h ago

Probably not, but maybe… just maybe…

Show all comments (8)
30°

Human Fall Flat 2 Delayed, Devolver Details Major 2023 Sales Decline

As part of its latest financial report, Devolver Digital has announced that upcoming physics platformer Human Fall Flat 2 has been delayed beyond 2025.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
260°

Microsoft has ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’ following its acquisition, studio says

Microsoft has 'let Blizzard be Blizzard' following the acquisition of the veteran developer according to World of Warcraft's executive producer.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Kaii2d ago

Diablo 4 storefront being a cash grabbing shitshow does unironically attest to that, kudos.

kythlyn22h ago

Microsoft needs to be guiding Blizzard to be what it USED to be, not allowing it to continue to be the greedy bastardization of itself that it has become.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Okay i will be interested if they become old Blizzard but might as well be dead.

Rynxie1d 12h ago

They will never be old blizzard. Most of all the OG's left from developers to those on the top (even some decision making folks left).

Vits2d ago

Shame most of the people that made Blizzard what they were, have already left a while ago.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

I was about to say this. How can they be blizzard when they're no longer blizzard from yesteryear?

Hofstaderman1d 16h ago

Just like Rare and Bioware...

blacktiger1d 16h ago

Rare was the thing I lost heart

victorMaje1d 13h ago

Exactly. Blizzard hasn’t been Blizzard for a long time.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.

Knightofelemia1d 22h ago

Blizzard is not the same Blizzard like it use to be.

PassNextquestion1d 17h ago

Were you expecting Microsoft to hire everyone that had left Blizzard long before they purchased the company...

Microsoft has let the Blizzard company they purchased continue to be the Blizzard company they purchased.

thesoftware7301d 10h ago

Wow, PassNextquestion,

You fully understand what that saying means, unlike some people on here who just have to say negative garbage talk.

When someone says, "Just let *blank* be *blank*, "they are just letting them operate how they operate.

It's pretty much how Sony "let Bungie be Bungie."

This comment section is full of outright haters, but you have to "let N4G be N4G"

GamerRN1d 8h ago

This site leans so heavily in one direction...

BISHOP-BRASIL23h ago

I don't think people commenting are necessarily blaming MS for anything here, this is just collective longing for what Blizzard/Vivendi was before Activision's meddling.

Show all comments (43)