For some gamers born and bred with traditional first person shooters and console games, MMOs are a daunting prospect, with an appeal that's not fully understood. The stereotypes (which are sometimes true) that persist are that "MMOs are boring, MMOs are too slow, all it is is kill quests, item gathering, stat-gazing and crafting - and all those things are boring, boring, boring."
Ludo and Dante from gaming-centric site Man vs. Horse refused to 'be slaves to those opinions' and put together a cleverly written MMO Showdown. They played the trials of City of Heroes, World of Warcraft, and EVE Online respectively and wrote about their experiences with these titles, having devoted roughly 7 hours of solid play to each game. Which MMO came out on top from the perspective of two experienced gamers, but MMO noobs?
Dragonflight may have drawn to a close but it’s time to recognize just how important it was in securing the future of the game.
What ??? If nearly made everyone leave for good with its weird furry/scaley centric crap
no that was shadowlands that l credit with any games closest rendition of hell and the afterlife as we could get. No one wanted to be there.
Bergur Finnbogason delves into the challenges and triumphs of steering EVE Online through two decades of immersive gameplay.
Uncover the artistic vision and technical advancements driving EVE Vanguard, the latest project from CCP that promises to expand the EVE Online narrative ahead of May's First Strike.
