690°

If Destiny 2 is delayed until 2018, Activision acquires a 'hefty chunk' of Bungie shares

Good thing it probably will release in 2017 then.

Read Full Story >>
ibtimes.co.uk
-Foxtrot3045d ago

Bungie sold their soul to the devil

UCForce3044d ago

Yeah, I agree on that one.

DillyDilly3044d ago

Were they that desperate that they even agreed to these stupid terms ?

TheCommentator3044d ago

More importantly, Random, does that mean that Destiny 2 releases unfinished just like the first one?

Elwenil3044d ago

@TheCommentator

That is precisely what it means.

Especially since now they know they can get away with it and the gamers today will eat it up and ask for more.

morganfell3044d ago

Rented, not sold. There is a huge difference. And are you going to sit there and say you have never enjoyed an Activision title? Activision is an easy whipping boy. They're a company that has to make money for stockholders and to continue making games. It is a business, not Santa Claus. If you are going to hate Activision you might as well turn that on every game company and leave the hobby altogether. Activision would not be able to conduct their affairs as they do if a massive chunk of the gaming demographic, the buying public didn't make this possible. Perhaps your hate is misplaced. Maybe it should be at that buying public. Or maybe at yourself for being in the minority. Plenty of people talk about how they revile Activision then they go out and buy their games as if they have no choice. A truckload of people discuss on forums how they revile Activision and then there they are at the midnight launch. or else they say, "Well I didn't buy full price" or some other such nonsense.

You played the game.

You liked it.

Damn at least be honest.

I do not wish to sound like this is only aimed at you. It is not. But it often seems as if disliking Activision is almost a reflex.

I'll be honest up front and say I do not care. If it is a good game I'll buy it. I bought Infinite Warfare and enjoyed the hell out of the campaign. I have purchased every COD...ever. No doubt I will get the next one as well.

Godmars2903044d ago

" Activision is an easy whipping boy."

Because they have a history of gutting IPs and studios. Bad enough that, as far as the audience is concerned, such works. Activision shortchanges devs, gamers, and we prove their methods by buying their product.

The 10th Rider3044d ago

And many people don't exclusively bash Activision, either. Ubisoft and EA each get their own dose of criticism, though EA has gotten better than they once were.

GorillaTact3044d ago (Edited 3044d ago )

morganfell

You enjoying Call of Duty is irrelevant to the point. Just because they sell a few games it doesnt mean that how they handle their properties is pro consumer. You are basically saying that its a good thing for them to release unfinished games and then charge consumers for the rest of the game via dlc.

TankCrossing3044d ago

None of what you said changes the fact that they are the worst publisher out there for microtransactions and DLC practices, and up there with the worst for base pricing.

None of that changes the fact that COD games and Destiny rely heavily on peer to peer connections, while even EA and Ubisoft host games properly.

Activision stink. They're very good at what they do, but they stink.

Dirtnapstor3044d ago

Morgenfell

I agree. Reflecting on comments now and of the past concerning similar topics, many individuals have no clue how the corporate world is structured and needs to function in order for us as consumers to continue to feed our wants and desires. Business is not about hand-outs and/or creating a type of consumer-welfare. Business is about providing not supporting. You want to be a producer, you must be able to produce as contracted. Others (individuals and entities) depend on goals being met.
My only potential fear is that Destiny 2 will be fragmented. But at the same time, Bungie has been at it for awhile with this IP and has seen what works and what has flopped. So it should be a non-issue. We shall see.

81BX3044d ago

@morgan
I agree its a business but there are businesses that are ran with everyone in mind not just suits.

morganfell3043d ago

Thanks to the people that get it. Activision doesn't just sell a "few" games. You do not stay in business and continue to fund titles by only selling a few. And for all the hate at COD, at least the layout of each game is different unlike Assassins Creed which I love but Ubi has run into the ground.

Here are the city quadrants, unlock this, do these same things over and over, boom quadrant freed. Next.

And detractors failed to address the point concerning buyers. The enablers to a policy with which some do not agree. But a large number agree and despite their hypocritical remarks they buy the games from a company they claim to despise. Action is the great definer. That is where and how lasting statements are made.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3043d ago
Chrisgamerguy3044d ago (Edited 3044d ago )

Yes but what company could they have of worked with and not sold there soul? Lol I mean ms owned it before them

Asuka3044d ago (Edited 3044d ago )

This has been debunked...see updated section

http://kotaku.com/destiny-2...

Ravenor3044d ago

We don't pay attention here!

Death to Activision!!!!!

Am I doing it right!? Am I hip yet!?

Lilrizky3044d ago

I do agree that might be the case with Bungie, but Blizzard "sold their soul" to Activision and they're killing it.

Ravenor3044d ago

Diablo 3 "not enough skulls"

Utalkin2me3044d ago

Seems Bungie likes selling their sole to the devil.

81BX3044d ago

Wtf kind of deal is this? Poor poor Bungie

Drizzy3044d ago

So now we know destiny 2 will be rushed trash

Phill-Spencer3044d ago

Freed their soul from one devil just to make a new deal with another one.

Dan_scruggs3044d ago

They made too much money to care what Sonic's sidekick thinks of them.

jaymacx3044d ago

@-Foxtrot best comment that sums up this deal. Was it better to have a new IP(with Activision) or continue Halo(with Microsoft)? It would seem its not much better LOL

Sparta073043d ago

Well it was either this or they could of stood with Microsoft and made halo, halo, halo and halo.....

I'll give Bungie the benefit of the doubt. I put in more hours in Destiny then I had any game this gen. It started off to a bad start but ended up being a great game.
Let's hope they bring out a great game Day one.

TheSaint3043d ago

Get ready for a buggy and messed up game on release.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 3043d ago
freshslicepizza3045d ago

when you sign with the devil you face the consequences. i think any reasonable deadline should be set in place because it is a business after all and there needs to be some accountability. when i see how games like gt 7 constantly get delayed and then turn into a smaller project i wonder what the heck is going on with those types of teams who constantly cannot meet deadlines. we also dont want games rushed like what i think happened with forza 5.

ShadowKnight3045d ago (Edited 3045d ago )

Well Microsoft should have sign them and expand their first party studios and portfolio. Oh well

freshslicepizza3045d ago

microsoft wanted them to keep pumping out halo, now activision will want them to keep doing destiny for 10 years.

TankCrossing3044d ago (Edited 3044d ago )

Microsoft did sign them. Bungie were very much a Microsoft first party studio. Bungie departed MS by mutual consent, on amicable terms because they simply didn't want to make Halo any more.

Then Activision offered them loads of money to make a game just like Halo, and for some reason they signed away their next 10 years.

DeadlyOreo3044d ago

Lol. Had to get a little Sony dig in there didn't you Moldy 😂 I mean, come on man. There are clearly so many better examples than GT7, you just couldn't handle putting a non biased comment.

freshslicepizza3044d ago (Edited 3044d ago )

i also mentioned forza 5 being rushed so stop being so defensive over plastic toys.

SpinalRemains1383044d ago

He makes a valid point and wasn't exclusively digging at SONY. His comment wasn't intended to attack SONY.

Liqu1d3044d ago

Of course you had to start talking about Sony in an Activision article. And GT7 didn't get constantly delayed and then become a smaller project. Just grow up.

freshslicepizza3044d ago

yes it did,

http://www.polygon.com/2013...

"The PlayStation 4 game which we'll likely call GT7 will be done in about a year or two"

that was written in 2013

then this was said in 2015,

http://gearnuke.com/gran-tu...

"Yamauchi spoke about the rumored 2017 release date saying “we are talking about Gran Turismo, people will not have to wait so long”. His statement likely points to a late 2016 release date, but a late 2015 release may also be possible according to his earlier interview in 2013 with Famitsu magazine where he said “a year or two (from 2013)”

and yes, this game will not be a full gt7 game,

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

"The old days, when the games were offline, the experience was defined by what's on the disc. You had a distinction between a Prologue and a full GT, it was very stark. When the game becomes more of an online connected experience, that distinction blurs. This will be much more than a Prologue type experience."

gt sport will not be a prologue type game but it also wont be a full fledged gt7 either.

anyways back to destiny 2, bungiue needs to be held accountable to release dates because this is a business and if the game gets delayed that is lost sales for that fiscal year.

Shadowsteal3044d ago

Honestly that's no one's fault but Bungie's. The fact that they felt they'd have a more enjoyable time with Activision as a publisher vs. Microsoft was a bad play. If they wanted even the slightest bit of creative control over what happens with their games they shouldve gone to Sony. You don't see Naughty Dog pumping out Uncharted, Guerilla Games making Horizon, and Sucker Punch is making a new IP.

freshslicepizza3044d ago

you really think there wont be another uncharted game?

InTheZoneAC3044d ago

then go work for M$

it is absolutely stupid to meet deadlines just because

these are smart qualified people, no need to rush because $$$, they will get more of that $$$ back when they release a quality product. Your mindset is what's wrong with a lot of America.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3044d ago
Gecksta3044d ago

And bare minimum game. Watch as the dlc is much bigger than the vanilla game.

Aenea3044d ago

I know it's not what you meant to say, but I kinda hope that is going to happen!

Hear me out! It's a game that does need a steady supply of new content to keep players engaged, so if the DLC's after 2 years aren't all that big compared to the main game I would not be happy!

Heck, Destiny 1 needed more DLC, not less!

GorillaTact3044d ago

I was thinking the same thing. Lack of content was one of my biggest gripes with the first Destiny. It lacked content in every aspect of the game. Years later and Destiny has finally became the game it should have been from day 1.

Kribwalker3045d ago

If they don't get it out this year they will be owned again. MS already got to keep a chunk of equity in the company when they separated in 2007, if activision gets a large chunk there won't be anymore equity for employees and they will be worse off now then ever before

Show all comments (102)
90°

Famitsu Sales: 6/2/25 – 6/8/25

Famitsu has published its estimated physical game software data for Japan for week of June 2, 2025 to June 8, 2025.

ZeekQuattro1d 7h ago

Hardware Sales (followed by lifetime sales)

Switch 2 – 947,931 (New)
PlayStation 5 – 14,535 (5,690,661)
Switch OLED Model – 8,040 (9,060,680)
Switch Lite – 6,089 (6,581,795)
PlayStation 5 Pro – 4,230 (218,056)
Switch – 2,482 (20,109,545)
PlayStation 5 Digital Edition – 2,017 (974,094)
Xbox Series S – 163 (337,686)
Xbox Series X – 113 (320,660)
Xbox Series X Digital Edition – 57 (20,820)
PlayStation 4 – 24 (7,929,628)

repsahj1d 3h ago

So its official. Switch 2 dethroned PS2 in Japan for the biggest hardware launch ever.

H917h ago

Tripled the switch launch numbers, yeah Nintendo's domination of the Japanese market is going smooth

repsahj4h ago

And take note. This is just for retail sales only; sales from the Nintendo Japanese website are not yet included.

ZeekQuattro9m ago

Not even a full week of sales either.

40°

ASUS ROG Xbox Ally is the “tightest collaboration” between Microsoft’s Gaming and Windows teams ever

Xbox boss Phil Spencer explains that the new ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X is Microsoft's best collaboration between gaming and Windows teams.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Jingsing19h ago

This is the tightest collab since the windows key on a keyboard, lol

80°

Inside the ‘Dragon Age’ Debacle That Gutted EA’s BioWare Studio

The latest game in BioWare’s fantasy role-playing series went through ten years of development turmoil

In early November, on the eve of the crucial holiday shopping season, staffers at the video-game studio BioWare were feeling optimistic. After an excruciating development cycle, they had finally released their latest game, Dragon Age: The Veilguard, and the early reception was largely positive. The role-playing game was topping sales charts on Steam, and solid, if not spectacular, reviews were rolling in.

HyperMoused1d 6h ago

Its easy they called the die hard fans people in their nerd caves who will buy anything and then went woke to reach modern audiences....insulting the nerds in their caves along the way showing utter contempt for their fan base. very hapy it failed and any company who insults their fan base and treat their customers with contempt and insults, in future, i also hope fail.

neutralgamer19921d 2h ago

It’s disappointing but not surprising to see what's happening with Dragon Age: The Veilguard and the broader situation at BioWare. The layoffs are tragic — no one wants to see talented developers lose their jobs. But when studios repeatedly create games that alienate their own fanbase, outcomes like this become unfortunately predictable.

There’s a pattern we’re seeing far too often: beloved franchises are revived, only to be reshaped into something almost unrecognizable. Changes are made that no one asked for, often at the expense of what originally made these games special. Then, when long-time fans express concern or lose interest, they’re told, “This game might not be for you.” But when those same fans heed that advice and don’t buy the game, suddenly they're labeled as toxic, sexist, bigoted, or worse.

Let’s be clear: the overwhelming majority of gamers have no issue with diversity, LGBTQ+ representation, or strong female leads. In fact, some of the most iconic characters in gaming — like Aloy, Ellie, or FemShep — are proof that inclusivity and excellent storytelling can and do go hand in hand. The issue arises when diversity feels performative, forced, or disconnected from the narrative — when characters or themes are inserted not to serve the story, but to satisfy a corporate DEI checklist. Audiences can tell the difference.

When studios chase approval from a vocal minority that often doesn’t even buy games — while simultaneously dismissing loyal fans who actually do — they risk not just the success of individual titles, but the health of their entire studio. Telling your core customers “don’t buy it if you don’t like it” is not a viable business strategy. Because guess what? Many of us won’t. And when the game fails commercially, blaming those very fans for not supporting it is both unfair and self-defeating.

Gamers aren’t asking for less diversity or less progress. We’re asking for better writing, thoughtful character development, and a respect for the franchises we’ve supported for decades. When you give people great games that speak to them — whether they’re old fans or new players — they will show up. But if you keep making games for people who don’t play them, don’t be surprised when those who do stop showing up

Armaggedon20h ago

I thought the writing and character development were fine. Sometimes things just dont resonate with people.