990°

New Sucker Punch PS4 game is a new IP

It looks as if the new long-in-development PS4 title from inFAMOUS developer Sucker Punch Productions is in fact a new IP, that is according to known industry insider Shinobi602.

-Foxtrot3088d ago

Ah awesome

Was hoping for inFAMOUS 3 (maybe something with Cole to wrap it up as a trilogy) but a new IP sounds awesome

Abash3088d ago

Another inFamous is still possible someday, but it is all they have done since moving on from Sly Cooper. I'm really excited hearing its a new IP, I love Sly and inFamous so I cant wait to see their next new series

bouzebbal3088d ago

Awesome stuff.. Looking forward to this. Probably at e3. I love this developer I platinumed every single game they made.

naruga3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

@ Foxtrot are u serious?? inFamous was mediocre generally (not technically bad but generic , uninspired and boring to play, completely forgetable ) ... its good that they didnt continued the IP instead invested their resources to smthing new ....i wonder what genre will be the new game and if it manages to attract my interest

nveenio3088d ago

Infamous 1 and 2 are still my only Platinumed games. If it wasn't for a change in my lifestyle, I would have done the same with Second Son. I love those games.

DARKKENT3088d ago

E3 cannot come quick enough

Deadpooled3088d ago

naruga receiving a well deserved 72 disagrees to a mere 2 agrees, want to see "not technically bad but generic , uninspired and boring to play, completely forgetable"? go back to Quantum Broken and Ryse.

Drizzy3088d ago

New ip's are cool. Just hope it's not another shooter. I love Infamous one of my favorite series so here's me hoping they make Infamous 3

SmielmaN3087d ago

@naruga.
Gotta disagree there. Infamous series is one of the best on Sony, imo. I could replay that game for hours. I don't typically return to hunt for wverything in a game when I'm done unless its really enjoyable to me. And infamous games had me hooked.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3087d ago
PhoenixUp3088d ago

Cole's story is already over

-Foxtrot3088d ago

I don't know that lightning bolt in the form of a question mark wouldn't be put their for no reason

I like to think Second Son will go off the Evil ending

Delsin is shown to be the real Beast...John being just an outcome of the timeline being changed

Cole is revived to face his Destiny

Trilogy over and we got a good Beast Origin story with Second Son

Darkfist_Flames3088d ago

but Delsin isnt, i want him to lose all his power except smoke and fight powerful conduits.

PhoenixUp3088d ago

Second Son canonically goes with the ending that Cole is dead, but there are still Conduits about.

inFamous at this point has grown past Cole and just demonstrates how different type of people morally adapt to the superpowers they receive

ShadowWolf7123088d ago

One game with a protagonist nowhere near as liked or well-received as Cole does not in any way indicate the franchise has "grown beyond" him.

And honestly, after the way 2 ended, with that bolt... that stuff doesn't happen for no reason. He'll be back.

PhoenixUp3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

You forget the other game, First Light.

They already went with the ending of Cole dying. There's really no reason to continue the story from there

IamTylerDurden13088d ago

Cole is done, but if anything i'd love to play as Kessler in an alternate dystopian future where u recruit two other conduits to help u take on the beast (perhaps Deslin as the beast) and the game would feature 3 player co op.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3088d ago
ziggurcat3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

"... maybe something with Cole to wrap it up as a trilogy..."

uh... they killed off cole at the end of 2... they even reference him in second son in the past tense as though he was dead.

Inzo3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

Not really, SPP left the door open for a return in both Hero and Evil endings.

ziggurcat3088d ago

At any rate, it says it's a new IP, so that right there is enough to tell you it's not a new infamous game.

Why o why3088d ago

You know what, for a second I tought aint they doing the spiderman game.....can they handle 2 big new ips then I remembered it was insomniac that have been given the opportunity to try their hand at an openworld hero game. Sony aint playing this gen. They are going for the jugulars

-Foxtrot3088d ago

I really wish they were given X-Men to do...they'd nail it.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

@Why o why Insomniac is working on the new Spiderman game not SP.

Ceaser98573613088d ago

Asuna
"Insomniac is working on the new Spiderman game not SP"

Hey there, Good morning .. Where have you been all this time. :D

_-EDMIX-_3088d ago

Definitely I'm happy to hear that they're starting a new intellectual property though because it was always hard for me to get into the infamous series.

Don't get me wrong I beat the first game and really liked it I just never really started the second game and a little while ago finished the third with Second Son.

I think another team would probably do fine with Infamous if they get tied up in their new intellectual property.

I mean we still got a Sly Cooper 4

badz1493088d ago

Sly 4 wasn't developed by them though. It was Sanzaru Games but the last I heard about them, Sony isn't tying them to anything 1st party related anymore.

_-EDMIX-_3088d ago

@bad- trust me, I know.

As to why I stated

"I think another team would probably do fine with Infamous if they get tied up in their new intellectual property.

I mean we still got a Sly Cooper 4"

That statement was simply saying that another team would do fine with Infamous simply because another team did pretty good with Sly 4.

I follow the industry pretty closely (too closely lol)

gangsta_red3088d ago

I always wanted Cole to comeback and actually build a team of metas sort of like the Justice League and then fight against other villains with powers.

Silly gameAr3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

That would actually be pretty awesome. Co op play would would work with a team of conduits , where you can actually play as the other conduits instead of just borrowing their powers like in Infamous 2.

Tussin1873088d ago

This is what I like about Sony's 1st party studios. They are now starting/have been producing 2 different IPs per studio. That's how you do it. I have absolutely no clue what they could be working on. I really love the Infamous series and I'm sure whatever they show will be amazing. What they accomplished so close to the PS4 launch was insane.

Imagine what they can do now. And with the PRO on top of that!!!! MIND BLOWN!!! Can't wait.

starchild3088d ago

Yeah, this is music to my ears. I really enjoyed Infamous Second Son and the spin off First Light, but new IPs are always exciting. Looking forward to seeing what it is.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3087d ago
MasterOfThe12Blades3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

Too bad...I really enjoyed the infamous series

G20WLY3088d ago

This doesn't mean it's over for infamous.

Ceaser98573613088d ago

Hows it bad?? At least SP is doing something new now. Aint that Great.

DigitalRaptor3088d ago

It's going to be a huge E3 this year.

I think Sucker Punch game reveal with either open or close the show.

Ceaser98573613088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

GOW gameplay will open the show and The Last of us 2 gameplay will close the show.. :)

SaveFerris3088d ago

Nice. I can't wait to see what they have been working on. GG with a new IP, and now Sucker Punch. It seems like Sony is letting the studios try something new for this gen.

3088d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (114)
170°

It Shouldn't Take Expedition 33's Success to Remind Square Enix That Turn-Based Still Sells

TNS: Expedition 33 was the wake-up call Square Enix needed, telling it turn-based RPGs are still popular, but that shouldn't have been the case.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Relientk772d ago

True, but if it does get it through their thick skulls, then that works.

Although, the Dragon Quest 1 + 2 HD remakes will be turn-based and (the worst kept secret) Final Fantasy IX remake should be turn-based I would imagine. Let's see if any newer games go turn-based too.

thorstein1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

DQIII HD Remake was turned based and very successful. Then there was a really obscure turn based game came Balder's Gate 3. I heard it might have done well.

Profchaos1d 18h ago

I wouldn't be shocked if they switched ff to the vii remake combat system

PapaBop1d 14h ago

It won't get through to them though, despite E33's success, they still won't risk going fully turn based for their big budget projects simply because they are still in the mindset that it needs to be action combat to appeal to the mainstream audience. I hope I'm wrong but don't underestimate just how stubborn Japanese execs can be

barom1d 7h ago

Ya'll are hyping up Expedition 33 too much. Reminder that FF XVI sold 3 million in a week and it took Expedition 33 approximately a month to get to that (33 days to reach 3.3 million).

thorstein1d 3h ago

New IP vs established IP.

barom20h ago

1 platform vs 3 platforms
1 week vs 1 month

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 20h ago
DivineHand1252d ago

While it is true that Sqaure Enix has moved away from turn based games compared to how they were in the past, there is a good reason for it.

Older gamers will know this but during the ps2 era, we were flooded with turned based games from Japanese studios and this created a form of fatigue back then going into the next generation.

When Square released FF13, they received heavy criticism for making the game turned based like every other FF game and not doing enough to innovate. This is why they made FF15, FF7 Remake and FF16 have real time combat. It gave the series a fresh spin and has brought in new fans to the series.

I personally would be happy with either turned based FF or the real-time combat version we see today.

Shane Kim2d ago

Remake and Rebirth have "turn based" if you set it in the settings.

Lexreborn21d 21h ago

Dang wish I saw your post before I made mine because we definitely feel the same way lol

Profchaos1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

Yeah hit the nail on the head but its like ww2 games we get hundreds of them then a decade of nothing and people start missing them i think we're going to start seeing them return

Claire, dragon quest even yakuza have seen turn based return

Runechaz1d 2h ago

Every Pokémon game is also a Turn Base RPG.. and selling millions

andy852d ago

Only need to look at their own game DQ 11 approaching 10 million to show there's a market. And that's not as big of a name as FF

Runechaz1d 2h ago

you can also look at the Pokemon game number

Tacoboto2d ago

Another article about Expedition 33 and Square Enix and turn-based games? This is starting to sound like propaganda.

The game didn't sell because it's a turn-based game; it sold and is enjoyed because it's a really freaking good game that released completed at a good price without gamer drama attached to it. No Mtx, no wait-until-it's-patched, minimal bloat, a self-contained story, no multiplatform BS. Just a solid original game that absolutely nails what it intended to do.

Redemption-642d ago

I was just about to say the same thing.

anast1d 23h ago

This comment should have a 100 upvotes, at least.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Maybe try actually listening to the fans who have supported the series for decades. This habit of ignoring your core audience just to chase people who were never interested in Final Fantasy in the first place makes no sense. And when that approach fails, doubling down on it is beyond baffling.

The battle system has never been the main reason non-FF or non-JRPG players stayed away. Gutting the series’ identity to chase a broader market doesn’t attract new players. It just alienates the loyal ones.

Keep going down this road and we’ll end up with Final Fantasy Fortnite abomination or a F2P Battle Royale game.. Oh wait…

Show all comments (27)
50°

Rematch is "chasing credibility" but not realism like rival EA FC

Pocket Tactics sits down with Rematch’s creative director, Pierre Tarno, to discuss why Sloclap moved away from Sifu to chase something new.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted3d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast3d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay3d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted3d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34853d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK3d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)