430°

Is Nintendo Going Bankrupt if Switch Flops?

Every Nintendo fan is haunted by one compelling question: what will happen if say, by some unfortunate turn of event, Nintendo Switch flops?

Read Full Story >>
mobilenapps.com
ApocalypseShadow3089d ago

From the article...

**Lastly, a flop is just a wild imagination for Nintendo Switch because as far as it goes, there is a high anticipation to this console. Gamers, developers or simple observers are looking forward to presumed release date in March. If this converts into Nintendo Switch sales, then all "what ifs" will be moot and academic.**

Why bother reading?

stuna13089d ago

You got to give the article credit. That was definitely an ingenious way of getting clicks lol.

wonderfulmonkeyman3088d ago (Edited 3088d ago )

Yeah, click bait incarnate, this one.
I would suggest no one here even approve this article.
But considering the anti-Nintendo nature of this site, I get the feeling it will get approved anyways.
That, or the ten or twenty people here with a grudge against me will see this comment and approve the article out of spite.XD

remixx1163087d ago

@monkey

Haha definitely the second part

bouzebbal3087d ago

Nintendo fanboys talking about clickbait... Hmmm..
Seriously, the article can be as stupid as you want, the idea is relevant !
If the switch flops, then what ?? Nintendo for sure won't go bankrupt, but they might become the new Sega if things turn out ugly.
I do not believe switch will be a massive hit but I hope I'm wrong.

ABizzel13087d ago

Bankrupt No. Continued Big 3 Console manufacturer, in jeopardy.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3087d ago
freshslicepizza3087d ago (Edited 3087d ago )

@Apocalypse Shadow
"Why bother reading?"

well because hype doesn't always generate success, look at the first titanfall for example. gaming is nintendos bread and butter, how many failures can nintendo survive? it's not like they can sell operating systems or life insurance to cover losses.

Eonjay3087d ago

Titanfall is a bad example in my opinion. First, one has to ask why EA did what it did in the first place. EA basically destroyed Titanfall every chance it got. It cut the original sales in half essentially and then tried to sabotage Call of Duty with the double header but just wound up sabotaging Titanfall with Battlefield 1. And Call of Duty still sold more than both of EA's games combined.

MaximusTKG3087d ago (Edited 3087d ago )

Shouldnt really matter given the sheer amount of cash assets Nintendo has. They could bail themselves out about 5 times

LOL_WUT3089d ago

Who knows? All people want is for them to deliver. Things happen for a reason ;)

Fist4achin3087d ago

I doubt bankrupt, but the gamers won't support it if the games are not there.

morganfell3087d ago

No one has asked what happened to all the money they made on the Wii. The thing sold like the cure for cancer and Ninty didn't use the money to support it or the Wii U.

Gemmol3086d ago

people ignore how much money Nintendo have, because it help them sleep at night.......they are far from bankrupt

Derceto3087d ago

It will flop. It will not bankrupt Nintendo.

Poseph3087d ago

No, it won't flop and yes it won't bankrupt Nintendo.

kneon3087d ago

I'm also expecting it to flop after the initial surge of fans buy it. And then when it fails the only course of action left is for them to go multiplatform.

RosweeSon3087d ago

Only another 5 years to wait then... in vain. Not gonna happen any time soon.

kneon3087d ago

I'm not waiting, I don't care as I can't think of any of their games that I would bother buying. But there are others that would buy them if they were available without having to buy their wonky tablet/console.

CorndogBurglar3087d ago (Edited 3087d ago )

Multiplat isnt the only other option.

They could finally realize that gamers just want a gaming system rather than gimmicks and then make something like a Gamecube 2.

Having said that, Switch isn't really nearly as gimmicky as the Wii's were. If you want it to just be a home console, it can be that. If you want it to be a portable system it can be that too.

If all the rumors are true, as well as the price, then Switch should do just fine.

PhoenixUp3087d ago

Nintendo still makes a lot more than Sega did when they exited the hardware market, so going bankrupt is unlikely

RosweeSon3087d ago

I'd like to know who's disagreeing to that as Nintendo clearly have more going on that Sega, sure Sega had loads of attachements 32x and mega CD etc but they were All pretty big flops in grand scheme of things. Nintendo got home and handheld consoles a new console en route. New Zelda. Amiibo's. New Pokemon just launched, Mario IPhone. Mini nes... no doubt with a mini Snes being readied. All more importantly massive success and making major money. All sold out or selling very well and all for a profit. Bankrupt?! Oh the drama on here is hilarious.

CorndogBurglar3087d ago

I agree.

And the Switch should do well.

Segata3087d ago

SEGA didn't have money. They were hundreds of millions in the hole. Only thing that saved them from certain doom was the CEO passing away leaving his fortune to the company to keep them alive.

Show all comments (91)
60°

Absolutely Beautiful Sega Genesis Games

The three most beautiful sights in this world are: 1) your spouse on your wedding day 2) the birth of your first child 3) a walkthrough for Ecco the Dolphin in some long forgotten scrawl.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Babadook71h ago

Have to install a few of these on my Apple TV.

80°

Nintendo Switch 2 Console review - Worthy Successor with Issues

"Nintendo Switch 2 is a safe and solid follow-up in many respects but it has its issues, including the Virtual Game Card system and an aging UI."

- Stuart Cullen, TechStomper

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Chilliersplash8h ago

Not sure what games you're playing to average 5 to 6 hours battery. Mariokart World and Zelda gets 2 and a half hours max.

gold_drake5h ago

not sure if its a successor or an upgrade.

and theres no way u get 5 hours.

100°

Even the Meta Quest can be an Xbox — Leaked images show an Xbox-branded Quest 3S

Windows Central writes: "CEO of Microsoft Gaming, Phil Spencer, had previously been vocally opposed to the idea of a native Xbox headset, stating in 2019 that 'nobody's asking for VR' on Xbox. However, Microsoft's marketing strategy for the Xbox Series X|S generation has shifted with the rise of Xbox Cloud Gaming and the 'This is an Xbox' marketing."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
mooreneco211d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Ah, a contributing factor to Meta dropping PSVR2 support for Beat sabre! Microsoft’s always stuck with the modus operandi of “if you want an original idea steal someone else’s” and try to destroy markets they cannot win in. They are doing to to console gaming and now trying VR!

OtterX1d 8h ago

It's like a rich kid who pays the smart kid to do his homework for him.

*Yea, such a shame about Beat Saber dropping Playstation support btw. :\

DivineHand12514h ago

Why would this deal with Xbox cause meta to end beat Saber support for the psvr2 when the game isn't even available on Xbox?

It is more likely that psvr2 is under performing and they feel it is time to end support. The psvr2 headset only sells whenever there is a sale to make it competitive with the meta headset.

OtterX1d 8h ago

The XBox way. Hardware, even game development companies.... let them do the hard work of building things, throw them some money, then slap an XBox logo on it!

Jin_Sakai1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Good old fragmentation. Just what Xbox needed.

IRetrouk1d 8h ago

Looks nicer than the standard one

PapaBop1d 5h ago

This is probably nothing more than a branding attempt to show Xbox really is on all platforms. The Quest already has the Xbox Cloud app that supposedly works great. Would be cool if Microsoft actually entered the VR space in a larger capacity but if they was doing that, I imagine they'd have showcased it at their summer showcase.

Vits1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Yeah, it's basically the same idea as the ROG Ally Xbox. Just a regular device that gives you access to the Xbox library and carries the brand, but nothing really special or groundbreaking beyond that. It’s not some custom Xbox hardware, just a repackage of existing tech with a logo and some software perks.

Now, when it comes to VR, Microsoft actually made a pretty serious attempt with something called Windows Mixed Reality. It wasn’t just a headset, they were aiming for an open ecosystem. They had APIs for developers, support baked into Windows, and even tools to convert regular desktop content into VR environments. On paper, it was a solid play. But it never caught on, third part support was half-baked and basically only Samsung headsets were worth anything. After about five years of trying to push it, they gave up and shelved the whole thing.

The bigger issue here is that VR just isn't ready for the mainstream. People love to hype it up, but at the end of the day, it’s a hard sell unless it’s cheap enough to feel like an impulse buy and even when you can do that, you need to support it with software. Making it a extremelly expensive segment for any company, just look at Meta, bleeding literal billions every years trying to get this stuff off the ground, and they are the market leaders.

OptimusDK8h ago

I don’t understand how people don’t understand that this is a huge consumer benefit. When I buy all these hardware component’s I can take my games with me. How many of us have not ended up buying the same game for handheld, vr and console not to mention pc. Stop the clear console war dogs and recognise this is good for consumers.