430°

Tracer Confirmed To Have A Girlfriend In Overwatch 'Reflections' Comic

Blizzard has been telling us for weeks now that LGBT characters will be confirmed soon.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
gangsta_red3058d ago

But of course, it was either going to be Tracer or Widowmaker. Two of the only really sexualized characters of the game.

littlefatgirl3058d ago

Doesn't Widowmaker have a dead husband?

Activemessiah3058d ago

Dead husband = New girlfriend.. :/

Goldby3058d ago

^dead husband because of new girlfriend

Summons753057d ago

Really? I was better on Zarya since she looks very stereotypical. Not that having a gay character in the game is a bad thing, it's great. I've seen a lot of great reception to it.

ravinash3057d ago

The Russians would love that.

gangsta_red3057d ago

Zarya would have been the obvious choice but what you also have to remember is this "gay" character is catering to a male audience. So what we get is the typical lipstick lesbian that hetero males want to see, not a bull dog dyke if it was Zarya.

"Not that having a gay character in the game is a bad thing, it's great."

Why is it so great though? I mean I have no problem with it and it won't have any negative effects from me because I love Overwatch. But this seems more like publicity and catering to a group rather than being gay to further her character or character story.

Summons753057d ago

@gangsta_red

You do realize she was probably written as a gay character long before this game was even revealed right? When you create characters you think up everything possible for them. This wasn't a sudden spur of the moment decision and it isn't catering. You nailed this exactly. It isn't a problem, because being someone who is LGBT isn't, and it doesn't have any effect on the enjoyment of the game. This homophobic reaction a lot of people have on N4G right now is uneducated hate. If you liked the character before this reveal then you should have absolutely zero problems with her now.

Goldby3057d ago

^ someone actually understands how characters are created.

+1 from an author

gangsta_red3057d ago

"You do realize she was probably written as a gay character long before this game was even revealed right?"

Possibly and then again maybe not. It still feels all too convenient/forced that Tracer would be the one that would be gay, the "attractive", bubbly, high spirited female character. It's exactly who a hetero male would pick to be gay if they had to pick from the roster.

When this character was created for this game I am sure more effort went into abilities, look, balancing and other factors that actually deal with the design and play of the game. Not really certain if the check box of "being gay" was a high priority.

Playing Overwatch there is an overall story but that doesn't seem to be the focus or main interest of the game. As it feels right now Blizzard appears to be making up the story as it goes along.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3057d ago
Kreisen3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

Except when youre straight, white and male.

Sm00thNinja3057d ago

Well guess I'm not going to main tracer anymore /sarcasm. I do hate that they felt a NEED to do this instead of letting fan fiction and the like run its course. This feels forced and I really thought it would be Mei.

Summons753057d ago

Honestly in creating characters for books, movies, games, whatever there is generally a character sheet that has EVERYTHING about the character on it. It's just her character. It's not forced, it is what it is. Like in real life. People aren't FORCED to be gay or straight they just are what they are and there is nothing wrong with that. I really don't understand this homophobic hate but sadly certain leaders to be say it's okay to hate gays and anything that is not white or christian so people are going full force on the hate train. Sad that creators are being so disrespected for their creation.

Goldby3057d ago

Characters are built with back story. Some of that may be the sexual orientation. Its not that hard to understand

Sharingan_no_Kakashi3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

Guess I'm glad I didn't support this game...

@below

Yes I am serious. I have to vote with my wallet on things I disagree with. I don't support the ideas of the LGBT community. I do so because of my Christian beliefs primarily. At least they were kind enough to say they would be adding LGBT stuff to their comic unlike Naughty Dog with the last of us dlc.

MeteorPanda3057d ago

why would this even matter gameplay wise? unless she suddenly causes in game changes...why. would. this. matter?

You're not a gamer you're just online too much.

GEORGIAN_GRENADE3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

The idea to have LGBT everywhere is just getting very obtrusive. It's almost like everything needs to have a gay character or a pro LGBT message in it. It's just not considerate towards Christians, Muslims, Jews, and many other religions. Why not just leave it out? Why have it in there? Is it necessary? I can't recall a game that has got a pro religion message or theme in it that's praised by media and/consumers.

Goldby3057d ago

^never played final fantasy x then Eh?

Number_93057d ago

Every single game that has any sexual relationship between unmarried people is against Christianity, Islam, Judaism and many other religions. I've never understood why people lose their minds over homosexuality on the basis of religion but have no problem with unmarried people going at it like rabbits. If you are going to use religion as a basis to certain things and people then exclude everything else that religion has a problem with, not just the stuff that conveniently lets you off the hook.

I'm a straight, male, Christian man by the way. I don't advocate for homosexuality but if you are going to use my religion to persecute people then persecute all the offenders not just the ones you don't like or fall under

Alexander1Nevermind3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

I would suggest that they are being rather inclusive than obtrusive.

What's the big deal if they're all gay? Would that make the game less fun? Everyone always seem to have the same complaint - (I don't care if a char is gay, just don't throw it in my face) yet I don't see many gamers complaining of all the heterosexual love in say the Witcher Yet they throw gobs of sex scenes in your face in that game (see the term throw it in-your face). I mean damn if you dont really care then you wouldn't complain about them "Forcing" it on you - lol like someone has your eyes taped open with a gamepad/keyboard in your had and making u play/watch the game. And the crazy thing is its not even in game its only a comic. So why all the fuss?

DragonKnight3057d ago

FFX is about the theme of overcoming religion Goldby.

As to inclusion, this isn't it. The LGBT community is being overrepresented in all media. They make up approx. 3 to 5% of the populace and yet are given disproprtionate clout and representation. That's just a fact whether you like it or not. Overwatch is a 5 on 5 MP FPS with no in-game story. Making a character's sexuality matter in such a game is unnecessary and blatant pandering at its peak. While it takes nothing away from the game, it also does not benefit it either and as gamers we should be more concerned with receiving more benefits than in pandering overrepresentation of a special interest minority group.

Christopher3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

***They make up approx. 3 to 5% of the populace and yet are given disproprtionate clout and representation.***

23 Overwatch characters, 1 is a lesbian. 1/23 = 0.04 (4%).

I get what you're saying in games in general, but in Overwatch it seems to line up. My biggest issue with LGBTQ representation is the hammer with which BioWare uses to include it at the level they do. It never feels organic but forced. Let alone romance in their games always seems taboo up until it's not. "No, we can't, we're too different, I've got my priorities, you've got yours, this is wrong, OKAY LET'S DO THIS!"

DragonKnight3057d ago

@Christopher: That is almost exactly what happens when you try to romance the elf in Dragon Age Inquisition except you don't get to do it in the end because he's apparently some Elf God incognito.

ginganinja3057d ago Show
DragonKnight3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

@ginganinja: "No, it's just being represented and you don't like it."

Hahaha. For starters no, it's being overrepresented. For the population numbers, this topic is inflated. But you don't like facts that refute your narrative so you go on the offensive. Second, one does not have to like or dislike something to talk about it. What I dislike is pandering, the kind of shame tactics people like you use, thought policing, and identity politics. I don't care about the non-existent sexual orientation of non-existent humans in fictional worlds because my identity is not so fragile that it needs constant validation in all things. Something you should learn yourself.

ginganinja3057d ago

@dragonknight
What 'facts' are these or have you just plucked them out your arse ?
And how do we go about deciding who gets to represent who? Should there be a list somewhere and we tick off whenever a minority gets a mention so if too many get used up in a year or so, no-one can until the next year.
"Hey, Blizzard, sorry the gaming media's used up its yearly quota of lesbians. There is space for a black pansexual, though."

Christopher3057d ago

***A developer cuts/edits content to comply with age ratings or what it believes the market wants and that we get offended 'gamers' whining that the creative wishes of the devs shouldn't be compromised.
A developer releases a COMPLETELY OPTIONAL WEBCOMIC as background and this is seen as forcing an agenda down everyones' throat. ***

Where did I say anything negative about Blizzard's Web Comic? And, I'm not saying developers shouldn't have creative wishes, only I greatly disagree with the handling of their creative wishes when it comes to romance in general. Did you see anywhere in my comment where I demanded them to change or anything? No. All I did was share my opinion.

ginganinja3057d ago

@Christopher
My humble apologies. I had a brain fart and thought you were still refering to Blizzard instead of Bioware - even though I copy/pasted your comment and still managed to miss it.
Though I still stand by the sentiment of the comment - that of the blatant hyprocrisy of some of the folks here - it was obviously directed at the wrong target.

DragonKnight3057d ago

"What 'facts' are these or have you just plucked them out your arse ?"

Do you REALLY want me to go into this ginganinja? Because we both know that I can, that I can show you things like, for example, the actual number of LGBT people in the world and how if they really wanted equality (which they don't) in representation then having relatively few LGBT characters in gaming is actually equality and going over that number is overrepresentation. Christopher already did the math. Tracer is the exact amount of representation necessary to equal the number of LGBT people in the world, and Blizzard is hinting at Tracer only being the first gay character, implying that there will be more. 1 more character would be overrepresentation by equality standards. But we all know that you regressives don't want equality, you want preferential treatment and elevation.

"And how do we go about deciding who gets to represent who? Should there be a list somewhere and we tick off whenever a minority gets a mention so if too many get used up in a year or so, no-one can until the next year."

All of that already exists and is used by you regressives. Remember AC Unity? No playable female character? SHAME!!!!! EVERY GAME MUST HAVE A PLAYABLE FEMALE CHARACTER THAT PASSES THE BECHDEL TEST OR THE DEVELOPERS ARE SEXIST!!

Hell, even having Tracer is not good enough. Your Lord and Saviour Johnathan McIntosh literally said that Tracer isn't gay enough because she's hot and doesn't make men uncomfortable.

But it's all about "representation" right?

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3057d ago
warriorcase3057d ago

??
I hope your just trolling/joking?

littlefatgirl3057d ago

You realize that Bill from The Last Of Us, who was only in the main game - not the dlc - was gay?

Sharingan_no_Kakashi3057d ago

Funny thing is I didn't at first cuz he talked about his friend as just a partner.

Goldby3057d ago

@sharingan

Hate to break it to ya, Ellie was lesbian in Last of Us even before Left Behind came out (no pun intended)

But hey maybe its time we all grow up and learn that what people do in the privacy of their own home and who they love has no effect on any of us.

Unless its a love triangle

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3057d ago
Kyosuke_Sanada3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

I remember when Fear Effect 2 revealed homosexual characters, there wasn't really any hype behind it. And even though it was a talked about subject after the fact, it only lasted a month like any other relationship.

Equality, ladies and gents.........

Show all comments (97)
80°

New Honkai Game Announced and It Might Look Familiar to Pokemon Fans

HoYoverse has announced the development of a new Honkai game, which looks to feature Pokémon-like creature battles.

80°

Amazing Bomberman will no longer be playable from May 29th

Konami: "Notice of Service Termination

Thank you for your continued support of 'Amazing Bomberman'.

The game has been available on Apple Arcade since its launch in August 2022, but due to multiple factors, the game has decided to end its service and operations.

Please refer to the schedule below for details.

We would like to thank you all for your enthusiastic support of the game.
The entire development team would like to express our deepest gratitude.
We hope you will enjoy the game until the very end."

Knushwood Butt2d ago

The game decided to end its service and operations?

jznrpg1d 13h ago

That’s one way to shift blame

1d 19h ago
Vits1d 13h ago

I mean… it was pretty underwhelming. They basically slapped on that overused “neon remaster” aesthetic that a bunch of older revivals have leaned on, cranked up the speed a bit, and called it a day. No real innovation, no fresh ideas, just a faster, flashier version of something we’ve already seen.

Games_People_Play1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

The all digital future looks bright.

460°

Former Santa Monica Studio Writer Shares Insight On The Game Industry: “It’s Not Great”

Former Santa Monica Studio writer Alanah Pearce has shared some insight on the game industry, and it's not great.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Goodguy014d ago

AAA has gone downhill as they focus on huge profits. Indie and other smaller games however have been amazing not chasing trends and the next big thing.

Redemption-643d ago

In all honesty, a significant majority of indies and smaller games fail. At best a you might hear about 10-20 indies that get attention or do well, but 100s more fail. AAA games can still be the bread and butter of the industry, but greedy executives would kill a good game if it doesn't make them a lot of money

Cacabunga2d ago

I don’t game much anymore as i used to. Last big game i played was Stellar Blade. Almost didn’t touch the console since.
I don’t have much backlog for the first time in a long time. Maybe others enjoy what’s coming, but I’m losing feeling a little

Ethereal3d ago

Nail on the head. AAA has lost the magic and focused on profits and "player engagement". Gaming is an art form, and like always the CEO fat cats roll in to capitalize at the cost of innovation, passion, wild experimentation. We need a major realignment in the industry and it starts with gamers voting with their wallets.

Killer2020UK3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I think that's already happening, we're seeing commercial successes in studios like Larion and whoever made Kingdom Come for example. Double Fine is another good example. Studios who are filled with and run by people who give a fuck that aren't hamstrung by money men. That's the answer and consumers are favouring it more than the soulless AAAs that have been put out. I don't doubt there is talent at Ubisoft for example but when they're told exactly what the end product needs to be by people who don't know what consumers actually want, it's always going to result in the same rehashed but slightly shinier slop.

Ethereal3d ago

Exactly. I do believe we are starting to see a shift in consumer habits. The market is saturated with GaaS and battlepasses, seasons, etc. We can't all play the same four games until the end of time. Fatigue is setting in and the industry needs to get back to making new experiences rather than chasing the latest "money maker".

Killer2020UK3d ago

I was wondering whether this is perception or actually happening but it feels to me, as a semi old gamer, there is more choice than ever and as such people are now much choosier about how they spend their time and money gaming. Certainly noticing this when it comes to GaaS as you mentioned, the question always has to be why would I play this instead of what I'm already playing. Anthem is going to have a real hard time prying away people, especially with a premium price tag that screams money men as a decision.

Palitera3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Nah. Devs need to pay the bills. Uninspired games fail, but artsy games usually fail even harder.

PapaBop2d ago

Gamers are voting with their wallets, Kingdom Come Deliverance, Expedition 33, games made by passionate developers who are not being controlled by money men are seeing their work get universal praise and selling extremely well. Meanwhile Outlaws and Veilguard are underperforming. I wonder how many people Ubi and EA had working on those games, in comparison Sandbox have just a core development team of 30 and managed to put something out EA and Ubi can only dream of.

The underlying problem though lays with how EA and Ubi execs react to these sort of things. Seems like they'd rather just lay off good developers and focus their efforts on their cash cows as opposed to change their development philosophies.

anast3d ago

She didn't even call out Stanfield's PNG file planets when she flew through one. She just 'yelled' something stupid like 'flat earth'. She wasn't even taken aback in the slightest. I am not sure she isn't a part of the problem.

Aloymetal3d ago

She's always been a narcissist bimbo, I'm even more surprised she's not in only fans yet.

3d ago
3d ago
anast3d ago

@Aloy ha!

@Lanx I'm sure you see where you are not making any sense.

3d ago
3d ago
SimpleDad2d ago

You know what...?... for once I totally agree with you. Gaming bimbo true.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
Cellblock113d ago

"Former", wow she didn't last at SM Studios very long at all.

isarai3d ago

4yrs is pretty good not sure what ur talking about

Cellblock113d ago

I wasn't sure of the actual number of years just seemed like it wasn't that long ago when I heard that she got a job as a writer there, guess time flies. 4 years being "pretty good" or not is subjective depending on ones perspective. The question might be, was four years long enough to make a discernible writing contribution to a video game based on how long development cycles are these days?

gleepot2d ago

Maybe for some industries. In gaming that's barely enough time to ship a single game.

QuantumMechanic3d ago

She left SMS because she needed to go back to Australia to support a parent with cancer.

Chard2d ago

Chuds hate her because she doesn't do the anti-woke brainrot thing

Petebloodyonion3d ago

She quit SM studio to focus on her own stuff, There was a video where she explained all of it.

SpacedDuck3d ago

Okay, explain like the other 50 jobs she's had and hasn't held......

I think she likes to bend the truth a ton on how involved she is and when her lies catch up with her she moves on to start a new batch.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Rainbowcookie3d ago

Greed , lack of innovation and agendas

Why do we rave about a good indie game but we avoid a AAA game.

Show all comments (44)