1030°

New No Man's Sky Update 1.1 To Finally Meet Expectations

No Man's Sky was indeed a huge blunder after releasing earlier this year in August. The new update should bring back the expectations of gamers.

Read Full Story >>
geeksultd.com
2727d ago Replies(11)
darksky2726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

This game still has the chance to be great. Let's hope they can add features overtime and ignore the haters.

Exoil2726d ago

If calling them out on their shady way of doing PR for the game equals being a hater I'll gladly be one.

reaperofsouls2726d ago

I wonder if you called out Microsoft for their shady ways ,

SoulMikeY2726d ago Show
SonyWarrior2726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

lol at the politically correct media zombies *looking at soulmikey* This whole dev team is trash sean is the biggest lier of the game industry and he further tarnished the indie scenes of being greedy lieing theieves thatll say any thing to scam people into there trash game. sean is washed up now he wont ever be any thing hello games will disban after this because no one will buy a game from them again.... the only reason they are supporting this game now is because of sony lets face facts... sony making them fix it just like they made driveclub creaters fix there game then they were promptly fired and disbanned

trooper_2726d ago

Theyre trying to fix their game and you still want to attack them?

Get over yourself please.

2726d ago
Exoil2726d ago

@reaper: I've been a PS gamer since the first Playstation was released so don't try to make this into some silly fanboy thing.

Hello Games lied and we were many gamers who called them out over it.
It's great that they now try to fix the game, but for alot of gamers it's too late.

I've already platinumed the game and traded it away, so for me it's to no use

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2726d ago
eldingo2726d ago

take a look at this link are these not broken promises made before the game released

http://onemanslie.info/the-...

are these not valid grievances and are you not generalizing everyone that had any?

gamer11382726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

All Hello Games had to do was launch the game as an early access game or be honest and say what came out in June was a first step. This all looks great but I think people were so burned by thinking they paid $60 for a complete product.

This looks like what I wanted the game to be. Honestly, traveling from solar system to solar system endlessly was too much scope. The planets were huge and you would barely explore all of them before you got bored and left. Now with bases I feel like I would have a reason to settle down on a world and explore the shit out it! Also, my own freighter(read Starship!) that i can customise? Let me fly this beauty between solar systems then use the smaller ships as scouts!

Next request: Narrative based missions. You've got these aliens races Hello Games, use them!

This is essentially Minecraft in space now.

@below

I didn't mean to say in terms of quality No Man's Sky is the same as Minecraft, only that is what the game clearly will turn into over time. Again, not quality but genre/gameplay style.

CorndogBurglar2726d ago

Only way worse lol.

Even Minecraft has more to it. You can actually build whatever you want. It has multiple enemy types. Online multiplayer. You have to actually think about what time of day it is before going exploring so you don't get caught outside your shelter at night time.

NMS was so dry and had no heart to it.

I would rate Minecraft far above this. I actually spent a good amount of time with Minecraft. I couldn't last 10 hours with NMS before getting bored out of my mind.

Tapani2726d ago

Yeah, but Minecraft is a 5 years old game. This game has been out less than 4 months...

feraldrgn2726d ago

People need to remember that Minecraft wasn't the way it is now on day one.
Minecraft also took multiple updates to get where it is today.

CorndogBurglar2726d ago

@ Tapani and Feraldrgn

Right. But Minecraft didn't come out of the box claiming to have all the features it does now. Minecraft was a little known project that got released almost completely under the radar and grew from there.

The creators of Minecraft didn't go on and on for years about all these amazing things their game would have, and then release a bare bones version with tons of missing content.

mixelon2726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

"You have to actually think about what time of day it is before going exploring so you don't get caught outside your shelter at night time. "
I've been playing survival in NMS and this is absolutely true in that game now too.. the planet I was on - the nights were so cold it took me hours to get off the first damn planet I had to keep finding shelter and crabs wanted to kill me..

Survival is pretty much the game I think a lot of players were roleplaying in their heads while playing normal mode, pretending there were real threats. I've died more in 2 hrs of survival than I did in over 80hrs in normal mode.. even the space combat is consequential now. :)

NMS has always had heart but it could take 20+ hrs to find your first mind blowing planet if you were unlucky. Where everything falls into place etc.. They're fixing a lot of stuff now.. spreading out bases more etc.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2726d ago
Irishguy952726d ago

Ridiculous, Mincecraft is a great game. NMS is not even close. Theres so much more substance to minecraft.

UltraNova2726d ago

...and so many updates that made it what it is today.

Give NMS 5 years worth of updates and then judge it.

Irishguy952726d ago

I'll give you that Ultra, minecraft certainly didn't start out that way sure my favorite part is exploring, building yourself up and finding the enderdragon etc. Along with having friends and building more **** on the way to that. I liked building outposts around the map. Agh, I gotta try.

zb1ftw7772726d ago

Darwinianism at its finest.

Except its gamers losing their money, instead of natural selection losing life.

Long story short, stupid people easily part with their cash.

Irishguy952726d ago

Yes, I felt extremely stupid for trusting the devs. I take that as a hit. But...I guess, we really shouldn't have to trust at all. False advertisment is illegal. But that system is just as corrupt as the gaming industry. For some weird reason, in this world, the more claim to fame you have, the more the law lets you slide. Devs can openly lie about their product and receive no repercussions. While presidents can also lie and get away with less than a slap on the wrist.

rocketpanda2726d ago

Fickle gamers getting hyped and pre-ordering games before any reviews are out then get pissy when said game doesn't meet their expectations. Or for the sake of getting a skin they'll use once or plastic statue made in China that will gather dust.

Dirtnapstor2726d ago

I agree. This game was ambitious from the get go, and all Hello Games needed to do is say they will continually support the game with incoming content until the game is fully realized.
Obviously NMS was not ready upon release as far as their vision was concerned. I have a feeling Sony was getting antsy with their delay syndrome.
Perhaps a remedy could have been two price points? Starter pack and complete edition?

uth112726d ago

But HG told us this update and others were coming when they released NMS. Not sure why people would believe they had the complete product.

NMS before now was a solid base platform-- but it sorely needed additional content to bring the universe to life and make it a great GAME. Seems like HG feels same and is delivering

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2726d ago
NohansenBoy2726d ago

Don't care. They had their chance.

2726d ago Replies(2)
rocketpanda2726d ago

You are a special one aren't you.

Where other developers would of let a game die, closed up shop or moved on to other projects. They are a least updating and adding content to those who actually bought the game. I didn't, because it was never my kind of game, but welcome when developers know their product isn't what was promised on release, but work to make it what is should be but updating and patching it.

With consoles connected online, games can be updated for the better, where in the past with no online functionality you got what you got, and if it was a mess then that was it. I get why people are angry by the false advertising and they should accept that negative criticism especially Sean, but this massive patch shows they still believe in their product and want to make it better. Battlefield 4 launched broken, now is great, if not better than most BF games, Diablo 3's patch 2.0 revived a dead game and is mile more enjoyable than before. The most recent Sim City launched with online only with limited building space, with massive negative comments got an offline mode and added new features and able to build multiple cities that could be connected together to revive the game somewhat. The list could go on, but it seems like many gamers these days all they say is "Don't care" or "Do people still play that game?"

How sad.

NohansenBoy2726d ago

Should've had this stuff day one. Plenty of people in the industry has gotten lazy ever since online patching has become a thing. Just throwing this in here, but I believe the version of the game that should be reviewed is the version we get day one.

xtheblackparade2726d ago

Looks like a meaty update! I doubt this has anything to do with satisfying dissapointed customers though, they planned to release upgrades to the game all along, building it up along the way with input from the community.

I might be interested in getting this in the future.

cleft52726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

I agree and it was probably the plan all along when they where talking about features openly. Yet, people got it in their head that this small team would be able to deliver all of these features right off. Yet, in order to do this they needed funding that they didnt have especially since they released multiplatform. If they had the backing of a major company as an exclusive maybe all of this stuff would have been their day 1. Instead they tried to do right by all and they got massacred for it. For goodness sake they released the game on GoG. Yet people just dog piled on them, instead of giving them a chance to explain what was going on.

I am glad they havent given up on the game because I enjoy what it is at the moment. Right now its just a chill game to mess around with. But this meaty update is certainly the foundation of a much larger experience. I am sure that with all of this base building stuff mp will come in time as well.

CorndogBurglar2726d ago (Edited 2726d ago )

People "got it in their heads that this small team would be able to deliver all these features" because they said they would! And even when they hit that point of realization that they WOULDN'T be able to deliver all of it, they said nothing and continued talking about all these things right up until launch.

Its getting very tiresome to hear people continue blaming the fans for having different thoughts in their heads when these were put in our heads from the lead developer's mouth.

Its great if you and anyone else is able to look past that, but even the die-hards have to realize that there was a better way to go about the situation.

I think its pretty clear the game was missing a lot of features. Most of which are in this patch. At this point, everyone has to admit this as there is undeniable proof everywhere. There is also undeniable proof of Sean Murray saying these features would be in the game. Hell, this latest Tweet from him pretty much admits it.

I would be okay with all of it ifnhe had just come out prior to launch and explained that they were not able to fit these things in prior to launch and they would have to wait until a future update. That would have been the honest thing to do.

But they were probably scared that it would hurt their sales, so they kept it under wraps and just let the consumers find out on their own after spending their $60.

So can everyone just agree now that promises were made and not delivered? It has nothing to do with gamers putting their own ideas in their heads.

thorstein2726d ago

This is one of the those games you'll grab, play (knowing what it is: a space exploration game) and wonder what all the hate was for.

Show all comments (119)
210°

No Man's Sky Is Easily One Of Gaming's Greatest Comeback Stories

Despite No Man Sky's rocky launch, Hello Games managed to turn it into one of the best space exploration RPGs out there.

darksky9d ago

HG could have stopped after making 3-4 updates and the debt would have been paid to those why are crying about paying full price. However, they have continously provided free updates for the last 6-7 years. No other developer in hostory has ever done this and probably never will.
There are many AAA games that disappointed but the devs normally move on or close the studio rather than fix the game.

-Foxtrot10d ago

I hate the whole concept of "comeback story" because at the end of the day it doesn't remove the core issue we had in the first place, that we were lied to, it was disappointing and it launched with bare content to what was promised for years.

Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch but for me if you launch in a terrible state then you had your chance. I can applaud you for what you've done after but at the end of the day there's not much of a choice since most gamers would blank your next product if you ditched your last game so fast, it's not about repairing the game but spending your time repairing gamers trust before you launch your next product otherwise it would be dead on arrival.

With these stories and the games being updated, the only way is up most of the time so of course it's going to improve the game and feel better over all, getting better and better as time passes. No Mans Sky, Sea of Thieves, Fallout 76 etc but then you have games like Anthem, Suicide Squad, Redfall and The Avengers where the devs just clearly moved on, now if they have another product people won't be as exited for it, I mean hell Guardians of the Galaxy was a great game but because of the Avengers it didn't help its sales since people were obviously still sour at that point.

I still think despite the improvements to games like No Mans Sky and Cyberpunk along with being better now overall the games are still not up there to what was promised and hyped as for years.

If we keep celebrating these “comeback stories” then unfortunately it only strongly supports the concept that these studios / publishers can continue to push half arsed broken products out for the sake of quick sales instead of waiting until they are fully finished. We need to condemn this awful behaviour or sadly we lose all voice and power as consumers.

Sonic188110d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I feel the same way about Cyberpunk 2077. I'm glad you mentioned that. I'm not a fan of comeback stories as well. But No man sky developer was a small indie team compared to CDPR. It's worse when it's coming from a AAA developer

Nacho_Z10d ago

"Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch"

You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal.

The reason NMS and HG are held in such high esteem and calling them liars is a weak stance is the amount of work they've put into it, for free. They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted.

-Foxtrot10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

They are liars though...

We are not revising history here, I'm sorry but we're not

They built this game up for years and they launched it knowing full well it wasn't up to scratch to what they originally showed off or hyped it up to be.

"They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted"

And like I said above most of that comes from the fact that if they had just moved on straight away nobody would have supported their next game. They've washed most of that sour taste away after supporting No Mans Sky so now they are doing a new game which more people feel like they can support and get excited for.

Anyway how can you say "You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not" and then make the point that "Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone"

This means that if a small team like this can turn a game around then big AAA games like Suicide Squad, Redfall, Anthem and the like should have been able to do it no problem, oh but that's right they didn't want to put the time or effort into it. They can do it but some people just decide not to.

Blad3runner0010d ago (Edited 10d ago )

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

People paid for the game at launch and got lied to. Now the game is what it SHOULD have been from the start (what people paid for) and we should be happy they aren't charging EXTRA? Its free because people ALREADY paid for the game at launch.

People PAID for what the game is in its current state (what it should have been at launch), not what it was when it released. Charging people AGAIN would result in even more backlash.

anast10d ago

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

They already charged for the full price game. All of that work is owed because it was already paid for.

JackBNimble9d ago

Fox ... sure HG made a huge mistake, but they have also done more then any development team that I have seen to fix the problem and go way beyond in supporting the game. And every update has been free, so I don't really get why you are holding on to this grudge.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
milohighclub10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Whatever happened at launch is in the past. By your logic they could have supported it for a year got it to the project they promised then stopped but they didn't. They're still supporting it to this they, they've released more content post than pretty much any game I can think off. More than most MMOs. They didn't have to go this far but they have and don't have any plans of stopping. All for free too.
Yeah they had a shit launch and they've apologised, learned and more than made up for it. I was pissed off at them at launch, but not petty enough to keep slandering them 7 years later.
You have much bigger studios releasing half assed games and fixing it later or even worse not even bothering.

anast10d ago

The DLC costs money. But yeah, people are hanging on to this one longer because of their previous reputation.

TheCaptainKuchiki10d ago

And it doesn't change the fact that the game is a boring procedurally generated environment in which your repeat the same actions over and over again with no real purpose. I hate when they say that the game became good.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
thorstein10d ago

I really enjoyed it at launch and had every trophy by August 2016.

The experience I had is no longer in the game: It was just me and my ship. It was a survival game and the feeling of loneliness in the universe was pervasive. There was no way to ruin too far from your ship and, in an emergency, you grenaded a hole in the ground to survive.

I miss that aspect, but since then, I love what they've done.

Hugodastrevas10d ago

I'd say it's THE definitive comeback story

TheGamingHounds10d ago

Final Fantasy 14 takes that one imho

CrimsonWing6910d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Yep and the way they actually did it where Bahamut destroyed the original FF14 and the realm was “reborn” seals it as the best way to do something like this, lol.

jwillj2k410d ago

Oh great another story about the cleanest shirt in a bin of dirty laundry.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Latest No Man’s Sky update adds ship customisation, space station overhaul, and more

Orbital update drops today, also bringing with it engine improvements and UI refresh.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Zeke6849d ago

The game that keeps on giving 🦾🥳✌️

Christopher49d ago

The support they've given this game only makes me more interested in their next game.

Zeke6849d ago

Agree, curious what they are cooking up for that one?!

180°

The 10 PSVR 2 Games You Should Own

If you're looking for 'must have' PSVR 2 games then look no further. These are the 10 titles every PSVR 2 owner should have in their library.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
kevco3359d ago

If you're wanting more PSVR 2 support, you should probably buy all of these games.

Speak with your wallet!

Profchaos59d ago

Bit rich to have to buy games you don't want because you want Sony to support the expensive headset they sold us which cost as much as the console it runs on beyond paying third partys to support it.
Seriously in terms of first party we have horizon on day 1 and a gt 7 vr mode.

They seemingly have made little effort to support it beyond paying Capcom to make re games in VR or a second party studio to make firewall which was mismanaged.

I'm a day 1 psvr2 user and the only thing I'm excited for right now is PC support.

I commented recently this bespoke VR game development model we have right now clearly doesn't work

crazyCoconuts58d ago

On the one hand I feel like there's been plenty of smaller non-AAA games to play and occupy me as a supplement to my flat screen gaming.
But I agree that Sony has done nothing to elevate this beyond the niche it's in and into the mainstream where it would be economical to create AAA games for it.

Babadook758d ago (Edited 58d ago )

Most of these games are worth owning for most people; I own all but 2 of them in fact. So I agree with kevco33. I think you're crazy if you downplay this list quite frankly. Sony can't keep funding software if people don't buy any of it, the ball is squarely in OUR court.

Sony has spent a lot on 3rd party stuff this gen like RE.

phoenixwing58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

Saving up for the headset is my first hurdle. Let alone buying games I don't want lol

mudakoshaka58d ago

People downvoting you for not having enough finances...what a world we live in, haha

phoenixwing58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

@mudako
They feel affronted at the very thought that I don't plunk down 500 immediately lol I have a little over 900 games in my backlog I've been buying games instead of hardware ever since I got my PC and ps5. I just don't know if vr is really for me honestly. Every time I have a couple hundred allocated to video games it makes more sense to buy a bunch of flat games instead of vr ones

mudakoshaka58d ago

I have 9 out of these 10 games. I try to buy all the VR games I like to support the advancement of VR!

TheEroica58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

I spoke with my wallet after watching the first headset get weak support. Easy pass until Sony earns my money. Feel bad for those who parted with 500 bucks, falling for the hype that Sony was actually gonna support this thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 58d ago
Neonridr59d ago

I own 7 of these titles off the list, lol.

NotoriousWhiz58d ago

I'm trying to decide if it's worth holding onto my psvr 2. I enjoy what it has currently, but it seems unlikely to get anything else. Might be better off just waiting for something with more support if that ever comes.

Profchaos58d ago

As a fellow psvr2 owner the question seemingly comes down to do you own a PC.

I think I'm all in I have a habit to hold onto my systems anyhow I still have my psvr1 to hell I still have my NES.

But while it's still worth something yeah you could sell it and if Sony turns the ship around you should be able to buy another one for less than you soldmit for I feel like we won't see any fix for the headset for the next 2 years rumours show that Sony has no current first party VR games in active development after they closed London studios

The whole psvr2 situation has left me feeling a little burnt on PlayStation as a whole to be honest. The first psvr felt experimental but it was supported far more than this superior headset

MIDGETonSTILTS1758d ago

GT7 surprised me, because I hate racing games, but i poured 100 hours into it way too quickly.

I’m looking forward to the Metro VR game this year, and I hope that WW2 dogfighter game releases eventually.

talocaca58d ago

I have most of them 😅

Waiting for a sale on Synapse and Arizona Sunshine 2.....also Metro coming this year looks great.

Show all comments (31)