370°

NVIDIA CEO: Nintendo Switch Has Groundbreaking Design, Hundreds of Engineering Years Went Into It

NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang explained how Nintendo got them on board with the Switch console, adding that hundreds of engineering years went into it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Aurenar2730d ago

Hundreds of Engineering Years? Really? I don't think so.

mikeslemonade2730d ago

Haha they just borrowed Microsoft logic. Like they say they over a trillion hour logged on Xbox live. Who cares and that is indicative of what??

Errorist762730d ago

It's a normal calculation.. if they had 50 engineers working for 2 years it's 100 engineering years.

Neonridr2730d ago (Edited 2730d ago )

clearly they were thinking about this thing around the same time America was signing its declaration of independence :P

I am guessing they are referring to the fact that you had a bunch of engineers working for a few years on this thing. So when you add it all up I am guessing that is what is implied.

KaiPow2730d ago

Two hundred engineers with six months of experience each?

Nitrowolf22730d ago

If you look closely in the Declaration of Independence you can see Nintendo name in small print

Neonridr2729d ago

@KaiPow - you are saying that the Switch was designed and built in 6 months from concept to completion? Wow.. these guys must be miracle workers then.

Pandamobile2730d ago

100 engineers x 1 year of work = 100 engineering years. It's the same thing as saying man-hours or man-years of work.

Alexious2730d ago

Thank you. I thought that was rather obvious...

iplay1up22730d ago (Edited 2730d ago )

I got it, I think some of these people took it just a little too literal ! LOL!!!!

Maybe it will be powerful!!! Can't wait! Groundbreaking??? Interesting!

GrontB2729d ago

Yes thank you. People won't sit and think about it for a second and realize that is what was being said. The switch will be a culmination of the many years that was put into the tegra line of mobile chips and their work on mobile gpu units.
The switch could surprise us when it comes to power, I'm just worried about the ole' battery life.

LackTrue4K2730d ago

NVIDA:
"Woohoo!!! Woooooo...!!!!
Buy a Nitendo Switch!!!!
BUY BUY BUY"

🗣🗣🗣

Segata2729d ago

Collective days and hours of each individual person added up. It's silly tho yeah.

Mulando2729d ago

Well counting the dev-time for the shield tablet, ... well if 100 engineers work 1 year, you have 100 years of dev time (one week = 8hours * 5 days)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2729d ago
-Foxtrot2730d ago

NVIDIA's PR on this is getting a little out of hand now

I mean "Hundreds of Engineering Years"

Yes because they worked on this back in the early 1900s when they were playing Poker at the Saloon

Alexious2730d ago

That's not it, obviously. Check Pandamobile's comment above.

-Foxtrot2730d ago

Then why not just say "yeah it took us a year"

Just seems like you are saying it to sound like more work has went into it then actually has.

Pandamobile2730d ago

@Fox

He's the CEO of a huge tech company addressing shareholders and journalists. Of course he's going to try to make it sound impressive.

ChickeyCantor2730d ago

@Fox

Because that's normal business speak.

It's not about the year itself but the man power that went into a year of development.
It gives people a sense of how much money they put into it.

Nitrowolf22730d ago (Edited 2730d ago )

Because it matters in other fields IMO

Call it bias or whatever, but I agree the term is dumb to use here cause I could care less about how many man hours were put into a gaming console unless it were some unique built 1 of a kind thing.

Like cars, I like the term when it comes to high end crafted vehicles

Now like other have said, it's a term addressing shareholders and such.

JLynn9432730d ago

Engineering years is the same idea as man-hours or man-years. It's an extremely common way of tallying how much work goes into something with a large workforce working over an extended time. For example, the Empire State Building took over 7 million man-hours to build.

If Nintendo had 50 engineers working for 4 years on this, that would be 200 engineering years.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2730d ago
Pancit_Canton2730d ago

Maybe he's from the future and trying save Nintendo from this abomination.

Mega_Volnutt2730d ago

Back to the Future "Saving Nintendo" lol

Alexious2730d ago

An abomination? Come on, the Switch doesn't deserve that

pcz2729d ago

NVIDIA are skynet. they sent their top researcher hundreds of years into the past to start working on the switch.

iplay1up22729d ago

A handheld that can run URE4, an abomination? Plus Switch, to TV mode by simply placing console in cradle! Sounds good to me!

Skyrim remaster, 3D Mario at launch, plus BOTW soon!?!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2729d ago
Jivesh2730d ago

Yeah...no, really looking forward to seeing how the Switch will turn out but it's not that far off from a tablet

ChickeyCantor2730d ago (Edited 2730d ago )

It's a screen, has hardware parts, it's not far from a tablet? What kind of an analysis is that.

It's not different than saying PS4/X1 are crippled PCs.
It's a dedicated system that will provide better scaling for developers. It's exactly what current consoles do.

BossBattle2730d ago ShowReplies(3)
Show all comments (52)
370°

It's Time To Stop Giving Xbox Boss Phil Spencer A Pass

Under his leadership, many have lost their jobs and fewer games have made it out the door.

purple1018h ago

people should call for his resignation, he has literally flushed xbox down the toilet.
another 3 studios closed today, thats it now, get out

Tody_ZA6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Well purple101 you'd have to convince Observer and the other Xbox faithful that these studio closures and the fallout from the acquisitions is a bad thing and a sign of what's to come, and I don't think you're going to do that.

Nobody has managed that feat.

Redgrave6h ago

Obscure and Zeref have been summoned to the floor to give their account of these proceedings.

VenomUK5h ago

I 100% blame 'nice guy Phil' for the death of Xbox. The thing to realise is the Xbox Series S & X are performing WORST in console sales and game sales than the much criticised Xbox One - how can this be?

His two big mistakes were 1-not developing enough exclusives and 2 - always trying to beat PlayStation. If he made more exclusives over his decade reign and not tried to 'win' then classic Xbox would still be here in a profitable third place. Instead he tried a series of different projects to win and he ended up ultimately destroying Xbox by changing its relationship with its most loyal customers. What did he do?

* Phil spent a decade only release new iterations of Halo, Forza and Gears and not investing in creating new first party studios and IP. He mishandled Scalebound and shutdown Lionhead Studios.

* Phil tried Mixer, a streaming channel that could be used to promote Xbox dominance with free giveaways...

* Phil tried to create a streaming service that he regarded as too superior to consider PlayStation and Nintendo as competitors! But would instead compete with Netflix and Google...

* But his worst mistake was Xbox Game Pass - a multi billion dollar investment that could only work if completely dominated the worldwide gaming market - but it didn't. Instead it changed the culture of Xbox gamers so they resented spending on third party games as they were now trained to expect everything for free. Now all the games Microsoft had invested so much in were not only NOT making money from other platforms, as ever, but they were now NOT EVEN making money from Xbox customers.

If Phil Spencer had just concentrated on making new games and not non-stop gimmicks to beat PlayStation, I genuinely believe the Xbox would be an attractive platform with regular exclusives like Halo but with others too that would give it its distinct identity and maintain a profitable existence. Phil's been in charge for over a decade, the blame lays at his feet.

amazinglover4h ago

Last MS financial results for FY24 Q2 which is the company's sales data through Dec. 31, 2023. According to the earnings, gaming revenue is up 49% year-over-year.

That doesn't sound like he flushing it down the toilet and that also makes very unlikely he loses his job any time soon.

crazyCoconuts4h ago

Revenue up due to acquisition... Spending 10s of billions for new companies of course revenue is up. They don't tell us profits but they wouldn't be shutting down these divisions if they were in the black. Pretty sure they're shifting so radically because their current state has been an abject failure

Scissorman4h ago

This is 100% due to Activision Blizzard. If that deal had not gone through, Xbox revenue would be flat, which means a game like Starfield failed to move the needle.

rlow13h ago

@crazyCoconuts
While I agree that Phil and team have gone back on their word. Especially the last six years of promises.

But I disagree on your logic about the revenue.
They bought the companies to boost their gaming division revenue. In that regard they were very successful. They are owned by MS so your point is moot.

Tacoboto7h ago

Phil needs to go. His time is over. When you oversee layoff after layoff after studio closure after studio closure, it's impossible to keep going forward and have people - employees and fans alike - trust you in any way.

Especially after HiFi Rush hit their metrics. I guess we know what to expect for Ninja Theory next once Hellblade is out, and Machine Games once Indiana's out & Todd Howard focuses back on ES6.

mastershredder7h ago

It's not just Phil (Phil is just the dumb kid taking the money) and Kotaku is NOT the voice to listen to as shi7 sites like Kotaku helped contribute to modern gaming toxicity and disinformation. Kotaku staff = Much like Phil, and yes need to go.

Moegooner7h ago

MS has been posting record profits, you think they give a crap about games and gamers? Think again.

DOMination-7h ago

What a prat.

People gave him and Matt Booty the benefit of the doubt for a few years due to the mess they inherited but a decade on and all they've done is ruin gaming for everyone.

The only success they've had is MS Flight Simulator which was developed by a third party anyway - and Forza Horizon which by pure coincidence went downhill in quality the second Playground were acquired (imo) and that's all I can think of. Everything else they've touched has been ruined.

It's genuinely staggering how either of these two guys are still there.

Hofstaderman7h ago

Phil didnt even inherit a mess, he was equally responsible for it because he sat on the executive so the kinect and XBONE roadmap vision was also on him. Mattrick was the convenient public scapegoat back then but now theres no one to place the blame on.

Tacoboto7h ago

If they're to keep anyone, I'd hope it would be Sarah Bond. She's at least consistent, constantly doing quick tweets with green emojis where she can, repping the brand, saying the next hardware will be the biggest leap ever (whatever that means).

Phil Spencer openly minimizes Xbox by going out of his way to congratulate competitors and talking about how great playing non-Xbox devices are; if only Xbox had someone that could even pretend to like Xbox for being Xbox.

LoveSpuds7h ago

This is the point I always found frustrating, the whitewashing of Spencers reputation when he got promoted. He was involved in the slide into mediocrity of the 360 generation!

Aloymetal6h ago

The worse is yet to come and their fanbase don't know it yet, someone at MS posted and deleted a tweet saying all their main ''exclusives'' Halo, Forza, Gears etc will be heading to PS soon so grab a front seat ticket and some popcorn and enjoy the show;) The crying will be hilarious.

Notellin5h ago

Yeah he is absolutely responsible for the abysmal state of Xbox. I can't tell Mattrick and Spencer apart at this point. Both have been horrible executives for the Xbox brand.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
Show all comments (59)
90°

Baldur's Gate 3: Neil Newbon Explains Why Astarion Was a 'Risk'

In an Interview with Game Rant, Neil Newbon discusses the performance choices he made portraying Baldur's Gate 3's Astarion, and why some decisions were risky.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
80°

Hasbro's $1 billion bet on internal game development

Brendan writes; "Head of digital product development Dan Ayoub tells us about the toy maker's plans to get back in the game."

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz