Like Blacktar, I love the underwater the most. I just wish Bioshock 1 had not warned me who the antagonist was in the first 20 seconds of the game. Wholly unnecessary.
You hate "underwater stuff"? Then Bioshock in general is not for you.
1 was the best of the series, and one of the most memorable games I've ever played. 2 had its moments, but felt a bit stale, but I wanted to go back and see more of Rapture, so I didn't mind. I actually didn't care for 3. It had gorgeous graphics, and Elizabeth as a character was quite unique, but Booker felt derivative of every other protagonist with a chip on his shoulder, but it was just the moment to moment gameplay in general that felt laborious, and repetitive. Not a bad game by any stretch of the imagination, but Bioshock should of stayed underwater.
One had one of the best written stories for me. And the whole reveal at the end was sort of nuts. I know there are great games now with stories, but back then for a console "FPS" to be that well written and have such a great art style was rare.
Why no love for 2, commentors? It is hands down my favorite. No stupid pipe dream from the first one, and it kept the dark tone of the first one. Minerva's den is also my favorite dlc in the series. For me, 2, 1, infinite.
Ok so here is my question... I played 1 and 2 years ago but haven't played Infinite. So should I start with Infinite and do the DLC then move to 1 and 2 respectively? Thanks for any input...
1, 3, 2
Gotta go with Infinite on this one.
Bioshock is untouchable with its atmosphere and MetroidVania style. I liked 2 a lot. Infinite was too linear and FPSish for me.
The first Bioshock is the best one in terms of the newer games, but I still prefer System Shock 2 because of the space setting.
1, infinite, 2