From EquityArcade, this article refers to how it's okay for players to dive into broken street date games early, but not exactly okay for reviewers to review them.
Warner Bros. Games has set a new leadership team and restructured around Harry Potter, "Game of Thrones," "Mortal Kombat" and the DC Universe IPs.
Shift Up once again proves that they appreciate their team, as they have just rewarded their developers with new Nintendo Switch 2s to celebrate the Stellar Blade sales reaching 3 million.
Marathon was slated to launch on Sept. 23, 2025 across Xbox, PC, and PlayStation, but Bungie will share the new release date in the fall.
If they were absolutely certain about the quality of Marathon, then they had not delayed it just now.
So they've basically just confirmed what everyone, well, a lot of people saw: Marathon is not ready yet, still no soul to be seen.
Unless you signed an embargo agreement, there is no iffy moral ground to reviewing games early. The fact that early reviews may not be representative of the final product is all on Sony and Hello Games. The fact that, in modern times, games don't ship in proper condition and require early patches is a serious problem in the industry and if either the games or devs & pubs that put them out there suffer for it, they can blame themselves.
"I mean, is it possible to sue for damages? That would honestly be a good question to look into."
Its a free speech issue. You can only sue if the allegedly damaging comment (or exhibition, in this case) was dishonest. Any early reviewer would have to lie about the content in order to be sued.
If you barely got the game a day ago how can you even review it anyway.
Not reviewing games early (pre day 1 patch considering all games literally have them now) would mean no reviews till after the release date. Would likely mean better reviews but too many people want a review to decide whether or not to make a day 1 purchase. I know what games I want way before release yet still check scores in case reviews are overwhelmingly bad.