220°

Smash 4 Is Now The Highest Selling Smash Bros

We have a new king of Smash, at least sales wise. The fourth entry in the Super Smash Bros series is now the highest selling game in the series with 13.13 million copies sold, beating Super Smash Bros Brawl for the crown.

wonderfulmonkeyman2811d ago (Edited 2811d ago )

"B-b-but, Nintendo should go third party!!"
Suck it, haters. This shows that Nintendo has the potential to do just fine with home and handheld combined, despite the rise of phone games and the popularity of competing systems, so quit port begging.

iTechHeads2811d ago

The 3DS version sold best, and by a large margin.
If it wasn't for the 3DS version, this would be the lowest selling ever, which would make sense considering the flop that the Wii U is.

Big_Game_Hunters2811d ago

The Wiiu version still outsold Most PS4 exclusives, if not all.

LucasRuinedChildhood2811d ago

Don't bother with the common sense.

wonderfulmonkeyman2811d ago (Edited 2811d ago )

And yet it would still be a high-selling exclusive regardless, compared to many games on more popular systems.
Nintendo haters need to step down off of their high horses; Nintendo doesn't need the help of rival consoles to make profit off of Nintendo's first party software.

RosweeSon2811d ago

Yet it still sold more than 5 million on Wii U last time I checked they only had 13 million console owners yet last gen with systems in the region of 80 million owners/users each (PS3/360) but games like tomb raider (1st reboot) and some other amazing games struggled to sell that amount of games, sure it's an established franchise but when that's well over a 1/3 of owners have bought the game that's not too bad. Clearly Brawl was the beast tho, these new ones are fantastic tho. Massive.

kitsune4512811d ago

Just an FYI...the whole point of having a hardware platform is to sell OTHER publisher's content and make a profit off licensing for their games. Exclusives are used to lure players into the hardware platform and make a killing off other properties like GTA or CoD. The fact that Nintendo is only able to sell their games on the Wii U is the worst case scenario. They are investing in a game that would sell better on other platforms but getting none of the profit from other parties licensing. The best case scenario would be to invest as little into your own games as possible while making a profit off licensing.

blawren42810d ago (Edited 2810d ago )

Why must you qualify it? Just to downplay the success? No other company has a viable handheld, why should it not be included?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2810d ago
2811d ago Replies(4)
Idiedgoodbye2811d ago

The disillusion is strong with this one ͡° ͜ʖ

Darkfist_Flames2811d ago

lol, isnt that combined with the handheld, with that huge install base, i mean come on, each fanboy at least bought the game twice, just shows what kind of games the install base will support, maybe they shouldv put bayonetta 2 in the 3DS xD

hells_supernova2811d ago

The Wii U sold 4.80 million copies, meaning it is currently the lowest selling in the series.

Direct quote. I think the haters have a point

wonderfulmonkeyman2811d ago (Edited 2811d ago )

The haters are ignoring that 4m for an exclusive on the least popular system is still good numbers, especially when many games on more popular systems don't break those numbers.
The haters have a bias, not a point.XD
@ Tef
That's an uninformed opinion; between 3DS and Wii U, there are tons of indies and third party games to supplement the exclusives.

Teflon022811d ago

Wonder
Are you forgetting that exclusives is all nintendo has
Nintendo you basically have no choice but the exclusives.
Playstation, extremely big variety, alot of exclusives too but full 3Rd party support
Same with xbox just not as much exclusives but a good bit as well as extreme 3Rd party support

Erik73572811d ago

Imagine if wiI u actually sold good, there would of been way more copies of this game sold!

Movefasta19932811d ago (Edited 2811d ago )

how in the world are you going to brag about sales,when the wiiu was a flop compared to it's competition?Sony and soft made waaaaaaay more money off of software sales,heck,sony made more money off of psn alone.

Lime1232811d ago

But you don't care about sales. If you do then you would know that last quarter PS4 outsold 3DS and Wii U COMBINED 3:1 and PlayStation division made half a billion dollars profit and Nintendo reported 200 million loss. It's going to be rough next 3 quarters for Nintendo. I hope they will be profitable this fiscal year.

wonderfulmonkeyman2811d ago (Edited 2811d ago )

You're only counting losses and expenditures on Nintendo's part and completely ignoring that Sony has had losses and expenditures that far outweigh what Nintendo has.
That on top of the fact that Nintendo's various marketing deals using their IP's for stuff like Amiibo, Poke-GO, clothing and apparel, hell even Nintendo-character-themed cafes, have been bringing Nintendo attention and profit from many more areas.

Just because Sony's doing well, doesn't mean you need to worry about Nintendo's finances, even by comparison.

Lime1232811d ago

Sony had losses? As a whole? I'm talking only about PlayStation division since whole Nintendo is basically one gaming division. Sadly, I don't see Nintendo being profitable this fiscal year mainly duo terrible Wii U and 3DS sales. Horrible software sales also. I mean, PS4 in 2,5 years sold 270 million games. 3DS took 5 years to reach 270 million games.

I hope NX won't be home console because it would be another flop like Wii U, N64, NGC,...

Amiibo, poke-go making money still Nintendo reported biggest quarterly loss in 5 years? Next 3 quarters will be brutal for Nintendo.

wonderfulmonkeyman2811d ago

Sony's PSV sales have been dragging their gaming dept down, whereas Nintendo's software sales between Wii U and 3DS have been doing splendidly despite the lower number of Wii U units sold.
They've been making profit for ages now, more than enough to balance out whatever losses they've taken by putting money into NX R&D.
The NX being a home console won't guarantee that its a flop, either.

Lime1232811d ago

Fantastic numbers for Wii U exclusive! I wish other Wii U games sell this well:

PS4 - 270.9 million games sold after 2,5 years http://www.dualshockers.com...

Wii U - 88.72 million games sold after 3,5 years https://www.nintendo.co.jp/...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2810d ago
lastking952811d ago

Nearly bout a wii U for this game. The only nintendo exclusive that sells me the console.

lastking952811d ago

Not a zelda fan plus it's milked to death

81BX2811d ago

Whaaaa? Its funny because i know not one type of game will appeal to every single gamer but i absolutely love zelda. Ocarina will always be a classic in my eyes

PhoenixUp2811d ago

While this is a great accomplishment, it's a shame that the Wii U version hasn't sold more than the N64 original yet

Darkfist_Flames2811d ago

i thought the wiiu version is gona end up selling more, since its the superior one, but i guess many didnt bother since they already played the 3ds one.

PhoenixUp2811d ago

It should be no surprise that the 3DS version sold more

RosweeSon2811d ago

Not when it has at least 4 times the amount of systems sold no.

TheColbertinator2811d ago

Of course it sold high numbers. Lucina and Robin are the best

Show all comments (49)
50°

Why Greninja Won Pokémon of the Year

In a relatively short time, Generation VI's Ninja Pokémon has become wildly popular, outpacing nearly 900 other Pokemon.

70°

What Super Smash Bros. owes SNK and Terry Bogard

While some Smash fans may have hoped for a more recognizable character, Super Smash Bros. as a whole has borrowed so much from SNK games that Terry is a natural fit. In fact, an SNK character probably should have been included much earlier.

Super Smash Bros. didn’t just emerge, fully formed, as a way for Nintendo to keep contemporary characters in the front of our minds while introducing newer players to classic characters, games, and even music. The series owes a lot to SNK, and The King of Fighters.

Immagaiden1585d ago

Interesting how many elements of Fatal Fury and King of Fighters is in SSB

220°

Japanese censors demanded panty checks for female SSB characters during development

When Super Smash Bros. Creator, Masahiro Sakurai, showcased Smash Ultimate's latest guest fighter, Terry Bogard, he brought up the fact that one of Fatal Fury's most popular characters, Mai Shiranui, would not be making an appearance in the game at all and alluded to her sexual nature as the main reason.

It turns out that Sakurai and his team had a bit of a back and forth with CERO during the development of Super Smash Bros. for Wii-U circa 2012 as the rating organization actually asked the Smash team to turn female characters upside down for panty shot angles.

Read Full Story >>
eventhubs.com
gangsta_red1601d ago

Well now it makes sense why some of the character clothes in smash Bros was changed

Abriael1601d ago (Edited 1601d ago )

Censors? CERO isn't a censorship organization. It's a rating board and it's no more censors than the ESRB.

They don't ask you to censor your game. They give you a rating depending on its content, no more, no less. If you want a lower rating than what you're given, that's on you.

Teflon021601d ago

Stop playing dumb lol.
You know Nintendo is aiming for a low board rating so they have to censor to get it based on what the board deems reason to raise it

Abriael1601d ago (Edited 1601d ago )

@Teflon02: I'm well aware, but that's on Nintendo. They have the freedom to keep the content intact and accept a higher rating. It doesn't make CERO into "censors" in any shape or form.

That's simply not what a rating board is. Censors dictate content. A rating board does not. It assigns a rating based on the existing content.

TK-661601d ago

Then that's on Nintendo, and not the ratings board.

TK-661601d ago

Yeah, I'm not seeing the issue with them asking to see if characters actually have underwear modeled. That would actually be reason to give the game a higher age rating. If Sakurai included them and Nintendo then removed them to achieve a lower age rating that would've made Nintendo the censors.

A rating board has every right to ask for this to accurately rate the game.

bluefox7551601d ago

Let's be honest, a game won't be sold by retailers in the US if it has an AO rating, they have power over the industry, even if they're only a "rating board".

Abriael1601d ago

That's completely unrelated, and the rating board still does not require any change to the content. The developer has full freedom to distribute the game via other means.

Calling a rating board "censors" couldn't be less accurate. That's simply not their job.

annoyedgamer1600d ago

Ratings Org can shift around elements and the ratings they garner. Im not saying that was done here but it's heen done in the US feature films and the MPAA.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1600d ago
tehpees31601d ago

I hope they did not ask to check Dark Samus under that armour.

Tross1601d ago

That would be an interesting job duty, even if it’s in the name of censorship. Someone was literally paid to do a panty check on female characters, lulz.

Abriael1601d ago (Edited 1601d ago )

It's not in the name of censorship. It's in the name of not giving a CERO A rating (All ages) to a game that doesn't fit its content guidelines.

Tross1600d ago

It’s still dumb no matter what you call it. Equestria Girl dolls have panties. Are those not child-friendly? Besides, in talking about Japan, you don’t want to know what CoroCoro comics get away with. A panty shot or two might as well be CERO A.

Abriael1600d ago

@Tross: you're comparing entirely different industries with different rules.

ibrake4naps1601d ago

Games will show muscle men's nips, but God forbid a quick glimpse of princess Peach's vagina. Hypocrisy!!!

Show all comments (24)