660°

Ashley Riot had to put on pants on her Cammy cosplay at CEO 2016?

It seems like the female cosplayer Ashley Riot was forced to put on some pants on her Cammy cosplay at the CEO 2016 Gaming event. And I find that to be beyond insane. So this is my (Robin Ek, TGG) take on the matter.

ArchangelMike3258d ago (Edited 3258d ago )

Sexism is one thing, but can we all agree that the pendulum has now swung the other way, and this whole feminsit issue has gotten way out of hand. This should have been a non-issue on so many levels, but because we've allowed common sense to fly out the window this is what we'll get from here on after. Such a shame.

TGG_overlord3258d ago

I think this comment is very spot on:
"SJWs now trying to police what people can wear. Doesn't that contradict the whole "my body, my rules"?".

Bansai3257d ago

SJWs are body shaming people that are more attractive than them, which is about 90% of population.

UltimateMaster3256d ago (Edited 3256d ago )

You know who is the most judgemental beings toward women? Other women.
Either they're envious simply because they see them as competition.
It's why feminazis are more after video games than anything else when they aren't even trying to be sexual, just well shaped.
You could go against the cosmetic and modelling industry where they hire anorexic model to Showcase their clothes or use photoshop to severely diminishe the shape and size of normal women to unrealistic proportion that are in fact quite lethal to the woman's health if they were to attempt to shrink themselves that much.
You could go against the music industry where they overly sexual in music video and lyrics and that just abysmal and downgrades woman to low level sluts.
Nah, instead go against video games with fictional Characters that aren't real who are built to be healthy and are an ideal good role model of self-respect for woman in general both physically and mentally.
Don't even say Grand Theft Auto since you can kill just as much generic man as you can with woman.
Sorry about the auto-correct BS.

morganfell3256d ago

90%? I find that number to be a little low...

Sunny_D3256d ago

SJWs of Tumblr believe if they yell loud enough that their healthy sized bodies (FAT), dyed, short hair and hipster glasses will be accepted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3256d ago
Yi-Long3257d ago

The sad thing is that 'sexy' has absolutely nothing to do with 'sexism'. If a person decides he or she wants to express themselves to the world in a certain way, be it sexy, nerdy, smart, casual, whatever, that's their own free choice. Nothing wrong with that.

Sexism is about women getting paid less for the same job, or men being denied certain jobs because they feel it's not a place for a guy to be.

This 'cover yourself up' conservatism has nothing to do with 'sexism': it's about certain people feeling so uncomfortable about someone being sexy, they will impose on someone else's personal freedom of self-expression. And that's way more damaging and pathetic than seeing a girl in a skimpy outfit will ever be.

TGG_overlord3257d ago

I think we now have reached the point where "some" people are even trying to police how we should look, talk, think and dress. And it doesn´t matter if it´s in the real world or in the world of games either. Exactly! I would also add that you have to work out a whole lot to get a body like that (I know, as I went from 130kg to 75kg).

NecoTehSergal3257d ago (Edited 3257d ago )

The 'Wage gap' is a myth, hope you at least know that much, and there's laws against it where if it does happen, you can sue the company so - it doesn't really exist these days in the West.

We can just leave sexism as a definition that is to look down at one gender/sex as inferior over the other. Leaving it as open as possible, unlike 'some' definitions which try to insinuate that its a Female word only and that 'male sexism' doesn't exist, just as some people try to imply in the SJW world that you can't be racist to white people. xD

And yeah, it's like, I don't want to see people naked, and similar to feminists trying to 'Free the nipple', I mean, I can understand if its a woman needing to breastfeed their child, but how I was raised makes my own perspective see nudity as uncomfortable if its a stranger. It's not sexism because I personally dislike seeing people so revealing, or others who live a more conservative life-style. People have preferences for everything, but most feminists just throw the victim card to act like they're bloody oppressed because they either can't dress whorey or because they don't get what they want. Public Exposure barely exists for females, but does for men at this rate, but we all know how much double-standards exist and we don't need to go on about that.

If the institution/hotel/CEO or building they were in, which is owned by someone, finds something uncomfortable about what a person wears, its in their right to dictate what they think is in their, or their customers best interests, whether it involves bias or not isn't as much to be questioned because you're in their domain, more or less. If there was something sexist about it, then an investigation to the one responsible could be had but, unless we saw a guy wearing a speedo and nothing else and he gets a free pass? Then it's obviously not sexism. I was a roofer at one point, and most of us and the team if it was a hot summer day would take off our shirts while working on the roof, one household we were working on were an old catholic family and they called our company up over the phone to tell our boss that they were very uncomfortable with a guy being shirtless on their lawn and roof and told us to have him cover up. And? It's in their right and we complied, it'd not have been sexism against us guys, as it isn't for a female to cover up. Any woman who 'fights for female bonus rights' to do more just have to check their privilege :P xD

rainslacker3256d ago (Edited 3256d ago )

Whether something is sexy or not is really a two way street. Someone may dress "sexy" and feel that they are sexy, but the person viewing that person, may not consider it sexy. Because of this, it's not really sexism at all, just people's personal preferences on what is sexy.

Sexism is the act of discriminating against another person due to their sex. Sexist is the belief that one gender is inferior to another. It really has nothing to do with how people dress. Even if someone is made to wear something "sexy" for whatever reason, like for work purposes, then it's actually objectification, not sexism. Could be harmful is done for indoctrination purposes like we see in a lot of media campaigns.

In this case, since riot decided to wear what she was wearing, she was just doing what she wanted to do. That isn't objectification or sexism or sexist, although, I suppose someone deemed it inappropriate. In no way though does it fall into any sort of SJW territory, other than for those people to get all judgmental on another woman's personal choice...which is kind of counter-intuitive to their whole philosophy.

@TGG

There are times when such dress may not be appropriate, even if it covers all the essentials. While I feel Riot was probably dressing in a way she felt was appropriate for the venue, some others felt it wasn't. I don't really see it as a sexism thing, more that someone really just felt it wasn't right for the venue. I won't cite an opinion on if I feel it's appropriate, because you didn't give enough details in the article, but never really felt Cammy's outfit would be out of place at anything gaming related. It's basically a leotard, gloves, a beret, and boots. More clothed than many cosplayers that I see at anime or gaming conventions anyways.

wsoutlaw873256d ago

@ neco the wadge gap is a checkable fact. dont be an idiot. You are just wrong. Do you get your news from someones blog, or facebook?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3256d ago
jessionpc3257d ago (Edited 3257d ago )

Common sense is your labia swinging out of your costume when you pose with your hips tilted? Yep. Common sense just flies right out the fkn window indeed. She may as well have gone naked.

Are the men on this site so lonely/horny that whenever a girl takes her clothes off you can't even see the forest for the trees? And you'll vote in favor of indecent public exposure then claim some justice throne because in your heads this is about some kind of feminism war?

Jesus i'll go to the next blizzcon with my nut hanging out a Illidan costume. Lets see what happens to me when I parade on stage?

...Sad lonely men.

@TGG_overlord Your joking right? Nobody polices how people should look, that's insane. We have freedom of speech and free will. But you think it's negative that we have laws against BLATANT public indecency?... People can wear all SORTS of clothing, even very attractive ones, and there's NOTHING wrong with that, but there's attraction... Then there's exhibitionism. It's like your just saying this because your horny and want more women to run around naked for you or something?... God...

thejigisup3256d ago (Edited 3256d ago )

was her labia hanging out?
Edit: found some photos of her in the same cosplay outfit ...for science, that her labia was in fact not hanging out.

rainslacker3256d ago (Edited 3256d ago )

Guess we should just not show any female gymnastics on TV then. Heck, lets just ban female gymnastics all together, since most of the pros are underage, and things hanging out is inappropriate. Cammies outfit is just a leotard, which is common dress for them. Outside of some wardrobe mishaps, labia's do not hang out despite doing more flexible moves than this cosplayer would be capable of given her build. You see more junk on a male wearing tight clothing than you do on a woman wearing a leotard, but we don't ask bikers to put on pants now do we?

Hold_It3257d ago (Edited 3257d ago )

Yep. This is what happens when you give someone or a group too much power. These types of people think they're some special little snowflake that is better than everyone else, and they deserve some kind of special treatment, while the rest of the world doesn't. Websites need to really update their TOS's and remove the reinforcement of PC and SJWs. It's probably only a matter of time till they move on to something more aggressive and dangerous than having a shouting match online.

LastcenuryRob3256d ago

That's what happens when liberalism grows out of control...You start getting something closer to fascism.

wsoutlaw873256d ago

a hotel said someone should put pants on, OH LORD. Who cares really? she can wear what she wants but the hotel has always had the power to refuse someone. Stop trying to turn things into issues and conspiracies.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3256d ago
Hoffmann3257d ago

For Cammy fans, it was the worst day of their life I guess.

#Tuesdayforever

TGG_overlord3257d ago

It´s about to get even worse, since CEO Gaming blocked Mark Kern on Twitter. And they refuse to talk about what went down with Miss Riot´s Cammy cosplay...

wsoutlaw873256d ago

omg there is going to be like 3 whole people who are outraged. this is so serious. conspiracy

Sunny_D3256d ago

Your comment just TRIGGERED ME. I want you to write a Tumblr post about how you should feel bad for triggering my PTSD.

WeAreLegion3257d ago

This comment is completely undervalued. Especially with that avatar. Well done.

TGG_overlord3257d ago

@Hoffmann
And while all of this is going down, someone hacked and deleted Boogie´s Youtube account :S

TGG_overlord3257d ago

Ah, great! I´m a huge fan of his you see ;)

Hoffmann3257d ago

I have no clue who that is, am using YT rarely for anything gaming related but trailers lol

Hoffmann3257d ago

Ahhh the fat guy lol, saw him in one of the parodies of that "DO IT!" clip by ShiaLeBouf

Fun guy ^^

ps, maybe this might be interesting for you to cover http://www.game-art-hq.com/...

Simon_the_sorcerer3257d ago

I´ve seen Riot´s Cammy cosplay pictures, and I don´t get why she was forced to put on some pants...

get_real3257d ago

I am all for equal rights but this is bloody disgusting.

ITPython3256d ago

First picture reveals quite a bit of "Cammy toe" for sure.

3256d ago
jessionpc3257d ago (Edited 3257d ago )

I 'm not a fan of censoring but lets be honest, these events are for EVERYONE. Walking around with a 1 inch wide strap of green panties BARELY wrapped around your box isn't going to be accepted. There's swim suits, then there's exhibitionism. At this point she ALMOST may as well have just gone naked.

https://scontent-grt2-1.xx....

Some people may try to defend this, because Cammy is cannon effectively naked in her green attire, "and I RESPECT that!", But that's comics and video games, this is the real world and we have public decency to uphold. This is CEO ffs, not a trashy night club.

In the end, if you want to cosplay as Cammy somewhere like CEO? Cloth more conservatively. Leave SOMETHING to the imagination. Besides that, there are plenty of safe places you can wear less without much backlash, "The costume she wore LITERALLY didn't cover her entire genitalia as her labia would partially slip out as she walked or stood hips tilted. Come the FUCK on! That's not SWJ, that's not feminism, that's retarded.

Yep, a glorious middle finger to thinking you can do whatever the hell you want, even if it literally skirts so close to breaking the law, the girl likely would have been arrested for indecent exposure if it WASN'T for the fact she was, "cosplaying", at ceo.

@TGG_overlord I am well aware of what people wear and get away with in North America, I am also aware that some police officers risk their career by accepting personal bribery and sexual favor. People get away with a lot of things, but this isn't a beach by the ocean. And even then people are arrested for this behavior every day. Oh, and btw I've been to both Disneyland and Disney world several times in my life and I have NEVER seen someone dress like that.

It's a classic case of someone pulling imagination proof out of their ass to try to cover up the issue. People do fucked up things all over the world, in all sorts of public places, that doesn't mean that everyone else just gets to do it, just because party A did it first.

TGG_overlord3257d ago

I don´t live in America, but one of our US readers and fans had this to say:
"BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! ....Oh wait, you are serious?! I've seen women wear far more revealing bathing suits and bikinis than that on the street and never get pulled over. Hell I've been to a few states where the cops usually pulled over to hit on the women dressed like that. Not to mention it was held in Orlando, Florida...the epicenter of barely there attire for women. You can't go five feet without running into a woman half naked (even at Disney World)."

PurpHerbison3257d ago (Edited 3257d ago )

So at a STREET FIGHTER tournament comprised mainly of adults... a fan cannot dress up exactly like the character in the game that is being played all weekend? If you aren't going to do justice to your cosplay then why even cosplay at all? You sir are ridiculous and no matter how much you tried to play both sides you are a certified SJW.

rainslacker3256d ago

It's more like two inches. Maybe you should learn more about the female body.

The key word here is barely. Barely still means it's "wrapped around". She was breaking no laws of public exhibition, otherwise, having to put on pants would have been the least of her worries, regardless of the venue she was at.

Someone deemed what she was wearing inappropriate. Most think that it wasn't inappropriate given the context of the venue. You think it's inappropriate because you want to find any reason to be hateful about anything that comes up around here, so it's not like you've proven yourself to be level headed and reasonable...but I digress.

You find it inappropriate, and one of the powers that be at CEO found it inappropriate, and action was taken. You got what you wanted, now let others have their say on why it was not inappropriate.

Next year, maybe I'll go as E.Honda. If they say I have to put pants on, I'll call them xenophobic for suppressing my right to express my appreciation of Japanese culture. All my junk will be more covered, so you should approve. Luckily, I have the stomach to pull off that outfit.

Truth is, in society, even if you find something distasteful, it doesn't mean you are the ultimate judge on what is allowed and what isn't. If you are in charge of a venue, then yes, you have some authority, otherwise, all you can do is sit there and judge others based on what they are doing, and be just as frustrated as you always are, because no one cares what you have to say or think.

DragonKnight3256d ago

@jessionpc: I wasn't going to comment on this low hanging fruit because quite frankly this has become too easy, but congratulations, you get to be on the receiving end today.

"I 'm not a fan of censoring but lets be honest"

This is said always before making a statement that is pro-censorship. Always. And having read your comment, I was right. You are pro-censorship because of muh feminism.

"these events are for EVERYONE."

Actually these events are for fans. You won't see non-fans at the events. Fans with any sense should expect this kind of attire. Fans are usually in on the cosplay scene and know what to expect.

"Walking around with a 1 inch wide strap of green panties BARELY wrapped around your box isn't going to be accepted."

Correction: Tolerated. And it's precisely because of prudes like you who are trying to shame attractive women into knowing their place and covering up. Afterall, this is the 1950's.

"There's swim suits, then there's exhibitionism."

This was neither. It was thematically accurate cosplay.

"Some people may try to defend this, because Cammy is cannon effectively naked in her green attire, "and I RESPECT that!","

Most will successfully defend this, precisely for that reason, and no you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have made this pro-censorship post.

"But that's comics and video games, this is the real world and we have public decency to uphold. This is CEO ffs, not a trashy night club. "

Modesty rules are not laws, and they were invented by religious prudery. Cosplay is not "trashy night club" wear and your categorization of accurate Cammy cosplay as being "trashy night club" wear shows you have zero respect for the character and her designers.

"In the end, if you want to cosplay as Cammy somewhere like CEO? Cloth more conservatively. Leave SOMETHING to the imagination."

Accurate cosplay requires no discrimination of location. No one needs to follow your prudish, sexist rules.

"Besides that, there are plenty of safe places you can wear less without much backlash"

See above. Prudes are causing backlash. People with little or no self-esteem are causing backlash. You and people like you are actually sexist and in the wrong.

"The costume she wore LITERALLY didn't cover her entire genitalia as her labia would partially slip out as she walked or stood hips tilted."

You're blind. That didn't happen at all.

"Come the FUCK on! That's not SWJ, that's not feminism, that's retarded."

Actually it is SJW, and feminism, and retarded because of both of those things. Also we'll add Religion in there as well because of "modesty."

"Yep, a glorious middle finger to thinking you can do whatever the hell you want, even if it literally skirts so close to breaking the law, the girl likely would have been arrested for indecent exposure if it WASN'T for the fact she was, "cosplaying", at ceo."

And a big nuclear middle finger to the prudish feminist a$$hats like you who think they have the right to rage about how anyone chooses to cosplay.

http://i.imgur.com/KJ5qPGP....

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3256d ago
Show all comments (68)
400°

The Xbox Game Pass Hot Streak is Getting Ridiculous at This Point

The Xbox Game Pass subscription service has been on a generational roll these last few months, and there really doesn't seem to be an end in sight.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Oblivion Remake
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Doom: The Dark Ages
Metaphor: ReFantazio

All of those in just 40 days!

I´m not gonna even mention the upcoming day one games for the rest of the year, because its not even fun anymore.

Gamepass is simply the best thing that happened to gamers!

Even more now with games costing $80+ while economy is in the toilet.

neutralgamer19922d ago

I know some people disagree with you simply because of your username and what you have said in the past but here you are absolutely right there is zero doubt that game pass is the best service available especially with the game prices going up

Microsoft owns the most Studios they own the most IP's so they are the biggest publisher in gaming

lukasmain1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

So why aren't GamePass subs growing at any rate worth mentioning? Why do they need Playstation to keep their whole gaming division afloat?

edit: Yes, GamePass is a great deal, a really great deal. That is for sure.

thesoftware7301d 17h ago

Neutralgamer.

Well said, MS got their ass whooped into a working strategy lol. MS will continue to make consoles for the foreseeable future, but they are now capitalizing on what has always been their forte, Software, and platform integrations.

It's kind of similar to Nintendo in that regard, the Wii U did poorly, and made Nintendo rethink the whole console stance, and lean all the way into where the dominated, Handhelds, they consolidated their console and handheld departments and are now stronger than ever.

neutralgamer19921d 17h ago

I never said GP was growing. It's a good service for those who have signed up

lukasmain1d 16h ago

But that's the thing right. If something is so great, then why isn't everyone jumping on board? The vast majority of gamers do not want to subscribe, and it looks like they'll never subscribe for any meaningful length of time. It's just not going to happen. That's clear now I think. Still the best deal in gaming, for those who like it though. Can't deny that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 16h ago
anast2d ago

2/4 are above average games. 1 being way above average. The rest are $20 dollar throwaways and that's if you feel you have to play them. No subservice is worth the rental price.

BeHunted2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

OpenCritic and Metacritic

Oblivion Remake - 82
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 - 92
Doom: The Dark Ages - 85
Metaphor: ReFantazio - 93

What game did you say that's average?

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Scores are given for marketing purposes. There are only 2 games on that list that are actually above average.

Why do people ask questions when they actually are making statements?

neutralgamer19922d ago

Anas

First of all you are objectively wrong according to gamer reviews and media reviews. And 2nd of the all GP is an amazing service if you have the time to play and try different games. It would have been a great service when we were in school. It's great for families on a budget since they can pay one price and their kids can play all sorts of games

As far as for hardcore gamers I signed up years ago and my subscription is ending this year, I will not renew because for me personally it's not worth it since I don't play as many games and I like to buy the games I play. For some weird reason even when I rented from blockbuster (yes I am that old 😁) or gamefly in the back of my mind was always I need to finish it and try something else

We can't deny that MS has the most Studios and IP's under their belt and they have the resources to use them too. Whether that's sequels or remasters like we just got. I think fact is Xbox fans over hype the GP and Playstation fans downplay it. Somewhere in tbe middle is the sweet point

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@Neutral

Game reviewers are an arm of the marketing team.

Renting is always bad for the customer.

Doom is an average game. Oblivion is a below average game.

Christopher2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Anast, you're flailing here. I would opt out before going further. All of the games are good games, some are just better. Even Doom TDA is over 4.5/5 on PSN store.

Edit: In fact...

Oblivion Remake - 4.66
Clair Obscur - 4.9
Doom TDA - 4.76
Metaphor - 4.74

That's from Sony gamers.

NotoriousWhiz2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The past few months of xbox game pass have been very good. But how many subpar months were there leading up to this? And how many great games will they have in the future? Game prices are super expensive now but so is xbox game pass and pricing wise, I just don't have the time to play enough games for xbox game pass to be worth it. If they ever release the family and friends package, then maybe.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

You're really reaching here, all of those are good games, I'd happily play any of those for hours, Oblivion might not be that appealing to me, and the new Doom game might be the weaker of the recent DOOM games... But they're still top tier games.

Notellin2d ago

Everything you say is false and misleading.

Lightning772d ago

Never seen anyone who purposely owns themselves with each and every comment you make. Pretty incredible if you ask me.

andy852d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Scores are given because they're good games. Oblivion is 9.3/10 on PS store and very positive on steam. That isnt a below average game in the slightest. Nothing to do with marketing

InUrFoxHole1d 22h ago

Good Lord my guy. I know you dont even believe some of the stuff you type. Instead of reading a comment and getting tight.... Take a deep breath and exit the comment section. You're better than this.

1d 19h ago
GhostScholar1d 13h ago

Ridiculous comment……

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 1d 13h ago
crazyCoconuts2d ago

Starting from November of last year to now has been incredible if you're on PC GamePass and a COD player. Seems like all the studios are delivering in the same time frame. I'll keep on for the rest of the year and then take a break for a year or so and let the studios catch up.

raWfodog2d ago

Definitely worth it if you’re a day one purchaser of games, and like to zip through them one after the other. I don’t have that much time these days to spend playing games so I will usually wait until they are on sale for 40% or more. I also don’t play through them quickly hence the reason for my huge backlog.

Sonic18812d ago

I agree but none of these games are exclusives. But I agree with games costing over 80 dollars aren't good for Sony and Nintendo fans

Dudububu1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

You do love embarrassing yourself, no? Yeah yeah reviews are for marketing purposes just like for Sony’s blockbusters or that doesn’t count?! Just stop it!

Profchaos1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

I think if you take what you play and unless you exclusively play games from the service if you buy what you want from the catalogue you're likely saving money over the course of the year.

After being subbed to gp ultimate for three years I cancelled my service because the value wasn't there I wasn't using it and the only reason i didn't cancel earlier was because i stack it

If you exclusively play games from the service then yeah it'll work out cheaper but my preference will always be buy to own physical if possible

GhostScholar1d 13h ago

The fact that your comment got that many down votes is wild. Say what you want about Microsoft (they waited to long to start making good first party games, the series s was a mess, they abandoned exclusives just when they started making good ones, etc), but to deny the quality of the game pass catalog is just silly and it really highlights the toxicity of fanboyism.

kikii1d 8h ago

@Obscure_Observer
Oblivion Remake
for the love of god its a remaster ^^

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1d 8h ago
anast2d ago

It's funny they used the red ring of death for the thumbnail. People don't think this stuff through.

smoothdude2d ago

I'll disagree that this service is worth it. I don't play games as quickly as I used to, so I can still buy games when I want to play them and on a sale and come out on top. Steam also allows me to share my game library with my family. That is worth more in my opinion.

So pick your preference at this point, but I'm still making my way through my game library, and the fact that I can play PS5 games on Steam and Microsoft games on steam and share those games is super cool.

GhostScholar1d 13h ago

Game pass users can also share with family…..what are you even talking about ?

gold_drake2d ago

its not xboxs hot streak, its that we've had good games come out lately and ms gave them money to have their hames on the service.

meanwhile, they've been selling like hotcakes on the other platforms.

Petebloodyonion2d ago

And?
Does the notion that the games are available elsewhere diminish the value of Game Pass offering?

gold_drake1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

no absolutely not, but you know i never said that.

but there are reasons as to why they're on gamepass, lets also not forget that

Show all comments (53)
100°

A First Look at Bravely Default’s HD Remaster on Nintendo Switch 2 - Marooners' Rock

Sarah previewed Bravely Default Flying Fairy HD Remaster at PAX East 2025 on the Nintendo Switch 2—here’s what stood out during her hands-on demo!

Read Full Story >>
maroonersrock.com
230°

Peter Molyneux recalls how Project Milo, the Kinect game with revolutionary promise, died a death

Vapourware can end up being the stuff of legend, like Rockstar's Agent, Star Wars 1313, or StarCraft: Ghost. Without ever seeing the light of day, these games never risked the possibility of being played and forgotten, and instead live on forever as the subjects of lengthy YouTube essays.

Still, Molyneux's most notable lost game (or tech demo, depending on who you asked at the time) was arguably Project Milo.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
darthv724d ago

I can see the potential of the kinect hardware... its rather impressive tech, but it was just not meant to be for gaming. If anything, MS had a huge missed opportunity to have used it for the AR/VR projects.

S2Killinit3d ago

Missed opportunity? They lied. It was the biggest lie in gaming history.

merlox3d ago

You can use the Kinect as an SLS camera for paranormal investigations. So it wasn’t a complete failure.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Remember Star Wars Kinect announcement? Biggest laughable acting seen

2d ago
2d ago
rlow12d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Do you mean about project Milo?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
-Foxtrot4d ago

It was built on lies Peter...you know this.

isarai4d ago

Bro that thing NEVER existed, what we got was a concept video

Knushwood Butt3d ago

"Unfortunately, as we were developing Milo, so the Kinect device was being developed. And they realised that the device that Alex Kipman first showed off would cost $5,000 for consumers to buy.

"So they cost-reduced that device down to such a point, where the field-of-view...I think it was a minuscule field-of-view. In other words, it could only just see what's straight in front of you."

Hmm, exactly what tech was in it, that was cut, affected the development? It was only ever interpreting visual and audio inputs right? The xbox was processing those inputs.

Nor do I see how the field of view thing is relevant to the discussion.

isarai3d ago

Exactly! Tf kinda BS statement was that? i don't really see how fov is relevant at all, since when do you move all around a room while talking/interacting to someone?

Amplitude3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This is entirely untrue. There was never a 5000 dollar Kinect prototype that could somehow use a wider field of view to scan and import generated in-game items and advance AI by over a decade. Anybody that fell for this was a stupid moron child, myself included. Anybody that falls for this lie now is a stupid moron child who doesn't realize that these people *only* know how to lie.

Show all comments (22)