220°

How to Find the Assault Marine Combat Armor in Fallout 4

Arm yourself with the most powerful armor in all of the Wasteland.

Read Full Story >>
shacknews.com
Oreic3264d ago

Umm Power armor, even t-45, is better...

wakeNbake3264d ago

Yeah but thats power armor that consumes fusion cores, this is just regular armor.

Elwenil3263d ago

It depends. Stat-wise, Power Armor is better but it also takes damage and has to be repaired. Normal armor is always there and always working and does not need to be repaired, nor does it require fusion cores or other resources once it is modified to taste. Personally, I use both, but I have to admit for most of the game I saved my fusion cores and only used the Power Armor for treks to the Glowing Sea. I also have to admit that I've thrown caution to the wind and used my X-01 with rocket boosters for almost all of Far Harbor. So it all comes down to taste and what you are doing, in my opinion.

ORyanDeee3263d ago (Edited 3263d ago )

yeah ive saved my fusion cores (have over 100 of them) and always use my power armor without needing to worry about running out.

NinjaRichParty3263d ago (Edited 3263d ago )

I actually like the wet suit and other mask that you get along with this suit of armor a bit better. It's got a pretty cool stealth look to it. Obviously, the armor is much much better stat wise, but the other mask and wet suit make a pretty cool visual combo.

MasterD9193262d ago

Good thing I didn't buy the helmet for 11,000+ caps the other day. I wasn't even sure I would wear the damn thing, I just thought it reminded me of a Power Armor helmet, which technically, you could still wear with the Power Armor.

90°

Fallout 4 on Switch 2 seems inevitable, but what about Starfield?

A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer199219d ago

I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future

On playstation they have been quite successful

anast19d ago

I'm not sure too many people want to play Starfield.

Profchaos19d ago

Phils all but confirmed they are going in hard with the switch 2

TheColbertinator19d ago

All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.

17d ago
Show all comments (7)
140°

Ex-Starfield dev dubs RPG’s design the “antithesis” of Fallout 4

Starfield and Fallout 4 developer Nate Purkeypile reflects on Bethesda's city design, calling it the "antithesis" of the studio's older games

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
TheNamelessOne121d ago

Starfield is actually a RPG. Bethesda hasn't done that in a while.

GhostScholar121d ago

People acted like starfield was so less interesting than fallout and drastically different, but I call bs on that. Both are decent games, but they are both filled with the appearance of things to do and items to interact with but 99 percent are just there to be there with no significance. Fallout has better character work but they are both sort of illusions that they’re vast.

121d ago
Shiore2u121d ago

Studio has been going downhill since Skyrim. Every following game gets dumbed down more than the previous. I'll be shocked if Elder Scrolls VI even has dialogue options.

anast120d ago

Fallout 4 was bad, real bad. Starfield might even be a better RPG.

trez1082120d ago

Fallout 4 wasn’t a great fallout game per se but real bad? I don’t know maybe I’m a little biased because I replied it not long ago and had fun with it.

80°

10 Excellent Open World Games Where You Control It All

GB: "Gamers have quickly realized that a fun open-world game isn’t just about size and scope but rather how you interact with it."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
anast162d ago

It's a click fest. Skip it.