430°

What Would DOOM's Failure Mean For id Software

Does id Software have a chance in Hell of surviving if DOOM is ultimately a disappointment?

Read Full Story >>
heypoorplayer.com
derkasan3333d ago

I don't think it'll be another Daikatana, but it'll be hard to live up to the original.

dead_pixels3333d ago

Here's hoping it does manage to, but this relative radio silence regarding the single player portion of the game is certainly scary.

thekhurg3333d ago

The later the review embargo the less confidence they have in their game IMO

NapalmSanctuary3333d ago

@thekhurg Thats not necessarily true but it is a possibility. Its also possible the the head guys are nervous cause its not enough like CoD.

EvilAsh3333d ago

I wish I knew what people expect out of the new Doom. Seems like it's the same old Doom we know and love with an online component that will get better every update as long as id Software listens to the fan base.

Bolts3333d ago (Edited 3333d ago )

Agreed. It looks great to me.

JMPetrequin3333d ago

This thing has at no point been any of what the originals were.

axesofevil3333d ago

Yeah, but I think that hope got tacked on to the game, unfairly. It doesn't help that it has the reboot title of simply DOOM and not DOOM 4 or something, but I think modern audiences are tired of military shooter drivel and need some button mashers to remind them gaming can be fun again.

thereapersson3333d ago

It looks enough like DooM and Painkiller had a baby, and I'm sure it'll be fun.

axesofevil3333d ago

That's exactly what I want plus it has the Serious Sam 3 melee kills, which hopefully won't wear out immediately like the mortal kombat X-ray moved or anything similar.

joab7773333d ago

That's the problem. For the life of me I can't understand why they didn't simply include a classic mode. Thus way, everyone is happy, and if people don't like it, at least those that loved the original and it's arena gameplay would form a nice little core.

I'm afraid many newer gamers may not like it, and older gamers will Haye the changes. And belive it or not, the sp does matter and we have heard nothing at all.

Yui_Suzumiya3332d ago

Actually I believe you can turn gory kills off if you don't want them

Kleptic3332d ago

I'm kind of lost...have people simply not watched any of the single player previews that have come up for like 2 weeks?

Nearly all information about single player you could want is available...and it answers many of the questions listed in some of these posts...

The 'classic' mode is baked in...all the modern stuff can be turned off (glory kills, weapon upgrades, runes, etc.)...you don't have to use any of that to complete the campaign...

there are no cutscenes, and the story is passive...you can explore and get information about what is going on, but you don't have to. They say the story elements are deeper than you may expect, but do not interfere with the game in any way at all.

It is nothing like Doom 3...there is platforming elements, puzzles, and 'arenas' that get triggered releasing waves of enemies...survival is focused on movement, not limiting ammo (ala Doom 3's bs)...

the only aspect not really touched on are the boss battles...they say they're in there, but didn't talk about it more than that. The only real thing leaked about it was the artist rendering of a new 'icon of sin'; that alone is worth the playthrough imo...

rye743333d ago

Its not going to fail. The game looks and plays great. I don't understand the hate towards this game at all.

dead_pixels3333d ago

I don't think there's any hate for it, at least that I haven't seen. The main issues are Bethesda's decision to send out review code on launch day and the extremely scarce bits of the single player portion that's been showcased.

That said, I think many have every right to be concerned, but I definitely hope the game delivers.

Nivekki3333d ago

Maybe they see the writing on the wall that reviewers aren't seen as reflective of the general publics opinion. That reviews are, by and large, just some random persons opinion.

Or maybe the game's shit.

We won't know until release day.

Pick your poison.

KesMonkey3333d ago

You may well not have seen it, but there is an extraordinary amount of hatred out there for this new DOOM. Just look at the Steam reviews of the beta, for a start. I don't really get the hate either. It seems that many of the haters wanted this game to be Quake V.

sullynathan3333d ago (Edited 3332d ago )

The game is shit and a disgrace to doom

DLConspiracy3332d ago

Wah... you complain about this game a lot.

Yui_Suzumiya3332d ago

Neither do I. Day one for me :3

3333d ago
Show all comments (50)
160°

It Shouldn't Take Expedition 33's Success to Remind Square Enix That Turn-Based Still Sells

TNS: Expedition 33 was the wake-up call Square Enix needed, telling it turn-based RPGs are still popular, but that shouldn't have been the case.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Relientk7717h ago

True, but if it does get it through their thick skulls, then that works.

Although, the Dragon Quest 1 + 2 HD remakes will be turn-based and (the worst kept secret) Final Fantasy IX remake should be turn-based I would imagine. Let's see if any newer games go turn-based too.

thorstein13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

DQIII HD Remake was turned based and very successful. Then there was a really obscure turn based game came Balder's Gate 3. I heard it might have done well.

Profchaos10h ago

I wouldn't be shocked if they switched ff to the vii remake combat system

PapaBop6h ago

It won't get through to them though, despite E33's success, they still won't risk going fully turn based for their big budget projects simply because they are still in the mindset that it needs to be action combat to appeal to the mainstream audience. I hope I'm wrong but don't underestimate just how stubborn Japanese execs can be

DivineHand12516h ago

While it is true that Sqaure Enix has moved away from turn based games compared to how they were in the past, there is a good reason for it.

Older gamers will know this but during the ps2 era, we were flooded with turned based games from Japanese studios and this created a form of fatigue back then going into the next generation.

When Square released FF13, they received heavy criticism for making the game turned based like every other FF game and not doing enough to innovate. This is why they made FF15, FF7 Remake and FF16 have real time combat. It gave the series a fresh spin and has brought in new fans to the series.

I personally would be happy with either turned based FF or the real-time combat version we see today.

Shane Kim15h ago

Remake and Rebirth have "turn based" if you set it in the settings.

Lexreborn213h ago

Dang wish I saw your post before I made mine because we definitely feel the same way lol

Profchaos10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Yeah hit the nail on the head but its like ww2 games we get hundreds of them then a decade of nothing and people start missing them i think we're going to start seeing them return

Claire, dragon quest even yakuza have seen turn based return

andy8516h ago

Only need to look at their own game DQ 11 approaching 10 million to show there's a market. And that's not as big of a name as FF

Tacoboto15h ago

Another article about Expedition 33 and Square Enix and turn-based games? This is starting to sound like propaganda.

The game didn't sell because it's a turn-based game; it sold and is enjoyed because it's a really freaking good game that released completed at a good price without gamer drama attached to it. No Mtx, no wait-until-it's-patched, minimal bloat, a self-contained story, no multiplatform BS. Just a solid original game that absolutely nails what it intended to do.

Redemption-6415h ago

I was just about to say the same thing.

anast14h ago

This comment should have a 100 upvotes, at least.

CrimsonWing6915h ago

Maybe try actually listening to the fans who have supported the series for decades. This habit of ignoring your core audience just to chase people who were never interested in Final Fantasy in the first place makes no sense. And when that approach fails, doubling down on it is beyond baffling.

The battle system has never been the main reason non-FF or non-JRPG players stayed away. Gutting the series’ identity to chase a broader market doesn’t attract new players. It just alienates the loyal ones.

Keep going down this road and we’ll end up with Final Fantasy Fortnite abomination or a F2P Battle Royale game.. Oh wait…

Show all comments (19)
50°

Rematch is "chasing credibility" but not realism like rival EA FC

Pocket Tactics sits down with Rematch’s creative director, Pierre Tarno, to discuss why Sloclap moved away from Sifu to chase something new.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
badboyz091d 10h ago

This where FIFA 2K comes in.

140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted2d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast2d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay2d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted2d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34852d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK2d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)