50°

TOP 25 public companies by game revenues

This Top Video Game Companies ranking is based on analysis of annual and quarterly financial reports published by a number of relevant publicly listed game companies. For companies that do not split out their game revenues, the analysis includes estimates, which may or may not be indicated explicitly. Revenues (GAAP) are restated to reflect Calendar Years, therefore do not necessarily match reported Fiscal Year results of individual companies. Revenues exclude hardware sales and other non-game sales to the extent publicly available. Microsoft and Sony estimates represent all Xbox and Playstation non-hardware platform revenues (including Xbox Live and PSN revenues respectively).

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3103d ago
miyamoto3103d ago

"We explicitly do not make any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the data or overview."

Don't waste your time folks. Move along.

dirkdady3103d ago

"For companies that do not split out their game revenues, the analysis includes estimates"

Lol we all know who they are referencing.

joeorc3102d ago

@miyamoto

Exactly!, this top 25 is nothing more than a guess... Lmao

There is no freaking way that they know, how do we know..well it's very
Simple.

Example:
"This Top Video Game Companies ranking is based on analysis of annual and quarterly financial reports published [by a number of relevant publicly listed game companies]"

Lol, Playstation subsidiaries conglomerate... Its companies stock is privately held..its not a public buy in..its a separate company..there is no public traded stock..

Now some may Say but..but..Sony stock...stop right there..Sony's the only stock holder of the playstation conglomerate.. But that is just held stock for asset purpose, that stock is held whole owned by a non alive entity.. iE: the company itself..playstation as a conglomerate has its own board of Director's.. Its a whole owned subsidiary conglomerate in unto itself..so no public traded stock, thus you have no real solid information about Playstation outside Sony itself having the info..and they do not put out that internal information other than basic shipping, Sold through data..and information that they can use for marketing purposes.

FasterThanFTL13103d ago

Interesting to see Microsoft more successful than Sony. Maybe focusing on PC as well as Xbox was the right call. This gap will only become bigger as Microsoft brings more 1st party games to PC and expands it gaming division's reach to its hundreds of millions of Windows 10 users.

dirkdady3103d ago

Nah don't think so.. Lol

"For companies that do not split out their game revenues, the analysis includes estimates"

uth113102d ago

Most likely because MS has Minecraft now

Rookie_Monster3103d ago (Edited 3103d ago )

Congrat MS and SONY on being #2 and #3 respectively. As a owner on both MS And Sony consoles and a fan of both, this is great news.

40°

University Of Oxford Study Finds Playing Video Games Can Be Good For Your Mood

Playing a game can help improve your mood according to a recent study. Who knew!

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community6h ago
jznrpg5h ago

It’s a form of escape like other entertainment just more interactive than most. Didn’t need a study to know this

LG_Fox_Brazil4h ago

Pretty obvious to me, my videogames are sometimes the main reason why I still havent put a bullet in my skull

210°

Ubisoft's Board is Launching an Investigation Into The Company Struggles

It has been announced that Ubisoft's Executive Committee and Board of Directors will launch an investigation and review of the company.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community23h ago
Christopher1d 13h ago

Is Ubisoft board going to investigate themselves since they're the ones telling Ubisoft how to do less for more and push MTX over taking longer to make better games w/o them?

DarXyde23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Breaking news:

Board investigation concludes wasteful spending on employee compensation packages responsible for financial woes. Live service a net positive for company.

OtterX23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

It's amazing how out of touch with gamers they've been for over a decade, and its only gotten worse.

The biggest innovation that I saw in that time was their "indie" arm w titles like Child of Light, and in VR with Eagle Flight and Transference. Loved all 3 of these titles. I want to see more of that side of Ubisoft, the one who takes risks.

BeHunted12h ago

Microsoft should open up their wallet and acquire Ubisoft

isarai23h ago

Honestly kinda glad all these AAA publishers are finally imploding, they've tainted this industry and took advantage of us too long. Die and don't come back

TheCaptainKuchiki21h ago

Ubisoft carries the entire french video games industry though. You don't want them to disappear or so many jobs are gonna be lost

isarai20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Both can be true, sure i absolutely do not want the honest people just doing their jobs and living their passion to lose that, but im also so tired of the schemes, toxicity, ripoffs, blatant dishonesty, and literal scamming they've done for years while laughing in our face about it! They've gladly even targeted kids in search of their precious "whales". They have no shame, morals, or even basic humanity, their lower employees cant keep being their shield for consequences

RiseNShine15h ago

That's not reason enough for not letting them fall, at this point they promote non-owned, sometimes dissapearing, buggy, crappy over-expensive AAAA games with generic open world checklist games filled with political agenda. Let them burn i say, they are a perfect example of everything wrong in the industry and they should fall at this point.

vTuro2446m ago

Not our fault they went to shit. If they don't want those people to be out of jobs, then stop producing slop and make games that people actually want to play.

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Just let them burn, at this point, I don't care if a few developers like Ubisoft don't survive, it's healthier for the industry, although, with everything that's happening, I feel like we might be due for a crash.

XiNatsuDragnel22h ago

We need more implosions the AAA collapse is coming

TheCaptainKuchiki21h ago

It's too late. That should have been done a good 3 years ago.

Hofstaderman20h ago

They investigating themselves? Pffft...

Show all comments (22)
240°

Nintendo Accused of 'Bullying' in Weak Patent Dispute Over Palworld

The article discusses a claim by an intellectual property (IP) expert that Nintendo likely does not hold patents strong enough to prevent the game developer Pocketpair from creating Palworld, a game that some believe resembles Pokémon. The expert suggests that Nintendo's legal challenges against Palworld could amount to nothing more than corporate bullying, as the patents Nintendo might be relying on are not robust enough to stand up to legal scrutiny. The situation could be seen as an example of a large corporation trying to exert undue influence over a smaller competitor.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong source
Gamesradar is the original source not MSN that used gamesradar.. correct URL >> https://www.gamesradar.com/games/survival/ip-expert-says-nintendo-probably-doesnt-own-patents-strong-enough-to-prevent-pocketpair-from-making-palworld-and-this-may-boil-down-to-nothing-but-bullying/
MaximusPrime_4d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
Changed: url
WolfSeed3d ago
Changed: title
WolfSeed4d ago
-Foxtrot4d ago

Crazy how far they are willing to go over nothing rather than tell Game Freak to get their shit together and sort the quality of the mainline games out.

Personally I'd drop the two game bullshit, make a full on complete game, and take their time making the best game they can without relying on a silly battle gimmick they'll ditch after one game. Gimmicks out of battle is what they should be focusing on, beauty contests, berry making, secret bases, the underground, Seasons, events during day / night and post game content like travelling to a new location or something.

porkChop4d ago

That's the thing, this is why we're now seeing more serious competitors in the genre. Game Freak has just been coasting by, doing the bare minimum in innovation for the last 20+ years. They need to get with the times. Hire more devs, give more dev time to foster creativity, etc. But now that they can't get away with that bare minimum they're trying to sue their competitors out of existence. It's disgusting.

Cacabunga2d ago

Nintendo risks big with this one.. it’s means competition to pokemon and that they dont want

gold_drake4d ago

been saying this since sun and moon.

gamefreak just isnt used to, still isnt used to, the console market. they did well on the handheld space but as a complete 3d developer z they fail miserable

the last two pkmn gens look like gamecube games. not to mention the bugs at launch.

but uve seen the ridiculous anount of copies sold at launch too.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Realistically though palworld Pokemon with guns featured so many themes and concepts that Nintendont
There's no way they would make a game where you could use realistic weapons or have pals slaving away.

They're not the same genre at all they just feature similar characters

Markdn2d ago

Can't hide plagerism I guess, Palworld had it easy, even flaunting it, they deserve ever thing Nintendo decides to throw at them.

gold_drake1d 2h ago

i think nintendo also made it quite impossible not to have similar creatures.

when u look at that other pkmn like hame, the name excapes me now, they look fairly similar to alot of pkmn.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I pretty much agree, two editions of the same game shouldn't even been a thing at this point. The foundations are solid, but the lack of content and having a lived in world really let the latest games down.

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Two editions worked way back in the day as a gimmick hey your mate has different Pokemon in blue than you have in red so trade them but nowadays it's pointless we don't have any of those limitations system links not really a thing anymore and two editions feels exploitive nowadays like they are targeting kids to double dip

badz1493d ago

why would they do that when the fanbase is still willing to buy whatever low-effort and low-cost crap they are churning out? they are out to make as much money as possible with as little investment as possible and say what you want but GF is excellent at that front mainly because the fanbase allows them to. Nintendo is saying nothing because they are making money.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 2h ago
Valkyrye4d ago

posting articles from msn.com now seriously?

MaximusPrime_4d ago

The article is actually Gamesradar's. MSN just used their page like a URL shortened link.

MeteorPanda3d ago

It's straight up bullying with mooney and using the government laws as a tool to do so. They should be fined.

Show all comments (24)