Gammon at GameSpew writes: I may be very late to the debate. It may be a fairly settled matter; most gamers and even the general public generally assume that video games deserve to be categorised as “art”. However there is one glaring issue that still bothers me about this debate and that is: most people do not agree on what “art” really is!
The Epic Games Store has a couple of fun games waiting to be added to your library.
PlayStation - The Concert is a magical musical experience for fans of the brand.
Two award-winning masterpieces, together in one incredible collection.
As expected. Unless it's going to Xbox or Switch 2, we can stop hearing about these older games now? We can move on to just news about new games?
This will be the 4th time Sony sells us The Last of Us Part 1.. And the 2nd time on the PS5.
Store says I already own it. I guess it’s just a straight twin-pack. Looks like they added 4 maps to ‘No Return’.
There is no debate for me , if some "douche" can decide that abtract paints that make no sense to many people , are art , people can just decide that gaming is art . Espacially when it does incorporate numerous already existing art form in its whole .
And i especially dislike in those convos , the trend of picking up quaint and unique or even obscure indie or retail games , to "show art" . Even deemed souless stuff like Call of Duty would categorize as art , no need to go dig up the one game where you don't shoot or attack things in some unique artstyle to make a point . If a michael bay movie is art , if a justin bieber album is art , if the most mainstream superhero comics is art , so are the call of duty , and other mainstream stuff of gaming
This guy should visit some "modern art" gallery or something. You can find everything from old shoes to garbage bags on display. Truth is the term art nowadays doesnt mean anything.