Approvals 10/3 ▼
Alexious (3) - 2964d ago Cancel
shodan74 (3) - 2964d ago Cancel
emad-E-three (1) - 2964d ago Cancel
Resis7ance (3) - 2964d ago Cancel
270°

Microsoft needs to clearly articulate its vision for PC gaming

Developer unrest over the UWP is justified; MS has not earned the benefit of the doubt, and has a responsibility to be transparent with its partners.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2964d ago
Changed: content
Overload2964d ago
Free_Fro2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

Patience ..

Everything will be as clear as day in due time.
How open will UWP be? They'll have to strike a balance.

Can they make the majority happy?
Villainous Microsoft ^_^
-
xoxo

Overload2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

There has never been anything that everyone was satisfied with. Just get over that, it's part of life.

You edited your comment..

Overload2964d ago

@malphite

He changed his comment.

Free_Fro2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

I said,

"one thing is for sure, not everyone will be satisfied"

If the majority are happy, it's still not everyone.

The wordings aren't all that different.

"There has never been anything that everyone was satisfied with"

Well, No sh*t Sherlock.
^_^
No Xs and Os for you.

freshslicepizza2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

when steam first came out people were upset about needing the steam client and so on. as it evolved it became the go to place. is it perfect? no. however unlike valve microsoft needs to be more open and transparent through feedback and phil spencer so far has shown all the right signs of being that but other people from microsoft need to be as well.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2964d ago
2964d ago Replies(4)
memots2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

UWP = GWL

As much as i like Windows10 on my laptop, i don't see this as being viable for gaming.

Death2964d ago

If I can purchase a game from the Xbox marketplace and play it natively on my PC then UWA's will be welcome. If you are a PC only gamer, the incentive isn't as strong. I'm looking forward to Universal Apps between my phone, console and PC. That doesn't mean I will use them exclusively. I will still use Steam and store bought games.

2964d ago
2964d ago
DethWish2963d ago

I removed Win10 from my laptop. Now I'm running Ubuntu.. That speed!

2964d ago Replies(1)
Maxor2964d ago

Without mod support UWP is going no where. It'll be a place to play some games where mods and customization is not a priority like MS crossplat games sure. But it won't be the ultimate destination.

Steam is the feature king of the gaming world, not just the PC gaming world so I don't see them unseating Lord Gaben anytime soon.

2964d ago
rainslacker2964d ago

Most of the advantages I can see for UWP right now are on the non gaming side of things. It's actually huge for general software development. Things like Java and .NET were a similar principal, however UWP is supposed to be more robust...however it is tied to Windows operating environments which will still limit it for some developers making Java or .NET more applicable.

For games, what little info I've seen seems to be sparse, although I've seen enough to wait for more information about it thanks to another user on here who decided to discuss it without all the fan boy connotations.

UWP is going to be one of those things that either is really great for games, or going to set back development if MS tries to force it's adoption for use to run in Windows. However, given the recent Sweeny incident, and Spencers reply, it seems that it won't be detrimental overall.

Overload2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

From NeoGaf and I completely agree.

"It's Xbox One pre-reveal all over again.

- potentially terrible plan with vague benefits
- poor explanation of said benefits
- the context makes the plan look even worse (back then, Kinect focus. Today, studios closing down and games going multiplat)
- a small community of loyalists defending the plan to the teeth using "what if"s and wildly optimistic conjecture"

http://m.neogaf.com/showpos...

It really isn't that different at all.

bleedsoe9mm2964d ago (Edited 2964d ago )

ms isn't responsible to explain anything that is happening to win or WUP to pc gamers , its an open platform . people will either adopt it or they won't , they will either spend money with ms or they won't , not like pc gamers have a lack of options . now ms should be transparent with its software partners , if they aren't thats a problem business wise . and from a business perspective its long overdue for ms to leverage the popularity of Windows gaming to benefit its shareholders .

2964d ago
Show all comments (35)
50°
5.5

Soul Covenant (PC VR) Review - CGMagazine

Soul Covenant feels like a game from the early 2000s, with its repetitive gameplay loop, waggle controls, and nonsensical story.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3h ago
120°

Cold VR is all About Acting Super Hot

Indie developer Carlos Alfonso is working on Cold VR, a game where standing still isn't an option. The complete opposite to SUPERHOT VR.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5h ago
Abnor_Mal4h ago

This sounds very interesting, Superhot was a great game to take inspiration from.

Babadook72h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I liked the VR version of SUPERHOT. If this ends up being as good I'l pick it up (once available) for PSVR2.

220°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Image broken, please fix
OtterX11h agoWhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5h ago
rlow15h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos3h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos1h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje1h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Eidolon1h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum3h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos57m ago(Edited 57m ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

SimpleDad35m ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

CobraKai4m ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.