VG247:
The Division is so close, and yet so mysterious. Let’s pull back the veil a little bit.In a new The Division Q&A hosted by IGN, Ubisoft Massive let slip a number of interesting comments in response to burning community questions.The whole thing is worth checking out if you’re keen on The Division – although the team didn’t say anything about raids and other hot topics – but if you just want the highlights here’s Arekkz‘s summary of the hottest tidbits.
from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.
If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!
TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."
I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.
Multiplayer or even co-op
If it was always a single player game then that's how it is
It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.
I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.
Someone posted this ask massive anything, thousands of us flocked to a page only to get ignored because of some false info from that person. We all waited days and find out this QnA already got answered, I fell that person who made a seperate page and got us to ask questions should never be allowed to create an article again.
There was some wicked question for the devs to, some better question than what got answered or chose to be answered. I think they should of answered more because of that fiasco, which was not there's or our faults..