110°

Why We Are Worried About The Division

Ubisoft's past indicates that the game may not be able to live up to expectations and hype.

Read Full Story >>
bidnessetc.com
razorpakk3437d ago (Edited 3437d ago )

What's the point of this article?
This is the beta weekend (which might as well be open beta for all the keys they've given), play it and tell us about your experience.

You can just play it, no need to "guess" what it will be.

P.S. (I'm among the sceptics by the way).

And I understand you're posting today because everyone is looking for info about the game, but it would've made more sense a few weeks ago.

ninsigma3437d ago (Edited 3437d ago )

For the type of game it's aiming to be I think it's going to be good. I don't think I'm too interested in it anymore though but I'll be playing the beta this weekend so that I know for sure.

Aenea3437d ago

Ahhh, another one of those "worried' opinion pieces about a game that is yet to be released.

Those type of articles is what worry me...

Perjoss3437d ago

It worries me a little that I'm worried about people who worry about the worry articles.

jmac533437d ago

And yet they say that Ubisoft produces some of the best games by bringing up 2 games that have not released yet in GR Wildlands and For Honor. Thanks for the click bait worry and wasting my time.

kraenk123437d ago

This is literally the first negative article about this game.

Worry on. Next!

80°

Exclusive Q&A: “Tom Clancy’s: The Division: Hunted” Author Thomas Parrott

from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.

Read Full Story >>
paulsemel.com
rpad503d ago

did you edit out the parts where the author repeated everything you asked?

50°

Ubisoft's The Division series just had 80% slashed off its price on Steam

If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
170°

Stop Forcing Multiplayer Into Single Player Games

TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Flawlessmic810d ago

I am in absolute agreement with the OP 👌

shinoff2183809d ago

I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.

-Foxtrot809d ago

Multiplayer or even co-op

If it was always a single player game then that's how it is

Inverno809d ago

It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.

Flawlessmic809d ago

Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.

What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.

Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.

Hofstaderman809d ago

I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.

Dagexon808d ago

I didn't notice your comment before I added mine.
But good times indeed

Show all comments (15)