440°

Rise of the Tomb Raider: PC vs Xbox One HD Video Comparison

Check out a hd video comparison between the PC and Xbox One versions of Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Neonridr3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

Just to note, that this comparison was done with an i7, a GTX 980 and 16GB of RAM.

So before people go all nuts on the Xbox One version remember that even the PS4 version will be outshone by the PC version.

That being said, I didn't really notice any incredible differences between the two (Xbox One had some darker shadows in areas and the color was maybe a little more saturated. I dunno, I am not an expert in that department.

OldGuyStillGaming3011d ago

The X1 doesn't look like that when you're actually playing the game...these YouTube comparisons are so bad it's not even funny

nowitzki20043011d ago

Do you think the PC version looks like it does in the video?

Utalkin2me3011d ago

Not only that, they are comparing cutscenes and just lara standing still. Whats next compare menu screens?

But thanks to MS i get to play this for free.

Yi-Long3011d ago

I'm sure it will look fine on whichever platform you play it. Even the 360 release was received very positively. The devs have done a good job with this.

Kalebninja3011d ago

He doesn't say what settings the game was on so a little skeptical there but, even if this were max settings there's still 4k for all the extra detail.

ravencry3011d ago

But all it takes is Gtx 750 ti and i3 4150 to run it better than xbox one just as every other game.

Gtx 980 plays every game on 1080p 60fps at ultra settings

cartoonx13011d ago

doesnt seem to be the case for 750/i3 to pull 30 @ xbox level detail.
http://n4g.com/news/1856062...

MicrosoftMackin3011d ago

Actually a 750ti can match performance but it will never be able to match detail because of the VRAM available for the consoles allows for much higher texture details to be implemented. For example PC highest texture settings in black ops 3 and shadows of mordor call for 4-6gb of VRAM which match ps4 texture quality in comparisons(not sure about shadows of mordor).

Angel9113011d ago

According to Digital foundry - You need a good I5 quad CPU and a GTX 960 to get Xbox one level of performance an visuals in ROTR..

Go read DF article..They tested the game on multiple rigs..

DLConspiracy3010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

@Angel

There is a huge difference between the 960 and a 980 though. Not that huge of a difference between 960 vs 750 ti. The 980 is 2 times the performance of the 960. The 980 is also 300 dollars more in price. For a reason.

Scroll about half way down to look at the numbers of tflops frames and power the 980 has compared.

http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeF...

Here is a comparison for a gtx 750 ti vs gtx 960

http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeF...

addictgamer3010d ago

Digital Foundry wasn't using nvidia's game ready driver for their analysis...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3010d ago
GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3011d ago

I agree, sharper textures in some areas, better shadows and draw distance. X1 looks really good in comparison, this game looks noticeably better than the last game all in all!

u4one3011d ago

Exactly. It's really annoying how people think the ps4 can magically keep up with a high end pc while they make fun of the Xbox because it's less powerful. They don't even realize that the ps4 is closer in power to the xb1 than either console is to a solid pc.

I own a ps4 and an xb1 and I don't own a gaming pc but I'm also realistic and fully aware of what pc's are capable of - especially since we use really spec'd up boxes at work for VR production. It's like comparing a Wii u to a ps4 at times (no offense Nintendo fans... I had a wii U too at one point)

u4one3011d ago

For GPU comparisons it goes like this:
Xb1: 1.41 tflops (with Kinect reserve off)
Ps4: 1.8x tflops
Gtx970: 4.6 tflops

Wii U: 352 gflops (not tflops)

FlipSwitch3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

You can always trust an xbox fanboy to make up facts.

Xbone is a 1.31tf machine. Kinect reserve or no kinect reserve.

It was originally 1.26tf and was overclocked to 1.31. A kinect reserve is exactly what it says. All it does is reserve part of the power for the device. It doesn't magically add more tf just because you free it up. It just gives back what was taken from the original number

PS4 is 1.84 tf

u4one3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

@flip:

first off I'm not a fanboy. i believe in facts. secondly - the kinect reserve occupied 10% of the xb1 gpu leaving 1.3x for graphics push. if you are as capable of basic math as you are at being a word i won't mention on here, you can arrive at the conclusion. even if that wasn't the case, the amount of power difference is splitting hairs, so chill the F out and stop judging people you know nothing about.

Neonridr3011d ago

@FlipSwitch - don't get so testy. He was merely offering some comparison numbers. They weren't exact.

FlipSwitch3011d ago

If you believed in facts you wouldn't spout such utter nonsense.

Xbone is a 1.31tf machine. ON A HARDWARE LEVEL. They reserved 10% of that number for kinect then they freed it up. This is a fact

You talk about maths yet you don't seem to have a basic grasp of them

Neonridr3011d ago

@FlipSwitch - yeah and the PS4 is on par with a Radeon 7850.. big deal. They are both underpowered regardless.

LamerTamer3011d ago

Show me these people. I never hear anyone saying that a PS4 can match a high end PC in power. You just made that up for the sake of sensationalism. I do hear people saying that the PS4 has more powerful hardware than the xbone though but that is true. It isn't a huge difference but there is one.

butchertroll3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

Xbone GPU is 1.31 TFLOPS. 10% of Kinect reserve was part that 1.31 TF. Back then when 10% reservation were active, TFLOPS for Xbone GPU were 1.18. Cut off 10% Kinect reserve and you get 1.31 again. Good? Good! Btw. nice try!

And here is the full specs of Xbone GPU and PS4 GPU :

XB1
1.310 TF GPU (12 CUs)
768 Shaders
48 Texture units
16 ROPS
2 ACE/CE/ 16 queues
12.8 Gigapixels/sec fillrate
38.4 Gigatexels/sec fillrate

PS4
1.84TF GPU ( 18 CUs)
1152 Shaders
72 Texture units
32 ROPS
8 ACE/64 queues
25.6 Gigapixels/sec fillrate
51.2 Gigatexels/sec fillrate

trainsgofast3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

Wow where did all that power come from in XB1.
GTX780 is 4.4TF and this game was not FULL DX12.
@butchertroll
Your list is only apart of story.
XB1 has 2 graphics command and 2 ACEs. The PS4's 8 ACEs that can only access GPU shaders, but XB1 can with 2 graphics commands (PS4 has 1) can talk to all of the GPU and not just the shaders. you also forgot about the memory to feed the GPUs and here to XB1 is the winner.
With full DX12.1 XB1 will be a beast!

Bdub20003011d ago

@Flip

How did you cannibalize his comment in such a troll way to turn it in to a discussion on the X1's Tflops? 1.41 vs 1.31? Well oh my gosh, whatever shall we do?

The basis of his comment was the huge gap between console and PC. i.e. Console is not even 2Tflops, and a mid range PC (GTX970) is 4.6 Tflops. And how close the consoles really are in power. Then PS4 trolls describe these "massive" differences between X1 and PS4, but all of the sudden you compare PS4 to a mid-range PC that's at 4.6tflops, and suddenly "there's no difference".

You can always trust a PS4 fanboy to change the topic when it shows how minuscule the difference between consoles really is.

Troll much? Stay on topic.

3011d ago
butchertroll3011d ago

@traingofast

MrX media follower here? Really?

JasonKCK3010d ago

Nearly everything posted above is ether wrong or cherry picked.

DLConspiracy3010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

@flip

I don't think you realize how you act on here. His comparison was to show that PC is nowhere near a console in specs. It's far beyond them.

If you like games you play with what you get or can afford. So it doesn't matter anyway. Everyone should know by now that a PC is usually going to look better. Especially comparing a gTX 980 for starters.

livininsin3010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

I don't think anybody has posted all the correct numbers above but don't worry, I can solve this controversy... WITH MATH lol

Xbox One with GPU at it's original 800Mhz clock
1.23 TFLOPs
38.4 Gtexels/sec
12.8 Gpixel/sec

FLOPs:
12 SCs * 4 SIMDs * 16 threads/clock * (1 mul + 1 add) * 800 MHz = 1.23 TFLOPs
Bilinear fetch rate:
4 fetches/clock * 12 SCs * 800 MHz = 38.4 Gtexels/sec
Pixel rate:
4 /clock * 4 DBs * 800 MHz = 12.8 Gpixel/sec

Xbox One with GPU clock increase to 853Mhz
1.31 TFLOPs
40.9 Gtexels/sec
13.6 Gpixel/sec

FLOPs:
12 SCs * 4 SIMDs * 16 threads/clock * (1 mul + 1 add) * 853 MHz = 1.31 TFLOPs
Bilinear fetch rate:
4 fetches/clock * 12 SCs * 853 MHz = 40.9 Gtexels/sec
Pixel rate:
4 /clock * 4 DBs * 853 MHz = 13.6 Gpixel/sec

dantesparda3010d ago

Why are all you rabid fanboys getting all bent out of shape because one guy is trying to correct the record. The X1 is 1.31TF total, PERIOD! Not 1.31TF plus 10%, that's just ignorance. And the PS4 is 1.84TF. And I have not seen or heard a single Sony fanboy say or think that the PS4 is on par with a high (or even mid/low range) PC. Only MS fanboys think that sh't, cuz they're dumb. All the meanwhile, they are the ones under the delusion that the X1 is more powerful than it actually is with delusions of DX12 and command buffer and all the other secret sauce bullsh't they believe in.

And the PS4's does 57.6 Gigatexels not 51.2, but screw the facts right, let's just go on our biased beliefs

Bdub20003010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

@Dante

No X1 fanboy anywhere on this thread said anything about being on Par with PC. There are a number of comments from Ps4 fanboys believing the PS4 version is on par with, or will be better than PC. Just read the comments section here.

Oh, stating facts? Like 1.31 vs. 1.41 Tflops is being "ignorant". Could have been a typo or misunderstanding. It's not like this 1/10 of an error really makes the X1 seem so much more powerful. Why do you care so much about the power of the X1 to be a narc and make sure everyone states the info exactly as you see it? So insecure!

And 51.2 vs. 57.6 gtexals? That's an error you point out and stomp on? Like anyone cares. You are incredibly insecure about the capability of your Ps4 to scour a comment section to correct these little insignificant figures.

You are the one of the "rabid fanboys" getting all bent out of shape. Only ps4 fanboys think that way because they are dumb as sh't. Right?

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 3010d ago
FlameBaitGod3011d ago

None PC owners will never understand these comparisons and will still believe there's minimal differences. All these youtube vids are compressed and looking at them that small will show little to no difference.

kraenk123010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

what do you mean with 'that small'?! ever heard of the fullscreen mode?!

I agree though...A YouTube vid will never show the true differences.

jc123011d ago

The textures are definitely sharper on the PC version, other than that, I didn't notice any major differences. Perhaps the Xbox One version suffers a bit from crushed blacks...

On the whole though, not a bad showing for Xbox.

theFAYEsorceress3011d ago

tbf, that graphics card costs more than an xb1 or a ps4. it's no an eyesore on consoles by any means, so i'm perfectly fine with the console versions~

Rayven3010d ago

Yeah. I just hope CD puts effort in maximizing the PS4's specs and not just try and reach the same spec the game has on xbone.

bofuknjanglez3010d ago

Yeah I'm skeptical the pc video was on max/ultra. Its either a bug that needs to be addressed or crappy port but it appears the shadows on the ground are crisper on the x1 than pc and that is a bunch of bs. x1 can produce better shadows than and i7/970 setup!!! yeah sure!!! This comparison is crap it doesn't even compare game play and when it does start to show some in game shot she is standing still LOL, FAIL comparison is FAIL.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3010d ago
Dewitt3011d ago

The game looks unbelievably detailed on both versions. It is definitely the most gorgeous game on the XB1 currently.

illtownNJONE3011d ago

theres not really much difference maybe besides res & res doesn't = graphics

Lenrulesdaworld3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

is the pc version 4k cause the xbox one version is 1080p gameplay. Unless your speaking of the cutscenes...

RedDevils3011d ago

But res does = to look better not by much, but noticeable.

badz1493011d ago

Res doesn't = graphics ?? LOL no wonder you guys praised the hell of the Xbone even when it was priced $100 more than the PS4 despite being weaker.

kraenk123010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

The considerable differences like resolution, frame rate, better AA and AF, better ambient occlusion (HBAO+) and extended tesselation are not easy to grasp in a highly compressed YouTube video.

The X1 version still looks pretty good.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3010d ago
vinniects3011d ago

must be getting old can't tell the the difference. sometimes the x1 looks darker in certain scenes.

headshotfrosty3011d ago

Both look great. PC a bit better obviously but considering the cost to own a PC that plays at Ultra or High settings with zero lag will cost way more than a x1. Side by side for the PC to have double the RAM and a much beefier processor, the X! holds it's own very well. There definitely isn't a MAJOR difference. A difference yes (I'd say 15-20% better) I'm sure framerate will be the biggest notice.

MadLad3011d ago

My PC that I built a fair while before the new consoles came out runs this fantastically.

How long are we going to argue cost of hardware?
Consoles nickle and dime you through their entire existence.

badz1493011d ago

And how long are we gonna argue nickle and diming of consoles to glorify pc gaming?

Sure you have to pay to play online now on both but the services come with free games monthly! Aside from F2P games or MMO, are Steam or Origin or uPlay or GoG give multiple free games too? No! It's no longer just about paying for online but building a backlog of games for members! Hate it all you want but free PS+ games have been keeping me happy and occupied and I still have loads of them just because I pay a mere $30.50 a year! That's right, our money is THAT pathetic right now, RM129 only equate to $30.50! NOTHING on pc can provide me with PS+ amount of contents on 3 platforms for a year. Humble Monthly Bundle might but I don't think its games are comparable to PS+!

There are places selling new releases for consoles for <$60 if you know where to look, most console game prices also dropped months after release and don't leave out the fact that you can trade in console games towards future purchases!

Look at it from all perspectives and you'll see that there are perks of console gaming too!

tee_bag2423011d ago

@badz149

How's paying for a service to play those games make it free? Enlighten me. They are rented at best. You stop paying that sub and guess what genius?

Oh yeah.. I downloaded DOTA2 this week for the first time to give it a try.. It was free. Left 4 Dead 2 was recently free too.
I also bought tombrraider on sale by selling me Steam trading cards too.. Umm.. Free, just from playing games.

But way to justify paying for something that has historically been free. Corporations love more chumps to make money off.

MadLad3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

@badz

PC gaming offers insane deals on games year around, being that it's an open market with multiple storefronts fighting for your dollar.

Something like PS+ offers you modest deals and, hopefully, a few older titles you may not have played at ... all for a monthly fee.
And let's just forget that online is hidden behind said pay wall.

And that whole dig at Humble just shows your own bias on the matter, despite the entire post being to go at me on mine.

Sorry.
I'll stick with PC gaming, where my dollar gets me a bit more.

nowitzki20043010d ago (Edited 3010d ago )

@badz

Yeah "free" games are great.. Just sucks when I decide to not renew my sub that I cant play those "free" games at all.... Build backlog? go see the free list of games available on PC... and when you get a PS5/X2 wheres ur backlog go?

bofuknjanglez3010d ago

@Badz Dude as someone above said hows that back log of rented games when ps5 6 or 7 come out. Shit pc is the master of backwards compatibility hell I can still play Quake from 1994 on my modern pc. Can you pop your PSX,ps2,ps3 games in your ps4 or does sony make you purchase to play again, aiding you in your money saving logic. The amout of money you save with pc over time is fantastic. And most of the time brand new day one on pc is always sub 60 with all the store fronts and markets competing for that money as said above. Green man gaming says hi!!! Oh and hows all those MODS on ps4/xbox1..............ps I have a PS4 but really its the wifes toy I use for the exclusive I cant touch on pc and that is about the only thing the ps4 out shines pc on but pc has its own exclusives to. ps4 screen bofojangles.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3010d ago
Show all comments (121)
70°

It’ll Be Fine, Right? Five Games With Unfortunate Release Strategies

Mark from WellPlayed writes about five game launches that were impacted by unfortunate scheduling.

Read Full Story >>
well-played.com.au
jznrpg355d ago (Edited 355d ago )

Zero Dawn sold really well so I’m not sure this belongs. The second game released next to a big game again and it hurt it some I forget what it was though, oh yeah Elden Ring .
But a good game is a good game to me I don’t care when they release personally but they do have to think about it when you want to get more people to buy it.

250°

The Tomb Raider Survivor Trilogy's Take on Lara Croft Deserved More Recognition

The Survivor Trilogy was a drastic reimagining of Lara Croft and Tomb Raider, and it provokes changes for the character that are truly fantastic.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
isarai468d ago (Edited 468d ago )

Deserves less IMO, i think the 1st in the new trilogy was a perfect 1st step for the new direction. The next 2 games were half steps at best. Not only that, every character in the series including Lara is just annoying and doesn't make sense in terms of motive, like yes they have a motive, but none of it seems proportional to the lengths they are willing to go through for it. The most annoying thing is every one of the games say "become the Tomb Raider" yet 3 games later and we're still not there? No thanks. Then there's the mess of the 3rd game, massive skill tree that serves almost no purpose as there's literally only like 3-4 short encounters in the whole game, and they took till the 3rd game to finally manage some decent puzzles even remotely close to previous games in the series. Nah, the trilogy infuriated me to no end as a long time fan of the series, i hope we get better going forward cause that crap sucked.

Army_of_Darkness466d ago

The first in the trilogy was my favorite. I thought they were going into the right direction with that one until the second one came out and seemed like a graphical downgrade but the gameplay was okay. As for the Third, Graphics were really nice but it was kinda boring me to death with its non-stop platforming and exploring with not enough action! Well, for me anyway...

DeathTouch466d ago

Graphics on the 3rd one were abysmal. It’s more colorful and has more variety, but everything else was a noticeable downgrade.

The more open world with NPC quests was also handled very poorly, to the point I missed Angel of Darkness.

thesoftware730466d ago

I know it is your opinion, but she did progress as a character in each game, she even got more muscular and seasoned.

That is the thing, people first complained that there was not enough platforming and actual tomb raiding in the first and second games. Shadow remedied that and kept the combat elements.

3-4 encounters? huh? did we play the same game? there was plenty of combat and, the skill tree did matter, like being able to hang enemies from trees, set explosives traps on bodies, being able to counter, and that are just a few of the combat skills. The skill tree also had things like being able to hold your breath underwater longer, crafting upgrades, zipline upgrade, and climbing upgrades that all changed how you can approach situations.

Not knocking your opinion, but we definitely had different experiences. I had 98% completion on the shadow.

SoulWarrior466d ago (Edited 466d ago )

Sorry but i'm with him about the low number of encounters, the game throws loads of weapons and skills you're way with a comparatively low amount of places to actually use them, so they felt under utilised.

-Foxtrot468d ago

Yeah...no

It was awful, for THREE GAMES it was "become the Tomb Raider" where she went back to square one after each game. Not to mention after a huge reaction of killing someone for the first time she then becomes Rambo straight after and goes on a slaughter spree without a single other reaction. Her development was all over the place.

She was whiney, weak and in later game a little arrogant and selfish

Oh and the voice actress compared to the previous ones was not as good

Lara Croft deserved better and while they are decent games as they are, we deserved actual Tomb Raider games, we could have had better survival games if they just stuck with the original Lara Crofts origin about her plane going down. Surviving 2 weeks in the Himalayas...I'd have liked to seen that, who knows what mystical threat she could have faced in the mountains or underground some secret concealed cave.

Tacoboto466d ago

I thought Shadow of the Tomb Raider had better gameplay than Rise, but it annoyed me the most of the trilogy when I stopped to think about the story.

It's like they deliberately decided to make her unlikeable and did nothing to make the character you're playing as likeable or have even one sign of humility.

SoulWarrior468d ago

2013 I thought was a fine entry, but Rise and especially Shadow were painfully mediocre follow ups imo, I really didn't like how selfish and angry her character was in those two.

Terry_B466d ago

No. Please forget the crap completely.

northpaws466d ago

First one was decent, played through it twice.
Second one was okay, played through it once.
Third one was really bad, tried twice a year apart, still can't get through the first two hours, it is just really bad.

thesoftware730466d ago

Honest question, what did you find bad about it? the opening 2 hrs of Shadow were fantastic imo.

The opening was very similar to the first 2, what did you find really bad?

Not looking for an argument, just an honest question.

Starman69466d ago

3rd one just didn't feel like a tomb raider game. Possibly because the development was passed to another development team. Big mistake! Microsoft killed tomb raider making the first game a timed exclusive. Never recovered after that.

Show all comments (45)
200°

Get three Tomb Raider games free at Epic Games Store

Starting today, Tomb Raider, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Rise of the Tomb Raider are free at Epic Games Store. The free game offers run until January 6 at 11 AM Eastern. Once you claim them, they’re yours to keep.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
CrimsonWing69847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

They're all solid games, but nothing quite matched the epicness of the first one for me. I think the 3rd one started off strong but once you got to that Peruvian area it took a massive nose dive for me.

lelo2play847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

You got to be kidding!
The first one was great at the time... but this latest trilogy of Tomb Raider games are also great.

LiViNgLeGaCY847d ago

I think he means the first one in the new trilogy.

CrimsonWing69847d ago

I meant the first of the new trilogy.

Furesis847d ago

yeah i remember liking the first one when it came out, so i tried the second one sometime after release and i just could not get into it, i couldn't finish it. So i might try the 3rd now that i got it for free but ehh. But i do remember enjoying the first one, i wonder if i'd feel the same way if i played it today? Better not taint those memories lol

ANIALATOR136846d ago

I was the same for some reason. Never finished the second one. I got like half way through maybe.

ActualWhiteMan846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

The first one of the latest trilogy is a masterpiece

Fishy Fingers847d ago

I'll take a copy of Shadow... Cheers.

Profchaos847d ago

Great games I've played them all on ps4 but it'll be good to finally try shadow on my rtx card.

Double_O_Revan847d ago

Trying to claim them and the store keeps crashing. lol.

gamefreaks365847d ago

EGS has been having issues all day.

RedDevils847d ago

Weird I don't has that issue.

Double_O_Revan847d ago

I finally got it after a while. But it was real bad for a while.

PeeShuter847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

Claim games by going to the website and login using ur credentials. I did the same as i couldnt use epic launcher. Also try reinstalling Epic Launcher I did it and it worked.

Double_O_Revan846d ago

I always go through the website. It was all just down for a while yesterday it seems.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 846d ago
Show all comments (19)