Capcom should return to the basics, but giving fans another remake is not the solution.
Resident Evil 0 is not a remake it's a remaster of an original Resident Evil game , and yes because not many people got to play this great game in 2002 , and calling the directors cut a remake and the 2002 version a remaster?
Sure. You're under no obligation to purchase it, but its there if you ever do have the itch.
Yes, we do. Some of us wanted it. Especially when Capcom's new ideas lead to stuff like Operation: Raccoon City and the upcoming multiplayer game. Also, it's a remaster. What they're doing to RE2 is a remake.
It's a solid game and not a lot of people owned a Gamecube. So yea, we did need this one.
No we don't, but this is all Capcom seems to be giving us. At least it is one of the better Resident Evil titles.. not like the garbage 5 or 6..
Well considering everything after 4 sucks my dong, yes. Crapcom cant seem to understand we want an actual RE game NOT a shooter with jump scares.
So does that make everything after 4 good or bad? We don't "need" any video games, we buy what we "want".
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.