770°

Hands-on with PS4's PlayStation 2 emulation

Digital Foundry:

It's been a long time since we first reported that classic PS1 and PS2 titles were heading to PlayStation 4, running under emulation. It's been so long in fact, that we began to wonder whether Sony had shelved the project. The company originally informed developers of the existence of the emulator at the same time it briefed them on the planned rollout for the PlayStation Now cloud service, way back in January 2014. Since then, the only hints at its existence came in the form of some telling PEGI game ratings, along with some sightings of PS2 classics appearing in shared media lists during the PS4 firmware 3.0 beta phase.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Neonridr3507d ago

It will be interesting to see the reaction around N4G if Sony suddenly allows PS1 or PS2 titles to work on the PS4 via their original discs considering how many articles arose questioning the need for 360 BC on the Xbox One.

Aloy-Boyfriend3507d ago

Considering most want PS3 BC, this if true wouldn't be much of a deal

SegaSaturn6693507d ago

The reason I want ps3 b/c is because downloading games on ps3 slow. I want the ps4 download/installation time for ps3 games.

Still though, ps2 and ps1 have amazing libraries. I hope we get them. I didn't expect the ps2 games to look this good. Surprising.

nX3507d ago

Who is most? The people I know can live without backwards compatibility. I for one neither have the time nor the old discs to make any use of it.

xHeavYx3507d ago

No one is saying that BC is not needed. It's a cool feature to have, but it's not a console seller feature like people want to believe it is.

garrettbobbyferguson3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Backwards compatibility is a console seller. The only reason I still have my PS3 is because I can go back and play my playstation 1 or 2 titles via an HDTV. If playing older games was not a system seller, or not even a big deal, we wouldn't have the constant remasters, we wouldn't have the emulation and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Not to mention; any consumer which isn't brain dead would be comparing features via each hardware. One has that extra feature that allows them to play more titles? Well that is a by definition a system selling point.

Backwards compatibility is in fact a big deal and I look forward to all the comments singing the praises if Sony ever implements it on the Playstation 4.

xHeavYx3507d ago

@Garret
"Backwards compatibility is a console seller"
What? If you buy a next gen console to play old games, then you are doing something wrong.
And no, we don't have constant remasters. We have a few remasters of acclaimed games.

_-EDMIX-_3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Yes and no. Like I've stated dozens of times. This is great for gamers, its not going to suddenly sell PS4's MORE because of it, not by huge millions anyway.

I friend of mine who has the bundle confirmed this to me that it was running PS2 as in the same way you play PS2 games on PS3 and he came to the conclusion that yes....PS4 is running the game as an emulation and not as a PS4 remaster or anything, as it wasn't ported or transferred the PS4 is playing a PS2 game, and not a PS2 game transferred to PS4......if that makes any sense lol

Now I have a pretty huge PS2 library in the small hundred and its actually the only library I have next to PC that is that large, but I've got lots of older titles on PSN through digital. My only consern is load times. On PS3, PS2 and PS1 games native on disk actually only have a slight bump in load times, so many titles I got digital even if I owned them.

Silly yes, but I wanted to play FFIX and thought just get the PSN version as it actually runs better then the disk version (I had scratches due to lending it to a former friend....notice I stated former) lol

That being said, my disk version didn't work clearly as good as digital version thus, I felt it made more sense to get it off of PSN. So I feel it would make sense for Sony to update PSN on PS4 to allow those PS2 and PS1 digital titles work on PS4, clearly with publisher blessing same as MS is currently doing right now.

I think its a nice move for them as PS1 and PS2 can easily be emulated compared to PS3.

Nice move for fans, won't move much units, but I'm pretty sure like MS, it wasn't intended to.

PSX will likely have the full confirmation of BC to PS1 and PS2.

@Bahamut- lol STOP! I have a HUGE pile of shame and your not making it grow even game you mention! lol!

I might start a game on DQ VIII now because of you.......thanks. I'm now going to just wait for the news of BC before I start a new game!

Bahamut3507d ago

That's what you think. I can't wait to pick up Dark Cloud 1 and 2, Rogue Galaxy, Suikoden 3 - 5, Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2, Dragon Quest VIII, and a few others. Haven't played those in forever!

TripleCs3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

@xHeavyx

I agree. I'm not saying it isn't a cool or great feature to have because it is is. There's no denying that but it definitely isn't a system seller. If it was the Wii U wouldn't be doing as poorly as it's doing. The Wii U might not be in first or second place but it definitely wouldn't be doing as poorly as it is now in terms of sales if backwards compatibility was indeed as system seller like people are making it out to be. I'm not saying everbody does this because there are people that are genuinely excited for the feature and have intentions of using it but a lot of people only hype the feature up not because they intend on using it but because console A isn't doing it while console B is doing it. The feature is mainly hyped up so it can be used as ammunition in console wars. That's all it is. Back when both consoles had backward compatibility you didn't get a million articles about it and the feature never got as much attention as it does now. If both the PS4 and Xbox One had the feature I can promise you that people wouldn't hype it up and it wouldn't get as much attention as it is now.

Again, it's a cool feature and it's a great feature and I'm definitely going to use the feature a bit to try it out but it's not that big of a deal to me. It's great that Sony is adding it but I don't care that much about backward compatibility. After I get a new console I rarely play my last gen consoles. I keep all my consoles and games and I never used it on the PS2 and I only used it like 3 times on the OG PS3. I can live without it. Whether they Sony added it or not I'm fine either way. The only reason I'd be happy that Sony is adding it is so we don't have constantly hear about it as much as we do now. I don't really play backwards compatibility, I play forwards compatibility. http://abload.de/img/testes...

starchild3507d ago

Speak for yourself. I would love if my PS4 could play my PS2 and PS1 games. Tenchu, Onimusha, Jak & Daxter, etc. Would be awesome. Technological convergence is fantastic. The fewer devices I have to have cluttering up my living space the better.

3507d ago
KiwiViper853507d ago

The back tracking has already started, I can't believe it, haha

BoriboyShoGUN3507d ago

I'd love it!! There are some serious classics I would love to play on the PS4. Gradius being one of them Gradius IV was sick!!!And I've seen it on the market for the PS3.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3507d ago

BC is like Shareplay...

Great to have, barely used.

KaZeDaRKWIND3507d ago

Like I care about anything on PS3

JasonKCK3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

XiKurapikaKurta Amazing you caught all the usual suspects in one comment.

How can anyone deny BC by saying "nobody wants it" when it's one of the most requested features on "every" console ever made?

Even back in the Nintendo/Sega days gamers were begging for cartridge adapters.

LOL @ people saying they don't want PS3 BC. PS1/PS2 perfectly ok but not PS3? You're only saying that because you have no other choice.

_-EDMIX-_3507d ago

@JasonKCK-"How can anyone deny BC by saying "nobody wants it" when it's one of the most requested features on "every" console ever made?"

Who? You can't just generalize everyone, this sounds more like you need to address that with a specific person that stated those contradictions.

"LOL @ people saying they don't want PS3 BC. PS1/PS2 perfectly ok but not PS3? You're only saying that because you have no other choice"

? Not really, consider many might not own a PS2, but more likely have a working PS3. PS2 and PS1 BC might be something they care about even more then PS3 BC as lots of good PS2 games haven't been played by many compared to games just last gen.

I can see how someone might want BC with something older like PS2 or PS1 as that might be missed by more then something as recent as PS3.

But thats just me, BC to anything it still good and you don't really know what console many might want for BC based on many reasons. I hear people asking for MS to go ahead with XB BC based on them saying they "might" which I think they will. Lots of good titles came to early XB, Fable 1, KOTOR 1 and 2, Conker Live and ReLoaded, Phantom Dust etc.

You can't just question every person that wants this as I'm pretty sure many might want PC to certain systems for different reasons. I don't doubt that many might want to play some PS2 games as I'm sure more have working PS3's out and about then working PS2 ready to be played.

I could be wrong, who knows.

Mulando3507d ago

Even if I want it (BC for PS2) I still think they are much to late with this feature. This should have been available for PS3 (so PS2 BC on PS3) and not only for the first PS3 gen. It shouldn't be that much of a problem to emulate the PS2 on the PS3. It may not be the fastest thing of the world, but PS2 BC now is just much to late. Most of the PS4 gamers never had a PS2 just because they are to young. Most of them wouldn't even play a PS2 game if they even can't play xbox one games when they are slightly reduced in resolution

well that said, PS2 BC is just to late. PS3 BC would be phenomenal but that just isn't possible, just via PS Now.

moparful993507d ago

@Mulando The PS3 had backwards compatability with PS2 games but everyone wined and complained about the consoles price despite being the most robust and feature packed console. So Sony started chopping features and BC got the ax. We basically told Sony "We dont want BC" so they left it out of the PS4 and now those some people are carrying on about how sad it is that Sony hasnt done BC. Even Microsoft admitted how difficult and costly the feature was to implement. Give Sony a break. I personally dont care about BC, all the games I cared about got remasters and not only look better but pkay better.

UltraNova3506d ago

I find it funny that most comments are from Xbox fans instead of PS fans.

Why is that? Hmmm

Personally speaking, BC is not needed we have more than enough current games to play plus I have all my previous consoles ready to 'fight'at a moments' notice should nostalgia kicks in.

Granted for some people this is a big deal.

But one thing's for sure, BC is no system seller at this point in time since most current gen future/potential buyers have probably already made their minds since they probably played everything they wanted to play from last gen, considering the 2 year drought ps3/xbox experienced.

Army_of_Darkness3506d ago

It's pretty cool that the ps4 emulator improves the resolution, reduces jaggies and doubles the frame-rate from 30fps to 60fps! very nice.
All I'm looking forward too playing and actually completing this time is Dragon quest 8 and Rouge galaxy :-)

t-hall7853506d ago

Sony: "Backwards compatibility isn't possible on the PS4...for free."

Kombatologist3506d ago

Just because backward compatibility isn't a system seller to one person doesn't mean it wouldn't be to another. Some of us have invested a lot of money on previous generations. To have access to those libraries on a current gen console without having to purchase those titles again is a plus in my book.

VforVideogames3506d ago

Here comes another 200dlls a month subscription.

BeefCurtains3506d ago

LOL: PS4 pushing BC, and suddenly it's a "nice to have" feature again.

Sitdown3506d ago

@Kombatologist,
Exactly, if one person purchases it because of backwards comparability, then by default it is a system seller. I purchased the 60gb PS3 early on because of reports that the revision would take out some of the backward compatibility features. Some people will go ahead and trade their 360 in if they know they can still play their particular games on the Xbox one; exorbitant since games with gold for the 360 can be played on the Xbox one. This played a part in why I went with the Xbox one version of Fallout 4.

donthate3506d ago (Edited 3506d ago )

BC is great news for PS4. I just hope we can use old PS2 discs in it and not be forced to buy the games again if we already own it. I hope PS1 BC also comes.

The backtracking though, is epic! :D

+ Show (23) more repliesLast reply 3506d ago
Genuine-User3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

As far as I'm aware, I haven't come across anyone that has questioned the need for BC rather its impact on sales.

PS2 emulation was rumoured quite a while back.

On-topic: This is exactly what I had in mind for PS2's emulation on PS4. Better resolution, frame-rate, Anti aliasing and trophy support.

uth113507d ago

exactly the argument is more whether BC is a game-changing feature 2-years in, not whether it's completely worthless.

Aloy-Boyfriend3507d ago

I remember a parent that was leaked online where it showed trophy support for old games (PS1 and PS2)

GordonKnight3506d ago

BC isn't a system seller, but it could be the final factor in the decision of what console to purchase. Anyone without a new console and is on the fence on what console to purchase take BC into consideration.

timmyp533507d ago

it's neither game changing or worthless. it's just fan service really.

WildArmed3507d ago

Yup, I'd use it here and there. But definitely won't be switching to a PS2-only library for my PS4 lol

PSX games I play on my vita might see more love since I might want to switch between a tiny and large screen. Though the PSTV has got that covered now for the most part.

Atomicjuicer3507d ago

Remote play would be game changing

Wallstreet373507d ago

What would be so interesting? Here you guys go with the conspiracy theory narrative. Most comments ive seen go like this "bc is an option and that is good but it is not necessary, nor it is a system seller" Ps3 fat had bc and many didnt use it (i used it maybe three times its lifetime).

Hperbole is going around saying "omg this is a system seller" when to most it is not, nor do most care.

KyRo3507d ago

I don't know anyone, even die hard gamers who use BC more than a few times. I had a BC PS3 but it just made you realise how awsome the PS3 was and how terrible the previous PS consoles had aged both in terms of graphics and gameplay mechanics.

Me-Time3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

I can't agree nor disagree. This isn't a gamechanger. All I need to do is buy a remote and maybe a power cable for my PS2 to start playing them again. Even then, I'm not a huge gamer (constantly playing games and all) but I would consider myself more into PS1 than PS2. IDK, I think most don't care, but most people aren't huge gamers (nor do I think Most People would prefer PS1 BC over PS2).

I still own a PS3 to play PS1 games and I still think would love for the PS4 to be backwards compatible with PS1 and PS2 games. If anything, Sony should go with PS2 classics in the PS Store since it's been confirmed BC isn't possible on the PS4; was it Shu who let us know?

Why o why3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Slight retcon but I get what you were trying to say. . I've seen many people add last gens games via bc to their 'reasons they prefer' lists. I've also heard 'game changer' and 'console seller' tied to bc on the x1.

Not gunna lie. . There were some who hated on it like it's not a good feature and I don't agree with that. An option is usually always better than no option at all plus I don't like when people use the term 'need' to discredit something they more often than not, don't have. Despite that, the consensus was it wasn't any of the above. Nice try though. .

starchild3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Well, I'm not gonna lie, one of the reasons I love the PC platform is because of the extensive backwards compatibility going back decades. It IS a big deal to me, in any platform. I use it all the time on my PC.

moparful993507d ago

Sony had BC in the PS3 and most scoffed at the console, even crying foul despite Sony taking large losses on every console sold for several years. This taught them that BC is not a desired feeature, they leave BC out of the PS4 and a lot of people are acting like Microsft forged a revolutionary idea. Just irks me how much Fanboys mo e the goalposts in respect to their preffered console..

X-233507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Probably going to be thought of as condescending to say this or something, but I'm sorry. Xbox360's gaming library doesn't hold a candle to the types of games that where available in the PS2's era and neither does the PS3.

Personally I would be excited just because of the ability to play several old RPG's I used to love or missed out on in the PS2 era.

Alot of people consider The PS2 and Dreamcast era a golden age for good games.

It's not something that's needed; as I've always stated, but it's a welcome addition. Especially for the PS2, if it was PS3, meh...could take it or leave it and I don't really consider this being a game changer or something that is going to impact sales, but you better believe if I can play some PS2 games on my PS4 I'll be happy.

SeanScythe3507d ago

all i would like it for is my old singstar PS2 games. They have so many songs from PS2 that wasn't carried over to the PS4 and I don't know why.

N4GGuy243507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

It will be amazing to have PS1 / PS2 / PS3 disc based backward compatibility on PS4. Just imagine a history of PlayStation under your TV in one box.

Do you guys remember PS1 games on PS2 had few settings in the settings menu to allow smoother visuals. Although some were fairly noticable and others not so much. But nowadays we have games that are upscaled and re-released.

kraenk123507d ago

PS3 won't happen..ever...sadly.

bleedsoe9mm3507d ago

as long as it works with discs and not just rebuys on psn , it will be awesome

Fez3506d ago

It would be so anti-consumer if Sony don't make this work with discs. Entirely pointless if you have to rebuy games you already own.

mechlord3507d ago

Who cares.
FFXII, Shin Megami Tensei Nocturne, Persona 3:FES, im waiting first for you girls :)

Spotie3507d ago (Edited 3506d ago )

Questioning the IMPORTANCE, not the need. And even then, the point was that it wasn't a game-changing system-seller. Not that the feature wasn't good or appealing or anything like that.

Somehow, though, too many people have taken that to mean "Nobody cares," rather than "This won't push a bunch of console sales."

Edit: Can you make an argument without hyperbole?

Who claimed "all Xbox fans" said it was a system seller? I don't recall ever seeing that. Not to mention Xbox fans were claiming BC was big enough to win E3.

Who's changed their tune? As far as I've seen, people are saying about this exactly what they said about the XB1: it's nice, but not a game changer.

Yeah, when Xbox fans are claiming that BC is gonna close the gap, when they're saying it was a better announcement than ANY game at E3, when they act like EVERY 360 game is coming to BC, when all they can do is misrepresent PSNow to try and make the XB1's BC look better, they NEED to be brought down to earth.

Or are you gonna act like none of that happened? I imagine you could say "Prove it," yet I never see you proving your claims. Ironic, isn't it? Now that you're claiming hypocrisy by certain people, you don't have a single example to back up what you say.

gangsta_red3506d ago

I think the real issue was a lot of people where ONLY questioning the importance because it was featured on the competing console.

That is why we saw this group in every Xbox One article trying to downplay the feature, over-exaggerate and say how all Xbox fans claimed it was a system seller and other points like one comment I read that said they were there just to bring Xbox fans down to earth (funny right?).

It is funny to see this feature coming to PS4 and the usual culprits now having to bite their tongues because they spent so much time s***tting on it. Now we get to read how nice it is to have but how no one will ever use it.

gangsta_red3506d ago (Edited 3506d ago )

Talks about hyperbole then goes on to say Xbox fans claimed BC was big enough to win E3.

Could you please stop using that term that you read others write and decided to fly with it, because you're doing it yourself.

"...they NEED to be brought down to earth."

*sigh*, more exaggerations and hyperbole(ha) from you Spotie. But I'm glad that you feel it's your job to go around and bring these Xbox fans down to Earth. Keep fighting that good fight!

"yet I never see you proving your claims."

Lmao, you sure do bark a lot out here in the comment section spotie. I guess you forgot all those PM's where I did prove it to you and I got not one reply back about it. I even asked you to give me just one link in return when you were doing your own "hyperbole"(ha) and again you were strangely quiet.

Sparta073507d ago

This is nice i guess, but I won't use it. People buy next Gen consoles to play next Gen games.

ashcroft3506d ago

Except the PS3 gen and this gen is a disappointment. Rehashes, day 1 patches, ripped out content into paid dlc.

There's more content on a ps1 and ps2 than a current gen game.

Some people like to play their retro games. Some even bought the nvidia shield to play emulators with high quality graphic filters to enjoy their games on their HDTVs

Retro gaming is a thing and it's a great thing to have, the option to have BC is a must for people who like games other than Call of Duty and first person shooters.

It sounds like you don't know much or even care about retro gaming, so obviously this subject is going over your head, but for many who have built a collection, BC is important.

Godmars2903507d ago

In what regard?

PSfanboy showing hypocrisy for BC making the PS4 worth buying, or Xbox fans still holding no PS3 BC over the other camp's head?

For me it would be a nice thing to happen, reason not to buy a new PS2 with the current one just dying, but still have to wait and see if its going to be physical or DDL as well as piecemeal because of licensing issues.

frostypants3507d ago

I have a PS4 and I could not care less about this BC stuff.

3507d ago Replies(1)
nitus103507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

All PS3's can play PS1 game disks so adding this capability to the PS4 would be a nice feature.

I do have an original PS3 that plays PS2 games as well and having the same capability on the PS4 would be another reason for me to purchase one.

As for BC for PS3 games it would be nice but because of the architectural differences between the PS3 and PS4 I doubt we will get an emulator.

It may be possible to get a PS3 image that is specifically translated to run on the PS4 but requiring a PS3 disk to be inserted to play, however I doubt we will see this happen.

Actually the question to as is "would you play PS1 and PS2 games on your PS4?". My answer would be "yes" since I have 30 PS1 and over 60 PS2 games, however I would only play them for nostalgia reasons preferring mainly to play current generation games.

divinealpha3507d ago

Me and you both man the hypocrisy will rise

DarXyde3507d ago

I find Xbox One backwards compatibility to be nice, but don't care for it but I do care about PS2/PSOne backwards compatibility on PS4. I'm not shy about saying that either. I simply have no need for it on last gen platforms. My PS3 and X360 are still hooked up in my bedroom. PS2 is a much bigger deal to me than Xbox 360 and since that was arguably Microsoft's greatest platform,I see the enjoyment behind it, but don't really feel the need to jump on it. Now if the Xbox 360 was from 2 generation's ago, I'd say it's great because odds are, it wouldn't be hooked up. PS2 which many would argue was Sony's greatest console being brought to PS4 would be huge.

stuna13507d ago

This would be right up my alley considering I still have 450 PS2 games boxed up in my basement! Is it a game changer? No, but the option would be nice.

pinkyxyz3507d ago

I personally want backward compatibility because of all of the ps1 and ps2 classics that I purchased on PSN. Pesona 3 and 4 are waiting for me. :)

3507d ago
babadivad3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Not trying to be a troll or anything but this doesn't interest me at all. There are GREAT ps2 emulators on PC that can run games better than the original systems. If Sony allowed PS3 emulation on PS4 though!?!? I would blow a gasket!! Just playing Ni No Kuni or Tales of Graces without having to find space for my PS3 would be HEAVEN! MAKE THIS HAPPEN SONY!!

UKmilitia3507d ago

doesnt bother me.
i wanted ps3 backwards compat and they forcing to psnow for that when MS has done it from disc.
i kinda move on with a new gen and leave rest to memories of greatness.
i dont think it will sell systems because it isnt like people are on ps2 consoles waiitng for it so they can make the jump.

paul-p19883506d ago

Tbh I would like the option, but it's NOT a system seller that MS are making out.

I would LOVE to play a load of the PS2 games I own on my PS4 (and a few PS1 games too), but it would probably only be for about an hour or so a YEAR inbetween playing new PS4 games. I used the backwards compatibility on my launch PS3 for about a week when I first got it as I was part way through MGS3, but this was played inbetween bouts of Resistance Fall of Man. When the PS3 games picked up I rarely used it, and the masses are most likely going to be the same.

TL:DR, great feature that not many of us will use that much, if at all, but nice to have the option and certainly not a system seller!

mark_parch3506d ago

I got the impression ps4 owners didn't want to play old games at least that's what they said when Microsoft announced backwards compatability

Neonridr3506d ago

yep, it was constantly brought up that they want new consoles to play next gen games.

I always think that BC is a great feature, no it's not necessary, but it's always a welcome addition.

babadivad3506d ago

Well you should've known that was a lie. Been playing more PS3 remakes than actual PS4 games. *I kid. . . Sorta*

BallsEye3506d ago

emulating ps3 would be awesome, emulating ps2 is a complete waste. How many of us still have ps1 and ps2 discs?

RosweeSon3506d ago

I very much doubt they'll bother with disc use. They'll just allow all the PSN downloads from PS3 be usable on ps4 and put them up on the store I would have thought especially as they didn't with PS3 games and just made psNow instead. Sony going digital?

RosweeSon3506d ago

I personally feel this will happen however I reckon Sony will do it digitally like they had all the ps1/2 classics on PS3 and just make them available on ps4? This is great news I haven't played some on these games for 10-15 whereas being an ex Xbox 360 user (still own it just doesn't get used) I wouldn't wanna go out an buy a new system just to play Xbox 360 games that I've been playing for the last 9-10 years as I owned a 360 pretty much from day one. It's a great option to have of course like Wii U allowed original Wii discs from day 1 but when I've been using the Xbox 360 games for the last 9-10 years anyway and I could just play them on my 360 it's not as big a deal for me on Xbox one as it is on ps4 as ps1/2 classics would be Amazing, I use my a vita for ps1 classics but if we can get them on ps4 brilliant not played majority for minimum of 10 years and the ps2 back catalogue was absolutely fantastic hence why the console sold 100 million plus.
Hey ho sure this decision announcement will cause some oh well when Xbox did it meh but now Sony are doing it wahey but it's just more exciting on ps4 for me as I had the Xbox 360 for 10 years I don't just want an updated revision for my next console hence why I went ps4/Wii u not looked back since.

BG115793506d ago (Edited 3506d ago )

It won't work with all the original disks. The PS4 can't read CDs, only Bluray disks and probably DVD...

lowkey100113506d ago

I suppose they had to put out something considering how good the X1/360 backward compatibility has taken off competition is good for everyone. On a side note xbox 360 servers are still up and I can play online with my 360 buddies. Are any ps2 servers still running?

BG115793506d ago

PS2 servers? Did the PS2 had online games. Apart from the Metalgear Online game, I can't remember any other games.

lowkey100113506d ago

@bg11579 killzone,socom 2, starwars battlefront etc.... just to name a few. Believe it or not I had alot of fun back in the day playing the first killzone online.

+ Show (26) more repliesLast reply 3506d ago
timmyp533507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

. I'm going to stay on the side of the skepticism. I see sony opening up the market for remasters for old games with trophy support for a price but not straight up BC. I'll be pleasantly surprised otherwise.

Genuine-User3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

That's fine by me. I don't have any of my PS2 games anymore.

I don't think many do. Just an intuitive feeling.

Lukejrl3507d ago

i have a ton. some will be worth alot later. but for now i cant wait to dive into to xenosaga again. and my ps3 is dying fan is getting much louder it is almost 10yrs old bc compatible one, so when i get a new one it needs it won't have bc anymore.

Imalwaysright3507d ago

I have them. Never sold any of my games.

_-EDMIX-_3507d ago

@Luke- OH YEA! I just played Onimusha 2 and Killer 7 a few months back on my PS2, after I put it back in the box and like a day after beating them, I was playing the Xenoblade X japanese import at a friends house and we were talking about Xenosaga and I was like "Damn...now I have to take it out again"

lol.

Xenosaga will be a nice playthough, along with Onimusha 3 and Dawn Of Dreams. Some nice old PS2 games lol.

DarXyde3507d ago

I do. I get too sentimental thinking about how great PS2 was. Honestly, it is my favorite console of all time. This is probably sad to say, but PS2 basically raised me lol. Dark Cloud 1 and 2, MGS2 and 3, Devil May Cry 1 and 3, Persona 3 and 4, Onimusha, Kingdom Hearts, Final Fantasy X, Ratchet and Clank, Jak and Daxter, Resident Evil Outbreak, Crash Bandicoot, the good Need for Speed games, etc., etc., etc.

It was sincerely a magical time to be a gamer. PS2 to me in my teens was basically what Disney was to kids in the 90s: you grow up and the love never stops. I would never turn in my PS2 collection.

Sounds radical, but I have an unwavering love of that thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3507d ago
Eonjay3507d ago

Sorry but the 'Accessing 8MB memory card' kinda gives it away. Its emulation not a remaster.

_-EDMIX-_3507d ago

...Sony doesn't own every PS2 or PS1 game though. They don't even own the game being shown right now.

Its more likely its BC to PS1 and PS2 as its unlikely anyone is going to be buying PS1 or PS2 games just for trophies. Its more likely PS1 and PS2 support through emulation.

I'm not sure why you would even say that considering MS is doing emulation of 360 and not merely for achievement support or for "remasters' as that isn't what BC is...

A remaster has nothing to do with emulation. Nothing...

Resident Evil Zero is being remastered, its a Gamecube game, being made for PS3,PS4, XONE, 360 and I believe PC.

...it has nothing to do with emulation. Your saying they are emulating PS2, to allow remasters? What? PS4 has remasters of PS3, Gamecube games etc, it doesn't have emulation of either system.

I think your confused on what emulation is bud. To seek to sell those games over again, is actually not to seek emulation as it means the system itself is being EMULATED, it allows the FUNCTION of a PS2, PS1 etc to be supported on PS4.

That is like saying for Resident Evil Zero to work on PS4, they need to have Gamecube emulation...

Maybe you don't' fully understand what a remaster is lol

Neonridr3506d ago

unfortunately going that route means us gamers having to pay again for these older titles. But I guess it's not much different than say Nintendo titles on the VC.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3506d ago
UserNameIsNotTaken3507d ago

Can't wait to play tenchu wrath of heaven again!
Yes, i like ps2 emulation because i dont have my ps2 again :[

timmyp533507d ago

For all we know a couple of PS2 games are wrapped in an emulator. This isn't exactly confirmation that a universal BC like PS3 had is incoming.

timmyp533507d ago

We all do brother. Believe™

starchild3507d ago

Wow, another Tenchu fan. I just mentioned in a comment up above how I'd love to be able to play the Tenchu games on my PS4. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins and Tenchu 2: Birth of the Stealth Assassins from PS1 and Wrath of Heaven and Fatal Shadows from PS2....all of them are awesome games for me.

Btw, when are we going to get a new Tenchu game on PS4? That would be amazing. One can dream...

iceman063507d ago

Add ME to the list too!!! Tenchu was an amazing game. It had it's flaws, just like any other game. But, at the core, it was really great. I wish someone would just take on the franchise and give it a go. Imagine what could be done now with the map editor!?!

Hoffmann3507d ago

Thanks a lot at the developers of PCSX2. Their emulator rendered backwards compatibility of PS2 games completely obsolete.

Hold_It3507d ago

@Hoffmann

Bubble up for well said

Elit3Nick3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Agreed, being able to play old games at multiplied resolutions and with updated shaders is amazing. You need a beast computer to run PCSX2 at a stable 60fps, my laptop with a GT540M couldn't do it, but my R9 390 rig handles it no problem :D

Hoffmann3507d ago

Well it depends from game to game of course. For some like Samurai Warriors or Tekken 5 you really need a better machine but many others, especially the 2d ones like Disgaea or Guilty Gear run on older hardware as well.

And damn..Final Fantasy XII looks amazing with the bigger resolution

vanity293507d ago

I could play some games at 60fps with intergrated graphics. And i still cant play Dirge of Cerberus on my Rig lol

Elit3Nick3507d ago

I only played GT4 on both, since it's one of the PS2's most demanding games it would explain why my laptop couldn't run it smoothly. I'll definitely add Shadow of the Colossus to replay and try Ace Combat 5 for the first time.

Blastoise3507d ago

Well if that were true it wouldn't be one of the most requested features on the blogs and this article wouldn't have got to 300 heat in 20 minutes.

Hoffmann3507d ago (Edited 3507d ago )

Its just that the most of us don't even know that there is an emulator like that. Others believe everything emulator related could be illegal or they simply don't want to go through the "hassle" to configurate the software.

3507d ago Replies(1)
Stringerbell3507d ago

Once I was running Rogue Galaxy at 1080 60fps I never looked back.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3507d ago
DivineAssault 3507d ago

I remember that patent being filed thinking it was for PS3 but i guess they were thinking way further ahead.. I hope they make as many ps1-ps2 titles available as possible down the line w trophies.. I didnt think it was going to happen because of psnow but im glad something is getting worked out

Show all comments (196)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted2d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast2d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay2d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted2d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34852d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK2d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)
340°

Sony PS5 Era Profits Soar Past $13 Billion, Outpacing All Prior PlayStation Generations

Sony’s PS5 era has generated over $13 billion in profits, surpassing the combined earnings of PS1–PS4, with $136 billion in sales.

Read Full Story >>
inspire2rise.com
lukasmain8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Their recent Playstation revenue is also more than Xbox and Switch combined, obviously in large part due to 3rd party sales.

Christopher8d ago

I mean, if Sony is keeping third parties happy, kind of feels like a winning method.

GamingExplained1017d ago

I mean they have to, since they have 2 exclusives anyone cared about this generation, and those are now on PC. The rest is this creatively bankrupt string of remakes and remasters, taking advantage of the creativity of developers past efforts, and laying off teams creative side since all that work has been done already by previous teams.

By far the least creative generation ever.

lukasmain7d ago

@ Gaming-NEW-Troll account

"those are now on PC"

In that case. Xbox is Playstation's competition. MS have ZERO exclusives. ZERO. Nothing. Nada. Not a single exclusive.

Playstation has Astrobot. Demon's Souls, Astrobot Playroom, Gran Turismo 7, still not going to PC. They got Death Stranding 2 coming out in 3 days, NOT ON PC. Ghost of Yotei, not on PC.

That is 6 real exclusives MORE than Microsoft. Microsoft's Xbox is Playstation's competition. So lets compare.

I mean you brought it up.

Or does being "creatively bankrupt" not count when you have certain console exclusives going to PC years after they were released? In that case Returnal. Ratchet And Clank. Spiderman. Miles Morales. Silent Hill 2. And the list goes on

IRetrouk7d ago

Kinda always been that way if you look at previous gens, exclusives are important but they aint the main revenue generator.

Reaper22_7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

.While that is impressive. Microsoft made 13 billion in one quarter. Making up facts doesn't make them true.

Mmmkay7d ago

microsoft is not xbox. a bot should know that by now. you have been told this bs 1000 times on this site alone.

OlderGamer177d ago

Yeah Microsoft but Xbox on the other hand.....

Aloymetal7d ago

Your defense of Microsoft is only highlighting Lord Phil's and the lame MS mismanagement. Since you're talking about MS as a whole, imagine having trillions in the bank and still losing to ''tiny'' Sony PS and Ninty. It doesn't get any more lame than that.

Christopher7d ago

If what Microsoft made as a whole was all that mattered, we would still have Windows Phones and Zunes. I would love to see Xbox' operating profits. Love to see it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
thorstein7d ago

I prefer Playstation over Xbox when it comes to consoles but how does this news justify their layoffs?

Shane Kim7d ago

But the execs brother. You got to think about them. How could they otherwise buy yet another mansion and yacht?

raWfodog7d ago

People are generally paid for the work they are doing. Layoffs generally occur when there is no work for them to do (project cancelled, business slowing down, etc). I’ve been laid off from two jobs during my 40+ years of working so I know about these things. A company is not going to just keep paying people if there is no work for them to do, no matter how much profits they made.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
MIDGETonSTILTS177d ago

And this is why the game output for ps5 has been a tad slower…

1) they needed to be… games take longer to develop, and they’d burn out their teams trying to maintain the same pace as ps3.

2) they can afford to… games cost more than ever to push boundaries, so Sony had to figure out a way to match Xbox’s clever profit strategies in order to afford to continue to innovate and take risks.

lukasmain7d ago

So much time was wasted on those Live Service shits. Glad they learned their lesson and have scaled that way back. Still haven't killed it, but I like it being in the background and not at the forefront

MIDGETonSTILTS177d ago

Honestly, I love Helldivers 2 so much that I can forgive them for over investing in GaaS. At least they got one gem from the endeavor.

And I still dream of Factions releasing one day.

I don’t hate GaaS inherently, most are just implemented poorly.

Reaper22_7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

@ s2killinit

Thats xbox which includes other services. The playstion division also includes other services as well. Its mostly playtion but not all playstation. What's up with all the double standards around here.

Chevalier7d ago

Yeah double standards like some idiots who got to talk about unrelated profits as a talking point. Wish those damn parrots could stay on topic with game related profits.

Next thing these idiots will talk about is something unrelated like Nintendo made more off the Mario movie than all of Xbox studios TV/movie endeavors combined you know?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...

7d ago
Deathdeliverer7d ago

@Chevalier

Mind you that’s only AFTER buying all those other companies adding them to the revenue. It was a LOT lower. This is Activision, Bethesda, and others COMBINED to get that number.

“The sales of windows professional on the other hand trounces god of war sales” 😂

Reaper22_7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

All you did was prove that you dont know what revenue is. Tencent is no.1 in profits. Buts that's ok because unlike Tencent and Microsoft, Sony isn't in it for the money, right.🤔

pwnmaster30007d ago

That’s what Xbox fanboys do. They’ve been doing this since Xbox one.

They will use all of MS, one of the biggest company in the world and play it like every dollar they earn comes from Xbox just to one up PlayStation.
Is actually pretty sad.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
Chevalier7d ago

"Mind you that’s only AFTER buying all those other companies adding them to the revenue. It was a LOT lower. This is Activision, Bethesda, and others COMBINED to get that number."

Guys we're off topic here you know? Can someone bring us back on topic and tell us how much revenue Xbox studios does for movies and TV? Pretty sure we should also discuss how much Nintendo stands to make at Universal studios on Nintendo land and the rides should be a hot ticket this summer.

"Ouch! hahaha no wonder reaper wanna hide behind profits made by windows XD"

Yeah idiots with some sort of inferiority complex needs to get their win somewhere though. But wait shouldn't we get back on topic guys? Like seriously how much money do you think Fallout Season 2 will bring in?!

Reaper22_7d ago

Nah, reaper's not hiding behind anything. I'm just pointing out some facts. At first the narrative was Microsoft isn't going to make the money back from the ABK deal to now their profits wouldn't be as high if they didn't get the deal. This very topic is part of the reason why the deal was secured. Sony's dishonesty and reluctance to tell the truth about how much money they're making and lying about how much this deal would hurt their business. That strategy failed. They're are making a lot of money. No doubt about it and its good for the industry but don't get butthurt when Microsoft post their profits and you guys see they are also making a lot of money as well.

CrashMania7d ago

@reaper.

Microsoft don't reveal Xbox profits, sales numbers, or gamepass numbers, I wonder why that is?

You call Sony dishonest but at least they don't hide and obfuscate meaningful playstation numbers like MS do with Xbox.

IRetrouk7d ago

Reaper stop lol, only one company hides that info and it ain't sony....

Chevalier7d ago

"All you did was prove that you dont know what revenue is."

Nah all you did was confirm you're an idiot.

Reaper22_7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

You seem to be fluent in idiocy. Not everyone speaks it. So next time speak slowly and clearly so we all can understand. Getting emotional doesn't really make you smarter. Before you post a link with info make sure you know what it says.🫡

Chevalier7d ago

"Nah, reaper's not hiding behind anything. I'm just pointing out some facts"

🤡 What facts? 🤣

Please share with everyone your idiocy

What does Xbox make in revenue and profit? What are their sales? How much money does Gamepass cost them? Oh right you got ZERO numbers to post.

"Before you post a link with info make sure you know what it says."

Says the idiot who can't even tell the difference between Microsoft and Xbox? Lmao. Seriously all you're showing everyone again is how much of an uninformed parroting idiot you are.

But go ahead and post your evidence! Oh right again ZERO from a ZERO. Absolutely 💯 hilarious to see you stumble like the idiot you are.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
Npugz77d ago

Only because of games prices otherwise it’s the worst generation in PlayStation history especially for games

Reaper22_7d ago

Thats true. The article did mention game and prices were a reason. Its also shows their greed is no different than Microsoft. Laying off all those people but yet bragging about profits and still tried to stop ABK deal. What the hell!

MatrixxGT7d ago

Closing studios, layoffs, leadership changes, PS plus increases, multiple game cancellations and delays, total flops like concord. Slowest release of first party games of any generation and they just shut down PS stars I guess because it was costing to much.
Yet they announce record profits…..the greed here is insane, MS and Nintendo too. All of them milking gamers and we just keep lapping it up like a blood hound for a meal.
Them tariffs are really hitting them hard I see.

Deathdeliverer7d ago

Well a part of running a business is a tight grip on that P&L sheet. In project management. It’s a known fact that the farther into a project you go, the more costly the corrections. Having something reach the definition of done, the end of the road, and it’s hated is a monumental loss of money. As games are usually made iteratively it’s like how was this not caught and course corrected several times before this point. Sony is definitely known as trusting and allows teams to make the games they want to make. They “trust the process”. The caveat to that big budget and freedom is if it bombs, especially if it’s your first game, you’re outta there. They have shareholders/stakeholders to keep happy. Where as normally a done game like Concord would give ROI as it was out in the wild. The cost of the project is recouped and turned into profit or delivered whatever value they wanted. If the game is now NOT coming out, how do they get that money back and stay profitable? By not paying wages for that team over a course of time that would have still been on payroll working on the next potential bomb, DLC for a dead game, and essentially costing more money.
It sadly isn’t greed, it’s business. They release these great profits because 1) it’s enticing for more stakeholders to invest, and 2) Despite failures they are still balancing the books and turning record setting profits.
How many live service games died at various stages of development? They are still this profitable? Imagine if the games came out and were hits to add onto the profits?

Christopher7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

So, you're saying that over $10B of this is from $10 to $20 software price increases? Zero to do with increased market reach? Massive MTX from third-party games?

Vithar7d ago

where are the "Sony is in trouble" sayers? LOL

Chevalier7d ago

They're talking about Microsoft quarterly profits like any true gamer would be doing.

Aloymetal7d ago

Oh, that's coming, it's a mandatory thing just wait for next gen and you'll see infinite articles from the shills and the green fanbase saying ''tHiS GeN WiL Be dIfFerEnT''

stonecold37d ago

over twitter xbox fanboy you tube are saying saying sony is broke cant afford warner bros.

Show all comments (72)
100°

PlayStation The Concert Announces U.S.Tour Dates

The tour is coming to the states as new dates have been revealed.