200°

Fallout 4: Here’s How To Toggle Multithreading On PC And Improve Performance

Fallout 4 users might face some performance issues on PC resulting in inconsistent performance for the game. It turns out that one of the issue regarding performance relates to the disabled multithreading for Fallout 4, even if we manually tweak the ini file. There is another way to enable multithreading though, and that can be accomplished by using console commands on PC.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Grap3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

I really dunno why this game get pass for $hitty port.
i know it's not game breaking but my 970 should get better than sub 60fps and i know the problem isn't in my end or 970, cpu bottleneck all over again.

DragonbornZ3464d ago

Has it been getting one? I've read that a lot of people love the game, but they've been pretty damn critical of the performance.
Then again I haven't read reviews really, just forums n what not.

Grap3464d ago

the game is great, but it's the old Bethesda game"broken at release" oh well at least not a lot of game breaking bugs .

Doodleburger3464d ago

I have a 970,and i'm at a constant 60 until i hit a big city, then it drops to 55. Sounds like your system sucks. Learn to keep it clean and optimized, quit blaming games.

traumadisaster3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

That wasn't fair. Although he needs to do as you say, games and drivers are potentially to blame. As well as we don't know his cpu.

Maybe try helping by listing your ways to keep the system "clean."

reversial3464d ago

That could be the case, but that's not the issue here. In this day in age games should be multi-threaded. Especially when you consider that the consoles CPU's took a "go-wide" approach, having many cores with relatively low clock speeds. Developers should have enough experience with multi-threading now, as it is probably the most important part of getting a game to run well on the consoles.

Grap3464d ago

dude my PC is very clean i have i5 cpu which cause the problem go check their forums, the game is not very good optimized especially for i5 owners. even 60fps locked is not that great for this game, the game isn't an eye candy.

reversial3464d ago

Yeah, I agree wit you Grap. This stuff is getting old. I remember when Skyrim was hardly playable due to micro-stuttering. Bethesda's games suffer from the same set of issues every time.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3464d ago
ninjahunter3464d ago

I pass it as a bad port because the frame-rate is bound by your ram speed. Which has been the case in virtually no game in the past 10+ years. You could be running a 980 and an i7 and this game could still run at 45fps if you arent running decent quality ram.

Grap3464d ago

Yah when CPU is a bottleneck faster ram could help a lot. that's why you see big boost when you have faster ram.

Reefskye3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

Weird I have a 770 and older 2600k i7 and 8gb RAM never dips below 60fps for me, except for the institute few areas in there drop my FPS to around 35, not got the game fully maxed out though shadows are on high and object fade I left at default but everything else is on ultra. I do have it installed on an SSD though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3464d ago
90°

Fallout 4 on Switch 2 seems inevitable, but what about Starfield?

A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer199234d ago

I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future

On playstation they have been quite successful

anast34d ago

I'm not sure too many people want to play Starfield.

Profchaos34d ago

Phils all but confirmed they are going in hard with the switch 2

TheColbertinator34d ago

All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.

32d ago
Show all comments (7)
140°

Ex-Starfield dev dubs RPG’s design the “antithesis” of Fallout 4

Starfield and Fallout 4 developer Nate Purkeypile reflects on Bethesda's city design, calling it the "antithesis" of the studio's older games

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
TheNamelessOne136d ago

Starfield is actually a RPG. Bethesda hasn't done that in a while.

GhostScholar135d ago

People acted like starfield was so less interesting than fallout and drastically different, but I call bs on that. Both are decent games, but they are both filled with the appearance of things to do and items to interact with but 99 percent are just there to be there with no significance. Fallout has better character work but they are both sort of illusions that they’re vast.

135d ago
Shiore2u135d ago

Studio has been going downhill since Skyrim. Every following game gets dumbed down more than the previous. I'll be shocked if Elder Scrolls VI even has dialogue options.

anast135d ago

Fallout 4 was bad, real bad. Starfield might even be a better RPG.

trez1082135d ago

Fallout 4 wasn’t a great fallout game per se but real bad? I don’t know maybe I’m a little biased because I replied it not long ago and had fun with it.

80°

10 Excellent Open World Games Where You Control It All

GB: "Gamers have quickly realized that a fun open-world game isn’t just about size and scope but rather how you interact with it."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
anast177d ago

It's a click fest. Skip it.