Bethesda's latest offering has been in development for years, but was only officially revealed a few months before its release. Fallout 4 takes place in Boston, known simply as the Commonwealth, and has players take the role of a vault dweller who was alive before the apocalypse hit. Now rising from the ashes, this survivor must come to terms with how the world has changed, as life as she once knew it has changed greatly. However, while the world has changed, war and Bethesda's Fallout does not.
For new players trying out Fallout 4, there are a few actions that gamers should avoid making as they journey with the Sole Survivor.
I think i made the mistake of giving Mama Murphy too many chems. Because I could never get my settlement past 98% happiness, and it even cost me the Platinum.
A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.
I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future
On playstation they have been quite successful
All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.
Starfield and Fallout 4 developer Nate Purkeypile reflects on Bethesda's city design, calling it the "antithesis" of the studio's older games
People acted like starfield was so less interesting than fallout and drastically different, but I call bs on that. Both are decent games, but they are both filled with the appearance of things to do and items to interact with but 99 percent are just there to be there with no significance. Fallout has better character work but they are both sort of illusions that they’re vast.
Studio has been going downhill since Skyrim. Every following game gets dumbed down more than the previous. I'll be shocked if Elder Scrolls VI even has dialogue options.
Fanboys will be mad.
They will call you a hater or "cynical" for not thinking this game is a near masterpiece or masterpiece.
They'll claim that site that game the game an average or above average score is "clickbait", sucks or looking for hits.
They'll claim that said game does not deserve a low score for reasons unknown.
They'll claim that said game deserves a high score because they liked previous entires in the series even if those entries weren't good.
They'll pick out only one part of your review that might have been wrong or they didn't like and only focus on that one part to try to discredit your review.
Seems I have a legion of people that follow me and disagree with all my posts. 3 disagrees within 2 minutes. Not sure if they're Bethesda drones or people who have something against me.
@Ezz2013 I don't go around claiming that any review is right or wrong.
You can disagree all you want but you will have to actually provide reasons against what the reviewer wrote.
@silkrevolver I highly doubt that. I have noticed that almost all my comments get disagrees less than a minute after I comment. There are a couple users on this site that are following my profile.
Story quality? WTF
Like this website? No
Move on folks, nothing to see here.
I didn't like fallout 3. Didn't enjoy it one bit. I gave last vages a chance and i had a blast but it still wasn't as big as the hype for me. I will do the same for this one hoping that i will enjoy it like you people but if not it is my lost. I don
t see why would someone like me hate fallout since it's multiplatform. Everyone have their own taste and opinion.
As for reviews, again why do you people care ???!!!. It is proven that reviews cannot be trusted. They seek for hits. Why do you fight over them ?!
Holy crap, RPGamer... I forgot this site existed, but I used to frequent it while I was in high school in the late 90s. I remember a fellow named Thor wrote a pretty funny Q&A column... at least I think it was Thor... *skulks off*