Top
Approvals 10/3 ▼
antbolton89 (2) - 2086d ago Cancel
zielocz3k (2) - 2086d ago Cancel
SimonSmith (1) - 2086d ago Cancel
d_g (1) - 2086d ago Cancel
pasta_spice (2) - 2086d ago Cancel
butchertroll (1) - 2086d ago Cancel
Crashbandicoot77 (1) - 2086d ago Cancel
700°
9.2

Call of Duty Black Ops 3 Review - IGN

With fun 4-player co-op, new powers, and a fleshed out Zombies mode, Black Ops 3 is the biggest Call of Duty game yet.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
embed video review
Geobros2086d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Wrong source
use IGN direct link, not facebook link
Geobros2086d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: title, url, embed code
Geobros2086d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2086d ago
The story is too old to be commented.
Flash812086d ago ShowReplies(10)
-Foxtrot2086d ago

Woah...totally didn't see this one coming.

/s

Eiyuuou2086d ago

I'm looking for that "sponsored by Activison" fine print.

APexGamer452085d ago

IGN actually gave very similar score as Halo 5 for example.

Way they scored was not out of norm for this game.

Halo 5 has 85 Metascore and IGN gave 9
BO3 has 84 metascore and IGN gave 9.2

maybe it is a decent game?

KurtRussell2085d ago

Actually Activision is really glad IGN is full of tards who are too limited to understand what makes a good game. No payment needed.

b3ast2085d ago

Well its better than halo 5 single player haven't played online yet

DafunkyRebel2085d ago (Edited 2085d ago )

Its actually really good, really interesting story line that follows the story of BO2 after Raul Mendez fuk everything up, plus the zombie nightmare story mode after you beat the campaign is a huge plus. MP is amazing again like the old days

2085d ago
DragoonsScaleLegends2085d ago

Well since they overrated Advance Warfare so much and this game is much better, it wouldn't make since to give it a lower score than Advance Warfare.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2085d ago
lelo2play2086d ago (Edited 2086d ago )

Oh IGN... how predictable! Expect you guys got very well paid by Activision.

Eamon2086d ago

Hope you're being sarcastic.

Look at the massive BO3 ads on the site. And the fact IGN has rarely given COD a score less than 9 despite the fact it's nearly always a rehashed game.

This has been the problem with major AAA franchises as of the last couple of years, especially COD. It's like reviewers set up a boundary of 8.0 that it cannot go below. And for the COD series, that boundary is 9.0

Even Halo 5 doesn't deserve to be in the 9.0 boundary. Though it's definitely better than BO3.

MasterCornholio2086d ago

@Eamon
"Look at the massive BO3 ads on the site."

GameSpot had CODBO3 ads as well and they gave it a 7.

So?

maniacmayhem2085d ago

Well a good number of people claim that Polygon is paid off, so why is it so hard to believe that IGN might be also?

SolidStoner2085d ago

its obvious that "Ignorants" are somehow connected to Activision because its impossible to score 9.2 for a game that looks worse than ever before.. and they on purpose use fake future stuff, so there is no possibility to do something wrong since its all SCI FI, with jumps!

this milking program fails hard!

Eamon2085d ago

@MasterCornholio, I didn't notice much BO3 ads on Gamespot. If there are any, it's not overly massive in your face like IGN.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2085d ago
sactownlawyer9162086d ago

So did ms pay for the halo review as well?

lelo2play2086d ago

How naive can you be?

Don't you think big companies pay-off for favourable reviews, and yes, include Microsoft and Sony in those big companies?

Don't tell me you still believe in Santa Clause and the Easter bunny?

Poshgit2085d ago

About 95% of IGNs reviews for Xbox one games are way above metacritic scores.

nyckrazy2085d ago

You guys are crazy. The most Hyped game of this generation Published By ACTIVISION Got a disappointing 7.8 score over at ign. That game is called DESTINY. Dont assume someone is getting paid under the table because of a high score.

kaizokuspy2085d ago (Edited 2085d ago )

Right bc the story was bad nonexistent. Now tell me why iGn didn't lower the score with halo 5 when the story too was also bad? Bc it's a biased review.

Edited autocorrect phone stuff

CamBulls122086d ago

LMAO never change IGN, never change.

d_g2086d ago (Edited 2086d ago )

yeah that looks suspicious

if you look at their other reviews you’ll see even the games that had 9 score have at least one single negative point

Black0ut2086d ago

Yeah exactly. Shouldn't there be a couple negatives considering the game isn't a perfect score? I dunno about that.

Aloy-Boyfriend2086d ago

Games can be 10/10 with negative points, and Games can be 9/10 with no negatives. Games aren't perfect. Review scores aren't math.

Crashbandicoot772086d ago (Edited 2086d ago )

I think it's because it got a higher score than Halo 5. Everyone shocked

iistuii2085d ago

P2p in 2015, not connected to COD servers issues, framerate drops in SP, crap story, but that's ok cause story doesn't matter in COD, there's a few negatives that they didn't mention