160°

Braid would be cheaper if MS agreed

Braid creator Jonathan Blow is "less happy," Microsoft insisted on charging 1200 ($15) Points for the game, rather than 800($10) Points.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
OC_MurphysLaw5732d ago

Wow...gotta love the irony in that interview. "It's MS's fault its $15 not mine....but if it was only $10 then I might not be able to make another game"??? WTF? What kind of bs double talk was that?

If anything I think this article makes it sound like this guy was an idiot and MS basically kept him from pricing the game so low he wouldn't have made any money off it and stayed in debt over it.

but remember, MS was the evil one here...not him...it's their fault he might make some money off the game. LOL

IzKyD13315732d ago

yes, but you still dont think 15 bucks is way too much?
were consumers remember? we dont care if the company's making a profit so long as we get our gratification (well, some fanboys might care about sales, but why should they?)

OC_MurphysLaw5731d ago

I tried the demo...its pretty good. But I dont think I would buy this game at $10 or $5...its just not my cup of tea.

With regards to the price being worth it? Well I guess it all depends on how big the game really is? I mean if its got 5+ hours of game play then yes..$15 is a decent price imo. Also replay ability should be considered too...and I don't recall if this has any kind of multiplayer aspect to it...but that would add to the argument of yes or no on $15 too.

NO_PUDding5731d ago

Guyz, don't be so harshzorz, they gots to payed for the pricecut somehow!

/sarcasm

callahan095731d ago

I agree... John Blow is a blowhard. But he made a good game. The only thing preventing the game from being perfect is the collision detection on the goomba-like enemies. It's a bit on the wonky side. Other than that, the puzzles/platforming, the level designs, the story, presentation, graphics, sound/music, etc. are all phenomenal and the game was well worth my 15 dollars.

Cicinho5731d ago

Well n00b if the game was 10$ then maybe more people would buy it and he would make more money.

1000 buying a 10$ game is better than 500 people buying a 15$ game.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5731d ago
badkolo5732d ago (Edited 5732d ago )

if the game is good and it is ,well that higher price in some cases, ill pay 15 for all arcade games if they where all quality games.

even though for arcade games 10 is the sweet spot and it should never cost more then that unless its a full featured game like psn has.

IzKyD13315731d ago

yea, ratchet and clank quest for booty seems worth 15 bucks

SCThor5731d ago

ask the bubble I just took from you.

Rhezin5731d ago

AND RATCHET AND CLANKS ALL OF THOSE 6 YR OLD GAMES BLOW! This game actually showed innovation where there was none so please keep your retarded comments to yourself.

IzKyD13315731d ago

i never said this game was bad

Shaka2K65731d ago

Always finding ways to ripping off their consumers.

i love spreading the shamesoft hate for such reason.

360rxorz5731d ago

It doesn't matter. What does Sony charge for their games? $20? Plus, you are getting the superior online service with better games. XBLA has 10x more games than the PSN and all of them are better than the PSN's.

Party Boy5731d ago (Edited 5731d ago )

PSN games are $9.99 and $5.99 at most for these types of games. Yeah. Keep on getting nickeled and dimed on points and games. Live is a joke. Pay $49.99 for online, pay $19.99 for 15 dollars worth of M$ points, pay for themes and avatars, pay $99.99 for a 20 gig hard drive, pay $99.99 for wi-fi, pay $149.99 for a useless HD-DVD add on. LOL, Live is a joke. Yeah. Keep on getting nickeled and dimed. You must like to whore money for M$. M$ is pimping you little hos.

ABACAB725731d ago

You have no clue as to what you're talking about. M$ always tries to rip off their customers. At least Sony gives you more value. For the record, I've played the demo of this game. It sucks ass. It's not even worth 800 points. flOW has more depth and graphical prowess than this game does, and it's in HD. This game is not. None of the XBLA games are...at least not in 1080p.

IzKyD13315731d ago

the games on PSN that are over 20 bucks are FULL games, such as gran turismo prologue, warhawk etc.

ruibing5731d ago

The most popular ones are all $9.99, and they just recently had a sale for $4.99. The $39.99 games are full retail games that you just won't find on XBLA due to the size restrictions.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5731d ago
Show all comments (37)
190°

The Most Famous Video Games Made By Only One Person

BLG writes: "Do you know any famous games made by one person? Well, we’re here to educate you on some of the best one-man projects out there."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
franwex688d ago (Edited 688d ago )

Nice list.

I’ll add 9th Dawn III to that list. Great game made by one person.

Always Sometimes Monster is made by two people technically, but let’s do an honorable mention.

NecrumOddBoy688d ago

I’d add HABROXIA 1 & 2 on here as well. Berry does pixel wonders with the Game Maker engine.

688d ago Replies(1)
ABizzel1688d ago

Technically speaking Minecraft should have been on the list. But it's nice to see these single devs thrive.

Rebel_Scum688d ago

Some of these arent exactly “made by one man”

Looking at you Braid and Fez.

AmUnRa688d ago

Theyr is no game made by one man. Theyr is always a team of developers behind them.
However there is always someone who comes up with the idea of a game.
When i would give an example of one man with that idea for me its Hideo Kojima....

LabRat688d ago (Edited 688d ago )

No there are certainly games made by 1 person, start to finish. Maybe after it launches and becomes a big enough success the 1 person will reach out for help maintaining it or updating, but games have been made by 1 person.

Unless of course you are being insanely nit-picky and trying to claim "the engine they used was made by Unity" or "the assets they put in were made by someone else"

Show all comments (10)
410°

Xbox Live Gold Subscribers Can Claim These Three Additional Free Games

Microsoft is offering three additional free games for all Xbox Live Gold subscribers in addition to the regular lineup of games this month.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
darthv72715d ago

Joe Danger is hella fun. Nice bonus from GwG.

deleted715d ago

I enjoyed Joe Danger back in the day, it's pretty fun. What's amazing is how Hello Games went from a few of these rather simple games to the ultra-ambitious No Man's Sky!

715d ago Replies(1)
Orchard715d ago

I would love a sequel to JD - although I do realize that Hello Games have kinda grown beyond that scope of game.

Godmars290715d ago

And still the contradiction of getting something for "free" from a service you pay for continues.

CrimsonWing69715d ago

But isn’t the service for online multiplayer? So, technically it’s “free games” included with your online subscription? I mean, what was the point of Xbox Live? To get free games?

Godmars290715d ago

Only, after they tried doubling the price of another online service, some similar nonsense, isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?

darthv72715d ago

"isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?" No, it was always been a paid premium on console. The free games was not related to the rumored price hike. They were giving them away long before that.

If there was a service for free online multiplayer on console, it was PSN. Until the PS4 came out.

Jericho1337715d ago

How would you have worded it then? I’d say ‘subscribers claiming free games’ is about as clear as it gets.

Godmars290715d ago

"As part of", "In addition to", "As an extra bonus". Anything better than, "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.

Jericho1337715d ago

That’s like saying ‘buy one get one free’ doesn’t apply because it’s not technically ‘free’. Stop trying to find a problem with something when there isn’t one.

gangsta_red715d ago

** "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.**

No, it actually doesn't, it's just like when you get a free refill of soda after you purchased your first cup.

I think we are well enough into these console gens to stop bringing up this tired argument

CrimsonWing69715d ago

You always had to pay for Xbox Live to
play online multiplayer… this was the case way back during the original Xbox when it was released.

I don’t understand what you’re hung up about when plenty of subscription services give free things as a perk or benefit to a user who subscribes to a service.

Hell, Nintendo Power gave me a “Free” Strategy Guide of my choosing for paying for their magazine subscription way back in the day.

You’re getting the games that you’d need to pay for regardless of the subscription for free, bottom-line. The service you’re paying for is the online multiplayer service Xbox Live. You aren’t paying for Xbox Live and paying for the game you were handed out for free, you’re still just paying for the online service and nothing more. Hence, why the game in itself is free for Xbox Live subscribers.

sinspirit715d ago

It was originally just for online access. It had updated and began monthly game releases to compete with PS Plus. Monthly games have been a part of Live for many years. It is more recently that the releases are getting worse and worse.

Godmars290715d ago

Its been a majoritively dismissed point as DLC, MTs and now subscriptions became things. Failed protest against policies meant ultimately to strip consumers of ownership rights over media in general.

Still, may as well keep pointing it out.

sinspirit715d ago (Edited 715d ago )

@Godmars290

I guess people are just missing the point. And, now we got people thinking Live is still just an online sub and games are a generous inclusion like it's not a feature of the paid service lol.

Live officially on Microsofts site lists, "Free games every month. Now that’s Gold.
Get 2 free games a month, including backward compatible Xbox 360 games".

But, many are starting to say that Live payment is still just for the online access. Which, if that's what they're believing then I'm worried about why they'd pay just for online access. Paying for it back in the day was already a ripoff since they didn't even host dedicated servers to ensure the best quality connection. You'd pay for it just to host it on the internet provider that you also pay for lol.

I do think it's great to offer extra games on top of the existing ones. However, Live has repeatedly offered very lacking games, has listed the same games more than once, and even listed the same game two months in a row one time. They need to have a solid consistent history of delivering quality monthly releases.

traumadisaster715d ago

And still the contradiction of bringing up a decade old tired complaint knowing we’ve all moved in but you. We all agree it would better if the author was accurate but this argument is so old now, move on.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 715d ago
Father__Merrin715d ago

https://www.xbox.com/ja-jp/...

I've just redeemed knights quest needs GP/gold membership etc

715d ago
100°

5 Great Games With Time Manipulation

KeenGamer: "Time manipulation concepts have been the foundation of many great games, including these 5 greats which do the them justice. Because every Back to the Future fan needs a bit more time manipulation to fulfil their time traveling fantasies."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
GamerRN931d ago (Edited 931d ago )

Im thankful Quantum Break ended up here! The only thing that stopped this game from being talked up was Xbox exclusivity and the live action scenes being way too long...

Otherwise, it's basically Control with lighter visuals

Godmars290931d ago

Isn't the AI broken? Physics issues as well?

Why, if it wasn't actually a broken game, possibly less so than Blix the Time Sweeper, would being an exclusive be an honest mark against QB?

GamerRN930d ago

Because people LOVE to HATE Xbox

NecrumOddBoy931d ago

TimeSpinner is a good time based metroidvania.

Also, Singularity rocks a a time-theme Bioshock-like FPS.