110°

Stop Trying to Make Destiny a Thing Already

Dave Walsh at the Stoned Gamer talks about the media's love affair with Destiny's latest expansion the Taken King and how it defies logic to give Bungie's shooter another chance after a disappointing year.

Read Full Story >>
thestonedgamer.com
DeathofSouls3564d ago

Destiny is a great game and they don't have to "try" and make it a thing, it is already. Wasn't it announced that The Taken King is the most downloaded game on PS4? That makes it a "thing". Your entire article was based on the game a year ago, I get it, it wasn't what we thought and I stopped playing it two months after it came out, but I picked it up again and absolutely love the changes they made. Another argument is that you shouldn't have to pay all that money, well if you pay $60 you get everything ever released for it, a year later. Why do I point out "a year later?" Because that's exactly what Call of Duty is, every year you pay $60 plus an ass load on all the DLC. The big difference here is that you keep everything from the year before, plus if you already bought it you get it discounted at $40.

The Taken King is a great game, if your thinking about starting Destiny again, get it. Mid your stuck in the past and judge it on what it was a year ago, your gonna miss out.

ravinash3564d ago

I never play Destiny, but if they said they wanted to make this game, and it takes a year from when it was realised to realise the game as they originally imagined... shouldn't people know. you know, the ones who wanted to play this game as it was originally promised?

The good thing about patching now is that you can keep working on the game. there is no "that's it, you've used your one shot, the game has to stay as it is".

StanLee3564d ago

I played Destiny, avidly and I have defended the game from time to time but a year and $140 to get the game we were promised, that's disappointing. Taken King may have brought Bungie and Destiny's defenders some redemption but let's be honest, for a year, the game was mediocre at best!

WildArmed3564d ago

Pretty much.

It's not the media, but the gamers that made it a thing.

I've had a love-hate relationship with Destiny, but here I am back into Destiny.

There just isn't another PVE coop shooter out there like Deatiny.

It scratches an odd itch. I play with a group of friends every week and I have a blast (even though I always get the short end of the stick when it comes to loot).

Pocketaces1113564d ago

@WildArmed

It's like your in my mind. :)

The game is great it keeps you hooked but same here love hate for sure.

Overall though sooooo happy with the changes it brought me back when I thought I was done with it forever.

Everybody complains at how much money they had to pay but if you calculate a per/hr of gameplay rate it's way lower then most games.

Baka-akaB3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

Not complaing much about the game , it is addictive and great to play in co-op ...

But it doesnt provide more content that many mp shooters or most mp centric games out there at a lower or equivalent cost . Especially when compared to rpg hybrids like Borderlands

The rest is a matter of personal preference and choices . So no , i feel people can objectively complain about the quantity it provides for its steep cost .

Especially for people that already got the first season pass and first game .... when they refuse to provide a better bundle for them without the cost of the two dlcs .

darren_poolies3564d ago

I love Destiny and The Taken King but the point you make about Call of Duty I don't completely agree with. If I don't buy Black Ops 3 I can still play Advanced Warfare. Whereas if you only own the Destiny base game, you're locked out of a lot of stuff now that you weren't before TTK which I think is unfair.

DialgaMarine3564d ago

Welcome to the wonderful world of MMO's. Destiny is basically WoW on console.

darren_poolies3564d ago

But you're not locked out of the base content of WoW if you don't have any of the expansions (as far as I'm aware).

Baka-akaB3563d ago (Edited 3563d ago )

Difference is the price of future expansions isnt jacked up because it include stuff you already bought as required .

And mmos dont lock you out of existing content , but solely the new ones and new stories .

Not everyone skipping the game necessarily boycott it ... some people have others plans delaying the purchase , but still intend to play the base game they bought , until they get the expansion . It's a pity Activision doesnt give a damn about pleasing those

djplonker3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

Dedtiny has a been a bit more expensive than a cod+ season pass

Destiny: £40

Dlc 1: £20

Dlc 2: £20

The taken king: £40

So thats £120 or $185 usd and we all know there will be more...

Gohadouken3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

Much more in fact . As much as i dislike COD and prefer Destiny , you don't actually need to own the overpriced dlcs to access the next game .

And when you actually do own those , you dont get screwed over for not just waiting and getting the new game with everything included :p .

PS : I don't mind the all inclusive bundle for newcomers , i welcome it , in fact . But a gesture other than lame shaders could have been done for earlier customers with the pass .

DrGonzo3564d ago

Thanks day 1 Destiny players for paying full price for what essentially amounted to a stripped down beta, then paying an additional $80 for expansions that I can go out and buy now for $45!

Destiny is toxic. Activision scaled the game back so they could sell it to the dumb masses piece meal. Its anti-gamer and anti-consumer no matter how you want to slice it.

jmc88883563d ago (Edited 3563d ago )

Except the only way they'll sell it to me is if I pay $79 for TTK... which has been shown to be about 4 hours of story content.

On top of that, there is still no matchmaking.

TTK looks like a $20 add-on, and not a deep one either.

Still haven't even attempted Vault of Glass? You know why?

NO MATCHMAKING.

..and no I'm not going to beg people, spam my username, go to a 3rd party website, or anything else.

Also I can jump on and play CoD:Ghosts right now and nothing has changed, meanwhile if I don't get TTK, then I lose access to content.

It's still funny that morons defend not having matchmaking, as if they've even thought it through without the propaganda they've soaked up.

Having matchmaking, doesn't mean you can't have fireteams, not having matchmaking... means a ton of people can't play content.

Which way is right? Which way is horribly wrong? It is clear, no matchmaking is wrong.

How about this, these morons think it's better FORCING EVERYBODY into playing at a deeper level then people want. Joining clans, using 3rd party websites, etc, etc.

But what if all your FPS/TPS were like this? Afterall, who needs matchmaking or server lists in a FPS game? Wouldn't you get more dedicated players with invite only? If it's so preferred, why aren't these people calling for using it for crucible? Afterall, won't most people give up and quit if they join with matchmaking? So why is ok for crucible randoms and not strikes? Oh that's right... THERE ISN'T A DIFFERENCE.

That's the point. The idiocy spouted as reasons to not have matchmaking can be used for anything, and no, it's not correct.

No matchmaking = a ton of unhappy customers who can't play what is already a pitifully small amount of content, and a lot of them simply won't buy TTK, or Destiny 2, or beyond. Well Bungie CHOSE for that to happen. It's a 'feature'.

Great plan for a product you wish to hock 10 years worth of games and expansion packs on. Or as dumb as a love child between Bush and Obama. That would be one dumb mf'er.

3-4-53563d ago

Destiny already is a thing.

Hey Hack bush league website I've never heard of.

Stop trying to make Drama happen.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3563d ago
ninsigma3564d ago

Stop trying to bring down a game while basing your opinions on aspects that are now irrelevant because the game has mostly changed for the better. You say it was a disappointing year but many (not me) have been playing the game this whole year, keeping the community alive so clearly they enjoyed it and didn't find it disappointing at all.

jmc88883563d ago (Edited 3563d ago )

So you're saying there is matchmaking?

So you're saying they changed the pricing model so people who bought the base game don't have to pay $79 for this small expansion?

So you're saying there is vastly more then the reported approximately 4 hours of story if I rush through it? So 4-6 hours for $79? Yeah...great.

So you're saying the people who still haven't bought TTK, either because they don't want to, or can't yet afford it... did their base game lose access to some content? Did the base game lose content starting with the first expansion (yes, it did).

Sounds to me like there is still a ton of problems, and the problem is, you jumped through their hoops and 'dont see a problem', while most people who saw and dislike the effects of these problems and jumped shipped, see the problems haven't been fixed.

It's one thing to play the same raids over, and over, and over again.

It's another to not even be able to get to play those raids over, and over, and over... because there is no matchmaking.

The game is still broken because people can't access the content. It's that simple. But these are just small problems. Who wants to actually be able to play their game without jumping through hoops, arbitrary hoops, using 3rd party means.

BlackSpartan1873564d ago

What is ironic he mention Call of Duty, which took parts of Destiny game play and added to Black Ops 3. Which is the same game with changes to guns maps and minor adjustmenrs to perks and gameplay. Destiny is a next gen experience that has significant upgrades from the original game, Call of Duty still feels like last gen with bits and pieces from other current gen shooters. I being playing call of duty since COD 2 and I tired of it and going to purchase the Taken King Legendary package and get on the Destiny band wagon, F Call of Duty.

HeavenlySnipes3564d ago

its already a thing. Didn't it break some download record on PSN?

The author of this lives under a rock

Hoffmann3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

Its mostly a thing because a giant marketing budget and a ton of gaming sites worked together to make Destiny something a lot more popular than it should be.

Which other game from 2006-2015 got over friggin' 550 articles alone on one big gaming site (destructoid) ..do you think Destiny is so much bigger or better than anything else that it got twice as many articles as every other video game of the last decade?

ninsigma3564d ago

"a ton of gaming sites worked together to make Destiny something a lot more popular than it should be."
The media can say what they like but it isn't the media that's making all these people enjoy the game, the game itself is doing a good job of that.

Hoffmann3564d ago

@ninsigma
The media can say what they like but it isn't the media that's making all these people enjoy the game, the game itself is doing a good job of that.

So how does it come that there is a majority of gamers whch bought Destiny were disappointed in the game if its so good?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media...

ninsigma3564d ago

Is there supposed to he proof there that the majority of players didn't like it?? Because I don't see it.

Baka-akaB3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

See i do have issues with Destiny as a game , after playing it less than a year , but as much as some of you guys wanna pretend that it's just marketing , the game always had a big active and playing community .

Yes even when it's was trendy (and deserved) to pile upon the game , and trash or criticize it .

Call it addiction or brainwashing , but the game has a staying power than no title with just good marketing , could pull all year long like that

BLow3563d ago

Ok I'm confused. You said a majority of people don't like the game but it set a record for most downloaded game on PSN. And that's not even counting the hard copies. I know you and a lot of people don't like the game but come on just don't make sh!t up. That's why I can't stand the Internet sometimes. People just make stuff up and pass it along as a fact. Millions enjoy the game. Get over it and let it go. You Destiny haters never quit. A lot of people were disappointed and a lot people like it. So what? Move on and play something else.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3563d ago
SaveFerris3564d ago

'Stop liking what I don't like!'

morganfell3564d ago (Edited 3564d ago )

This. What kind of tantrum is this stonedgamer having? I have tried, albeit briefly - do not want to waste too much time on this article - to fathom why the the troll behind this exercise engaged in such an effort.

I can only reach a single conclusion.

I have arrived at the fact this person has a dislike for Destiny that is of a personal nature as it certainly doesn't derive from an objective review of the facts. Then again, what supposed site, basement throw up or supposed industry magnate employs objectivity these days?

I picture someone that actually isn't very good at Destiny. It also seems likely his friends let him know about his incompetence. Otherwise what explanation is there for such an illogical, poorly conceived piece? The theory fits the facts and this angry, irrational article can be little else but revenge driven angst.

What a grand way to submit a first, and hopefully last, exposition to n4g.

Show all comments (39)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans147d ago (Edited 147d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr147d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast295d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

295d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris295d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

295d ago
anast295d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole295d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast295d ago (Edited 295d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

295d ago
anast295d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 295d ago
Profchaos295d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_295d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981295d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140295d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85295d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj295d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman295d ago (Edited 295d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake295d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn295d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg295d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07295d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

294d ago
Knightofelemia294d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 294d ago
Chevalier294d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom295d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac295d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake295d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark295d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde295d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125295d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)