250°

The Order 1886 Development Started In 2011 With 45 Devs, Peaked At 140; Runs Fully Real-Time On PS4

Ready at Dawn recently held a technical presentation at SIGGRAPH 2015 where they detailed the technology behind The Order 1886.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Walker3599d ago

The Order's Graphics are mind-blowingly phenomenal !

Erik73573599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Wish we could get a sequel to this game. Could of been a lot better if the dev team got rid of the stealth sections and added more openness to the level design.

_-EDMIX-_3599d ago

We can still get one and the team can fix many things with a sequel the second time around.

We've seen many IPs open up to become greater then their originals.

TwoForce3599d ago

Give them a second chance.

Army_of_Darkness3599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Yeah just like the uncharted series. It has been getting more open with every sequel :-) I don't expect full out open world, just more flexibility regarding gameplay techniques and routes.

njulo3599d ago

Has the Order 1886 reached 1 millions sales?

AndrewLB3599d ago

Nope. I have no idea how they expect to hit 5 million in sales by Jan 1, 2016 the way things are going.

http://gamingbolt.com/pacht...

Spotie3599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Lol, Andrew. So you're taking a prediction by Pachter before the game came out and was subject to a pretty heavy smear campaign and implying it was somehow a Sony prediction?

Good job, kid.

Edit: wait. Why are you here in the first place? Since when do you actually care about anything Playstation, except to put it down?

Well, you ARE putting the game down. AGAIN. I guess that's why you're here.

AndrewLB3598d ago

I own a PS3 and a Vita, but had to pass on drinking the PS4 kool-aid considering there still isn't a game that has convinced me to buy one.

What "smear campaign" are you talking about? The fact that people (myself included) played the demo before it's release and thought the gameplay was lackluster at best? Or was it the super linear levels? Or the fact that the game was a QTE fest with absolutely no replay value? It also could have been how they were charging $60 for an 8 hour long game.

Stating facts about a game is not a smear campaign, just like stating that the Xbone is substantially weaker than the PS4 is also NOT a smear campaign. Do you even know what a smear campaign is? It's an organized effort to defame or discredit by making false or dubious accusations. If you're going to claim there was a smear campaign, how bout you back that up by listing some of these false claims?

You clearly have a bad case of fanboy derangement syndrome because you react to valid criticism of a game like someone insulted your mom.
It's people like you that personify the filthy console peasant stereotype.

mikel10153599d ago

So why didn't this game make any money and cause RAD to split from Sony as a contractor?

jukins3599d ago

a technical marvel doesnt make a good game or money. RAD split because Sony was disappointed with sales obviously no matter how good it looked.

thehitman13983599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Jukins, just quick question. Do you work at Sony or a subcontractor for Sony? If not, then your statement of implying truth only boils down to your opinion and nothing more.

So stop trying to talk like you know what was the reason for anything, cuz ultimately you don't know.

jukins3599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Lol I don't have to work for Sony to figure this out. Tell me why they've only previously worked with Sony had successful sales with their previous games but when there last one bombs in ratings and sales they all the sudden start working on a pc vr game?. It's called logic and common sense. If the game had been good saleswise Sony would've instantly contracted them or even bought Rad to develop a sequel

IamTylerDurden13599d ago

Bc there was an obvious smear campaign.

It's shameful what ppl did to RaD, and naive ppl fell in line with the charade.

Scary world man.

marlinfan103599d ago

Yeah don't blame the devs for putting out a mediocre game, just blame everyone else for not blindly loving it. Good call

Khronikos3599d ago

There was indeed a smear campaign for this game. It isn't the best but it's hardly a bad game for the 28 I just got it for on digital with PS Plus. It's a nice game to relax to and enjoy the view. Most games cannot even claim that. People are just jealous of graphical games trying to do something different. Wah wah this and yet the newest COD gets 9s every single time.

When you stick out in this industry they come at you like they have something to prove. Game journalism is a joke.

user99502793599d ago

calling it like you see it != smear campaign

the game looked boring. And, once released, critics seem to have agreed with that assessment.

...How terribly shocking.

GMR_PR3599d ago

Graphics dont make a good game and The Order is an example of that.

Jaqen_Hghar3599d ago

Agreed. This game was severely underrated. It's way more open than many TPS and great fun to replay due to its cinematic elements (like a great film). Love the lore and gunplay too. Very visceral tense action to play through.

Erik73573599d ago

Now I think it was over hated but I don't think it was a good game.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3599d ago
_-EDMIX-_3599d ago

Split? Sony doesn't own this team, last I heard Sony also made money from this game, they own the IP.

Ready At Dawn where already paid as they are contracted out.

I've heard nothing regarding a split based on low sales as they are not owned by them, this game was never stated as being a series and we don't even know if they are under contract with Sony for more Order games.

Hell we don't even know if The Order 2 will even be done by Ready At Dawn, for all we know Sony Santa Monica might be as we speak taking over the series and working on The Order 2.

Those stating sales in regards to sequels likely existing or not existing....consider InFamous barely goes over 1.5 million an entry and we have like 5 of them.

nix3599d ago

I hope sony owns the IP. I would love to play the 2nd part.

wenaldy3599d ago

Using "split" and "contractor" at the same sentence is oxymoron.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3599d ago
WowSoChill3599d ago

Wow, since 2011? and only 6 hours of Gameplay? some workers were slacking then lol

IamTylerDurden13599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

U didn't play it though so how do u "know" it was six hrs?

Funny how it took me approximately 10hrs on hard. Maybe longer bc i took my time to appreciate the masterwork and beauty on display. I honestly want to say it took me over 10hrs but i know ppl will have fits and start convulsing. All the ppl who never played it but know "it sucks" and is "4-6hrs".

himdeel3600d ago

Also took me about 10 hours to complete on hard. It was an awesome game and I enjoyed it thoroughly.

XBLSkull3599d ago

Honestly that is exactly what I was about to say. 4 years for 6 hours with a 63 metascore? Not money well spent.

Sureshot3599d ago

10 on hard is quite poor. Are you counting replaying sections because of repeated deaths?

WowSoChill3599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

10 Hours you say? so about 4 Hours of cut scenes and 6 Hours of Gameplay then? hmmm sounds about right

DoctorFry3599d ago

How can you assert that he hasn't played it yet? You don't fully know that.

I myself beat the game in 7 hours, and I genuinely liked it. The reviews were too harsh for it. But the game was pretty short, even I took the luxury of admiring the graphics, exploring interiors, and replaying several action sequences for fun, but it was short nonetheless.

I hope the The Order gets a sequel because the developers established a very interesting universe begging to be explored more.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3599d ago
VJGenova3599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

Agreed. I rented it and beat it in one 6 hour sitting on Hard. Wasn't a very good game. Found the battles to be quite repetitive and the enemy variations to be non-existent.

I find this site to be helpful:

http://howlongtobeat.com/ga...

Says 7 hours and 10 to "complete" everything in the game. So still below average length for a below average game with great graphics. I'll probably rent the sequel too.

IamTylerDurden13599d ago

So 10hrs to complete, not bad, surely u could speed through it in 7 but why? Why speed through in 1 sitting? U played it wrong imo.

I find HowLongToBeat to be very inaccurate and usually my playthroughs are much longer than they claim. So for them to say 10hrs isn't bad.

Sureshot3599d ago

@tyler
"I find HowLongToBeat to be very inaccurate and usually my playthroughs are much longer than they claim"
It's okay, video games are just harder for some people *pats backs*

VJGenova3599d ago

I always play on hard, if it's an option so most games take me longer than those listed too. It's a good baseline, if you will.

I didn't feel like 6 hours was rushing or a speed run. Sure I might've farted around in it longer if I spent $60 on it. But I didn't. I spent $3. I really don't think it'd have much replay value. The story was predictable and again, the gameplay was mediocre. I don't get why everyone on this site loves this game.

Spotie3598d ago

So please point me to the website that details how long every game should be, how long every game is, and how to determine whether or not it's worth its asking price in relation to how long it is.

I imagine there's some insanely complex formula that goes into that. It has to be, in order to work for every game and take into consideration the expectations of every gamer.

thisgamer5033598d ago (Edited 3598d ago )

@Spotie

Judging by the general reaction from the gaming community and press, i'd say it's not worth the money. No let's use this logic for a lot of PS or Xbox fans; Xbox fans cry out about features PS may have base on media perception, yet those people don't own a PS. Sony fans downplay everything Microsoft does for xbox, yet those fans don't own an xbox. Are you intentionally setting a double standard, or just doing it on accident?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3598d ago
Yui_Suzumiya3599d ago

Took me around 9 hours on easy

IamTylerDurden13599d ago (Edited 3599d ago )

You are correct, what a waste now that we will never get a franchise with sequels. I feel the same way, such a waste of an awesome potential franchise. The Order was excellent.

I really liked The Order as well, it's a shame how misrepresented it was.

objdadon3599d ago

Just went back and finished this game the other day. It started off slow as hell but ended up really good! Loved it. Hope they make another.

Show all comments (76)
210°

The Order: 1886 Sequel Would Have Featured Larger-Scale Battles & Multiplayer

A sequel to Sony and Ready At Dawn's action-adventure game, The Order: 1886, would have featured larger-scale battles as well as multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
pwnmaster300026d ago

I missed it when games use to have a multiplayer to them.
Hope Sony revives the game at one point

KyRo26d ago

Killzone, Resistance, Uncharted, TLOU, Motorstorm. Great times. Its a shame how far they've fallen this generation

Muigi26d ago

Oh they still do…its just the whole game now 😂.

-Foxtrot26d ago

Why add multiplayer when the single player (despite enjoying it for what it was) had flaws?

You'd work out the issues with how you craft the single player then once you’ve perfected it do multiplayer after.

RaidenBlack26d ago

https://www.videogameschron...
"Two sequels were planned for the franchise, The Order 1891 and The Order 1899. While the third game was never in development, Weerasuriya says he had planned where the story of the franchise was planned to go, if he had been able to develop the full trilogy."
...
Alas, we'll also might never get the PC version of 1886, which is currently residing in some dev's hard drive, nearly ready for a release if required.

Charal26d ago

It’s a shame we didn’t gave its chance to this franchise.
Game world was very interesting, and gameplay could have evolved to a major hit with sequels.
Not even speaking about graphics that were way ahead of their time.

Reaper22_26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

If "we" is sony, i agree. I liked the game but it was metacritic that contributed to it's death. It's a shame.

AshleeEmerson26d ago

No, we are "us," the gamers who rated it so low on Metacritic, hurting... Killing its sales. I agree it is a shame. I loved this game.

Charal25d ago

No it is not, it is us has a community which crucified this game, which is happening much too often.

CrimsonWing6926d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I think MP being co-op would’ve been awesome. Essentially, I always viewed this as Sony’s take on the Gears series.

However, it really failed to measure up to what I expected. I definitely saw the potential but there were some things that really bogged it down for me like the forced slow walking segments (which I know was to hide loading), the repetitive warehouse werewolf fights, not enough variety in enemies, oddly we fought more humans than Darkstalkers, and the stealth sections were infuriating.

One thing there’s no denying though, this damn game was a looker. Such a shame at the wasted potential.

Show all comments (16)
120°

The Order: 1886, a Ten Year Reunion

WTMG's Leo Faria: "After finally playing the now decade-old The Order: 1886, what do I think about it? Is it really worthy of all the hate it has received over the past decade? Or is it some kind of hidden gem? I honestly think it falls somewhere in the middle. I loved the setting, the story is initially fine, the combat isn’t half-bad, and the potential for some awesome world building was there. It was all bogged down by too much ambition against a tight deadline, as well as poor marketing. As a result, it’s short, full of plotholes, infested with QTEs, and not exactly memorable as a whole. As a game you can grab for less than ten bucks today, I absolutely think it’s worth checking out. It’s one hell of a wasted potential, but for such a discount, I had some fun with it, and I’m sure you will too."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
SimpleSlave122d ago (Edited 122d ago )

Great setting, great graphics, even decent gun play, but what a trash of a game. The fuck were these people thinking? We could've had something like an Alan Wake 2 meets Mass Effect 2 style game. With investigations, creepy locations to uncover and explore, people to talk to and even recruit, clues to uncover and connect, monsters to slay, side quests to get lost in, and a more expansive lore to go with it.

Instead we got a shitty AAAAAAAAA Third Person Pew Pew snoozfest. Awesome.

_SilverHawk_122d ago

The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games I'd put the last of us 2, the order 1886, days gone, horizon zero dawn and God of war.

SimpleSlave122d ago

"The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games..."

Jesus H. Christ, bud. You just sound like a Sony apologist. What the fuck? Anyways. Good luck with that or whatever.

coolbeans122d ago

God. The "what could've been" you're describing would've been way better than just being the most empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation.

SimpleSlave122d ago

Right? I mean, I can understand people enjoying this thing ironically. Knowing that it sucks but still enjoying it for what it is. I get that. That's fine. We all have our guilty pleasure no doubt. But to come here and actually pretend that this is a top 5 PS4 game? Wow!

To pretend that this barely there game is anything more than an "empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation," as you said, is beyond ridiculous. But I guess Self-Awareness is some expensive ass DLC still.

Espangerish122d ago

I really enjoyed this game and also think it was one of the best PS4 games. It’s weird to me that this makes you so angry. I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player.

SimpleSlave121d ago

"and also think it was one of the best PS4 games"
"I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player."

Yeah, OK. You want to lie to yourself? You do you, bud. But like I said to the other Sony apologist, "good luck with that or whatever."

-Foxtrot122d ago

Jesus, it had some flaws but you're acting like it was unplayable.

It built a foundation, a rocky one but a sequel is where they could have refined things.

Personally my only issue is I feel like the "Gears of War" like over the shoulder gameplay, especially getting into cover and the like didn't really fit the game as much. In Gears you understand that kind of gameplay because they are wearing super heavy amour and guns but in the Order these guys are super human, they should feel more of a breeze to control, easily jumping over things and being allowed to climb whatever similar to Uncharted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 121d ago
Inverno122d ago

Im back again to simp for The Order, if ya like games well grounded in their reality with consistency in everything it does then I recommend it if ya haven't played it. Play it thru emulation or on your PS it don't matter just play it.

1nsomniac122d ago (Edited 122d ago )

A great game run down by the media for it's price vs length - Which was understandable, but it shouldn't of been the be all and end all.

At the right price this was a great game & deserved a sequel!

thorstein122d ago

Exactly. What a weird metric that suddenly was important and then, within a few months, no longer mattered.

andy85122d ago

I enjoyed this. I think the complaints were the length if I remember. Nothing wrong with a short good game, at least to physical copy owners 😅

Rebel_Scum122d ago

Put the thing on PS plus already!

Show all comments (16)
310°

The Order: 1886 Dev Pitched a Sequel to Sony, But Was Denied

Co-founder thinks bad reviews were to blame.
Ready at Dawn co-founder has revealed the now-shuttered studio pitched a sequel to PS4 exclusive The Order: 1886 to Sony, but was denied the chance to make it.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
_SilverHawk_132d ago

I can't believe sony turned down a sequel to the order 1886 which ended basically on a cliffhanger. The game is amazing and I would love a ps5 pro enhanced version just like I'd like a driveclub ps5 pro enhanced version.

DodoDojo132d ago

About 2 million sales and not the greatest of reviews, I can believe it.

Tbh there's a lot of dormant Sony exclusives that are more deserving of a sequel.

ravens52132d ago

Have you played it? Just curious.

ABizzel1132d ago (Edited 132d ago )

2 million probably wasn’t enough to make a strong profit on, and the mid reviews didn’t help, even though it was a solid game just short, and could have expanded way more on the creature mythos.

Days Gone: +7 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Infamous SS: 6 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Killzone SF: +2 million (4 mo.) / mid reviews (no sequel)
Driveclub: +2 million (2015 / leaks say 5m) / mid reviews (no sequel)

Basically it looks like for the PS4 generation budgets were getting out of control and Sony made the decision

sales + reviews - budget = sequel or no sequel

goken132d ago

Whatever the number, can’t be worst than concord

SimpleDad131d ago

Glad that Alloy Lego is doing great.

Toecutter00131d ago

Two million in sales for a new IP is pretty impressive. The world-building was in a class on its own. Any moron could see this IP had mad potential and the fact that Sony balked on it makes one question their competence and leadership.

Cacabunga131d ago

Nothing to do with sales. It’s all about the broken vision that Sony is having lately.
Days Gone sold great but they still don’t want a sequel to it.
Sony wants Easy money and they saw it in gaas and lazy games like lego horizon and countless remasters..

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 131d ago
pwnmaster3000132d ago (Edited 132d ago )

Idky you can’t believe it.
This game was shitted on by everyone besides some PS fans.

Don’t blame Sony on this one. Blame everyone who wanted to see this burn. Sony does a lot of stupid shit with their IP and waste a lot of them like bloodborne and days gone, but don’t be surprised with this one.

Outside_ofthe_Box132d ago

Exactly. I came to post exactly this. The game was torn apart upon release. It's not shocking that a sequel was denied.

S2Killinit132d ago

Not “upon” release. There was a whole campaign “prior” to release.

In my opinion they should have made it a bit less linear and it would have been great. I did enjoy it. But the reception it got makes sense that Sony wouldnt want to risk a sequel if it was going to open up a can of worms with people who wanted the first one to fail.

132d ago
Christopher132d ago

I played the game. I 100% believe Sony turned down a sequel.

blackblades131d ago

Well pretty obvious when it was left on a cliffhanger. Many sequels get turned from companies as someone else said above blame the SOB's that always whining.

Sabbath1313131d ago

i 100% agree with you, both of those games were amazing

Bathyj131d ago

What's so hard to believe? Don't you remember this game was crucified by the media.. it was DOA. It's a shame because it was a really fresh new IP it was gorgeous and a play really well . it had some issues but it wasn't the only game with qte repeated bosses and a playtime under 10 hours.

TheEroica131d ago ShowReplies(2)
mkis007131d ago (Edited 131d ago )

It was panned because of the graphics hype. Kind of similar to Ryse and hellblade 2...although the story was pretty interesting in all 3.

As a matter of fact I think Indy's success is partially due to the fact the graphics were not hyped up pre launch.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 131d ago
-Foxtrot132d ago

It’s strange though Sony would be so proud about their work and overall quality but wouldn’t give them an extra year to, give them that quality.

Anyway he talks about if it was in the 70s they’d have had their sequel but Days Gone is at 71 on Metacritic and we don’t have a sequel.

Both games should have one, I think they deserve a second chance at refining and building onto that foundation already laid out.

neutralgamer1992132d ago (Edited 132d ago )

Definitely days gone 2 should happen. Who knows maybe now Sony will let them make it since bend had to cancel its live service game. Days gone 2 for PS6 sounds amazing

As far as order 1886 sequel it would be have been interesting. I think if this game was a RPG with 15 hour story it would have done so much better. Don't get me wrong game is great but you can tell the potential is there if they were allowed to make some drastic changes

Sadly this new Sony is not the PlayStation they are suits and spreadsheet guys. Playstation has lost its touch with gamers. I miss Shawn jack Andrew house etc

At the launch of PS4 Playstation was at its full strength with gamers running the company but not anymore. No we have a guy who loves horizon above every thing else and is willing to fund projects based on that IP

Redemption-64132d ago

So an IP that actually sell? Sony moved away from the type of games you saw during the launch of the PS4 because many gamer didn't support them. I hear people crying more about say Japan Studio closing than actually supporting their games when they were open. Wasn't it shawn layden who said many of these games fail and you hope a few like horizon to make up for the failed games. Maybe if gamers actually supported these games there would be more of them. Shocking right?

Redemption-64132d ago

There is no sequel for Days Gone because it didn't sell. The director himself said "If you love a game, buy it at f****** full price. I can't tell you how many times I've seen gamers say 'yeah, I got that on sale, I got it through PS Plus, whatever'.”

Majority of the sales from days gone came from when it was heavily discounted, and I have seen many gamers say they will not pay full price or the game isn't worth full price, but they will buy it when it's discounted. Yet they get triggered when the studio decides to move away from a game they refused to support at full price

jwillj2k4132d ago (Edited 132d ago )

What this is showing is that the majority of people don’t like the price. It doesn’t mean they don’t like the game. Two different dimensions.

Example: The company Take Two took advantage by selling NBA 2K at $20, completely undercutting NBA live to become the most popular basketball game. High priced games isn’t the only way they can make money.

-Foxtrot132d ago

Well. If we are going to go off that director apparently Days Gone hit 8 million sales around the same time frame that Ghost of Tsushima later did.

https://x.com/JakeRocket/st...

One was considered a failure, the other a massive success so I don't think it just boils down to sales.

Redemption-64132d ago

@Foxtrot

Hey, maybe you clearly know more than the director/writer. If memory serves me right, Days Gone went on sale faster than Ghost. Also, please know budget is a major factor. There is a huge difference between Ghost with a budget of $60M selling 8M, vs Days Gone, with a budget of $250M selling 8M after major price cut. One can be considered a success, because it had a much lower budget.

Don't Complain If a Game Doesn’t Get a Sequel” If You Didn’t Buy It “At F-cking Full Price, clearly shows the game didn't make the money it needed to make within the time frame it needed

Redemption-64132d ago

@jwillj2k4

What is shows is majority of gamers didn't think Days Gone was worth the $60 price tag and clearly Sony agrees with them. You can like a game, but if you don't think it is worth the price tag, why do you complain when the company decides to not invest in a game you don't think is worth what they are charging? They should release the game, lose money, cut the price and then you will support it?

jwillj2k4130d ago

Reading is fundamental. I said start with a reduced price not cut the price after you’ve already released it. It was an example to show how there are other ways they couldn’t make money. The idea is that number of buyers is much greater at $20 than $60. I didn’t think I had the point that out to you.

Redemption-64130d ago (Edited 130d ago )

@jwillj2k4

The number of buyers being greater at $20 than $60 does not equate to more money. You literally have to sell 2-3 times more to makeup the difference. Starting with a reduced price for an AAA that costs say $250M is pure stupidity and again would have to sell 2-4 times more depending on the reduced price break even. Or include micro transactions. They can make it into a free live service game with mtx. Yeah, you are right, maybe they should follow the route 2K NBA took

Clearly many don't think the game is worth $60. Who knows maybe the remaster can give it hope. But it would be funny if they get a sequel and people refuse to buy it at full price. Highly doubt those who think the game isn't worth 60, will be lining up for 70.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 130d ago
S2Killinit132d ago

Days Gone deserved so much better than 71. I’ve noticed that some PlayStation games get attacked and it feels generated. Like money is behind the hate campaign.

-Foxtrot132d ago

Days Gone was that one game which wasn't really attacked by gamers but by journalists.

As soon as it was revealed they really didn't like it for some reason, it was made out to be because it came across as a generic looking open world game or another generic "zombie" game but at the time we had plenty of open world games and a fair few "zombie/infected" games that these journalists didn't bad an eyelid towards.

When the game released broken before the Day One patch it just gave these journalists a massive excuse to slaughter the game in their reviews.

On one hand, a game shouldn't have released in that broken state or at least they shouldn't have given journalists a copy without the Day One patch HOWEVER these are the same journalists who usually gloss over that kind of stuff with so many other games, take Star Wars Outlaws for example, the game was a buggy, broken mess at launch with plenty of issues, bad AI, some clear performance issues and a lot of quality of life improvements needed but it still did a lot better than Days Gone at launch.

Personally I think they knew they could get away with it more because Sony Bend weren’t that high up and respectable, they knew calling their game out as much as they did wouldn't hit them with any major consequences unlike if they hypothetically were like this towards NaughtyDog, Sony Santa Monica or Insomniac.

RaidenBlack132d ago

Yea and there was/is a PC version of 1886 too in 2016 ... but now maybe collecting dust in some dev's hardrive.

Relientk77132d ago

That's lame. It's not perfect, definitely a flawed game, but deserves a sequel. You already have the first game as a starting point just need to improve upon it. This could have been a much better sequel like the jump from Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed 2. The IP has potential.

S2Killinit132d ago

But Assassins Creed sold a lot.

Show all comments (57)