200°

E3 '08: Square: Game Informer Discuss The Publishing Powerhouse's Hardest Hitters

Last week during E3 Game Informer had a chance to sit in on not one, not two, but three Square Enix roundtable discussions. Each of the intimate chats involved up and coming titles from the publishing powerhouse, including talk about Final Fantasy XIII, Star Ocean 4: The Last Hope, Infinite Undiscovery, and The Last Remnant.

Roundtable Participants:
Yoshinori Kitase: Producer, Final Fantasy XIII
Meagan VanBurkleo: Game Informer Online
Joe Juba: Game Informer Magazine

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
Laexerias5900d ago

Why dont they ask for the Release Date of THe Last Remnant for the PS3? And why dont they ask if there will be a Star Ocean Port?
If they would be fair to every platform why dont they share the Exclusives!?
Okay Star Ocean 4 is the Versus 13 for Xbox360.. so why not sharing Infinite Undiscovery? B/

monks5900d ago

i personal think Star Ocean 4 will come to the ps3 as the other Star Ocean where on the playstations i could be wrong but thats what i think

now Infinite Undiscovery is a diffrent story being a new IP so who knows maybe we will learn more at the SE event soon

Laexerias5900d ago

But i didnt want to start a flaming contest against me. Star Ocean 4 is a Platin-like Exclusive for the Xb360 Owners and Infinite Undiscovery is a new IP, so there are many doubts, i dont care which of them comes to the PS3 but one should at least come! ( i hope Star Ocean 4. )

B-Rein5900d ago

SE did say that they are NOT SIDING with any companies, if a ps game star ocean remains 360 exclusive that means SE jus LIED!!! and are untrusworth and a really bad company

tako20005900d ago

To tell the truth I don't think SE give a damn about what they said...

So better not raise your hope

juuken5900d ago

B-Rein, I really don't trust Square. They could be saying one thing, and a pile of money is right in front of them.

I want to know what their so-called big announcement is.

Corrupt5900d ago (Edited 5900d ago )

Microsoft owns the Infinite Undiscovery IP since they funded the games development.

cellypower5900d ago (Edited 5900d ago )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... Publisher(s) Square Enix. Theres prolly a timed contract between MS and SE,But MS does not own the IP.

Corrupt5900d ago (Edited 5900d ago )

I'm fully aware Square are now publishers. Tri-Ace and Microsoft teamed up to create an original IP. Microsoft was publishing the game but allowed Square to take over the duties.

Edit: Since Microsoft was the original publisher, they still hold the intellectual property rights for Infinite Undiscovery.

http://www.microsoft.com/li...

'Ctrl + F = Infinite Undiscovery' should end the port speculation.

B-Rein5900d ago

i totally agree, SE are liars, i can no longer trust em, 1s my fav company now my worse but i have the biggest collection of square enix game and i feel as if now they are wrothless, plus i was lookin forward to more of the ps games but....sigh...

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5900d ago
beavis4play5900d ago

if square would spend as much time devoted to actually MAKING the games instead of talking about them then we would probably have the FF games by now. i've gotten tired of listening to this bunch tour the interview circut. just give us the games square and shut up.

mistertwoturbo5900d ago

I like how they asked about how the fanbase feels about Star Ocean going to a completely different platform, and he basically just sweeps the question under the rug.

Le-mo5900d ago

I doubt Square-Enix cares about the fanbase of Star Ocean at this point. Even if it flops on the 360 they're still making money off of Microsoft paycheck.

gano5900d ago

How since the e3 setting of a xbox version of ff13, the same stories/questions/reminders are being thrown out. When it was a ps3
exclusive u didn't get this much info let alone interviews about it.
There are no new trailers, or info just the same dumb a$$ questions,
and theories on a release.

I guess it's fun to mock no?

VsAssassin5900d ago

Before, I was really an SE fan. Even when people got turned off by the Chrono Cross game, and lots of rants were thrown about, I didn't care. But now, I'm more focused on the gaming circle that I simply cannot ignore the kind of direction they're taking.

I still don't care if they release tons of JRPGs for both consoles. Heck, they can bring VsXIII to the 360 for all I care. The thing is they said that they want to be fair and want to cater to almost everyone. Why are they taking their sweet time to announce SO4 as a PS3 game, too?

I was so pissed when I learned that FFXIII will be multiplat, but only for maybe a day, I guess. Now, my confused judgment on SE has turned into 'I don't care anymore' attitude.

Let's see what kind of 'shocking' news they will deliver in their party this weekend. I know SE's party doesn't feature 360 anywhere. But who knows? Maybe the shocker is the unveiling of future FF mainstream titles to be MS exclusive. There I said it.

Show all comments (21)
230°

Nintendo Accused of 'Bullying' in Weak Patent Dispute Over Palworld

The article discusses a claim by an intellectual property (IP) expert that Nintendo likely does not hold patents strong enough to prevent the game developer Pocketpair from creating Palworld, a game that some believe resembles Pokémon. The expert suggests that Nintendo's legal challenges against Palworld could amount to nothing more than corporate bullying, as the patents Nintendo might be relying on are not robust enough to stand up to legal scrutiny. The situation could be seen as an example of a large corporation trying to exert undue influence over a smaller competitor.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
-Foxtrot1d 19h ago

Crazy how far they are willing to go over nothing rather than tell Game Freak to get their shit together and sort the quality of the mainline games out.

Personally I'd drop the two game bullshit, make a full on complete game, and take their time making the best game they can without relying on a silly battle gimmick they'll ditch after one game. Gimmicks out of battle is what they should be focusing on, beauty contests, berry making, secret bases, the underground, Seasons, events during day / night and post game content like travelling to a new location or something.

porkChop1d 13h ago

That's the thing, this is why we're now seeing more serious competitors in the genre. Game Freak has just been coasting by, doing the bare minimum in innovation for the last 20+ years. They need to get with the times. Hire more devs, give more dev time to foster creativity, etc. But now that they can't get away with that bare minimum they're trying to sue their competitors out of existence. It's disgusting.

gold_drake1d 8h ago

been saying this since sun and moon.

gamefreak just isnt used to, still isnt used to, the console market. they did well on the handheld space but as a complete 3d developer z they fail miserable

the last two pkmn gens look like gamecube games. not to mention the bugs at launch.

but uve seen the ridiculous anount of copies sold at launch too.

Profchaos16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Realistically though palworld Pokemon with guns featured so many themes and concepts that Nintendont
There's no way they would make a game where you could use realistic weapons or have pals slaving away.

They're not the same genre at all they just feature similar characters

Markdn1h ago

Can't hide plagerism I guess, Palworld had it easy, even flaunting it, they deserve ever thing Nintendo decides to throw at them.

FinalFantasyFanatic13h ago

I pretty much agree, two editions of the same game shouldn't even been a thing at this point. The foundations are solid, but the lack of content and having a lived in world really let the latest games down.

Profchaos6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Two editions worked way back in the day as a gimmick hey your mate has different Pokemon in blue than you have in red so trade them but nowadays it's pointless we don't have any of those limitations system links not really a thing anymore and two editions feels exploitive nowadays like they are targeting kids to double dip

badz14912h ago

why would they do that when the fanbase is still willing to buy whatever low-effort and low-cost crap they are churning out? they are out to make as much money as possible with as little investment as possible and say what you want but GF is excellent at that front mainly because the fanbase allows them to. Nintendo is saying nothing because they are making money.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
Valkyrye1d 17h ago

posting articles from msn.com now seriously?

MaximusPrime_1d 10h ago

The article is actually Gamesradar's. MSN just used their page like a URL shortened link.

MeteorPanda17h ago

It's straight up bullying with mooney and using the government laws as a tool to do so. They should be fined.

Show all comments (22)
90°

Dragon’s Dogma 2 Shouldn’t Let Its PS5 Pro Update Arrive Empty-Handed

Entering Q4 and with the impending release of the PS5 Pro and major AAA titles this holiday season, Dragon's Dogma 2 has a golden opportunity for DLC.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Eonjay23h ago

I have to disagree. Personally, I feel like DD2 still needs a lot of optimization. I really dislike games that try to sell a bunch of DLC when their game is still a mess.

Redgrave21h ago

This, RDR2, Bloodborne.... and of course, Life of Black Tiger.

80°

Anniversary: Nintendo Is 135 Years Old Today

Where does the time go?

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com