Product Review's Daniel writes:
Recently on the MTV's multiplayer blog we read a few comments Peter Dille, Vice President, Sony Computer Entertainment of America made about exclusives and how they affect the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 sales.
What's interesting is the view Peter Dille has on exclusives that then become non-exclusive and the real exclusive games.
One game that comes to mind is Final Fantasy XIII, this was going to be a Sony PS3 exclusive and then Microsoft open their wallet wide to get FFXIII on the Xbox 360. This will bring sales to both games systems.
I agree but what I don't understand is they don't have any and are simply not activly doing anything to get them.
But, when people say he doesn't make sense I don't see what they mean. You can clearly see his point is as followed.
Having a real game exclusive is more important than having DLC for a multiplatform game exclusive. Simple really and if people were more open minded they'd probably be able to see how easily his words are to comprehend, then again Kotaku is one of the 1st sites to run this story originally so being stupid is a prerequisite to the site.
I'd rather have a full on exclusive game like MGS4 and Uncharted, R&C, Resistance, Killzone and so forth and so on than DLC for GTA4 which sucks so bad it's not worth the 30 dollar price tag the DLC is going to carry.
Don't get me wrong,but right now,the ps3 does have a much better line-up,if you're talking about exclusives
EDIT: mind explaining the disagrees? Jeez xbots
I personally don't see a FF13 as a mover of systems, that title belongs to Halos, Metal Gears/God of Wars, and Marios/Zeldas.
If I was making a game I would want to sell that game to as many people as possible. If I could make a version for every console I would.
PS3 wins hands down!!