GameRevolution: "I've always been fond of tactical shooters, so this E3 was a particularly memorable one for me. Ubisoft alone had three of these games on the show floor, all with Tom Clancy in their name, and the potential to be great games. One of them I played was Tom Clancy's The Division, a title that was just as unique as I expected it to be, but not quite as polished this far into development as I hoped."
from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.
If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!
TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."
I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.
Multiplayer or even co-op
If it was always a single player game then that's how it is
It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.
Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.
What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.
Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.
I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.
Thanks to the lowest denominator on the platforms it's on.
I knew it would get another patented Ubisoft graphical downgrade, but I couldn't believe how bad that game looked. My jaw dropped in the worst way possible.
I know graphics aren't everything, but when a game garners so much initial interest based on a new drop dead gorgeous engine, it's a complete and utter disappointment to see it in its current state.
I really want to like this game but every time I hear something about I feel more and more concerned. Im not sure why with Rainbow Six being coop/multiplayer and now Ghost Recon being coop why this isn't just a single player Fallout meets Far Cry kinda game with a really cool atmospheric setting.
Im really hoping this turns out better than this last e3 showed. No more 4 player theough tablet or phone, graghics being worse than originally shown, and people who played it saying its not exactly what they expected are starting to worry me. Since this was my number one anticipated game outside of Fallout4 im really hoping they find a way to make it work nicely... my other worst fear is that it will get the neverending "game balance" treatment so the gear you try and work for one day is less valuable than the day before because of a nerf.
Omg 2013 build was single player( wich always have better graphics then multi) and what we seen this E3 was multiplayer. Get that already. The game still looks good enough. If you dont like it then just dont buy it. Its that simple.