130°
7.0

Bloodborne Review | Gamer's Palace

Gamer's Palace: "Bloodborne has its strength in its great atmosphere and its beatiful and frightening environment, just as it has solid hack'n'slash mechanics at a fairly high difficulty level. Also, it does not lose its appeal for motivated players in the long run, because story as well as the random dungeons offer a great load of challenges.

However, technical flaws weigh as nearly as much: As if stuttering and flickering were not bad enough for a PS4 exclusive,the game has massive clipping problems and the battles are heavily influenced by those and AI flaws. More effort should have been made in the technical area to make Bloodborne a better and more challenging experience."

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
FITgamer3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Knocking 30 points off mainly for technical issues seems a little ridiculous.

360ICE3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

"(...) and the battles are heavily influenced by those and AI flaws" is the argument they're making. I haven't played Bloodborne, so I don't know anything, but the reviewer apparently thinks the technical issues intrude on the core gameplay.

Crimzon3310d ago

I can't fault the AI personally, I think it's done very well and works perfectly for the design of the game itself. I don't really know how it could be improved.

The technical issues, though? Yeah, they're incredibly frustrating. The loadtimes are abysmal but they don't really bother me too much I guess, the main complaint I have is in regards to the framerate being so bad which just ruins the whole experience. The whole game is so janky/stuttery that it's driving me crazy, and it's all the more frustrating because the game looks gorgeous and is brilliantly designed, but all of that comes undone when it runs so poorly. It makes me sad that this will never come to PC because getting to play this game at a stable framerate would be fantastic, and 60fps would be a dream.

breakpad3310d ago

a mediocre review for Bloodborne is a clickbait review ...end of story (or an idiot's review you choose)

Perjoss3310d ago

"AI is rather intelligent"

Yes, the fights vs other AI hunters is kind of creepy, they dodge your attacks and heal up nicely.

360ICE3310d ago

@Everyone except Breakpad
I don't disagree with anyone. Haven't played the game. I will as soon as I can find the time, though. I'm really hyped!

@Breakpad
There are many kinds of gamers with different likes and dislikes. Some people hate long load times and don't really get a huge sense of achievement from difficult bosses, others approach it completely differently. You'll always have someone who disagree with the majority.

But I understand that people having different opinions can be difficult to grasp and really aggravating. MDMA might help (with some caveats).

Also, let's not live in a world where "7/10" is considered mediocre.

uptownsoul3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@360ICE

Valid load times/frame rate issues aside, a reviewers like/dislike of a particular game style or genre should NEVER factor into their final score.

And the only legitimate criticism of this game are load times and frame rate issues…And if you believe those 2 issues should knock down a game's final score 30% then MOST of the games from the 7th & 8th gen were WAY OVER scored

360ICE3310d ago

@uptownsouls

I agree criticisms of specific genres are not really that interesting in a review. You'll note that I didn't say anything else.

And again, the criticism is that frame rate problems and other issues effect the core gameplay. Not saying I agree with that, but it makes sense.

If there were frame issues in "The Impossible game", for instance, it would be a terrible game -- because some games are very dependent on high frame rates.

Snookies123310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

@Number-Nine - Exactly! I was watching a guy doing a walkthrough on YouTube, and when he came across a Hunter he actually thought he was fighting a real person for like 10 minutes. 'AI flaws', yeah right...

ChronoJoe3310d ago

In fairness I think you could make a really strong argument of Bloodborne being a bad game, based on its technical failings. The framerate is awful, and it's clearly not because it's on PS4, but because it's not been optimised all that well (the segments where the framerate dies aren't fantastic visually, and while the game looks good it wont blow you away overall, so really there's no excuse).

Additionally, the load times are atrocious, the network is poor and you spend huge amounts of time searching for someone to invade. I've also had the game crash on me twice.

Still, despite these flaws, Bloodbornes' combat and design is so far ahead of any other RPG, that most of these issues become largely irrelevant. The game is in a league of its own, and that's why it gets the praise it does, I can see why for some these issues could be a deal breaker, but for those that appreciate the games strengths, there's nothing that comes close on the market, and as such Bloodborne deserves a score that represents that.

Just my opinion.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3310d ago
ninsigma3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

I think if the reviewer feels like it affects the game for them too much then I think a 30 point reduction is acceptable. I don't find it to be an issue too much, but they are there. We've been screaming at reviewers since unity released with bugs for giving the game too high a score. We can't turn around and bash them FOR doing that now. If we did then we will get nowhere with achieving some proper journalism. I personally think the game is more than 7. I'd give it an 8/8.5 due to the technical issues but 7 is still a respectable score.

Edit:

Though I do disagree with the reviewers statement on the AI. God knows it's kicked my ass plenty of times.

Edit 2:

Scratch that, I'll give it a 9. Nonetheless I stand by everything else I said.

StrawberryDiesel4203310d ago

You're really comparing the POS launch of Assasin's Creed Unity to Bloodborne? They are not even close in terms of fail...Did you play Unity at launch? My friend is an Assasin's Creed fanboy and he returned it despite the fact that he had been anticipating its release for quite some time. He was excited but soon found the game was UNPLAYABLE at launch. Hardly the same scenario as "Frame Pacing" which is BB's problem. Go read Eurogamer/Digital Foundry Technical Analysis before you spread nonsense.

ninsigma3310d ago

What the hell are you talkng about?? I'm not spreading nonsense at all. Maybe learn some comprehension skills.
Bloodborne has frame rate issues full stop. It has audio stutters full stop. It has long loading times full stop. These are the three problems the game has and people may find they ruin the immersion for them. I never said that it was worse than unity but that doesn't stop the game having faults. My point was unity had stupid high scores for being buggy and everyone was goin crazy about that, myself included. The guy above is giving out about this reviewer docking marks from bloodborne for having bugs, which is the exact thing everyone went crazy about NOT happening! I'm just pointing out that we as readers need less of the double standard and more sticking to our guns no matter what the game is in question or else we get force fed the crap we see on here everyday.
so tell me, where is the nonsense??

MysticStrummer3309d ago

"Bloodborne has frame rate issues full stop. It has audio stutters full stop. It has long loading times full stop."

I just killed Amygdala so I'm pretty far into the game. I've seen frame rate issues and long load times (though I don't believe any load time has been the 40 seconds one article claimed right before launch). I don't know what you're talking about regarding audio stutters. The game sounds amazing. The technical hiccups I've experienced aren't worth 30 points. It's this reviewer's right to subtract those points, and it's my right to ignore their opinion from here on.

ninsigma3309d ago

@mystic
I don't find them to be a problem either but I can understand why people would.
I've come across the audio getting messed up a good few times. Mainly in Old Yharnum.

lol that's ok. I won't lose sleep over it ;)

Revolver_X_3309d ago

Its kinda funny when I hear about the framerate issues. I just platinumed BB yesterday, and have to say those framerate drops I only noticed early on in the heavy spider webbed town areas. Once you leave that area, to me, it either didn't happen any more or it was small enough that I didn't notice. It makes me wonder if people who claim this is reoccurring even made it past the beginning areas. Don't get me wrong. The loading times are ridiculous, especially when you die and are anxious to get back into action. The claims of stuttering audio is a first for me, never came across such. My complaints would be completely different. If you are a pro Souls gamer. BB is just far too easy. The speed of combat and the fact that 90% of enemies, including bosses can be riposte by guns, makes this game so easy it's pathetic.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3309d ago
joab7773310d ago

I havnt had any framerate issues during fights, and only a couple in Old Yarnham.

But I think this author misses the point. Everything is meant to be the same b/c you are supposed to learn from your mistakes as you begin to master the system, or your own strengths. It would go against everything that From's games are to change enemy location etc.

Also, the SI and combat are top notch. I had 75k echoes last night and was fighter beasts that throw boulders. I attacked 1 and noticed another above me. I backtracked bit he threw the bolder towards the exit, my natural retreat. I died. But why would he throw it anywhere else? It isn't cheap. It's just smart.

Then you have hunters you can fight, and often they fight like we would by simply overwhelming you, stunning you, finding something that works and repeating...like the widespread gunfire.

This game has some flaws, and I'm an rpg fan so my biggest issue is its streamlining, which leads to less replayability...unless dlc adds more.

remixx1163310d ago

I just feel like he blows it all way out of proportion, I haven't noticed massive fps issues or barely any sound clipping, though the load times are a bit much but not as overblown as this blatant click bait trash would have you believe.

nucky643310d ago

well, he called it a "hack and slash" game - that statement shows he doesn't know what he's talking about.

SmielmaN3310d ago

Totally agree. I played it kind of hack and slashy for about 7 hrs before I started to lure ppl out and dodge like a mofo.

MysticStrummer3309d ago

People actually disagreed with you.

lol

Proof that they have no clue.

scientificreasoning3310d ago

Especially considering they are exaggerated and not near as bad as this troll makes out, the Frame rate is sold 99% of the time and the bets of any souls game.....

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3309d ago
psplova3310d ago

Right. I rarely see any hiccups and when I do they do nothing to hamper my experience in this game. Load times being the biggest complaint I have, give me a moment to check my phone which works out well actually.

xabmol3310d ago

Yeah, and it give me time to make a sandwich. So the load times are A-O.K. with me!

/s

poor_cus_of_games3310d ago

Must be a very small sandwich.

psplova3310d ago

lol Riiiiight.. They're not that bad dude. Give me a break.

xabmol3310d ago

Just trying to point out how stupid it is to say that long loading screens are OK because you needed that time to do something else anyway.

Just cus it's an awesome game doesn't mean it gets a free pass.

Guess I need a larger "/s" in my post. Or maybe my humor is off?

Deadlead3310d ago (Edited 3310d ago )

Haha I'm surprised it took this long for the blatant attention seeking review to show up. Not even clicking to view article.

bmwfanatic3310d ago

So I guess all the other reviewers and gamers me included are playing a different game.

MasterCornholio3310d ago

-shrugs-

I guess. I'm playing the game and it isn't anything like what the critic played.

TheColbertinator3310d ago

Oh yes this must be the true definitive review we all waited for. Silence everyone,the Gamers Palace has spoken.

/s

Show all comments (56)
140°

The 7 Best Souls-Like Games - Mastering the Challenge

The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?

toxic-inferno23d ago

Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.

kevco3323d ago

Still DS1? You don't feel it's been surpassed yet?

Demon's Souls has the remake of course, but DS1 has surely been outdated?

Smellsforfree23d ago

I think that the DS1 remake is better looking than DS2. The interior lighting matched with the low resolution textures in DS2 is very garish, IMO.

Besides graphics, what do you mean by DS1 being "outdated"? I'm someone who played through Elden Ring and just recently played through the DS series, and as far as gameplay went, there were all very similar.

Cacabunga23d ago

I haven’t played many but Bloodborne and NIOH1 are on top of my list.. had a blast with these 2

toxic-inferno23d ago

For world design and interconnectedness (that's a word, right?) DS1 is yet to be beaten.

290°

9 Years Later, Does Bloodborne Deserve All The Praise It Gets?

Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."

jznrpg25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne

thorstein25d ago

I literally replayed it recently and it's better than I remember. I think it's like going back to a beloved book and noticing things I hadn't before.

raWfodog25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yo! I was getting ready to reply with the exact same four words you started with lol. Yes, I think Bloodborne has withstood the test of time and remains a great game. That’s why all the fans are hoping for a sequel someday. Hoping that we can catch that magic again with a new storyline.

Leeroyw25d ago

Yes. Just replayed it a few days ago. My first Platinum. And yes. I rage quitted so many times and called it BS too when I started. It's tight. The combat is amazing and the lore is rich.

GamingSinceForever25d ago

Elden Ring was easier? I don’t know about that at all. I remember leveling up in Bloodborne and breezing through it. In Elden Ring no matter how powerful I got I was still catching a beat down from every boss.

thorstein25d ago

That's due to scaling enemies. I remember not doing Haligtree untill near the end and having enemies withstand almost a full blast from Azur's Glintstone Staff Comet Azure. My level was quite high.

Melee characters are not fun in that game, especially for the Elden Beast.

MeteorPanda25d ago

Considering l did a run 2 months ago? Yes.

Show all comments (54)
160°

Bloodborne's Potential Remaster Continues To Be Sony's Biggest Missed Opportunity

"Sony is missing out on a hugely profitable opportunity by ignoring fan demands for a Bloodborne remaster and PC port," says Ahmed from eXputer.

thorstein54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software. What missed opportunity? I am sure the people at From Software know what they are doing. Especially since they are hiring devs instead of laying them off.

Maybe do an article about that instead of writing a hit piece on them acting like they don't know how to run their business.

53d ago
-Foxtrot53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

To be fair Hidetaka Miyazaki said in an interview

“Unfortunately, and I’ve said this in other interviews, it’s not in my place to talk about Bloodborne specifically. We simply don’t own the IP at FromSoftware.”

So the ball kind of is in Sonys court, it feels like a missed opportunity because it’s something people really want and Sony just hasn’t really been bothered to get it off the ground. There was rumours it was at one point but it all went silent.

Cacabunga52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Sony has been missing nothing but opportunities for a few years now.. since GOW release, it’s worrying silence we’ve been getting..

As for Bloodborne, imo it would be too soon to release it because PS4 game still looks phenomenal..

Bloodborne REMAKE I think will be PS6 launch title by Bluepoint. I truly hope so! 2 gens later we can get the same wow effect as Demons Souls.

Eonjay52d ago

He is right because it is Sonys IP but a little further back he also explained that they only work on one game at a time. This means that From must also be available. In other words it could already be in the pipeline. Ecen if that is the case, it's still up to Sony to reveal it when they are ready. As ever, I prefer not to hear about it until it's about 3 to 6 months from releasing.

CrashMania53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

'Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software'

Actually Sony owns the IP, same with Demon's Souls. I think they'd prefer if From did the work on any future of both of those though, but if Sony wanted to they could have those off to anyone else to work on them, like the DS remake.

thorstein53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Yeah. Thanks for the info.

But I still think that remasters should wait a generation. And Blue Point did Demon's Souls which was superb.

It can be a huge risk. And I think Hidetaka Miyazaki hinted that it would be a PS6 title. I don't he has no say in what happens, it's a partnership.

--Onilink--52d ago

To be honest, if there is a remake/remaster (not that it needs one) I would prefer someone else to handle it, like they did with Demon Souls

From many perspectives From Soft is an amazing developer, BUT, on a technical level they are far from impressive, both in terms of dated visuals (again, on a technical level, not art/design) and usually poor performance.

And what is the point of a remake/remaster if not to provide a visual and performance enhancement to a game that already nailed the rest?

Michiel198952d ago

@thorstein what huge risk? Part of one of the most well known ip's in gaming nowadays, there's not much risk there when it comes to a remake.

thorstein51d ago

@Michiel

I meant remasters in general are a huge risk, not Bloodborne.

Bloodborne isn't, but I think it's going to be on PS6, like how Demon's Souls went from PS3 to PS5.

Sorry for the confusion.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
thesoftware73052d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Thorstein,

Wow, your post seems angry..relax it's an opinion.

And btw, it is on Sony, they have the exclusive right to the game, on top of that, they could have easily, at bare minimum, offered an official 60fps patch, with a few extras and charged people $10 to upgrade or $30-40 for new buyers.

I believe I saw an interview where , FromSoft said it was all up to Sony on a sequel and other dealing with the game.

A "hit peice", that serious huh?..relax lol.

thorstein52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Wow you seem angry. I responded to crash 2 days ago about the remaster and who did it.

Why do you care what other people think in a moment about some journalism. Calm down, buddy, it's just my opinion. From 3 days ago.

Edit: I just went back through my comments and found 2 where I call out the author in the past month. Wow, I'm a rageaholic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
potatoseal53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

It will be a launch title on PS6 just like the remake of Demon's Souls for PS5 launch

OhReginald52d ago

Sony realizes people will flock to buy ps6s for a bloodborne remake. Easy money.

jznrpg52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Rumored it’s slated for PS6 launch. Some say PS5 Pro. Who knows ?

P_Bomb52d ago

Highly requested, unfortunately neglected.

jznrpg25d ago

Some say we didn’t need TLOU2 remake but that was a PS4 game and now we need a BB remake but that was a PS4 game. We send mixed signals

Show all comments (23)