1040°

Square Enix reveal E3 Line Up

Square Enix Ltd, the publisher of Square Enix interactive entertainment products in Europe and other PAL territories, and Square Enix, Inc. the publisher of Square Enix interactive entertainment products in North America, announced their extensive line-up for the E3 Media & Business Summit today, confirming an impressive array of games ranging from re-mastered classics to brand-new IP's.

Read Full Story >>
wonderwallweb.com
Harry1906190d ago

The Legend of Kage is getting a sequel. Pure awesome.

Yoma6190d ago

Oh well

No Final Fantasy XIII? I thought that was confirmed?

PS360WII6190d ago

Ha that's what I'm saying. Not to long ago I picked up The Legend of Kage on VC so this is a warm welcome :)

Lots of games they'll be showing off and lots of games I'll probably end up buying lol

Pika-pie6190d ago

I dont believe for a second that FFXIII wont be at E3.

TheHater6190d ago (Edited 6190d ago )

wow, no PS3 exclusive.
Edit: @2.1
I know. But why are they not listed. Will the not be there. Or is Square just messing with us?

GodsHand6190d ago (Edited 6190d ago )

You already know the PS3 exclusive. I'll give you a hint it used to be exclusive to Nintendo NES, and SNES era.

Harry1906190d ago

and only talked about during the Sony Conference. I know they are supposed to provide official papers and all,but in the past,many games
have been kept secret until the press conferences and not mentioned in the lineup.

SUP3R6190d ago (Edited 6190d ago )

So I'm guessing FFXIII info is exclusive to their August event?

Also, thanks to this site for noticing, but Star Ocean isn't listed as a 360 exclusive unlike Infinite Undiscovery.
http://buttonmasher.co.nz/2...

AngryBot6190d ago

We all know this would be a multi platform game. Some people were just living in denial. Thats all.

Do not live in denial just like they are. Embrace the reality.

JasonXE6190d ago

The info below doesn't state the ps3 verison (just 360) and they could of just assumed it was already exclusive since its in the 360 section.

Voiceofreason6190d ago

Or maybe Square decided to not let the PS3 version of the game hold back the 360 version of the game. Like GTA4 didnt do.I dont mind waiting an extra 6 months as long as it plays at the same resolution as the 360 version will. Then again I look back at GTA and think"Well they had more time on the PS3 version yet it doesnt play at 720p and still needed to be patched to make it some what close to payable as the 360 version."

sleepyk6190d ago

Actually, due to 360 old gen dvd drive and lack of disc space and the fact that the online multiplayer is at work. And yet, the 360 is holding back the true potential of the PS3.

fusionboxer6190d ago

Shut the hell up haha. You know you couldn't tell it wasn't 720p until rockstar said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6190d ago
iGrenade6190d ago

Wow these guys are smart, saying: The Last Remnant - "Groundbreaking graphics only possible on Xbox 360 bring the intensity to a whole new level." when it's also coming to the PS3? It really makes no sense... what are they hoping for? And "...introducing the amazing graphics and visual effects only possible on Xbox 360." - Star Ocean IV, not confirmed as a 360 exclusive, PS3 version is just not announced (most likely a timed-exclusive, I'm looking at you BioShock), Star Ocean has always been on PS, it will come.

What the hell happened to FFXIII? Did it die or something? If it's not coming this year, the PS3 has no real contender against Fable 2.

SUP3R6190d ago

You comment isn't worthy of a proper reply so I'll just leave this...

BLUR1116189d ago

SO corny... BUT that is the best picture of FAIL ive seen

jkoz6190d ago

Give me DS/PSP/PS3 Kingdom Hearts!!!!

Show all comments (97)
80°

Josh Sawyer: "I feel good about the ability for people to create games."

Game Pressure met with the one and only Josh Sawyer at Digital Dragons and chatted about RPGs, Pentiment, Pillars of Eternity, the state of the industry, and the genre.

Read Full Story >>
gamepressure.com
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola11d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion9d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola9d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin8d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola8d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop8d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel18d ago (Edited 8d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola8d ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel17d ago (Edited 7d ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris11d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK9d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds8d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar9d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy9d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel18d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola10d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer9d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused9d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion9d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher9d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer9d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion9d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola9d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
victorMaje9d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola9d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused9d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
Inverno9d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool9d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
80°

Silly Polly Beast: A Silent Girl's Fight for Freedom • VGMM

Play as Polly, a silent girl on the run from her dark past in this neon-soaked psychological horror shooter.

Read Full Story >>
videogamesmademe.com