310°

Xbox One 900p vs PlayStation 4 1080p – Is The Resolution Really Important?

The war between Microsoft and Sony has become a dispute between their fans and they arguing over which system is more powerful, many invoking the higher resolution supported by the PlayStation 4 to be a bigger advantage, while others don’t consider the small resolution difference a big deal. But how will we differentiate these consoles? Let’s put the fans in a dilemma by talking about their content, features and frame rates.

Read Full Story >>
thefusejoplin.com
stuna13755d ago

For some it is and, for some it's not! I think the basic concept applies to most thing in life as far as what some would say makes something more appealing or, considered better made or, of bette quality, but I think the one thing that should always take center stage in this case. Is the gameplay top notch!?

You can have the most pristine graphics, but if the gameplay doesn't at least come close, who's going to bother?

sinjonezp3755d ago

Ultimately gameplay is the most important aspect of any game. However, getting the best visual experience is important and I own both systems. I have played most multiplatform games and the ps4 games look better. I have a 55 inch led to measure and it's clear. So if you can get the best visual experience with gameplay experience, what is there to talk about? That's like saying will you take the same car with less horse power? It's all the same but that car has 200 less horse power for the same money. I think especially the fact that we waited 7-8 years for a new console, gamers want that fidelity and who can argue that. I myself like the highest quality with a game experience. And I'm sure most if not all would agree.

typittt693755d ago

Funny i have both too as well as a 55" tv and unless i get 12 inches close to the tv i can't see the difference. And reading your comment, i think it's pretty clear you only own one system, and which one it is.

reallyNow3755d ago

@typitt

not trying to be a total jerk, but either you're sitting too far from your tv or you should go to an eye doctor, really. 55 inches is plenty big enough to see the differences between 900p and 1080p if you're sitting at the correct distance. I would know, i require corrective lenses.

UKmilitia3755d ago

i have a 47" tv and from 5/6ft i can see a slight increase but when i play on my 106" projector 1080p is a huge difference(sat 13ft away)

Bennibop3755d ago

I game on a 4k tv and you can see it then due to the upscaling

Griever3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

People have forgotten what this resolution debate was all about to begin with. When both consoles were announced, there was an endless debate about which one was more powerful and by how much margin. When it was established to a certain extent that PS4 was more powerful, the Xbox One fans claimed that extra power, if any, will go to waste since developers will aim for parity. However, when mulitplatform games started appearing with higher resolution on PS4, it was undeniably proven that PS4 was more powerful and PS4 fans used that point as an argument. That is what the whole debate is about. When someone says that a certain game runs at higher resolution on PS4, he only means to prove that PS4 is more powerful; at least that is what it used to mean. Why dont people get what the whole issue is about and think that fans are fighting just over pixels? The PS4 fans are fighting over the denial about the PS4's superior hardware. Even now hardcore Xbox fanboys such as Mister X and his followers keep spreading lies about supposedly superior hardware capabilities of Xbox One which have been kept secret due to some inexplicable NDAs.

Army_of_Darkness3755d ago

If you have a full 1080p HDTV that's 50" or bigger, then yes. It matters.

Highlife3755d ago

I have an hd projector and at 120 inches I still don't care the game still plays the same. If the ps4 is more powerful great but the games still look close enough. Same went for most ps3 and 360 games

frankdrebin723754d ago (Edited 3754d ago )

Yet is it not the same people that eagerly await Digital Foundrys analysis of games?
The same people who shout from the rooftop that 1080p is THE definative proof of power.
Yet these people grasp at DF tests, on how many hours of a game was played BEFORE any apparent difference occurred?
Ask yourself if you rely on DF to tell you that game a i slightly better after 6 hours game play, that game b had better fps due to the hour age of analysis via a computer, then IF no such comparison website existed would it be noticed?
I mean they need computer software to weed out the info after hours of playing.
1080p is x amount of more pixels than 900p Cmon get a life.
I don't see the ps4 fanatics complain when they stream the games they have at 720p.
Does the fact those games are only 720p make that game any less enjoyable??
But I must admit the amount of peeps with 108 " projectors, 60" led TVs,..my my my one only wonders the size of there living rooms,bedrooms,

UnHoly_One3754d ago

If everything is the same between two versions of the game, 1080p is better, of course.

But, I'd rather have more fancy graphical features, lighting, etc... And have the resolution held down if necessary.

Same goes for framerate, 60 fps is all well and good but I'd rather have a better looking game at 30 fps.

All of that said, the difference between resolution isn't going to be enough to override other differences between the consoles and make me choose the PS4 version of a multiplat.

Xbox has all of my friends, my preferred controller layout, my achievements, etc... Plus the console's features and interface itself is light years ahead of PS4.

Just my 2 cents, but all of that stuff is more important TO ME than a few extra P's.

Neonridr3754d ago

on a 55" TV you have to be sitting less than 10' away to see the actual pixels with the human eye. They have done studies, there is no way to BS your way through that. I don't sit that close to my TV, so my eyes have a hard enough time trying to see the difference between 720p and 1080p.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3754d ago
Bigpappy3755d ago

I'll keep it simply. With everything else being equal, 1080p is clearly the better resolution.

Having got that out of the way, there are other things developers can do graphically at 900p, that would be much more difficult to achieve at 1080p. Even though the PS 4 can display more detail than X1, due to the GPU having access to more shaders, developers may choose to not use 1080p, so they can use the extra resources on other graphical effects like facial animation, material physics and lighting.

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3755d ago

I think considering Xbox One can 99% produce the same Graphic quality as PS4 but either at a lower native resolution output or lower framerate and considering it's GPU shortcomings compared to the PS4, it's hardly a big factor. Right now, the Xbox One is $350 and PS4 $400 so It would make sense for the stronger GPU to be in the more expensive system even though X1 is/used to be $400 as well, you could argue that the faster CPU could be the balance in price but most people buy these consoles for gaming and really dont brag about stuff like being able to run 4 apps and 1 game at once vs 1 app 1 game, etc. 900p and 1080p is much harder to tell the difference between vs 720p and 1080p.

PrinterMan3755d ago

99% graphical equality???? I think you are over estimating.

Sarcasm3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

900p = 1,440,000 pixels
1080p = 2,073,600 pixels

44% more pixels in 1080p.

Yeah totally 99% of the PS4.

o_o

Mehmeh3754d ago

@sarcasm

Graphics and resolution = two different things

Just for general information

3755d ago Replies(3)
otherZinc3755d ago

Lol! The PS4 has zero 1080p 60fps AAA Exclusive Games, none! All the PS4 has are PS3 & 360 ports that's 1080p 60fps. Also, there are no 60fps locked titles.

Forza Motorsport 5 is the only 1080p 60fps AAA next-gen Exclusive, period!

Also, the PS4 has no 1080p 60fps AAA Exclusives on the way for 2015. None!
The Order 1886 isn't
Blood Born isn't
Uncharted 4 isn't
Now what?

However, for XBOX ONE 2015:
Fable Legends will
Forza Motorsport 6 will
Halo 5 will
All be 1080p 60fps.

Now what?

BattleTorn3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

You can shout from every mountain top - "Forza 5 is the only next-gen AAA-exclusive that runs @1080/60, and it's only on Xbox One" - but that won't change the fact that the overarching trend is devs are getting their games to run better on PS4 than Xbox One.
I am almost positive you're aware of this, so pretending otherwise is incredibly misleading!

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag
Battlefield 4
Battlefield: Hardline (beta)
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Destiny (beta)
Dragon Age: Inquisition
Dying Light
Far Cry 4
Golf Club
Lords of the Fallen
Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes
Metro: Redux
Middle-Earth: Shadow Of Mordor
Murdered: Soul Suspect
Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare
Pro Evolution Soccer 2015
Shadow Warrior
The Evil Within
Thief
Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Trials Fusion
Warframe
Watch Dogs
Wolfenstein: The New Order

That is the complete list of multiplats that ran at higher specifications on Ps4.

Here is the Xbox One's:

nil
zip
natta

http://ca.ign.com/wikis/xbo...

And people question why we left Xbox... FMR

Dhampir3755d ago

Halo 5 beta ran at 720p. 343 couldn't even get halo2 to run at 1080p, most likely it will run at 900p@60.
Fable Legends is targeting 1080p@30hz
Forza 6 hasn't had anything shown or announced other than cover art.

Spotie3755d ago

And Turn 10 only needed cardboard cutout crowds, no day/night cycle, no weather, no dynamic lighting, and half the content of the last game in the series to get that 1080p, 60fps.

Any game can reach those numbers if you cut graphical content.

What's more important is what Griever noted above: there's a difference in multiplats.

ShwankyShpanky3755d ago

Isn't MLB The Show 1080/60?
COD:AW maintains 1080/60 99% of the time as well.

ENSABAHNUR3754d ago

Now I can see you're a typical sheep that's clearly a X1 Fanboy... Probably due to some obviously mental illness but hey I'm not here to judge... Just pointing out the obvious.... What has me wondering though is when are ALL of you sheep/fanboys gonna start taking the medication your doctors provided you... Btw this applies to both MS & PS idiots.... If you take a look from the outside looking in... ( which I have for a few months before signing up here) you guys have a sickness to a degree that if someone that pointed out cold hard facts about your respective system , that shines a light on its shortcomings, you bold face deny it as if real life is some sort of fantasy dream land... Seriously people like you and the others need to get off the sticks for a while because clearly you have some sort of malfunction...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3754d ago
assdan3755d ago

THIS! I'm so tired of people saying res makes no difference. A resolution downgrade is immediately apparent to me. If it isn't to you, that's fine, but don't be a dick because you can't see it. Which is what most xbox fans have become at this point.

miyamoto3755d ago

18.5 million units sold says it is very important.

Syleros3754d ago

@stuna1
i completly agree with you, some people like their french fries with a little salt, some like mountains of salt. it's all to taste, i personally can't tell the difference between 900p and 1080p. as i would believe most people that say they can tell the difference are completly full of crap.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3754d ago
Neonridr3755d ago

In the grand scheme of things, no, the resolution is not THAT important. The game will suck or be good regardless of the resolution. TLOU was a great game at 720p/30fps and it was the same great game at 1080p/60fps. The increased resolution and frame rate did not make the story of the game better in any way.

But graphics are always a piece of the larger puzzle, and while better graphics may not make a game better in the grand scheme of things, it definitely won't hurt either..

George Sears3755d ago

Well, why I do agree resolution isn't such a deterrent towards gameplay; using your example of The Last of Us, the remastered version was way better with 60 FPS than with 30 FPs.

Gameplay was like night and day. 30fps was so slow and clunky compared to the bump to 60. It made the game lot more enjoyable and worthy of a repurchase.

Neonridr3754d ago

yet when you played it the first time, you didn't notice any of those flaws. It's only when you have something to compare it against that you tend to pick up on everything. It was still a GOTY at 720/30fps is what I was trying to get at. The story was not made any better with the increased graphics.

BattleTorn3755d ago

Dying Light, despite running identical across consoles, made me realize when I LOVE a game, comparisons matter MUCH less.

purp13m0nk3y3755d ago

Dying Light does not run identical on consoles. There is a clear performance advantage to the PS4, not to mention the slight resolution advantage.

I do see your point though. If a games is really fun you tend not to notice the graphical flaws.

RG_Dubz3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

If it's not important then why do you have a 1080p HDTV to begin with?

MS fanboys don't consider the Current-Gen difference to be a big deal but Last-Gen the even smaller differences were a huge deal.. As we can see it's only a big deal if it's in Microsofts favor to MS fanboys.

Ultimately though, the frames per second is more important than resolution because it's actually effects the gameplay.

1080/60fps is preferred but I'll take a 720p or 900p game @ 60fps over 1080p/30fps anyday.. Unfortunately for Microsoft they don't offer that increased frame rate with the lower resolution.

@ Neonridr

But the 1080p/60fps did make TLOU play a lot better and smoother and that's the point.

@ any disagrees

I expect the majority to disagree because the majority of gamers are casuals whom know nothing about gaming.

lifeisgamesok3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

The difference won't be noticed by most and it is so slight that you have to have both versions running side by side to tell so it isn't important

http://static.gamespot.com/...

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aoMr7...

http://cdn4.wccftech.com/wp...

http://storage10.tunefiles....

Death3755d ago

The majority are not disagreeing because they are "casuals" that know nothing about gaming.

Both systems are outputting at 1080p. Native resolution is where the difference is. It's no secret the Xbox One has relied more on the upscaler though. If you are using PSNow or remote play, resolution is not issue for you. Most games on the PS4 are indeed "better" in the fact they run at a higher resolution and at times better frame rate. These games are "superior" in that regard. What is debatable is how much of an impact that makes. Not everyone can see the difference so it is less important to them. There are other features and benefits of each console that are more important to some people and in the end make more of a difference than resolution.

RG_Dubz3755d ago (Edited 3755d ago )

Native > > > Upscaled

Upscaling causes noticable screen tearing even in WATCH_DOGS, AC Unity and EA Sports UFC on the PS4, they all screen tear because they're upscaled from 900p to 1080p, PS Now screen tears like crazy upscaling from 720p to 1080p.

What also makes the PS4 superior in a lot of games is the missing textures on the XB1, lower res textures on XB1, better lighting on PS4, further draw distance on PS4... Don't try to act like it's purely frame rate and resolution because we all know the difference is much bigger, MS fanboys are just trying to down play it as usual.

MS took the resolution off the back off the XB1 game cases, when they were the first to add the resolution to cases when they had the upper hand early on Last-Gen, now hiding the resolution of XB1 games from their consumers.

And believe me that's exactly why they're disagreeing, because if they talking the same BS upscaling you is it's quite evident that they don't know nothing about gaming.

Volkama3755d ago

Upscaling does not cause screen tearing. Those games tear because they do not deliver frames in sync with your screen refresh, so you basically see part new and part old frame. Nothing to do with the resolution, the only link is that the lower resolution and the inconsistent frame delivery both indicate the devs struggled with performance.

Upscaling makes existing defects more noticeable, and bad uoscaling can introduce shimmering, ghosting, halos or other uglies. But the biggest difference is just that the equivalent native resolution can potentially pack more detail.

Kiwi663755d ago

Yet this gen its mostly Sony fanboys that make it a big deal when the average gamer doesn't care

UKmilitia3755d ago

yeah i know the sony fanboys going on about how muich better 1080p is and how it matters so much.

sounds like last gen when xbox 360 fanboys was constantly going on about having 570p over 560p

snoopgg3755d ago

Yeah and last generation it was the 360 fanboys praising better multiports while the ps3 was getting muddy ports early in the ps3 lifecycle. Now that things have changed it no longer matters to the 360 fanboys that graphics are better on the ps4.

Multiplatguy3755d ago

Any fanboy of any platform will consider something to be a big deal only if it's in their favor. Not just MS fanboys. Of course it's only a big deal if it's in their favor, they are fanboys. In the same way that if this situation was reversed, Sony fanboys would claim they don't care too. Not much point listening to fanboys over the matter; only reasonable adults with no loyalty to a company behind the product.

I disagreed because I feel like you're implying only fanboys and casuals don't care about this. I have always chose to game on my console rather than my gaming rig, even last gen when the resolution differences were larger.

Nobody ever called me out for choosing the lower resolution by going with console yet now; If I choose to game on the Xbox then I get called a fanboy, casual or people imply that I am in denial.

You're being disagreed with because there are people who just don't care as much.

donthate3755d ago

To be fair though, the difference last generation mattered more simply because everything was more magnified at lower resolution. As you keep climbing the resolution ladder, you get more and more insignificant differences.

The law of diminishing returns applies!

Just like how once you reach 60 fps, and you start to go over, sure there is a minor difference, but I hardly think most notice or even care if they did.

If they did at that level, they likely would have jumped to PC anyhow. Even the wider gap of PC is hardly noticeable for most people in my opinion anyhow.

I think other choices are far more important to people that choose consoles in the first place, like the social aspect i.e. where your friends are, what features you enjoy, what apps, what games and the controller are far more important.

There is a reason why both Xbox One and PS4 still sells despite PC having a huge performancce gap.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3755d ago
jay23755d ago

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1080P should be a rule, mot acception. Same with 60fps.

Tedakin3755d ago

What if the consoles just can't achieve that every time? Downgrade the in game visuals?

3755d ago
kingduqc3755d ago

You are welcome to game on pc.

Frankly this debate is just stupid, if you want high IQ, res and framerate the only possible place to play is on the pc, been on 1440p for two years and it's just fantastic and worth it.

3755d ago
Show all comments (110)
190°

Nintendo Switch 2 To Sell 100M+ Units by 2029, Is The Most Important Console Launch Ever, Says DFC

DFC Intelligence has big expectations for the Nintendo Switch 2. They estimate over 100 million units sold by the end of 2029.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
_SilverHawk_4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

dont think itll happen because of COQ. it costs as much as gaming consoles that are way better in a lot of ways and nintendo normally thrives on selling cheaper hardware than the competition. i believe that because the switch 2 and the games are so expensive and are far inferior to better versions available for the same price or cheaper on better gaming consoles that gamers would rather get a better value for their money and buy something better than the switch 2. the switch 2 can do a lot better if it isnt expensive and the games are cheaper.

Muigi4d ago

Yeah but I can’t play my PS5 Pro on a plane or the subway.

Neonridr4d ago

don't worry, they'll tell you to buy a $300 accessory on top of the console so you can "stream" it to play it. (subject to network capabilities of course)

MrNinosan4d ago

@Neonridr
The Playstation Portal is amazing, but if you don't want to spend the 300$, just use your phone or tablet that you probably own already

jznrpg4d ago

@MrNinosan it’s 199$ for Portal

MrNinosan4d ago

@jznrpg
Might be, I just answered to his bullshit comment.
As I live in Sweden, I paid way more for my Portal, around 350$ at release, but still use it daily at work and in my bed, so well invested 👍

b00mFargl33d ago

However, the Switch 1.5's capabilities do not compare to those of the PS5 Pro; in fact, the Series S is more powerful.

The PlayStation does offer an accessory that provides a similar function, but many other handheld devices offer superior capabilities. Essentially, you are purchasing a device primarily for playing Mario games, with some niche features that Nintendo cleverly markets to its loyal customer base.

Jingsing3d ago

Also remember Switch 2 is now bigger than Switch. People don't like to carry as much stuff these days.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
Neonridr4d ago

*costs as much currently.

We've already seen MS have to adjust the price of their consoles, and it's possible Sony could follow suit.

And your definition of "far inferior" is subjective to the end-user. Can I take my PS5 Pro version of the game with me on the go? No.

Dhika3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Hahaha. We'll see. I'm not keen on seeing you moving goal posts as usual lol.

princejb1343d ago

Inferior according to who? You may not like Nintendo because they don’t have the most updated graphics but they do well when it comes to fun games. What’s the point of a game that looks beautiful but is boring to play. There’s a reason why they keep selling millions every generation.

thesoftware7303d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Silver, I disagree.

Nintendo sells consoles primarily off of their exclusive content that you can't get anywhere else ever. I will add that that content is regarded by many as some of the best in gaming, if not the best, along with a super loyal fanbase, nostalgia, and the most popular IPs ever created. The system will run exclusive 3rd party games as well as playable ports of current and future games for the next 4-5 years, the majority of casual gamers don't care about tech specs or FPS, and even some hardcore fans don't care that much, and will choose a very playable portable port for the versatility of playing on the T.V or on the go...

I think the price will have a small impact, but 100M in 4 years is totally doable. Where else can you play the next Zelda, Mario Kart, Metroid, and Pokemon games? It will sell.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
darthv724d ago

Pretty ambitious... it could be done so long as they lower the price of the games and the system to something more reasonable.

jznrpg4d ago

Least exciting Nintendo launch for me.

MrNinosan4d ago

First console I won't buy at release since the original NES.

repsahj4d ago

Not me. I am excited as when I first bought my Mario Odyssey bundle Switch 1.

MrNinosan4d ago

Because of Mario Kart?
Or what is it that excites you?

repsahj4d ago

Because of everything Switch 2, I am very impressed with what I am seeing so far. And because 3 of my friends who I play Helldivers 2 with will also get it. We will all be getting the Mario Kart World bundle.

Elda4d ago

For me...I beg to differ it's an important launch knowing it's not launching with any interesting exclusives except the $80 Mario Kart & I'm not into racers. Until I see some interesting Switch 2 exclusives that I think are a must play I can wait as long as possible before obtaining a Switch 2.

Neonridr4d ago

While I'm getting MK at launch, I'm actually most interested in Donkey Kong. I love the destructible environments.

NotoriousWhiz4d ago

I'm most interested in trying out cyberpunk with mouse controls. If they work really well, Switch 2 may be my console of choice for shooters.

MrNinosan4d ago

Couldn't you try that on PC for the last 5+ years?

NotoriousWhiz3d ago

^ I don't game at a desk and am not interested in using one of those lap desk things. My only "gaming computer" is a steam deck.

neutralgamer19924d ago

I’ve seen a lot of people projecting that the Switch 2 will sell over 100 million units by 2029. While I understand the optimism—especially considering the original Switch’s success—I think those numbers might be overlooking the current state of the market and how much it’s shifted.

First off, we need to stop using early sellouts or pre-order hype as a reliable indicator of long-term success. Every major console that’s launched in the last 25 years has sold out during its pre-order window. Even consoles that were ultimately considered commercial disappointments—like the Wii U—sold out at launch. The PS3, which launched at a hefty $600 back in 2007, still had people lining up. That early rush is almost always driven by the core gaming audience, not the mass market. The real test comes after that honeymoon phase, when sales depend on casual gamers and broader adoption.

And that’s where things get trickier now.

The gaming landscape has changed dramatically. Mobile gaming has completely taken over in terms of both revenue and number of players. It’s bigger than console and PC gaming combined, and it's still growing. That makes sense when you think about it: everyone already has a phone, and many have tablets too. Pair that with a Bluetooth controller and you’ve got a portable, high-quality gaming experience with almost no extra cost.

Consoles and gaming PCs, on the other hand, require a substantial investment just to get started. When money is tighter for a lot of households and the average consumer is more price-conscious, it becomes harder to justify spending $400–600+ on a single-use gaming device—especially when they already own something that plays games well enough.

I’m not saying the Switch 2 won’t be successful. Nintendo has a strong brand and a loyal fanbase. But I do think people are underestimating how much harder it is today to move that kind of hardware volume. The market’s more competitive, more fragmented, and more mobile than ever before

Neonridr4d ago

I fully expect the Switch 2 to sell 100M units. But to say it'll do it within 4 years is a big ask.

Show all comments (38)
50°

Gamescom latam 2025 just ended with record-breaking numbers

"gamescom latam 2025, the Latin edition of the world's biggest games event, was a total success, breaking records during its second year.." - gamescom latam.

60°

GSC Demo Disc #4: May Issue

Explore GSC Demo Disc #4 with a variety of new game demos to try this month. Find your next favourite title today!

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca