640°

The Order: 1886 – Another ‘next-gen’ letdown or a victim of poorly chosen demos?

Dealspwn writes: There’s something not quite right with The Order: 1886. It’s undeniably gorgeous, a testament to the power under the hood of the PS4, but having played it at expos and press events and watched extra footage, many are struggling to form an attachment to the game. Where there should be a giddy urge to have the game in our lives as soon as possible, which should be a part of any AAA console-exclusive, we find ourselves struggling to gather much enthusiasm for Sony’s first big game of 2015. Given the rather lacklustre gameplay scenes we’ve seen so far, we can’t help but think that Sony has decided on some oddly dull demos to try and hook us journos and gamers in. Are they avoiding spoilers, or does The Order: 1886 just not have that much to show?

Read Full Story >>
dealspwn.com
Fro_xoxo3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

Neither. .

They are clearly avoiding spoilers. .

If you want more footage you'll have to wait till release.

Personally, I like the mystery. .

Ballsack3384d ago

Lol these 'journalists' and I use the word loosely

'struggling to gather enthusiasm' ..maybe because you have alterior motives like bashing a game you have maybe played for ten minutes if that for hits

Weirdly enough gamers are not struggling for enthusiasm as the order has topped pre order charts..an i for one cant wait to delve into this title

vishmarx3384d ago

as generic and boring these journos think the game is, they sure do love writing about it

Kingthrash3603384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

I dont get the disagrees.
they've been bashing this game far too much even when it was far from release.
if it looks boring to you then its your opinion. If you dont like qtes then its also your opinion. But your opinion isn't fact.
I dont like minecraft. A record selling game, that just looks plain boring to me...bad graphics. ..no story...not for me.
Do I think its a bad game...no I dont. I know its a great game, its just not MY type of game.
This is the first time ive even mentioned minecraft in any post. Because my opinion Is irrelevant due to the fact that 1 ive never played it and 2 I dont like its 1st imperession enough to even try it.
thats the level that these journalists are at. To say something looks boring or you hate the Pacing of a game you haven't played only seen or touched a incomplete demo of is just plane opinion .. ill wait till it comes out ...buy it day 1 and make my own judgment on the game...so tired of people bashing this game but didn't see the signs of tragically released games like ac:unity or bashed Ryse for its qte kills...or even mention the fact that quantum break has basically the same game using slowmotion gameplay, and qtes.
(Qb looking as fun to play as 1886 btw)....these future seeing journalists need to relax a bit becuse the more the bash the game the more "I told you so" articles will come even if it turns out to be a great game..because they hate to eat crow.

breakpad3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

why they all expect super massive quality hits from the first year of a console ? it is only the first year and all speak for letdown and failure for a game that seems exceptionally good (ok maybe it s not the game that cause tremors but its a solid AAA game worth the rational hype ) ..why all that bashing before even the release of the game

freshslicepizza3384d ago

aside from the graphics what exactly is compelling about it other than ps4 owners waiting anxiously for another good aaa exclusive? bloodborne looks a lot better to me.

SpringHeeledJack3384d ago

What is with all the attacks on this game, trying influence and put ideas into reviewers just before release?

This game is going to do really well in Europe with it's dark Victorian setting and werewolves.

morganfell3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

dealspwn - Another typical trash blog or the victim of porrly educated writers posting flamebait articles?

@vishmarx,

Precisely. But then again they are little more than remoras.

stuna13384d ago

I gave you a well said, because what you said was "Well Said!" And I don't get all the disagrees either. It sad when people are so wrapped up in their warpped mental states, that they can't even acknowledge a fair comment.

360ICE3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

"maybe because you have alterior motives like bashing a game you have maybe played for ten minutes if that for hits"

How is that an ulterior motive? That's not a motive, that's an action.

And to be fair to them, I didn't like the one demo I played that much either. Could still be a pretty decent game. But next to Uncharted, it just looks grounded, heavy and felt a little bit clunky.

Then again Uncharted is awesome.

StarLord_Who3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

@Kingthrash360

That's you opinion, thats good but the people trying to rebuttle against The Order 1886 criticism are 99% people who haven't played it yet and they are only judging it by the 30 mins/12 hours of gameplay footage. In this case, those opinions shouldn't count, subjectivity has no place in selling a game, only buying one.

People are really losing grasp of their adjectives, there are more words than amazing and terrible. Try the word worried, because a lot of professonals are with The Order 1886

Nawwwwwww are they skitting your console??? hmmm? your precious console?? I have a ps4 and a brain so that feeling is always negated.

nix3384d ago

dealspwn.com

Story Quality: WTF.
Like this website: NO.

----

Not that these filtering makes any difference 'cause we believe in freedom of press. Sadly.

oODEADPOOLOo3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

@kingtrash360

"if it looks boring to you then its your opinion. If you dont like qtes then its also your opinion. But your opinion isn't fact."

... https://www.youtube.com/wat...
not trying to make the article look like fact either, just found it funny.

Even though I mainly play on PS4 and could be considered a fan of sony..though not a "Fanboy"(becuase I dont like being assiciated with some of the overzelous people online...and esp here on N4G who feel that everything sony produces is absolute gold and should appeal to EVERYONE). Even I'm not picking up The Order right away like so many others, why? because of three reasons... First being it looks a bit too linear, looks to have limited replayability and last, but more minor gripe ..I dont like how this game is turning out to have a low framerate. I like the fact its a story driven game, but I don't see much replayability after completing it, at a gut level.

Before I knew it was single player I was really excited for this game since they gave a premise of team/squad based game, I wanted this to be a great single player/online story co-op game..that to me would have been enough replayability and made sense for the type of squad/based story game its trying to be...without even adding a traditional plyr vs plyr multiplayer. That said the game standing on its own as just a single player game..dosen't sound like something I would pick up day 1.. maybe later on down the road when its cheaper.

I think most of those issues can be attributed to the studios relatively small size compared to other first party studios and their first attempt on console, so maybe I will be more excited about the sequel if it adds adds some online co-op and general replay-ability if this one does well.

But, like I said in the beginning... that's just like, my opinion man.

OB1Biker3384d ago

This game is going to be a huge success and the only ones going down the toilets will be these so called gaming journalists,
The sad thing is lazy jounalism from trolling sites like this one or gaminbot are damaging gaming journalism and you really need to follow writers to be able to put some faith in their opinions.

wsoutlaw873384d ago

I don't usually see writers constantly talking about a game they feel is just what ever. Plenty of games get average reviews, why the hate for the order which is a new ip from a new to aaa console dev.

Spid3r63383d ago

Sony Fanboys have their Ryse.... BTW Ryse was a hell of a good game and everyone bashed it because people thought it was all QTE which really was not the case. They were just finishing moves and you can choose whether you wanted to finish him or continue till their bar would run out of health. I remember the article hitting Ryse really hard like the one where the author stated that "Ryse is as fun as dialing number on your phone" By no means do I think the Order will be a bad game but I don't think is going to be as good as we all thought it would be just like DriveClub and Killzone. Graphics cant hold a candle on story and gameplay.

DARK WITNESS3383d ago

@ StarLord_Who

you are complaining about the people bashing the game based on an opinion they have formed even through they have not played the game... Yet the people defending are also basing their opinion on footage they have seen even though they have not played it.

how do you know it's going to be soooo amazing or ground breaking?... just because it "looks" like the sort of game you like?

If people can form an opinion that the game is going to be amazing, even though they have not played it, what's wrong with people forming an opinion based on the same footage that everyone has used to assume it's going to be awesome, that the game is boring, dull etc?

I am just saying...

personally, I have zero interest in the game. My money is going on bloodborne for feb. There are a lot of games that I think look rubbish that I have never played. If we are honest about it how many people go out and buy every single game to decide if they are going to like it or not? That is crazy.

That's the whole reason people play demo's and devs release footage of their games and so on.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3383d ago
spicelicka3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

That's extremely optimistic thinking. The game isn't going to get spoiled by showing a bit of footage. This is how the game is most likely going to be, for people that like it, great, for people that don't they shouldn't get their hopes up too high.

Game demos are meant to show what the game will be, please stop with the "oh they don't want to reveal anything". If you compare it to the Uncharted 4 demo it looks like a joke, we got a whole lot of features shown in the Uncharted demo, and it shows how the game will look and play, and it looks awesome which is why you don't have any articles bashing it.

For me personally, it seems like a game I'd borrow or rent. I like a bit of choice and sandbox environments. Even Uncharted was too linear for me, but the puzzle-solving and platforming made up for that.

Tetsdah3384d ago

But ultimately if ya into more sandboxy games, it's not gonna be your style of game either way. Really they have to keep their cards, if they do have them, close to their chest because it's a linear game and it'll take away the mystery of the game if you show off too much. It's entirely possible what this writer is writing possibly be the case of just bad demos. Or it could be the alternative as well.

The comparison to Uncharted is interesting because it's an established franchise that doesn't mind showing much of itself because it already knows what to work with and has a multiplayer component that the game can fall on if ya don't like the singleplayer. And you did have a couple of articles nitpicking it's linearity, one of which was a hot article a while back.

Either way, the skepticism and such will build for the The Order because it's a new ip and been having poor demos that's constantly being put out in the hands of the critics. I think even if the gameplay turns out to be pretty solid, the critics are still probably gonna slam it for playing it too safe. And plus it's getting their sites a lot hits, after all it's still in N4G's most discussed games.

No_Limit3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

I have no expectation for this game but let see how the reviews are. Since Sony is charging us $50 a year for online play, you would think they would include some MP function for more of their games to give value to us subscribers. $60 ain't cheap and just like inFamous SS, which I traded in after 10 days after beating it, it is one and done and no replay value whatsoever for these Single player only game.

iceman063384d ago

What does Sony charging for access to online have to do with creating a single player experience??? I mean, I get that you would like to have multiplayer in the game. But, tying that to paying for online is just ridiculous. It was a design decision (maybe based on the fact that this is RaD's first console game, or time...whatever) simple as that. Not to mention that replay value in single player games often comes from enjoying the game play mechanics or certain set pieces within the narrative, etc. I enjoy a good multiplayer experience as much as the next person. But, I also believe that there is room for just a great single-player game. Let's just see if The Order is great or not.

Jumper093384d ago

Yup
Sony really needs to create some good Multiplayer games or add Multiplayer to their IPs.

The Order would probably be a great Coop Shooter. But yeah...

DigitalRaptor3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

You can tell really who the "new school gamers" are these days.

I remember a time where single player games were played through again rather than relying on unnecessary shoehorned multiplayer, just to tick a box for marketing. $60 isn't cheap, but it's been a standard acceptable cost for single player only games for years, and if you've been around the block, so to speak, $60 for a single player experience should be no skin off your nose.

My library from last gen still consists of Uncharted 1, BioShock, God of War, Shadow of the Colossus, Bayonetta and many more. Games that I play regularly regardless of no multiplayer. You'd have to be mad casual these days to think that multiplayer should be a requirement.

It will be interesting to see what your opinion of Quantum Break will be. Why has Remedy not bloody shoehorned in multiplayer? Stupid devs, not knowing what's best for their game is multiplayer EVERYWHEREEEEE.

------

@ Jumper09

There are already more multiplayer games on PS4 than any other console this gen. Both of you need a strong dose of reality.

TFJWM3384d ago

Who pays 60 a year for PS+ in the US I have never paid more than 35 + tax

DeadlyFire3383d ago

If that is how you feel you Shouldn't buy single player only games until they are 20 bucks or less.

airsick73383d ago

Like Digital Raptor said, most of my favorite games are single player only. Legend of Zelda, Mario 64, Skyrim, Fable, Kotor, Bioshock 1, Metroid Prime, Pikmin, Shadows of the Colossus, hell even Shadows of Mordor last year.

Cramming some generic online play into a game is never a good thing, but they do it more and more these days to satisfy guys like you.

I didn't trade my Super Mario 3 in after I beat it the first weekend. I re-played it many many times... in fact, I still play the cartridge 25 years later.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3383d ago
Jumper093384d ago

Lol "avoiding spoilers"...

The game is probably very short, thats why they dont show much.

TFJWM3384d ago

I don't think 10-12 hours is short

harrisk9543384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

How about these so-called journalists wait until they have a game to review. It would be like a book reviewer reviewing a book after reading one chapter or reviewing a movie based upon the trailer. This game may not look innovative, but other games that do the same thing (ie, linear, story driven experience) and get a pass... No one rips apart Uncharted or Tomb Raider like this.And none of these websites have played the full game yet. They are all going into this with an undeserved bad predisposition toward this game. From what I see around the web, the more people see off this game, the more excited they seem to get.

smoothop3384d ago

It goes both ways, people are quick to bash it like you say, but people are quick to claim its going to be brilliant. I say everyone should hold off a bit longer and actually see if its any good.

otherZinc3384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

The Order 1886 is a letdown:

It's 2015
The Order 1886 has:
No Campaign Co-op
No Online Play
No Multiplayer
No Horde Mode
It's a Movie
It's Linear
Does have QTEs though
Pop-up AI

Yeah, all that missing, it sure is a letdown to me. I want more for $60. There are no options in this game. If there are, what are the options in The Order Of 1886?

Multiplayer wouldn't be shoehorned in as there are 4 characters in the damn game!

ziggurcat3384d ago

please explain how a game you won't play on a system you don't even own is a "letdown"?

RealtorMDandDC3383d ago

Yes, it's 2015. Most games are linear tho COD, Battlefield, just to name a few. I love Last of US but I don't play the MP mode.

Because there's not a multiplayer component calling The Order 1886 a let down seems like a hard stance that I do understand.

I feel the same way about the Xbox One being a let down because it's 2015 and Microsoft's game library is a joke considering my library of games in Full HD except for Killzone due to a slight technicality.

LordMaim3383d ago

otherZinc, I expect you to post the very same complaints about Quantum Break when it ships.

It's 2015
Quantum Break has:
No Campaign Co-op
No Online Play
No Multiplayer
No Horde Mode
It's a TV Show
It's Linear
Does have QTEs though
Pop-up AI

But you won't, because your comments have nothing to do with The Order, and everything to do with your comment history. The game just went gold a few days ago, and no reviewer anywhere has a complete copy of the game. Aside from being highly slanted, this article is based on the same demos that have been available to the public for a year and not on any insider information that the public wouldn't have.

Once review copies get into legitimate journalists' hands, then we'll see what they have to say. Till then, that site doesn't know any more about The Order than you do.

glennhkboy3383d ago

All sane developer/publisher have tour their best game-mechanism as best as they can. On one ever thought that part as spoiler. Just look at WB/ Monolith talk about their Nemesis system for months before the release of the Shadow of Mordor.
So I guess Sony really think the the graphic is the best to offer in the Order.

theBSdectector3383d ago

But if a bunch of people play it and think it sucks, then that should be a clue as to avoid it regardless of fanboy devotion. I wouldn't need to play 2 hours of a game to give you an honest opinion. Let me try a game and within 15 minutes I can tell you if it's garbage, and that takes control schemes and everything into consideration

Run_bare3383d ago

I wonder why they did not bash AC unity before and after release.

bjmartynhak3383d ago

Yes,

And let me add:

Victim of people wanting a game that this is not.

I wont' get tired of saying this: this is a 3rd person cover shooter, very linear, very story-driven. If this is not your thing, stop getting disappointed with this game. It's not for you.

Tzuno3383d ago

To be honest there is nothing new to play on PS4 so yes people take whatever they release without a thought, i am not saying that is not good but what else is out there?

gedden73383d ago

Lmao @ clearly avoiding spoilers lol... What could they be hiding?? Its the gameplay that sells games not the story. Even if the story was perfect the game what will sell the game. All this is gears of war bad ai and quick time event. Lmao spoilers... If Sony doesn't pay for great reviews this should get 6s - 7s at best...

bubblebobble3383d ago (Edited 3383d ago )

just hope its not haze 2015 anybody remember that halo killer by the way this is coming from a huge sony fan

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3383d ago
Hellsvacancy3384d ago

Surely you should of seen enough gameplay by to know if The Order is for you or not, I personally think it look great

Mustaches ftw

CocoWolfie3384d ago

how much werewolf/lycan footage have we seen too? XD that shit is *unexplainable words*

Kingthrash3603384d ago (Edited 3384d ago )

How many games today have werewolfs in them? Dang bro....you want more zombies?
There hasn't been a decent werewolf in a game since altered beasts. (Altered beast shout out? ....yes.)
How much mushroom footage do we see in mario?
how much gun reloading footage to we see in any fps ever?
how much climbing footage have we seen in assassin's creed?
How do you have a problem with werewolf footage?
Lol kids these days.

CocoWolfie3384d ago

@kingthrash360 im... excited, thats why im saying how much have we seen? like none, that shit is unexplainable words because of how excited i am -.-

Kingthrash3603383d ago

Oh...mabad.
I stand corrected..still, I now want to play altered beasts lol

CocoWolfie3383d ago (Edited 3383d ago )

@kingthrash360 dont worry its alright :') haha yeah same actually

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3383d ago
Nathan1703384d ago

If the story and length of the game are good this game might be rated between 8-9,
Personally, I believe this game will be good but not a system seller.

Walker3384d ago

a victim of poorly chosen demos, exactly . i know this game is gonna be epic just like uncharted

ginsunuva3384d ago

I think (hope) this game will be more like Resistance Fall of Man. The brown/gray colors, crazy weapons with secondary fire modes, and alternate-timeline England make it hard to believe they weren't consciously thinking of RFOM during development.

Finally, RAD give us what Insomniac refused to (even though R2 & R3 were good in their own ways).

smoothop3384d ago

How do you know that its going to be epic? You're just as bad as the people bashing it, from what I have seen on the game so far the gameplay looks weak, graphics are great and I wouldn't have the foggiest if the story is any good.

purp13m0nk3y3384d ago

Pretty much my mentality too bro. Yes the visuals look insane, but what has me the most excited is the story and the setting.

Second most anticipated release of this year. Second only to No Mans Sky with UC4 a close third!

Show all comments (170)
350°

The Order: 1886 pushed visuals hard in 2015 - And still looks stunning today

Digital Foundry : Released in February 2015, The Order: 1886 was a stunning PlayStation 4 game at the cutting-edge of rendering technology, with visuals that still hold up today. The game's release pre-dated in-depth Digital Foundry coverage, something we're looking to address with this new video! Ready at Dawn's game never received a sequel and never received a PS4 Pro upgrade, but thanks to developments with exploited, older firmware PS5 consoles, we can now show you the game running locked at 60 frames per second.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
VenomUK258d ago

The gameplay was bland and extremely frustrating at times with unnecessary QTE combat at points. But the world and the lore and the characters and the story were fantastic. I’ve always wanted a sequel. I still hope Sony will surprise us one day.

shadowT259d ago

Sony missed the opportunity to acquire Ready at Dawn Studios.

Tacoboto259d ago

But... Sony didn't want Ready at Dawn. Clearly

mkis007258d ago

I'm guessing had 1886 turned out more positively they would have.

RaidenBlack259d ago

And let's not forget,
Ready At Dawn showcased The Order 1886 running on PC at 60fps at SIGGRAPH 2015
https://www.dsogaming.com/n...

isarai259d ago

I still stand by my theory that this game just released at the wrong time. Almost every outlet spent a lot of time in their reviews ragging on the game for not being an online experience, everyone was in the Destiny hype train and at the time they wanted EVERY game to follow suit, bashing any game that didn't. If this were released after everyone realized how much that wasn't future, people would've appreciated it more. I loved it, and I'm always disappointed that we'll never get a sequel

Tacoboto259d ago

That doesn't seem to be true about outlets complaining on the lack of online. The review summaries on Metacritic are very consistent: Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return.

Here's an example of how *little* time IGN spent talking about multiplayer:

"With no multiplayer, and no reason to revisit the short and stunted single-player campaign once it’s been completed, there just isn’t a lot to it."

It's the final sentence. They don't even take the time to say "online multiplayer"

MrChow666258d ago (Edited 258d ago )

"Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return."
You are right, that's what everbody was saying at the time, never heard anything about it not being online.
I've been thinking about trying this game for years, I may get it now that it's dirt cheap, no big loss if it sucks

MrChow666258d ago

Oh, add to that bad enemy AI, I remember that from the reviews, I saw a video of a wherewolf boss fight with a very weak AI

thorstein258d ago

And there we glowing reviews for shorter games. It was one of the times where hating this game was "cool."

CrimsonWing69259d ago

Can you show me the reviews that rag on it for not having an online experience?

I’m not doubting you or anything. I’m just being lazy.

isarai259d ago

Sorry, not multiplayer, open world is what I meant.

Tacoboto259d ago

That's also fake news, isarai. Again, the game was consistently criticized for what it was (Pretty but extremely short, extremely linear, hand-holding, no replayability), not for what it wasn't (multiplayer/open-world)

isarai259d ago

Nope, every review uses the term "linear" several times as if it's some inherently bad attribute. Not fake news at all. Since then there's veen plenty of short and sweet single player linear games that get lots of praise, again after the reality of everything being open world set it and it wasn't as great as everyone thought. But at the launch of the last gen everyone had open world fever, and especially the first couple years "linear" was a con in many games reviewed

Tacoboto259d ago

That's your own contortion assuming criticism of its extremely linear design is suddenly a call for it to have been open world.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 259d ago
zumlauf14259d ago

You totally made up a claim regarding an overall review consensus that isn't true. And, instead of just ignoring being called out for it, you respond with "oh actually i ment to say OPEN WORLD". Which literally isn't true either. You can't show us one review that bashed the game for "not being open world". And, somehow the other guy is getting downvoted. Over a bullshit liar.

isarai259d ago

Games were being criticized at that time for any game that wasn't open world or online. So yeah I got one mixed for the other, doesn't change my argument one bit that it would've been received better if it released later. People are agreeing because if you were not riding the "online and open world" hype train at that time, it was blatantly obvious there were biases in play for how games were criticized. Now after all that has happened since people want to say "oh wait these games were actually pretty good" cause they know better now

Rude-ro258d ago

The gameplay was very shallow and when one says repetitive, it is by the very definition for some fights. As in, completely identical but different setting.

The game has amazing potential.
The graphics, the lore, characters…
This could most definitely have been all corrected with a sequel and became a franchise hit…
Still would love to see an attempt.

Ie fantastic premise and moments that shine…
But it had its downfalls that deserved the negative marks.

thorstein258d ago

It was the "game to hate" when it launched. And right here, on this site, we saw people posting stories that were outright fabrications about the game. It was weird. The game launched, it was fun, a really cool game but the hate was too much. And so were the lies.

Minute Man 721258d ago

It was just too short....but I loved every minute of it....double dipped and grabbed the ultimate CE

babadivad258d ago

That isn't true. I remember people talking about how incredibly short it was and the somewhat janky gunplay.

KwietStorm_BLM258d ago

First I'm hearing of this. I don't know what multiplayer has to do with anything. The game was just dull. Amazing graphics, great narrative, great lore, boring gameplay sprinkled in pieces between cutscenes, and lackluster AI and controls.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 258d ago
anast259d ago

People cried this game was too short. No people are crying because games are too long.

isarai259d ago

Pretty sure everyone is complaining about bloated games lately but ok

anast259d ago

Thank you for the ok. I needed that.

RaidenBlack259d ago

Games like Ubisoft open worlds not enjoyable lengthy games like Elden Ring or Baldur's Gate III

anast258d ago

I get it, but people also complain about the main stories being too long or just games being too long in general because they are "adults".

Show all comments (50)
230°

The Curious Case of The Order: 1886 - A Retrospective

Ready At Dawn cut their teeth developing spin-offs for PlayStation Portable and porting games to consoles. When they got a chance to establish their own with The Order: 1886, its poor critical reception ostensibly halted their trajectory. Can one middling game really sully one’s reputation in the eyes of Sony?

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
moriarty1889725d ago

Wanted a sequel for this game so much. It was left wide open for one with the ending it had.

porkChop725d ago

Sony did file a new trademark a while back, so you never know. Though if I were to guess it would be a reboot rather than a sequel.

REDGUM724d ago

The Order was great from my playthrough and really enjoyed it. The same with Days Gone. Both, amongst others out there, deserve a follow-up. Anyone who actually played through the complete games knows there were hidden gems in and around these 2 games. Too many out there put too much faith in reviewer's opinions instead of thier own and get put off or join the hate bandwagon.
Seriously, gamers need to game & not read or view other people game with added opinions thrown in.
Honestly, if you haven't played either of these 2 games yet, do yourself a favour, pick it or them up, forget anything you know about them & just play it for yourself & create you're own opinions.

Ninver724d ago

I ignored the reviews and went straight to the store to but the game. Thoroughly enjoyed it I might add. If only Sony had the balls to summon enough faith to reboot or give us a sequel. Maybe even a prequel done right and make it a 3 part series. Wasted opportunity for a really different exclusive if you ask me.

barom724d ago

Days Gone is really an exceptional game though it feels like it took a bit of time for it to get interesting.

The Order 1886 was unfortunately not very good. Super beautiful game with beautiful cinematics but felt incomplete and don't really remember much happening at all in the game i.e. it was kind of bland. A sequel where they learned from their mistakes would be very intriguing though and I would have bought it.

monkey602724d ago

I loved Days Gone and I would have loved a sequel.

I didnt like The Order. There was enough there for me to give a sequel a chance if they improved on bits but I'm losing no sleep over the absence of it. I thought the 1st one was genuinely terrible for a multitude of valid reasons.

S2Killinit724d ago

I really enjoyed it. I was hoping for a game in the same world but less linear. With lots of that sweet lore.

YoungKingDoran724d ago

Yeah with the tech sorted and expanding on the existing assets, they could/should have been able to do a trilogy that gen. What happened..

moriarty1889724d ago

Agreed. Such an interesting title just abandoned. Makes no sense. As I said the ending of the game sets up for a sequel perfectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 724d ago
porkChop725d ago

Incredible graphics and presentation. Great use of photo mode. A really interesting premise. The actual gunplay felt solid. The game just needed to be longer, and the levels could have been a bit less constrained. More enemy variety as well. At full price it just didn't have the value, at least in my opinion.

I would like to see a sequel or reboot, which I think is more likely. It would need to be a new dev as Ready at Dawn are part of Oculus now

robtion725d ago

I think Bluepoint could do a good job. They have the technical capability if Demon's Souls is anything to go by.

MeatyUrologist724d ago

Agreed. Because of all the bad reviews I waited until the end of last gen to buy it, but was really surprised. The only knocks against it were length and linearity. Really loved the visuals, atmosphere, story, and characters. The gunplay was actually really well done with unique and fun weapons.

You mentioned the photo mode, and this was one of the best examples I have seen. They actually allow you to add filters and modify the visuals in the photo mode, and then apply those to the game. I have never seen that before or since. I really wish more games would allow this. Give the users more control over how the game looks to cater it to their tastes.

uth11725d ago

This was a weird one in that the community hated the game but also demanded a sequel

SonyStyled725d ago

Because it’s literally a 5 hr game, yet had the same quality offering of the other AAA Sony games that are tens to hundreds of hours of gameplay.

I used a walkthrough trophy guide for the platinum to not miss any collectibles in one run, it took 8hrs. I thought it was actually a pretty great game, but always wonder why that level of game development didn’t continue for a 15hr single player campaign.

robtion725d ago

I'm part of the community and I loved it.

I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon. Clearly there was the usual hate from xbox fans but also from insecure PC players as the graphics were (still are) phenomenal.
The game is a flawed gem. A new entry on PS5 would have great potential (doubt it will happen though, Sony isn't into risk taking these days).

Eidolon724d ago

All the early hate was a people who haven't played it and were quick to call it a QTE game.

AuraAbjure724d ago

I'm an Xbox fan and I'm planning on getting a PS4 pro one day to play this game along with gravity Rush 2 and others.

coolbeans724d ago

-"I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon."

Can we please stop retreating back such tired defenses? It's had a heavily mixed reception ever since critics PLAYED the game back then, and justifiably so. Even trying to rope in "insecure PC players" just shows how shallow this view actually is.

725d ago
Shiore2u725d ago (Edited 725d ago )

Can't ever forget those terribly designed lycan fights.

ClayRules2012724d ago

Ugh, I love this game! But yes, those lycan fights were terribly designed, for real.

Overall though, solid gameplay.

Show all comments (37)
540°

Sony Files A New Trademark For The Order: 1886

The Order: 1886 has received a new trademark filed by Sony. The trademark application is for a video game, implying that they want to extend it.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
zsquaresoff860d ago

I hope they give this game another chance, it had an incredible story and gameplay, It was just unfortunate that the game length was extremely short.

Magog860d ago

The team that made it was bought by Facebook. I don't see why they would continue the series with a new team rather than just make a new IP.

Neonridr860d ago

I guess it's still possible that another studio could take another swing at it. But yeah, Ready at Dawn was bought by Facebook.

darthv72860d ago

would be cool to see an oculus version.

CrimsonWing69860d ago

It wouldn't be the first time this has happened. Bungie and 343 come to mind with Halo.

Magog860d ago

@CrimsonWing69 the difference is Halo was still successful. In my mind they should have put the series to rest when the original creators got tired of it but Microsoft love to flog the series so there you go.

ALMGNOON860d ago

am pretty sure Sony owns the IP so that doesn't matter at all.

GamingSinceForever859d ago

So what other great games has that studio produced since being bought by Facebook?

Magog859d ago

@GamingSinceForever they made Lone Echo a well received VR game.

Lord_Sloth859d ago

The team was, but that doesn't mean all of them left Sony. It's entirely possible that several of the employees still work for Sony.

Rhythmattic859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

"The team that made it was bought by Facebook."
Yes.. Not the IP...
Personally, The IP has soooo much potential for exploration.......If done right.....
Which brings me to your post... Unlike FB... Sorry, Meta.... A team is not IP, and with an even better team working on such said IP, It could be a winner...

Def wont be 1886 infinite,

deleted859d ago

Exactly @Rhythmattic Could you imagine if The Order was handed over to a studio like Santa Monica?! The Order 1886 set up a really nice setting and lore... now the idea could be pushed to the next level by one of Sony's high tier studios. It may be too much to ask to get one of the big dogs on it, but one can dream.

It could even work out that someone like Santa Monica create a smaller team just for creative vision, then hand over the busy work of building that world to one of their subsidiaries like the newly acquired Valkyrie Entertainment, which specializes in high tier support work.

Magog859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

@Lord_Sloth Readyatdawn were never owned by Sony so no, none of their employees stayed with Sony. Order 1886 was a second party game funded by Sony but developed by an outside company.

Neonridr859d ago

@GamingSinceForever - Lone Echo and its sequel are some of the better VR games out there with a great story and some awesome VR integration. The second game only came out in October of this year, so it will be some time before we see their next project.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 859d ago
_SilverHawk_860d ago

Hopefully playstation-5 will have a sequel to the order 1886.

FlavorLav01860d ago

Please let one of the big boys take a swing at it and slay us with an awesome game. Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, and Sony Bend could all do this IP justice.

Magog860d ago

Why would any of Sony's teams want to take their time and resources to work on another studios unsuccessful IP instead of their own unique ideas? Generally speaking Sony doesn't assign their top teams games to make they let them make what they want and are passionate about.

senorfartcushion859d ago

It’ll be just to hold on to the rights. They’re not making a new one. A remaster in 5 years is most likely, but until then, no.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 859d ago
FlavorLav01860d ago

If it had been marketed correctly as a strong narrative experience and sold for $30-40 instead of full price, the game would’ve big a huge success and we’d have guaranteed sequels. Loved the game, hope more from this IP is on the way.

Rhythmattic859d ago

It def cut corners though.. The Wolf fights where copy and pasted, the gun mechanics, decent... But the World was what made it... Maybe your standard gun mechanics, but never the guns....

The round table needs to be fleshed out....

ChasterMies860d ago (Edited 860d ago )

Short games are ok with me. Everyone loves the Titanfall 2 campaign and it was only about 5 hours. The issue is gameplay, and frustrating controls that did not need to be frustrating. Other than that, the look and feel was fantastic.

porkChop859d ago

Titanfall 2 also had an excellent multiplayer mode though. As excellent as the campaign was, no one would have paid full price for just that.

Ramboforlife860d ago

Totally agree. If it was a 20-30 hour campaign, it would have sold very well. It deserves another chance.

Livingthedream859d ago

Nah it had mediocre to terrible reviews. Don’t really know anyone who actually loved the game, but there was potential. They should give it another go same studio. Lol

Rude-ro859d ago

This is not that type of game.
I can not think of a single story driven game that does not have endless fetch quests in a forced open world type game that comes close to 20 hours.

Let’s be realistic…
Either way, the game had issues that can easily be remedied and make for an amazing sequel and I hope it happens.

senorfartcushion859d ago

It was good but had a terrible
Cliffhanger. An actual second half would have skyrocketed the game’s status. TLOU 2 was over 30 hours long for some people.

porkChop859d ago

It really just needed to be twice as long. I can put up with super linear, tightly scripted gameplay as long as I feel like I'm getting my money's worth. But the game was so short with little replay value. And the length prevented the lore from being properly realized.

I'm interested as long as they can flesh out the length. Possibly open up the gameplay slightly without detracting from the movie-like scripting.

-Foxtrot859d ago

Yeah I really liked the overall world and Sir Galahad

(SPOILERS)

Having Werewolves and then vampires opened it up to so many possibilities, who's to say other mythical beasts couldn't be introduced.

EmperorDalek859d ago

The story was good until it ended on a cliff hanger, I wouldn't call it incredible. The gameplay was dreadful. I would like to see an improved sequel however.

itsmebryan859d ago

@zsquare

Maybe I'm missing something but, wasn't that game panned after much hype as not very good and poor gameplay? Metacritic is 63% and user rating of 6.7 and by no means consider a hit.
Actually a new developer could be good for the game.

Flewid638859d ago

Limited gameplay mechanics too but I REALLY enjoyed what was there.

alb1899859d ago

Yep, I always liked the atmosphere and characters of this game. I think it can be a really good game if they put emphasis on the gameplay.

DarXyde859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

I don't know if I would say the gameplay was "incredible." The lore was fine and the weapons were awesome (and truly a standout visually, no questions asked). I'm impressed they got a game looking this good to run in such a stable condition when you consider the tech last gen. I only played it on base PS4, and that was really a marvel.

But that all said, the gameplay didn't stand out for me at all. Felt like a pretty standard affair and, as you said, the length was pretty short. Granted, I got it on sale for $12, so I don't feel bad about that purchase. It didn't really linger so the point was really to tell the story they wanted to tell, which I can respect.

I also hope they give it another chance, but I would prefer if they really made it stand out. There's a ton of creative talent over at PlayStation, so if Ready at Dawn had learned from the shortcomings of the first game and they're willing to solicit feedback from PlayStation studios, it has great potential.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 859d ago
NovusTerminus860d ago (Edited 860d ago )

I really want another one, I bought it day one zero regrets. I enjoyed it a lot and has lots of room for a sequel.

HOWEVER

USPTO policy is that a trademark only be updates with visual proof once every ten years after initial filing, and since the game is still for sale on the PlayStation Network it is likely just a paper work error that will be corrected so that they can continue selling the game digitally.

RaidenBlack860d ago

Yea ... I initially though this might be for a near-future res+fps boost and/or a PC port, paving way for 1887.

GhostofHorizon860d ago

It was a really good game but there was a ton of room for improvement all around. If they had another crack at it, it could be something special.

Eidolon859d ago

A lot of games before and since have made absolutely shameless attempts at making a great experience that ended up falling short. This game gets the worst of it because of hype. And it's actually has really good narrative and gameplay. Tell me one thing NOW that it did wrong that other games aren't doing. Tell me.

BenRC01859d ago

I really like it, bought the special edition years after release, expecting an average game but was very pleasantly surprised

Relientk77860d ago

I really liked the concept, but the game wasn't perfect. It definitely had some flaws. The graphics not being one, they were insane. The coolest guns in the game were only usable for a short period of time. I believe there were like 2 werewolf fights that were basically identical which people pointed out. I'd love for the series to get another shot.

masterfox860d ago

hope there is a sequel, first one was and still is stunning from every aspect, from gameplay, visuals , music, etc, you name it, it literally the whole game is realtime cgi!, imagine what a PS5 can do to it!

Show all comments (88)