VideoGamer.com has published a video comparison looking at Unreal Tournament 3 on Xbox 360 and PS3.
The game sux.....NEXT!
Can't possibly suck, everything is covered in bumpy shiny normal maps! All hail Epic's mighty Unreal Engine!
its quite awesome, just not much different than prior installments (which are also awesome).
@ExAtari... In complete agreement. I've used UE3 in my game dev courses and even at the lowest level natively supported by the engine, it's still shiny as hell.
UT3 is a game for those of you who like no nonsense shoot every one in sight kind games. The game is kind of nice for a couple of weeks As for the comparisons i expected a bigger leap in graphics for UT3 360. The game is almost 8 months older than PS3 build and development on 360 started first before sony struck their deal. Plus with epic optimizing UE3 significantly since then we were supposed to be seeing some gears of war 2 type graphics in the game. All it does is 360 version has better lighting in some areas and thats it. Graphics are exactly the same as far as i can see
The game was used at E3 '05 to demonstrate the power of the PS3. 360 development started much later. It stopped when MS and Epic couldn't agree on mods. I did think they would have done more with the 360 version too though. I believe Epic has been less than honest about the progress of the games development on the 360 though. I think they pushed the date back because they wanted more time to try to get MS to except mods. I believe the 360 version was finished long before the PS3 version. If I remember right, the PC version had to wait on the PS3 version for release. The 360 version is not that different than the PC version in development terms. I know that it wouldn't have taken this much longer to make it.
It's a pointless comparison anyway. The first 1/3rd of the video is comparing a pre-recorded video to another pre-recorded video that might even just be the same damn video. I don't think the morons doing the comparison videos know that those weren't in engine cutscenes.
the first part that was comparing the cutscene was pointless. in fact i bet that it was the exact same video file on both disks. (its not real time) secondly this game will get old so quick. it lasted me about two weeks. then every sweet mod that came out breathed new life into the game. but there hasn't been any mods lately so there it is again collecting dust. i dont see how this wil last long on the 360 with no mods.
I did notice that environmental effects were absent in the PS3 version (rain, snow, lava dust, etc) That video comparison was horrible anyway. There was only 1 or 2 scenes that played exactly the same... but they played 1 right after another instead of side by side. The only thing I could see aside from the weather effects was the graphics looked blurrier on the PS3 and the contrast was adjusted and the image was sharper on the 360. I dunno. I LOVE the UT series and have owned every single game up until this point. The PC demo is all I have because the lack of user created content in the 360 version blows it for me.
in one month battlefield, now ut3, man the world is completely messed up! how can there be no difference??
User made stuff for one console, but not the other : )
I noticed that there was snow falling in the last level show on the 360 version. Does the PS3 version not have precipitation or is this a random effect?
Random effect and yes it occurs on the PS3 as well.
Cut scene, maybe a little nicer on the 360, gameplay, not really anything instantly noticeable, same. Anyhoo UT3 is so faced paced you never have enough time to have a prolonged look at everything, it's a great looking fragfest on any platform.
Up close they are the same. However if you look at the PS3, from a distance everything is a bit more blurred. I would say 360 barely better.
360 for the cuscene, but only because its darker. other than that no cutscene difference. i didnt see a gameplay difference execpt for liking the weapon models on the more. also mods for ps3 version = pwnage. anyways, i have this and dont play much thanks to COD4 and MGS4..
the cutscene is not real time. its a video! the exact same video on both disks. if you play it on a hdtv you would notice that the cutscene is slightly blocky because of video compression. the ONLY, I repeat ONLY, difference between the two versions is that the ps3 version is slightly brighter or the 360 version is slightly darker; as usual.
Looks the same no differance.
it's like asking which turd looks better.
I actually like the grfx, but yeah, they look exactly the same to me.
i thought the developers said it would look better than the ps3 version. i see no difference except the for the color which can be adjusted with the t.v. settings
bubbles for you as well my monkey brother
Yall should combine and form Smoking Monkey Poo!
There aint much difference But then again turn the RGB to full and you'll have better color on the PS3 for sure But the gameplay the Xbox is miles behind Blurry visuals Not as fast paced oh and no mods
I have to agree. What's with the blurry visuals in the game play on the 360? I also noticed it in the GeOW2 videos too. Edit for XGamer..You seem to like to talk crap. You should take off those Microsoft made glasses every so often and take a look at the real world.
The Xbox 360 cut scenes are much much better as well as the optimized graphics and game play as well as the play speed for the Xbox 360 version is on par w/ the speed of the PC version, the ps3 version is now officially last on all accounts. And this has been agreed upon by most every site that has played the game. Ms. ps3 i'm sorry you have sand in your vagina and are now sad and don't feel well.
You bought an Xbox Ha Ha Your frustration's are clearly showing Ha Ha Never mind XgaymerBot
WOW! You sound like a 5 year old yourself there!!! ;-D 'Are you F'in retarded' ??? + 'i'm sorry you have sand in your vagina' ??? Hmm and you called me a 5 year old!!! ;-D You do Intellectual comments my @ss!!!
paying attention to him? he clearly is a casual lol
Does the 360 version have user created mods? No! Then whats the point of buying UT w/out mods? '/thread
Gamer...I'm watching the video right now. The 360 version does seem blurrier in some of the images. But, like Prime said there...these comparison videos are ridiculous.
Want to see a real difference? I am a Qore subscriber and the exclusive Resistance 2 Videos in there show a draw distance that GeOW2 can't match.
In every way. but... in the end ......WARHAWK>>>UT/Ge ar same crap different color.
with one thats not even out yet...jeez you droids are f*cking retarded...whats next..the comparison with killzone 5 vs halo 3....I have not seen no comparisons with gears of war 2 against resistance 2 because there's no comparison....cant wait for those.. qore subscribers=sucking sonys d*ck a little to hard there...wait for the videos on youtube droid. and I seriously dont know what the f*ck you people are smearing on your eyes to say the xbox version is blurrier...its called textures...the xbox side seems lighter..hahaha what morons.
Sorry you are not that smart Snuka. Qore = OXM except the disk always works. I prefer nice Hi-res movies - it is why I have a PS3 and a 52 inch Sony XBR. I also have a 360 but it's image quality for multimedia is hardly on par with a PS3. Games, as we see in this comparison are also looking better on the PS3. Your post is the simple words of a bitter loser on the downside of supporting a console from last gen. Too bad. I am enjoying laughing at you as you scream and twist in the wind like a hanged man who didn't drop far enough for a quick snap and a dirtnap. Quite humorous actually. Since it only requires a click to get here, that price of admission is worth watching you make a public spectacle of yourself as you come apart at the seams. And why shouldn't we compare games that are already out. After all you are already stating what the sales numbers will be. Or did you forget saying that because it was convenient? And since you were already boasting of the graphical prowess of Gears2 then it deserves a headshot and Resistance2 is a 50Cal API Boattail. If you can call sales numbers on a game not yet out with no idea of relevant hard data of how it will sell, I can certainly make a video comparison having been provided plenty of video evidence by Epic and MS. Such a comparison is especially relevant since it has been the source of untold chest beating by the dying 360 community. And for goodness sakes, have the moral honesty to admit you are a 360 fanboy. I admit I am a Sony fanboy and the vitriol in my 360 comments does not begin to approach the level of relentless hatred you express for all people and all things Sony. And don't even bother to deny it unless you can find a way to magically delete all records of your past posts. That's right. You actually had the unmitigated gall to say it isn't true but the fact is you are a fanboy so stop pretending. Everyone should take the opportunity to peruse your past comments and witness the sheer volume of unmitigated adolescent angst that peppers your anti Sony remarks. Which is by the way anything you have to say. I lost count after the 10th time you called someone a droid, said they were full of horsesheit(your redneck spelling), told them they were morons, or attacked some Sony product. I really like how you have a special hatred for MGS4. Sucks not having the new bar in game development on your 360 gumball machine, doesn't it. And like any fanboy on the losing end, watching you kick and gasp for breath is bona fide entertainment. Snukadaman is at the end of the day, just Snukadaangry15yearold.
is what the EPIC dudes have come up with to hide their embarrassingly low poly count. it used to be FOG, now it's DOF. and as usual, the trick works for a while but then it gets repetitive and soon very annoying. play halo3 or GoW right after MGS4 or GT5P and you'll get an unforgettable 'lastgen' feel like going back 5 years in time: it's hilarious after that to read xbot's comments on N4G lol!
One.....im paying for the option to play games that are better then playing it on the free service.....Two...there something called inside xbox that has the exact same thing as qore...exclusive videos...news..hints on games and cheat codes....The only difference is your being suckered into thinking your free service is heads above what im paying for..of course free is great but im sure if you had the option to get a service where you can play games and actually have voice chat in games and and working xmb where you can hit up friends and tell them to join your game IN EVERY GAME...you would be all up on it so please...i didnt cry like a baby like you, I gave you clear points...please try and do the same. By the way..I call mgs4 the best game on the ps3 by far...how is that hate? Only when comparisons go the other way it quickly turns to the old "WHATS TO COMPARE THEY ARE BOTH THE SAME" horsesheit we see here over and over again...dont worry..when bioshock for the ps3 has comparison videos im sure you and a couple of your droid friends will proclaim it to be the version thats better....as with this comparison...bioshock ps3 SHOULD be the superior version with time in its corner...then let the "chest thumping" commence right? And by the way....I have said time and time again that mgs4 is the best game on the ps3....how is that hate for it dummy>? "I love to watch xbots when good news like this comes out. You would think they have the St Vitus Dance. View" "I admit I am a Sony fanboy and the vitriol in my 360 comments does not begin to approach the level of relentless hatred you express for all people and all things Sony" To bad for you we can look at your past postings and actually see your pattern for 360 hate..so please....shut the f*ck up and stop acting like your not the same.
Paying to play games is better than free? How does that work? Oh I see it isn't the games you like so much as paying to have ads thrown at you. You saying MGS4 is the best game on the PS3 is deceptive. That is your saying it is the best of the worst. As for not crying all one has to do is read a few of your posts to see you are one of the most vocal infants on this board. Teenage angst, cursing in almost every post, unmitigated anger, all forms of whining, complaining, and bawling. Grow up. Clear points to you are ones with which you already agree, are written with a No2 Husky pencil, AND are no more than 1 syllable. Did you not comprehend (oops, sorry more than 1 syllable) that I said unlike you I don't deny I am a fanboy. But you actually went to great lengths to state you were not in a prior post. It would have been laughable were it not such a blatant lie. I admit it openly and freely. What part of that comment was beyond your obvious 7th grade education level? All of it? What I did say was that my negative comments about the 360 do not approach your level of hatred for Sony. And if you want to compare posts on that fact you will find you will be left wanting. You come off as an angry child that has somehow gained internet access and utilizes sites such as N4G as a loosing ground for your tantrums. Also go back to 1st grade math class. You said "2 things" and then proceeded to display an absolute ignorance of the simple ability to count. Your overuse of vulgarity and numerous attempts to beat the swear filter betray you as someone that has just discovered cursing and you are under the misguided perception it is associated with some degree of cool. I have witnessed this in children numerous times and you are more obvious and transparent than most. While certain people display instances where one word can be humorous, your overuse easily shows you to be in your lewd language use infancy. I have a policy against maintaining a banter with the underaged. Since you easily reveal your maturity level to be barely above the single digit level, if that, there is nothing further you could say that I would find even remotely interesting or amusing. Here, this is me putting you on ignore. Have a nice brief and blatantly dumb life.
Xgamer, actually it sounds like your testicles got stuck in your 360 disc tray when you were ramming it last night. You are a moron, theres no point in calling someone ms ps3 when you yourself are more of a brainless fanboy. User created content and maps>MARGINALLY better graphics, all day everyday. FAR GREATER. But being 10 dollars cheaper, having user created content AND better graphics than both 360 and Ps3 is even better, which is why I play it on PC.
The 360 version has more vivid lighting and color and has greater detail in far off objects. The 360 version is overall more crisp and has less of a ghost frame effect. The 360 version looks more crisp in movement like the way a game that is 720p native looks on a HDTV that is 720p native if the console is set at the 720p rez. The PS3 version looks like the console was set at 1080i when the HDTV is 720p native(blurry movement *and* somehow not more crisp while displaying still content). Take note: I'm not actually talking about TV's and REZ just using TV and rez as an example of the visual differences. So in this case the 360 version has the best of both worlds (1080p) figuratively speaking. In a NutShell: The 360 version has better color, better contrast, more detail over all and even more so in the distance and stays sharper durring fast movement lacking the ghost frames. It is clear the differences would be greater if the quality of this footage was not sh*t and in HD.
If you PS3 fanboys can't grasp what I'm saying and just hitting dissagree re-watch the Hoover Board footage.
You'd say that the 360 version looked better, even if it was covered in dog crap.
Have a nice day, wasting your life in the internet fanboy race, mmkay?
...Snuka got owned! O_O
someone forgot to turn on RGB to full...
whenever i see these video comparisons, i look at the game im playing, and go "wow, mine looks insanely better. way more color depth and contrast." These comparisons are pretty useless, unless its done with identical hardware, on its best settings. (same tv, HDMI 1.3, and every feature turned on). Then you can decide which one looks better. Of course, it still looks best on PC, but what can you expect from PC game makers?
I can't really tell if they did it or not but you can change the type of post processing used with the PlayStation 3. The three opions are Vivid, Intense, Muted, or Default. You'll see a difference with colour dramatically and overall look. I wonder if that's present on the XBOX 360 version.
Yea, wheres the PC comparison lol, it still looks and performs better on PC, AND its cheaper. My dual 8800gt and quad core shat on both of those lol.
there i said it
user generated mods are the best part and they really make this game special. w/o them it would be something you'd play for maybe a month, if that and be done with it. The campaign blows [as it always does], and the online doesn't offer enough content on it's own to be worth while. It's really the user generated content that drives this game, and gives it value along w/ playability long term... It's easily the best part of Unreal Tournament. Well mods and the fact it is an excellent fast paced frag fest...
lol, that's true I once played with PC (Personal Computer) speeds with moded guns. Everyone was having a blast even though the speeds were too fast for the console, lol.
Here we go again... Instead of wasting time watching these videos, we all should go and play the games we like.
i totally agree!!!
I think comparisions like this are pointless because the same are suppose to be the same. How come gaming websites can't be more like Reviews on the Run (Judgment Day) when they do their versus hosted by Victor Lucas and Tommy Tallarico. They do versus with different games like for example GRID vs. NASCAR 09, instead of determining which version of the same game is best on a console. Official Website HTML: http://www.elecplay.com/ind...
Ya, like Battlefield?
Even though it isn't that great of a game, you can't beat PS3's user-created content.
ITT: People trying to spot difference that justifies buying a game for a console they don't own. Got a PS3? Buy the PS3 version. Got an XBox360? Buy the XBox360 version. Only real question here is: Do you want mods or offline splitscreen?
i don't understand why developers don't follow halo in making splitscreen online. i mean. don't get me wrong. 1 i'm a ps3 fanboy 2 i hate xbox. 3 halo really doesn't ring my ding. i think it's FPS on training wheels dang i wish i had splitscreen online...
Thats the only reason i play Halo3. Allows guest players on Live. And im a PS3 fan too. Warhawk is the only one so far, not sure about Haze
time to own some fanboys its clear the 360 version look sbetter just luike this comparison of mass effect for pc/360 http://forums.gametrailers.... there sre something called black lvls ( black should be jet black not white +black makign th eimgae seem washed out.
Personally, i'd rather have splitscreen, and this is coming from someone who owns both the PC and the PS3 versions of this game. And no, it's not because I make my own mods, but because I can play either my PS3 version on my large 1080p TV, or on my PC with the graphics turned up to maximum and a faster framerate. It's all about choices, my good people.
My PC runs this game way more graphical and way higher resolution.
to play Games at affordable prices.
I'm sorry but a gaming PC is not used for gaming only. It can used for millions of things that consoles can never do. But you're still a kid. You stated you spent your childhood playing Pokemon. you wouldn't afford a PC so you just hate it. PC > Consoles and MORE WORTH IT
If I can buy a Ps3, a Wii, and a 360 (400 + 250 + 400 = 1050 + tax), not to mention, I bought all of these within roughly 1 years time. Yes, I play pokemon, and I'm 17, so yeah, I guess you could say I'm still a kid. But I'll tell you one thing. It's funny how I may still be a kid, but I know way more about the industry, and How PC gaming isn't making any money because It's less economical for a mainstream audience to spend roughly $800-1500 for a decent Gaming PC, in comparison to a Console, $250-400. On top of which, An even larger audience than that still plays their games at 480i, and many are satisfied with 720/upscaled 1080. You can't tell me Paying That much money is worth it to play virtually the same games I'm getting on Consoles, but with just Higher Resolutions and better AA, maybe slightly improved textures. In other words, if you factor all these things together, it becomes more practical for developers to make games on consoles. That's why, per year, Consoles get more AAA exclusives (exclusive per console, or simply to consoles) than PC does, not to mention Piracy being very easy to do on A Pc. Thus, PC gaming is on a declined, for even more reasons than this. so learn your fan faved industry =P
Your pc should run this game at higher rez, otherwise it must be a pretty poor pc.lol. But on a pc, you really need 2gb ram for higher rez. At least a dual core. and at least a 7series or 1900xt, or higher. 8800gt-etc. Point is, on a console, it looks and runs very good for a system with alot less ram, etc. And costs alot less.
Falling snow on the xbox 360's version, none on the ps3 version. Massive ammounts of texture and bump mapping on the xbox 360's cut sceens, none on the ps3 version or very little. Darker more alive on the xbox 360 version, washed out and bright on the ps3 version. As usual the ps3 version lacks in every area. I guess it's just not as powerful as it was suppose to be. Kind of sad. Sony should be ashame dof themselves.
You don't own half the games you talk about. PS3 version looks clearer in these videos. User generated content and keyboard support makes PS3 vastly superior in gameplay and replayability.