@xblskull come on, these screens definitely look good but they dont really look near as good as Ryse imo. I would venture to say Killzone Shadowfall looks more impressive. The character models are the best part here, the environments look kind of bland (although this is probably alpha or beta).
Luckily, Halo games have never been known for their graphics, more for their amazing gameplay
Wow, those character models look f-ing sick. I think the environments are plain only because it's a closed look at some sort of hologram training arena.
BiggerBoss - Actually, Halo has ALWAYS been known for its graphics. Halo 1 on xbox amazed people, and so did Halo 2. Halo Reach impressed people and Halo 4 is the best looking Xbox360 game. Only Halo 3 had a lukewarm graphical reception, even though I think they are rather good.
@XBLSkull ha! You've gotta be kidding me. I'm gonna have to agree with @BiggerBoss RYSE looks way better than this right now on the X1.
You're pretty good at trolling, very subtle. The comment was more of a dig toward PS4 than it was toward anything else.
As someone said awhile ago, this gen is only gonna get worse in terms of Fanbois... I tend to agree, it's gonna be an ugly generation. Lot's of butts will be hurt.
Yup. Doubling the framerate requires roughly double the power, so if devs aim for 60fps for either of these consoles this gen, there will have to be cutbacks in other places. It's just the way it works. The 30fps games will be the ones that push graphical boundaries.
That being said, 60fps is undoubtedly the right decision for this game. No one wants to go back to playing Halo at 30fps after playing the MCC.
Not that I really should reply to a troll, but it looks NOTHING like any COD map, however, it looks very similar to Titanfall's VR map from the first map pack.
Damn. Those shots look really impressive. Especially the character models. Can't wait to see the shots from the main campaign.
That stage looks cool, the floor sensors and stuff.