Top
140°

Assassin's Creed Rogue PS3 vs. X360 Image Comparison Shows X360 Trumpeting Over PS3

GearNuke: "We check out both versions of the game to determine which one is the best."

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
The story is too old to be commented.
CerebralTiger1534d ago

Disappointed with the pared back foliage and inconsistent performance in the ps3 version. At least the image quality is on par.

Thefreeman0121534d ago

Why is it the xbox version seems to have the warmer colors.. it may be more detailed but it looks like it has a odd filter on it..

headshotfrosty1534d ago

Only real difference is PS3 looks cooler, 360 warmer.

imt5581534d ago

Different time of day. Look at the positions of shadows in some places.

1534d ago
1534d ago Replies(2)
Magicite1534d ago

at least there will be PC version.

TheWatercooler1534d ago

They really can't be bothered any more it seems. The PS3 is by far the more powerful console. There is no reason at all it should be the inferior version.

starchild1534d ago

That's not true. Both consoles are pretty damn similar. The PS3 simply has a more powerful CPU, but the 360 has a more powerful GPU with unified architecture and also more available RAM due to less OS overhead. MOST developers are going to be able to get better performance out of the 360 than the PS3 and that is why most multiplatform games were better on the 360 throughout the generation.

headshotfrosty1534d ago

Still comparing last gen? Weak. They both look good enough for last gen.

Ares84HU1534d ago (Edited 1534d ago )

Well they have to hold on to something (xbox fanboys). Because this gen, it doesn't look good for them.

But one would imagine they would stop with this shit after they got a taste of their own medicine with the PS4 having better graphics on every game over the XBone, but nooooooo, they have to keep living in last gen and bring back the good old glory days where they sit in their high horse and look down on the PS3 because of minor graphical differences.

smellslikeralph1534d ago (Edited 1534d ago )

are you serious? high horse? you PS4 fanboys trash the xbox one at every turn and from what I have seen is you PS4 fanboys are some of the biggest snobs ive seen yet.

nicksetzer11534d ago (Edited 1534d ago )

Looks almost exactly the same, (other than video settings that can easily be changed) wouldn't really call it a "trumpeting" difference. Then again these sites make the same over-exaggerated claims over essentially identical games this gen too....

starchild1534d ago

Oh that's not true. There are noticeable differences between games on the PS3 and 360, and there are certainly noticeable differences between games on the PS4 and XB1. How much any one individual will care about these differences comes down to personal taste and perceptiveness, but the differences are real.

FireTallow1534d ago

Why is it ok to not have parity between the last gen consoles, but when it's the other way around ( xbox one ) parity is a necessity ?

starchild1534d ago (Edited 1534d ago )

There hasn't been parity between the PS4 and XB1 either. Some of you are getting your panties in a bunch prematurely. Once AC Unity and Far Cry 4 are out you will see that there are differences in those games too. Just because they announced the resolution is the same doesn't mean there is graphical "parity". Resolution is just one element among many.

After all, AC Rogue is the same resolution on both consoles (as far as I know), but that doesn't mean that they are graphically the same across the board (as we see in this comparison). Ubisoft never said the graphics are exactly the same in Unity on the PS4 and the XB1. People jumped to their own faulty conclusions and labelled it "parity", even though Ubisoft never used the word "parity" and never claimed that there wouldn't be graphical or performance differences.

Show all comments (28)
The story is too old to be commented.