GearNuke: "We check out both versions of the game to determine which one is the best."
Disappointed with the pared back foliage and inconsistent performance in the ps3 version. At least the image quality is on par.
Why is it the xbox version seems to have the warmer colors.. it may be more detailed but it looks like it has a odd filter on it..
Only real difference is PS3 looks cooler, 360 warmer.
Different time of day. Look at the positions of shadows in some places.
at least there will be PC version.
They really can't be bothered any more it seems. The PS3 is by far the more powerful console. There is no reason at all it should be the inferior version.
Nope not true.
That's not true. Both consoles are pretty damn similar. The PS3 simply has a more powerful CPU, but the 360 has a more powerful GPU with unified architecture and also more available RAM due to less OS overhead. MOST developers are going to be able to get better performance out of the 360 than the PS3 and that is why most multiplatform games were better on the 360 throughout the generation.
Still comparing last gen? Weak. They both look good enough for last gen.
Well they have to hold on to something (xbox fanboys). Because this gen, it doesn't look good for them. But one would imagine they would stop with this shit after they got a taste of their own medicine with the PS4 having better graphics on every game over the XBone, but nooooooo, they have to keep living in last gen and bring back the good old glory days where they sit in their high horse and look down on the PS3 because of minor graphical differences.
are you serious? high horse? you PS4 fanboys trash the xbox one at every turn and from what I have seen is you PS4 fanboys are some of the biggest snobs ive seen yet.
Looks almost exactly the same, (other than video settings that can easily be changed) wouldn't really call it a "trumpeting" difference. Then again these sites make the same over-exaggerated claims over essentially identical games this gen too....
Oh that's not true. There are noticeable differences between games on the PS3 and 360, and there are certainly noticeable differences between games on the PS4 and XB1. How much any one individual will care about these differences comes down to personal taste and perceptiveness, but the differences are real.
Why is it ok to not have parity between the last gen consoles, but when it's the other way around ( xbox one ) parity is a necessity ?
There hasn't been parity between the PS4 and XB1 either. Some of you are getting your panties in a bunch prematurely. Once AC Unity and Far Cry 4 are out you will see that there are differences in those games too. Just because they announced the resolution is the same doesn't mean there is graphical "parity". Resolution is just one element among many. After all, AC Rogue is the same resolution on both consoles (as far as I know), but that doesn't mean that they are graphically the same across the board (as we see in this comparison). Ubisoft never said the graphics are exactly the same in Unity on the PS4 and the XB1. People jumped to their own faulty conclusions and labelled it "parity", even though Ubisoft never used the word "parity" and never claimed that there wouldn't be graphical or performance differences.
Oh wait, no parity with this one? Thats ummmmmm surprising
No wonder PS3 users jumped ship as fast as they could. You can tell that PS3 sells least on all multi platform titles
Er, Assassins creed 2/3/4 and revelations all sold more on ps3 than 360 according to vgchartz estimates. You were saying?
Final Fantasy says hello.
So ps4 ACU can't be better then Xbox so they limit it. But Xbox can be better no problem? That's not very fair.
really the x360 has a better GPU ? well thats is just amazing. To bad everyone knew this all last gen. Jesus people are getting despreate for clicks.
On a different note I gt an early copy of AC Unity on ps4 I'm 15 hours in and trust me people saying ps4 is dumb down in resolution for console parity that is definitely not the case, wile playing it on the ps4 version the frame rate dips in some places badly specially the opening scene was very very bad. It's nt smooth at all. There has been a patch since I gt the game and the game runs much better bt note super solid. I'm nt a tech guy bt I'm sure if the res was higher on the game and was running on full 1080 the game would struggle badly. I haven't seen the xbox one version in person so can't judge on that. The way the game is optimised at the moment for the ps4 it dose look like it's pushing its limits. I'm nt saying this the consoles full potential at all I know it will get so much better as we go further in the consoles life cycle. Obv when people actually get the game and play it know what I'm on about then will see the game was nt dumb dwb for parity , trust me !!!! Also should have an early copy of far cry 4 by end of the week I'm thinking to do a live stream bt note sure if it's good idea or gono gt blocked from psn or xbox live Ps I gt both consoles ps and an xbox so people not being a fanboy here.
I don't think you are being a fanboy at all. I've been saying the same thing for a while now. I could tell that the game would be very demanding once I learned what was going into the game from a technical perspective. Unity is easily one of, if not THE, most technically advanced games yet released. I've also been saying that I think it is likely that the PS4 version will have some graphical advantages over the XB1 version...and/or it may have a somewhat better framerate. The game is really impressive in terms of the graphics techniques being used and I'm sure all three versions will look fantastic in their own right, but there will still be differences and advantages for PC over PS4, and PS4 over XB1.
Also I have to say I'm loving AC unity . It's solid enjoyable game. For me best of the series :D We'll so far!!!!
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.