Polyon:
"Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare has won plenty of plaudits for its entertaining portrayal of near future combat, and for incorporating the weapons of tomorrow into an established and valuable gameplay formula.
Part of the game's charm is its slightly sci-fi setting of computerized combat simulations, swarm drones, boost jumps and robotic prosthetics. But at its heart, it remains a point-and-shoot gallery wrapped around an expensive narrative frame.
So where does Call of Duty go next, in its grueling annual attempt to offer novelty and freshness to an audience with plenty of other options at their disposal"
Former director at Activision, Bret Robbins, revealed that Advanced Warfare 2 had a working prototype, but it was eventually shelved for COD WWII.
That is a shame. AW is my favourite CoD. I hope they do a sequel one day.
I still prefer CoD based on historical settings or in near future settings(like CoD: Ghost) ... even though I liked infinite Warfare's campaign ... it was top notch
A lot of people who never played a shooter prior to like 2012 get really mad about anything that isn't a modern combat game.
Game Rant Writes "With rumors swirling about a sequel to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Sledgehammer Games can bring back a few weapons for a modern encore."
GR: "If one series truly defined the seventh generation of consoles it was Call of Duty. Sadly, the series has struggled to reach the same heights on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One and only Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare feels like the previous era of innovation and top-notch storytelling."
I quite enjoyed it but I think black ops 3 was the high point.
Modern warfare could be if a few tweaks are made and the new maps are good.
Story wise.. black opps 3 was all over the place. Modern Warfare story is so much more cohesive and actually makes sense.
I quit that campaign after about an hour. All I remember is some crappy robot drone combat R2D2 thing that you had to use. I didn't make it past that.
For me the Black Ops installations have always been the high peaks in terms of PVP mode. Black ops 3 campaign was pretty bad though. Advanced Warfare's campaign was pretty good, one of the best ones - but PVP was bad!
The campaign was OK, but the guns sounded like cap guns and the multiplayer maps were not memorable at all.
I love cod3 game i started on it biga$$ maps, cars tanks, to drive and and.... not that much lag for an old game. I think thiy should go to ww2, thiy jummp to fast in the timeline of wars and this is me but the fast a$$ paste in cod and camping I dont play cod anymore. May sound stupid but thats me and I love the oldschool cod. P.S the gay a$$ snipr $hit you got now, in cod3 it tock skill and a little luck to be sniper and that made the game feel fare, all guns had something to thim to have an edge but not like it is know.
I suggested this last year. I think it's finally time.
Why WW2 and not WW1. There aren't many WW1 games or based games.
Vietnam War should be done and not just a short level like in black ops and this time you can be the French, Vietnam and US.
No its not. 6th gen was flooded with WW2 shooters with the exception of a few (conflict desert storm I loved it). The game needs to stay in modern times because quite frankly, these little kids only know modern time they won't eat up classic war time like we did...