530°

Nvidia: Golden Days of Consoles Are Over, So Many Other Ways To Enjoy Games

Nvidia's CEO at the recent earnings call stated that the best period of console gaming is over and now there are many alternatives to properly enjoy games.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Nyxus3869d ago

Hardware sales suggest otherwise.

codelyoko3869d ago (Edited 3869d ago )

Actually hardware sales DO suggest the same. The trick is differentiating the mainstream PC OEM industry (usually without GPUs) from the Gaming Oriented hardware.

Nvidia's share price has been enjoying an absolutely positive trend since the past 7 years or so and thats 60% of the PC Gaming industry right there. AMD is in a bit of a pickle with a fluctuating trend but that is because R&D costs are too high, and they can't afford it. And imagine for a second that AMD powers consoles while there aint a single Nvidia Chip in any console. Thankfully for consoles, AMD is protected from insolvency by Law ;) If AMD dies, Nvidia will become a monopoly (which Laws prohibit).

Still, I dont believe for a second that consoles are dying anytime soon. Both platforms have their advantages and both should and will co exist for the forseeable future.

Nyxus3869d ago

I was just talking about the fact that this generation of consoles (especially the PS4) is setting all kinds of sales records. I agree with you that both consoles and PC will coexist.

DeadRabbits3868d ago

If I had of built my PC first I would never have got a PS4. For heavens sake I just got CODAW for 34 euro compared to 60 euro on PS4 and FIFA 15 is now going for 24 euro on PC.
Also I am playing through Skyrim I bought for 5 euro modded out to the max!

TFJWM3868d ago

Umm anti-trust laws do not work like how you are implying. If AMD had to sell off all their assets the law would prevent Nvidea from buying them up not other companies.

Sy_Wolf3868d ago

Actually sales show consoles have never been in a better place. The PS4 is the fastest sellng console ever...

Wizard_King3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

What they are saying is the golden era of consoles is over and that is true.

-Lowest launch game count of any gen ever
-for 1 year in lowest game count of any gen ever
-most expensive games of any gen ever
-shortest single player experiences on consoles of any generation ever
-Paying to access online multiplayer is a console standard now
-planned and withheld content now sold as DLC after the fact is a norm on consoles now
-Still using shitty p2p networks for AAA shooters (only on consoles lol)
-Smartphones launching with faster CPUs and GPUs paired with 2k and 4k screens

Yeah I'd say the golden age for consoles is well and truly over. The best times for consoles where the PS2/Xbox days and things have progressively gone down hill since then.

Prove me wrong.

Meanwhile PC gaming goes from strength to strength and is what you choose to make of it. Literally 1000's of fantastic titles out there.

mep693868d ago

@Wizard_King Yeah, i regret buying my PS4 a launch. I've got 4 games and only completed 3. I've used my nintendo wii more than then PS4 so far.
PC all the way :P

thekhurg3868d ago

Agree - consoles aren't dying anytime soon.

Chris5583868d ago

Wizard you forgot about cheapest consoles ever and best architecture (easy to make games for ever) etc

Chrischi19883868d ago

I wonder, if consoles will decline in sales, or if companies will pull a smartphone with consoles. Dont understand me wrong, what I mean with pull a smartphone is, release a new console every or every 2 years, make an OS which runs on all these consoles (of course Sony and MS and Nintendo all have their own OS) and make it like with smartphones. I kind of think Nintendo already did something like this, with the New 3DS. And that thing is selling like hotcakes. Who knows what will happen. I mean, we all know technology is evolving faster than ever. A new device becomes old faster than ever. So maybe that is the way of the future... Not too expensive consoles, just always up to date, if you know how I mean that.

Not that I want that^^ I like it better the way it is, but who knows, what will happen.

I am waiting for play online contracts, for 2 years, that will get you a console, just like with smartphones nowadays. This concept could actually work.

It is something like, pay $20 per month, play online and get the newest console or something like that...

King_of_Nothing3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

I know you have a law degree from the internet, but that's not how law relating to monopolies nor insolvency/bankruptcy work...like at all. Its not illegal to be a monopoly per se, that is until there's anti-competitive acts taken by the company in a relevant market.

Also, please elaborate on this special status enjoyed by AMD that cuts out an exception in the legal system and economic market for them to be protected from insolvency.

PS. there's a reason people go to school for 7+ years to practice law, one is to avoid spouting false information. kthxbye

jdiggitty3868d ago

AMD stock price has gone from $10 five years ago to $2.75 today. They have never paid a dividend either. Did you even bother to look at the share prices before writing that?

jebabcock3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Well since ati owns the console space and nvidia failed to enter it on its own. Do you expect them to say any different?

Ju3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Wizard_King:

All this applies to PC gaming as well

-Lowest launch game count of any gen ever

Does a PC actually have a launch window? # of games on PC does not really exceed console releases, however, not all console games are released on PC either.

-for 1 year in lowest game count of any gen ever
-most expensive games of any gen ever

These two are probably related: Highest production value of games ever. We can debate gameplay, but from the level of details which are going into todays games and the budget this requires release are slower - and yet I am still budget constraint to play everything I want. And yet, I would argue, without consoles, those games would probably never come to PCs.

-shortest single player experiences on consoles of any generation ever

How is this different on PCs? Those games run there, too.

-Paying to access online multiplayer is a console standard now

How is this different on PC? XBL costs money there, too. Rest...well...I'l get to that.

-planned and withheld content now sold as DLC after the fact is a norm on consoles now

How is this different on PCs? You get the same DLC.

-Still using shitty p2p networks for AAA shooters (only on consoles lol)

How is this different on PCs? The servers are exactly the same. What makes it worse is, there is not a single online platform but 3 or 4 or what do I know how many (XBL, Steam, Origin, GameSpy and what not). None of those has dedicated servers (XBL probably offers the same access to servers on PC and XBO).

-Smartphones launching with faster CPUs and GPUs paired with 2k and 4k screens

Nope. Far slower CPU/GPU and 2k/4K on a tiny screen just covers up the lack of polygons and details games in that resolution actually have. Those are far behind even last gen consoles (still - while they are getting close).

It's the typical NVidia PR. Promis, promis, promis. Yet I fail to see them deliver.

UltimateMaster3868d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

@Wizard_King

-Lowest launch game count of any gen ever
-for 1 year in lowest ever game count of any gen

The PS Vita had the highest game count launch of any console in history and exclusives it's first year, even more than the PS2. How's that in any way relevant to sales?

-most expensive games of any gen ever

Same price as last gen.

-shortest single player experiences on consoles of any generation ever

I remember how Heavenly Sword and Genji on the PS3 was much shorter than any of the PS4 exclusive titles.

-Paying to access online multiplayer is a console standard now

It's always been the case on Xbox, that never stop people from paying before. It's not the case on the portable consoles and Wii U.

-planned and withheld content now sold as DLC after the fact is a norm on consoles now

Also true for PC, nothing different.

-Still using shitty p2p networks for AAA shooters (only on consoles lol)

That's ESPECIALLY True on PC. Unless you're playing some huge MMO, you will be getting p2p.

-Smartphones launching with faster CPUs and GPUs paired with 2k and 4k screens

Name one. (Readies pop corn)
Then tell me which AAA games runs on smartphones.

@DeadRabbits

COD AW is already half price for consoles (30$)
at some retailers.
http://n4g.com/news/1617692...
They sell you the "Day Zero" because they know that day 2, it'll be half price, or at least it will be when Black Friday arrives.

Antifan3867d ago

Why don't nvidia come sell me a gaming PC at the same price point as ps4 and xbone, then I'll believe them. Until then, it's all rubbish.

ProjectVulcan3867d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

Golden days died with the PS2 for me. PC has been declared dead so many times the past two decades and yet it's very much thriving even in the face of new consoles.

This shows how strong it has become. Traditionally new consoles signalled a serious slump in PC GPU sales until it picked up later in the console's life, they often dictated the health of PC, but now PS4 and Xbox One launches haven't made remotely the same impact.

starchild3867d ago

Well said. Both PC and consoles are flourishing. All of the platforms are doing well and we should just be happy that we are living in a golden age of gaming. There has never been a greater diversity of games and different ways to enjoy them than there is right now.

Utalkin2me3867d ago

So if that is true, then why would they even comment about it? Nvidia getting a little to cocky for their own good and personally makes me want to buy ATI for my next card.

UnHoly_One3867d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

@Wizard_King

"Lowest launch game count of any gen ever"

N64 launched with 2 available games in the US.

TWO.

Mario and Pilotwings

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3867d ago
decrypt3869d ago

@Nyxus

Consoles have no games. Hardware useless without games.

rocketpanda3868d ago

Consoles have no games is what a 5 year old would say without giving justification for your argument because you seem to show favour to a particular platform. Just because there are multiplatform games you can get on the PC doesn't make any other platform less relevant. Some people prefer not upgrading their hardware or drivers and content wotwith not having the super uber visuals.

Just because there is nothing "you" find appealing on consoles doesn't mean there are no games!

thekhurg3868d ago

"Consoles have no games."

Said no one ever.

ShinMaster3867d ago

One could argue similarly for high-end PCs, with no more than 2 games that take advantage of that hardware and the most popular games on PC being MOBAs, MMOs, indies, all that hardware is pointless.

3869d ago Replies(7)
snookiegamer3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Nvidia are just salty that they didn't get the current gen contract. Nvidia would be singing from a different Hymn sheet had their components been chosen for PS4/X1 instead of AMD.

I imagine PC Gamer's will share a different opinion...Some are as much a fanboy as any PS/Xbox user, except with added elitism!

3868d ago Replies(2)
Azzanation3868d ago

Your correct, that's why this article exist, Nvidia is killing the competition in sales and destroying console sales aswell. You don't need Sony or Xbox to invest 2 to 3 billion in R and D to produce console hardware when there are other ways to game.

3868d ago
Magicite3868d ago

There have always been many alternatives, but for now all software sells best on PS4, so sorry Nvidia.

starchild3867d ago

Proof?

And I'm not talking about pointing to one or two games we have sales figures for. I'm talking about proof that shows there are more games sold on PS4 than PC.

I would be willing to bet that there are more games sold on PC overall than any other platform. But sadly I don't think such figures are available. PC simply gets more games than any other platform so sales are spread out among more games.

venom_awakens3867d ago

Dimitrijs88 I completely agree with you.
You all that disagree what is your problem?
why you can't face the truth.
Most of the multiplatform games sell best on ps4 that's why you especially pc gamers take ports...

breakpad3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

i dont understand why so much hatred from Nvidia towrd consoles ..and is this due to AMD preferences of the two major console Companies ? is this due to PS4 overdominance , which dont be hypocrites is a japanese company that destroys sales of other consoles and PCs in Nvidia s area which is gaming. PS4 (and Xbone , Wii) create a serious competition against a graphic card manufacture who mainly targets PC gaming ...Nvdia gtfo you are just buthurt from consoles exclusive gaming (which is far superior than PCs)and a possible decline of high end-PC building

ABizzel13868d ago

@gamepard

Yes and No. NVIDIA wants to be a Monopoly or as close to it as possible. So if consoles die, that only leaves PC and mobile. NVIDIA is the biggest GPU manufacturer in PC gaming, so they could finally try to put the nail in AMD, and they're becoming possibly the best Mobile Performer as well with their current Tegra plans. Although the competition in mobile is harder for them, because there are already established players who control most of the market share already. The only good news for NVIDIA is technologically (GPU wise at least) they are slightly ahead of the curve with the main players playing catch-up a few months later.

It's just pure corporate greed, and something that needs to be balanced, because if it's only NVIDIA I can guarantee you the price of gaming will skyrocket.

r1sh123868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Theres a few things that are misrepresented, the old days gaming and games was a bit niche, dont get me wrong it might have been big but nothing compared to the present. Now a days its a lot more accepted, hence the number of casuals who play certain titles like COD because their friends/ family members do.

The total number of console games has increased exponentially, hence the great sales of the current gen (xbone/ps4).
Again whilst PS4/xbone sales are a good indicator of sales, we actually dont know how many of those sales were upgrades from the previous gen, whereas with PC one of the first things to 'upgrade' is usually the GPU or RAM, and therefore a new PC would not need to be purchased.
hence the numbers would never directly correlate, I have to say from being a gamer across pretty much most platforms over the past 15ish years PC did drop off for the past 10 or so, but its made a very strong comeback.
For the first time in many years I have not purchased release day consoles, for the moment although the PS4 is amazingly good value, there is no proposition for me to purchase either of the consoles, because the majority of the games I do want are on PC, albeit different release dates in some cases (GTA V etc).

With exclusives on PS4/xbone I have the same luxuries with PC where things like DayZ etc are actually just as fun.
Consoles will never die, but the momentum for PC is growing.
With the steambox it could disrupt home gaming a little and whilst the initial cost of a gaming PC is higher than a console, the games are cheaper so over a generation I would spend less.
I also would not need to pay for online gaming like XBL and PSN/SSN

r1sh123867d ago

@Frostypants..
I work with Nvidia commercially and they have a lot more going on than most would realise.
E.g the Tesla range of cards are used for facial recognition and there really isnt anyone competing.
I know I work for enterprise security and we integrate NEC neoface who spec tesla cards for production systems.

Nvidia also have the tegra cards going into small applications to use cuda cores to do live computing on ANPR, facial rec etc...

Nvidia of course make a lot of money on PC gaming, and thats their core market and they are not really in the console war so they do need to get into that market somehow.
PC gaming/ steam boxes are a way to do so, I doubt they will do much damage for now anyway

2cents3868d ago

of course they would say this because the days of console gaming is over for them!
They can keep all the 'other' ways of gaming.

I think we are all very happy to continue to play fully fledged games on our consoles for many years to come, while we continue to be amused at 'other ways to play games'.

Nice try Nvidia

frostypants3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Yeah, Nvidia desperately wants the golden age of "real" PC gaming to return (today's numbers are inflated by Farmville-like stuff), because even when they get their hardware into consoles, they have to deal with the low margins of volume pricing imposed by MS and Sony. Console success in turn makes people less likely to buy powerful PC hardware, resulting in people buying Nvidia's lower spec GPUs, so it's sort of a double-windfall for them if they can push people back to the mid-high PC market. This is more wishful thinking than reality by Nvidia. Consoles have never sold better than this.

I used to do the majority of my gaming on PCs. No longer...and the reasons are becoming fewer.

hiredhelp3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Firstly dont attack me green team ive stated countless times ive batted both teams greens and reds.
But finally the ceo shows true colors all cos AMD has there hardware this gen consoles and yes you maybe taking lead on pc platform but to count out consoles is stupid.

SilentNegotiator3868d ago

I think every generation of consoles has sold more hardware than the last, so...

Dannylew3867d ago

Not only :d hahahah but this desperate intention to talking bad about "console" in a world that is more and more smart and portable... is completely out!!!...

only nvidia "because feels InVIDIA" are capable of this affermation.

Clunkyd3867d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

yep, even if a high end PC was the same price of a console, I still wouldn't get one for the reason that I find gaming on a computer unappealing. That and for the reason that it doesn't have good AAA exclusives on there. IMO

16bitNutritionist3867d ago

Give me a way of experiencing all the AAA exclusives that console get on another system and I'll give it a serious look...it will never happen though...

Dynasty20213867d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

What?

PC hardware sales are officially outselling consoles.

PC gaming hardware is doing better than ever. Wake up.

And I love how everyone is saying Nvidia is clearly miffed at losing out to AMD.

You idiots. You absolute console idiots. AMD were picked BECAUSE THEY WERE THE CHEAPEST, TO REDUCE THE PRICE OF YOUR DATED HARDWARE BRICK.

Nvidia has always been, FOREVER, given you the best "Bang for your buck" - they have as near as makes no difference beaten AMD in every card category/price band in over 10 years, simply out-powering them, using less power, less heat, more FPS etc, and so many games are made for PC specifically coded to make use of Nvidia combined with Intel, to the point where I'm surprised if a game fires up and says "AMD" instead of "Nvidia" in the loading screen/intro.

The ONLY reason you choose AMD is to save money. They're a poor man's hardware.

Kind of like a console.

Crazay3867d ago

you seem...sad or upset. need a hug?

Elronza3861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

You speak the absolute truth bro! I own both an Asus Rog G46vw and an Nvidia Shield Portable And don't even remotely care to own one of these under-powered consoles this generation! Not to mention my 3g PS Vita and PS3 collect dust!While the console gamers are arguing about 900p vs 1080p. I and my Gtx 660m are playing games in 4k same goes for my Nvidia Shield Portable! http://www.gameranx.com/upd... https://forums.geforce.com/...

Muzikguy3867d ago (Edited 3867d ago )

So when PS5 gets released their going to change their minds and put a card in it?! Nvidia keeps talking trash. I'll take a console over a phone/tablet any day thank you very much

KillerResistance3867d ago

but would u take a console over a PC Gaming Machine that has a NVidia GTX980, i7, and a 4k Monitor? what does phone/tablet have to do with Nvidia? they're PC GPU company

Muzikguy3867d ago

Well the talk is about so many other ways to play games. PC is just one

"He also mentioned the fact that Android is poised to be a great mobile gaming platform of the future."

That's why I say tablet and phone

Crazay3867d ago

So says the CEO of the company that WASN'T picked by any company to be the provider of GPUs in the current market.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 3861d ago
nucky643869d ago

whoever wrote the article needs to explain to me how I can play bloodborne, the order, and uncharted 4....as far as I know there aren't "many alternatives".

decrypt3869d ago

Why would you like to limit yourself to a handful of games (most of which arent even out yet lol).

PC has 30 years of BC with over 4000 games on Steam alone. Not to mention the thousands Steam doesnt have.

In comparison the new consoles have no games.

DragoonsScaleLegends3868d ago

So many older games do not work on the newest Windows, and so many more of the newest games no longer support the older versions of Windows. Linux and Mac support for games is laughable. PC gaming involves a a$$ load of troubleshooting for older games while newer games seem to get buggier with every release. Quantity does not mean quality no matter how far you push those graphics.

WalterWJR3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Ps1 has 1300 games in the US alone so I don't really get your point.

edqe3868d ago

drpepperdude: "Linux and Mac support for games is laughable."

According to wikipedia Linux has hundreds of games more than PS4 or XBox One so the support is not that bad. Sure, many console game ports is still lacking but it has many great PC games.

sinspirit3868d ago

Who's limiting themselves? You think people here only play one console or PC? I play every console I can get my hands on. I primarily game on PC though. I plan on getting a PS4 eventually but I just don't have the money to get a TV along with it right now because I don't have one anymore.

FriedGoat3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

As someone who's gamed on PC since the beginning of the 90's, a back catalogue doesn't help me, i've played all I need to play. PC is lacking in NEW games, MOBAs are boring, all the best shooters such as quake 3 are dead or you can play counterstrike (which i've already played to death).

All you get to play is bad ports. PC doesn't have much going for it for me ATM. Things might change when Star Citizen comes though.

The place for new AAA is consoles, simple as that.

r1sh123868d ago

@drpepperdue..
What are you talking about?
Every game on steam works with pretty much every major OS for PC, there are updates and patches.
E.g I recently played Knights of the old republic, jedi knight dark forces on windows 8.1 without any issue.

What games are you talking about that need troubleshooting?

andibandit3868d ago

@drpepperdude

just run a virtualized version of whatever windows you need.

frostypants3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Please stop with the retro games argument. It's older than you are.

@andibandit: The vast majority of people aren't going to, nor want to, set up a virtualized machine just to play an old game. Even if they, like me, know how to.

decrypt3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

@frosty

Retro is just an option, nothing wrong with having options.

Though tell me, why do console gamers jump like little girls when games like Tombraider are announced for new consoles? Those are old games too. So there you go, most of you dont admit it but will go out of the way to pay 2x to get a game back.

Last gen we had PS fans screaming like little girls at the announcement of a God of war trilogy, most of them are even now begging for a uncharted remake on ps4, of course you can be a hypocrite and deny.

For those of you who claim you can hook up an old console to your new HDTV, be my guest enjoy the jaggies on the new TV.

I stand by my statement, PS4 or XB1 hardly have any games. What little exclusives they do have are not system sellers. Multiplats run better on PC anyways, not to mention PC tons of its own exclusives which is a number any console can no longer match even given a decade wont happen.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3868d ago
codelyoko3868d ago

"whoever wrote the article needs to explain" seriously? the poor guy is just quoting Nvidia's CEO. All this game-journalism-hate is starting to get old.

3868d ago
tee_bag2423868d ago

Funny.. You must have a time machine if you're playing them right now

mysteryraz113867d ago

My number 1 fanboy making a fool out of himself once again, what else is new

Irishguy953867d ago

Yeah i'm playing them on Ps4 right now...oh oh...no, they aren't out

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3867d ago
masterfox3868d ago

"So Many Other Ways To Enjoy Games"<-- I agree on this, but sadly Nvidia doesn't fit in that sentence with their ridiculous GPU prices and wasted raw power, also if hes talking about Mobile gaming he is just retarded then, sorry but thats the hard cold truth ;)

Vegamyster3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

"Nvidia doesn't fit in that sentence with their ridiculous GPU prices and wasted raw power"

The GTX 970 is around the same price as r9 290 but it gives better performance and uses less energy, usually they're more expensive but there cards always draw less energy and have better performance but the price isn't really a factor with their new cards.

3868d ago Replies(1)
DragoonsScaleLegends3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Console gaming is over and now there are many alternatives to 'properly enjoy' games?

So you are saying that PC has the only games that are good and people who played games on old consoles didn't enjoy them properly? Fúç# this guy and this is why I hate the PC community more than the console fanboys community, so many more are full of bull $hit.

peowpeow3868d ago

Some of you are quite sensitive. He didn't say console gaming was over. He did say the 'hay days' were, meaning consoles aren't as dominant as they once were.

Neofire3868d ago

True but anyone with a brain can read in between the lines and see that Nvidia contempt with console sales declining you dont see people making comments about pc software taking dips here and there so why is it so important to Nvidia who has no stake in the console space anymore?

FriedGoat3867d ago

What I love, is that back in the late 90's and 2000's, PC's were leading the way in gaming innovation.

Games like Doom, Quake, Unreal, Half life, hugely different to their dumbed down console counterparts. Loads of exclusives, PC really was the place to be.

Now you'll be lucky to even get any decent exclusive PC triple A titles. One comes along once in a while but still. Ad a PC gamer for over 25 years, I can tell you, now is not the best time to be a PC gamer if you've already played the back catalogue.

ginsunuva3868d ago

They're talking about other devices too, not just PCs.

Nvidia makes android devices now, remember?

Show all comments (210)
70°

NVIDIA Smooth Motion: Up to 70% More FPS Using Driver Level Frame Gen on RTX 50 GPUs

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 “Blackwell” architecture has been a bit of a bore for us gamers. Apart from Multi Frame Generation, which has limited use-case scenarios, there isn’t much to be excited about. It is achieved using GPU-side Flip Metering. The optical field data is generated using AI models in the Tensor cores.

Read Full Story >>
pcoptimizedsettings.com
60°

PNY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti GPU Review

Between the price, performance and power draw, with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, NVIDIA nailed the mainstream formula.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
57d ago
230°

Nintendo Switch 2 Leveled Up With NVIDIA AI-Powered DLSS and 4K Gaming

Nvidia writes:

The Nintendo Switch 2 takes performance to the next level, powered by a custom NVIDIA processor featuring an NVIDIA GPU with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements.

Read Full Story >>
blogs.nvidia.com
ZycoFox70d ago

The raytracing probably doesn't even equal a low end PC GPU, even if it did it would probably be mostly useless. They'll probably force it in some game now that will run like shit maybe 30fps at best, just because "it can do it"

B5R70d ago

Raytracing is so unnecessary for a handheld. I just hope you can turn it off.

Vits69d ago

A lot of gamers don’t realize that ray tracing isn’t really about making games look better. It’s mainly there to make development easier and cheaper, since it lets devs skip a bunch of old-school tricks to fake reflections and lighting. The visual upgrade is just a nice bonus, but that’s not the main reason the tech exists.

So you can be 100% sure that developers will try to implement it every chance they get.

RaidenBlack69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Agree with Vits .... but also to add, if devs and designers just implement RT to a game world then it won't always work as expected. RT is not just reflections but also lighting and illumination as well. For example, If you just create a room with minimal windows, then it will look dark af, if RTGI is enabled. Devs and designers needs to sort out the game world design accordingly as well.
DF's Metro Exodus RT upgrade is an amazing reference video to go through, if anybody's interested.

darthv7269d ago

So is HDR... but they have it anyway.

thesoftware73069d ago

Some PS5 and SX games run at 30fps with RT...just like those systems, if you don't like it, turn it off.

I only say this to say, you make it seem like a problem exclusive to the Switch 2.

Neonridr69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

sour grapes much?

"It probably doesn't do it well because it's Nintendo and they suck". That's how your comment reads. Why don't you just wait and see before making these ridiculous statements?

Goodguy0170d ago

Please. I'd like to play my switch games on my 4k tv without it looking all doodoo.

PRIMORDUS70d ago

Nvidia could have said this months ago and cut the bullshit. Anyway the rumors were true.

Profchaos70d ago

Would have been nice but NDA likely prevented them from saying anything

PRIMORDUS69d ago

TBH I don't think Nvidia would have cared if they broke the NDA. A little fine they pay, and they go back to their AI shit. They don't even care about GPU's anymore. I myself would like them to leave the PC and console market.

Tacoboto69d ago

This story was written half a decade ago when the world knew Nvidia would provide the chip for Switch 2 and DLSS was taking off.

Profchaos69d ago

Yeah but similar thing happened a long time ago when 3dfx announced they were working with Sega when they took the company public Sega pulled out of the contract for the Dreamcast GPU.

In response Sega terminated the contract and went to a ultimately weaker chipset.

So there's a precedent but that Nintendo would have much Of an option its AMD, NVIDIA or Intel

Profchaos70d ago

I'm not expecting of anything from ray tracing but dlss will be the thing that sees the unit get some impossible ports.

andy8570d ago

Correct. All I'm seeing online is it'll never run FF7 Rebirth. If it can run cyberpunk it'll run it. The DLSS will help. Obviously only 30 fps but a lot don't care

Profchaos70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

Exactly right when I buy a game on switch I know what I'm getting into I'm buying a game for its portability and I'm willing to sacrifice fidelity and performance to play on a train or comfortably from a hotel room when I travel for work.

69d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (23)