According to Alessandro Martinello, Resoltion and Frame-rate debate is genuine when deciding on buying a new PS4 or Xbox One but doesn’t make sense when it’s a choice of a studio for its game
PSLS writes: I have traveled across the country using the Razer Kishi Ultra in airports and hotels for both PlayStation Remote Play and mobile gaming in general, and I am thoroughly impressed.
Fallout 4 is now available on next-gen consoles, offering 60fps gameplay and 4K resolution. But it's bad news if you claimed the game on PS Plus.
Probably won't happen for PS+ since Sony makes a clear distinction between a PS4 game and a PS5 game, unlike PC and Xbox where it is not a specific device game (It's now always an Xbox game).
So to make the PS5 game of fallout 4 available. Bethesda would need to renegotiate the complete deal with Sony.
hence why there's often only the PS4 version of the game available on PS+.
Let's hope Bethesda and Sony can arrive to term quickly.
From Dragon Ball creator Akira Toriyama, Sand Land is a fun adaptation of the manga and anime in videogame form. For all of its simplicity and repetition, it's a beautiful interpretation of the source material.
I agree with the thinking, but 720p is pushing it a little. Both machines are stronger than that.
i prefer 30fps.
1080p is what the industry standard should be, fps second, i want to see my details and see it with pace, not babble my gun around like if im on some drug
According the the author, "These things (especially Resolution and FPS debate) didn't event exist during PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 days."
Such a statement is completely false. Resolution differences and framerate were a major point of discussion last gen and there are numerous comparison vids and thousands of comments to prove it. I can't count the number of N4G articles that made the "Hottest News" section that were PS3/360 comparisons.
And the resolution differences last gen were smaller than they are (in some games) this gen.
As a studio, they have to think what is best for their game. Go for 1080p while sacrificing other elements of a game like content, AI, effects and other aspects that go into design and production or make the game they way they envisioned it with all the bells and whistles a design team had in mind with the possibility of the game not being in 1080p but having full content at running at a higher framerate.
It's a shame that some here can't think like this as every time a 3rd party developer releases a game not to some over blown sense of expectation it is automatically blamed on "parity".
Edit:
"Dude how on earth is paying just to access online play(MS last gen) is the same as paying for PS Plus this gen?"
Because...they're... both...*drums*...MANDATORY!!!
At the point I started seeing comments like "Not 1080p@60fps [or something close], pre-order canceled [or 'not buying']" I started caring about graphics discussions, because they became just an excuse for whiny people.