Looks like a couple new career opportunity ads from Ready at Dawn caused some to argue that The Order : 1886 might be delayed further. Luckily CTO Andrea Pessino dropped the axe on the idea, in a very clear cut way.
Sweet. Really excited that I get to play this, Bloodborne, and The Witcher all in the same month. It's going to be insane!
After last gen, I prefer playing only one game at a time because otherwise I might lose interest in the others too fast (for whatever reason). So I for one won't be able to enjoy all three within one month (even though I'm excited for all of them) because after February 6th, Bloodborne will consume me from the inside :D
Same I'll probably pick up The Witcher first and the other 2 later
Well they just confirmed it...1886 delayed and THE LAST OF US 2 is coming to PS4!!! I kid... 1. Don't delay this. It looks awesome. 2. Naughty Gods, we know you always deliver.
A man will be skipping Bloodborne though it looks great if you're into that sort of thing. The Witcher will have to wait since a man is so stoked for this he already has the CE preordered though The Witcher looks fantastic and will be bought when it goes down to $30 or so since April and May will probably see it down to that price.
As long as the game is good. Delays always seem to spark trouble in the end
A lot of games that have been delayed lately did not turn out so well. Watch_Dogs, The Crew, Drive Club (imo a great game. Shame other people dont like it)
@doomed those games werent bad at all sans the crew with it not being out. Overhyped and overpromised yea but not bad. Sometimes though a publisher and or dev just put out an unrealistic release dadate or are optimistic in thier team
duke nukem forever
@DoomeDX People like driveclub but its a PS4 exclusive so .... you know "Concern"
@DoomeDx It can go both ways though. If it released earlier, the games might have been even worse. Developers just have to put effort into their work and make a good product, rather than a pile of poo.
I'll take that with a bowl of salt. Not particularly excited for this 1 but bloodbourne is gonna be fantastic.
http://theviralupdate.com/n... Is this the reason for the bowl of salt? (it's a joke)
Is it wise to release a game amongst heavy hitters like The Witcher and BloodBorne? sure you could argue BloodBornes a new IP, but it's really not. Here's hoping it all goes well, I'm going to be feeding on Noodles that entire month.
"Is it wise to release a game amongst heavy hitters like The Witcher and BloodBorne?" I don't see why not. The three of them played differently and they had their own market. "sure you could argue BloodBornes a new IP, but it's really not" It IS a new IP, even though it share some element with Demon's / Dark Souls.
I would say that all of them have a very similar target group, and all these February RPG's might steal the excitement from The Order:1886. I wish RAD lots of success but I would've preferred their game a little bit later (and therefore more polished). I will definately buy it though, just not at launch.
Going by my disagrees, let me clear up some logic for you folk, working class average joe, could afford one or maybe two games a month, two established well known IP's like the Witcher or Bloodborne (Souls game), and an out of the blue new IP. If cash is short that month I'll buy Bloodborne solo, if not I'll buy Bloodborne and The Witcher, new IP's aren't always a good thing, and going against these two in the same month is a stupid move. Move it to March, and I'll likely get it as I'd have cash, much like other people who work and have bills to pay.
@Bloodborn I can see the same target group between The Witcher and Bloodborne because both of them is action-RPG, even though both got their own style and fanbase. But for The Order, it targets the TPS / adventure market. So i don't see Bloodborne or The Witcher can steal The Order sales. @Twiggy Listen kid. Like i said before, the three of them got their own market and that's why they will not cannibalize each other. And we're not talking about you who prefer Bloodborne / The Witcher over The Order because you didn't trust new IP and don't have enough money to buy two games in the same month. But we're talking a MARKET here, which means the possibility of hundreds, thousands, or a million of people who will buy The Order because it is more appealing to their taste compare to The Witcher or Bloodborne.
There are people that are interested in both genres (I don't now anyone that only likes one genre) and there are people that can only afford 1 or 2 games each month. Also, while Bloodborne is a new IP, it still is a Souls game through and through. TW3 and Bloodborne WILL "steal" 1886 potential sales and the contrary is also true but I believe that will be on a much smaller scale.
funny thing is that in reality it has more pre orders than both.The other games should be delayed if u think like that http://www.vgchartz.com/pre...
February is a cluster **** with games. But it isn't quite bad, I'll be getting all three, so it won't make a difference for me. However, I can see more people interested in Witcher or Bloodborne over The Order.
I said this a few months ago and I was disagreed for it. The entire production of a game is also a learning curve. They don't want to be over staff with employee because it too costly. I think They rather feel things out first to avoid over budgeting.
thats what we're train for. i mean ive killed millions of zombie already (in game) and i know im not alone no fear we gamers alone not the military can stop those pesky lil zombies rest asure we 'll make sure that this game wont be delayed even we got a zombie apocalypse
I'm woundering If there maybe zombies in 1886, might be a cheeky hint. Just throwing it out most likely not though
Actually wasnt it already delayed? I thought original release was this month.
Super excited for it though.
Okay I guess im not excited, thanks for letting me know.
Ebola might get us first.
I just wish that this game had multiplayer and co-op modes. I think it would be perfect.
February is so stacked even with Dying Light being moved up, and Arkham Knight being pushed back. I personally think there's room for each game to move a lot of units. CD Projekt Red, and the Souls games each have a huge following, and The Order 1886 is a new IP from a developer that's crafted awesome Vita experiences, and is now getting their first shot at the big time. I for one want to get all three.
We are going to be very busy in the first 4 months of 2015.
So then its confirmed delayed? lol
Zombie Apocalypse confirmed
Well if this developer ever does confirm a delay from this point on I am headed for the hills up North where it's cold. According to Romero Zombie lore, zombies freeze easily...unless you count Dead Snow...then we are all screwed. Here's hoping this game comes out on time for the sake of humanity.
I was super excited about this game before E3. But, after the E3 demo I felt a bit let down. There was really nothing wrong with the game in the demo. It just didn't feel like there was anything special in the game. I will definitely buy and play it. But, I don't see it as the next big game.... Bloodbourne on the other hand.... Let's just put it this way, I am drooling to get to Bloodbourne...
If it's good who cares? But I'll probably pick it up a little later. Bloodborne and The Witcher 3 are day 1 for me.
He means "delayed again".
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.