640°

Ex-Dice Employee: "Don't Buy Battlefield Hardline at Launch"

"It's not uncommon for ex-employees to voice opinions about their previous employer and the projects they are working on. Via an Ask Me Anything (AMA) on Reddit this week, we were able to hear what ex-Dice designer Tim Kjell had to say about the Battlefield franchise. His opinion: don't buy Battlefield Hardline at launch."

Read Full Story >>
gamesreviews.com
ArchangelMike3495d ago (Edited 3495d ago )

I won't be buying BF:Hardline at all. I'll be getting The Division instead.

badz1493495d ago

why not? the dev said it will work on release. /s

http://n4g.com/news/1594973...

XBLSkull3495d ago

Only reason the "Battlefield" title is attached to this is to help it sell. It is in no way, shape, or form, a Battlefield game. Skipping it for sure. EA needs punishment anyways for the BF4 debacle, and they shouldn't be turning Battlefield into an annual franchise.

3495d ago
KingKevo3495d ago

@badz149: Funny that someone from the devs really felt the need to actually say that the final version of the game that is sold to consumers will work. Just imagine you buy a car and the seller was like "and oh, the best thing about this car is that it comes with an engine, 4 wheels, breaks and, believe it or not, it actually drives!!" I did not read that story you linked, so maybe the headline was just misleading, but it is actually really ridiculous what EA did and keeps doing with BF.

I'm like ArchangelMike, I won't buy the game at all and thus won't have any trouble. I really did not like the Beta, it felt like any other BF and even those games seem to be in constant Beta even when they are 'gold' and released..

killacal133495d ago

@ prince ali, in my opinion battlefield should be about battlefields with tanks, choppers, etc... Not a bad boys movie.

dennett3163495d ago

The fact that a developer even had to say that is a sign of just how broken the games industry actually is. No other industry gets away with such obvious contempt for the paying customer, yet people are perfectly happy to continue plonking down their $60, sight unseen, practically begging the publishers and devs to take advantage of them by stripping out content and selling it back to them as Day 1 DLC.
Battlefield 4 was a test to see just how sloppy they could get and still have people make the game a success, and worse, openly stick up for the developers in the face of such a broken farce of a game.
Hardline is a test to see whether or not someone will pay $60 for what is an extremely stripped down concept, to the point where I suspect it was actually supposed to be a "Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon" type of expansion to Battlefield 4 instead of a full retail game. And, of course, gamers are drooling and lining up to buy it just because it had a flashy presentation at E3....who cares that Battlefield 4 was a mess, it'll be different next time???
Honestly, it's getting to the point where I think that the majority of gamers are their own worst enemy. They keep falling for the cycle of hype, pre-order, get game, "Oh wait, it's not very good", repeat. They keep buying the same old experiences, except each time, more and more content is stripped out and made into DLC so it costs them more and more each time to experience the exact thing they've already experienced several times before. Look at the delusion people are suffering over Destiny...I see people rushing to defend it in DROVES because they fell for the empty hype machine. "But it's fun to shoot stuff with friends". And? There are lots of games with satisfying FPS mechanics that are far more complete experiences than the empty shell that is Destiny. Anything can be fun with a few friends...throwing stones at a beehive and running away is fun with friends, that doesn't make it any less of a bad idea. Stop settling for less, stop falling for the hype and start speaking up when you're given a game that doesn't live up to the promises they made throughout its development. Demand MORE for your money, not less...make them EARN that $60 instead of bending over and letting them take it.

LonDonE3495d ago (Edited 3495d ago )

@dennett316
Dude paragraphs are your friend! seriously you should edit it and just put some paragraphs in which makes it easier on the eye to read or else people will find their eyes jiggle and they keep losing what line they were on LOL

On topic i AGREE WITH U 100% just some advice space out your paragraphs and it makes such a big difference for the readers of your comment!

Please dont take offence to my suggestion i dont want to come across as a grammar nazi its just because i often write walls of text lol but i space out my paragraphs so it makes it easier on the eye when some one reads! :)
See how the spaced out paragraphs are easier on the eye? lol

PONTIAC08G8GT3494d ago

After the turd that BF4 was, they really should sell this game at $30 or $40. Charging $60 just doesn't make sense. The BF series needs an over haul and a "I'm sorry" for putting out such a broke a$$ game as BF4 was. BF really didnt do anything to make up for the garbage that was BF4.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3494d ago
WombBat3495d ago

yup, battlefield 4 is one of my only regret buys of the last ten years.

Im never buying one again

spacedelete3495d ago

i'm glad i did buy BF4 so now i never will buy another BF game again. curiosity killed the cat.

Lwhit63495d ago

With this upcoming patch I feel like BF4 will finally be the game that it was meant to be. Maybe you'll give it another chance like I am?

princejb1343495d ago

I bought bf3 and bf4 at launch. I'll never touch a battlefield game again.

Matt6663495d ago (Edited 3495d ago )

I rather still play BF over COD any day of the week

annoyedgamer3495d ago

Crysis 2 was my final straw with EA. I learned my lesson long before.

Dirtnapstor3495d ago (Edited 3495d ago )

I really don't understand the BF hate... Are these issues PC problems? I experienced server drops (PS3) initially (fixed) and rubber banding (PS4) on Naval Strike, that's about it.
If I get Hardline at launch, it'll be for the SP campaign at this point.

wsoutlaw873495d ago

@matt you dont have to get either

Kidmyst3495d ago

"Kjell’s opinion on why consumers shouldn’t buy Hardline on day one make perfect sense. Don’t reward EA for promises they have yet to deliver on. If they don’t deliver 100%, it wouldn’t be the first time. "

IF EA just finished a game and released it when ready this would get so much better for them. But EA is known for this crap and many gamers are getting smarter and not buying into the BS.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3495d ago
InTheZoneAC3495d ago

A battlefield game that's simply cops and robbers, no actual battlefield or heavy military vehicles?

No thanks!

They should've called it something else and either gave us bad company 3, battlefield 5, or a futuristic battlefield.

I don't even know why they veered off like this, almost like they wanted to be a battlefield meets call of duty hybrid.

psuedo3495d ago

They don't want to do futuristic, because they are doing Star Wars Battlefront. They wanted to spin off the battlefield series some how though, and you get what should of been an alternate game mode into a new game. "Hardline" Greed.

Magicite3495d ago

''Don't Buy Any EA game at Launch!''

UltraNova3495d ago

"Buy Activision games at launch instead because the work" ohh, in order for you to play all the game you will have to pay up to 120 bucks 60 for half the game and another 60 for the rest as DLC PLUS the season pass.

:)

Ninver3495d ago

He'll I urge everybody not to buy a BF game until they get their act together.

ramiuk13495d ago

i will never buy another BF game at launch,regardless of anyone.

Same reason i will bever buy DLC or a season pass.

people bitch and moan about things but then still go and buy.

3495d ago
DarkOcelet3495d ago

Its a shame that Visceral are the one who are in the middle of this . They are really a good devs .

Crazyglues3494d ago (Edited 3494d ago )

Ex-Dice Employee: "Don't Buy Battlefield Hardline at Launch!"

-Don't worry I won't, I wash my hands with DICE- I really don't care what they make or what's made using there broken game engine..

So you can keep hardline / and I'll just buy anything else instead --> The Division / Assassin Creed / GTA V / Rainbow Six / Call Of Duty AW / No Seriously anything else...

I'm not wasting any money on that crap..

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3494d ago
daBUSHwhaka3495d ago

Maybe pick this up a year down the line when it's bargain bin material.No chance im making that mistake again.

isa_scout3495d ago

Yep, this is a franchise that EA has totally wrecked. I might pick it up used a year down the road, but I'll make sure EA doesn't see any of that money. I don't like buying games that take 10 patches spread out over a year to finally be the game I was promised when it launched.

HappyWithOneBubble3495d ago

I thought about getting it later used from ebay but now I think I'm not getting it at all. The cop theme isn't interesting for a BF game. I'm getting bored of FPS anyway. Rainbow Six might be the last FPS I pick up for awhile til BF5.

JJShredder3495d ago

I enjoy the Battlefield series a lot but after 3 and 4, I will most likely be skipping on this and waiting for the new Battlefront instead(hopefully next year).

sAVAge_bEaST3495d ago

" Less guns makes designing the game easier, and allows resources to be used elsewhere. Choose the best, scrap the rest." -Totally Agree. + it's easier to balance.

Show all comments (89)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot758d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250757d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface757d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop757d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno757d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel758d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps757d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888757d ago (Edited 757d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33757d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888757d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH757d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
120°

Ranking All The Battlefield Games

From Xfire: "With the next game being a return to the classic XX42 formula, now is as good a time as any to make an utterly definitive and in no possible way controversial ranking of the Battlefield games we've enjoyed over the years, with which undoubtedly nobody will take issue in the comment section. Right? Okay then - here we go, from least good to best."

OMNlPOTENT1028d ago

Battlefield 1 above 4 and Bad Company 2? Not a chance.

Ruegrong1028d ago

battlefield 4 was broken as shit on launch same as battlefield 3

isarai1028d ago

Bad company 2 was still my favorite, sure it was a bit gimped compared to the rest if the series but more fun and far more satisfying weapon unlocks.

XxINFERNUSxX1028d ago (Edited 1028d ago )

Battlefield 1942 + both expansions are my all time favorite, it can still be played online to this day. Vietnam would be my 2nd, 3rd Battlefield 2, last BF2142 the rest I didn't care for. They really need to remake from the ground up in the new engine BF1942. Next year it will be 20 yrs since it was released. If they don't at least to me would be a disservice. ☹

CoNn3rB1027d ago

"erasing that simply reinforces toxic male privilege." I see the writer is one of those types of people...

70°

The Life & Death of the Season Pass

In a time not too long ago, a foul infection spread its way through the games industry. It was a vile illness that burrowed itself in deep, feeding off of greed and the incessant begging of teens desperate to receive funds from their parents. It divided friend groups, suffocated player bases, and was common practice up until recently—it was the season pass.

Read Full Story >>
play.jumpcutonline.co.uk
IanTH1257d ago (Edited 1257d ago )

This doesn't make a ton of sense. Season Passes may slowly fade out for multiplayer games, perhaps, but I don't see them going anywhere in games that are primarily single player. They don't seem to touch on this either, with every game being some kind of online/multiplayer/GaaS title, and nary a mention of a single player game - at least that I saw.

I mean, games like Borderlands 3 just asked people to buy in to the 2nd season pass. Battle passes can't really take over in places that have story driven content and such. So I'd say perhaps they missed a bit of a necessary distinction but, since they claim the death of season pass is at hand, it appears they may have missed how single player games factor into this entirely.