100°

Op-Ed: Capcom needs to stop forcing co-op into every Resident Evil game

'Resident Evil: Revelations 2' is suppose to continue the style of its predecessor and return the series to its horror survival roots. However Capcom is still trying to shoehorn co-op into another game despite how unpopular it is with fans.

Read Full Story >>
digitaljournal.com
stanr3511d ago

Every gamer would agree that they are tired of co-op being forced into another Resident Evil game. Just make a damn MMORPG already or give up on multiplayer.

sloth33953511d ago

outbreak had good co-op but that's about it

scark923511d ago (Edited 3511d ago )

They should remake the Outbreak games or port it, I would like to play them

Kurylo3d3511d ago

Hell yea out break was some real resident evil type shit. Its just sad that when they did outbreak u needed to buy a modem for the ps2.

MrSwankSinatra3511d ago

My problem is the fact that capcom says they've been taking fan feedback, but this co op garbage directly contradicts that

Lord_Sloth3511d ago

Not really because a lot of the RE fanbase seems to like the co-op as well. It's rather split.

-Foxtrot3508d ago (Edited 3508d ago )

RE fanbase? Sorry but the majority of that fanbase would of probably been introduced to the series with RE5 or RE6 and in my opinion they are not RE fans, they have become a fan of a changed franchise which has become a shadow of it's former self. I bet they wouldn't be a fan of the actual RE games would they

People who like co-op are the people killing this franchise.

3511d ago
Kurylo3d3511d ago

Problem is .. its all a line. Anytime they say were taking in fan feedback.. they are just trying to lure back their original customer base by bull sh*tting. They have been doing that a lot. Like when tehy said RE6 was going back to racoon city roots horror wise.

Then you play the game and the zombies have assault rifles and there are 100s coming at u at the same time and u have unlimited ammo... oh and you dive and roll away from them, use martial arts, and have dual handguns. lol... ok capcom. Jerks.

ShaunCameron3510d ago

But it does make sense for Chris and Leon to have all that. They're no longer rookies. They're trained professionals. Well-experienced. Elite status. Plus the threat they now face are no longer local. It's now global. Way too big for either one of them to take on by themselves. So co-op at this point is logical in the overall RE timeline.

Kurylo3d3510d ago (Edited 3510d ago )

Chris was never a rookie in any of the games. He was former airforce/ military and became a cop as part of a special unit. Doesn't change the fact that he now has unlimited ammo and looks like he is roid raging. Are you really going to dive and roll away from zombies? lol.. or do fancy spin kicks or suplex wrestling moves? Don't know how global or local factors into the horror. It changes nothing for coop. You can have other characters in the story without turning it into coop and giving everyone unlimited health and ammo.

The first couple of re games treated every character as a real breathing person. All these RE games do is make every character some sort of clichy. Chris- the guy from gears of war... ada- the chick who for no reason keeps disappearing from a guy she had romantic feelings for lol cause shes somehow now batman with a grapling hook. Wesker- the guy who is suddenly a bond villain who wants to kill the planet and rule it?... where as in re1 he was just trying to sell a corporations secrets to the highest bidder and make some extra cash.

Kavorklestein3511d ago

I personally don't EVER see co-op as a bad thing. Especially if it's optional.
I think having options is always a good thing, I mean look at how a good game like Titanfall is stunted by it's lack of features and game types.

It had potential to be AMAZING, and it was simply PRETTY GOOD instead.

I never played the Co-op missions in Far Cry 3, (mostly because Nobody else was ever available to play with) but at least the option is there.

lazyboyblue3511d ago

Optional is good. I agree. But resi forces it on you and if you don't have a partner they force an AI one on you.
Just want a traditional RE game from 7 tbh.

KimoNoir3511d ago

Open-World Resident Evil (done right) is what i'm curious about.

Show all comments (40)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ43d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia43d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73043d ago (Edited 43d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6943d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y43d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex43d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y42d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07202d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde202d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude202d ago (Edited 202d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992202d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme202d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992202d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313202d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69202d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor202d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69202d ago (Edited 202d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack202d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface202d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)