Gamerheadlines.com: Assassin's Creed Unity might be the next-gen after all. Should it be delayed until the next-gen game is truly made? Give us a next-gen game already!
Shaz from GL writes: "Assassin’s Creed Unity is looked at as one of the worst in Ubisoft’s iconic franchise. But playing it nearly 10 years later reveals it may just be the best"
Small video game maps that are packed with things to do are better than huge but empty maps. Here are five small but brilliant maps in games.
GF365: "Since the first Assassin’s Creed game, there have been entries up until now. There are more than a few titles that are far from an ideal stealth game. Let’s discuss why 2014’s Assassin’s Creed Unity is one of the best games in the series."
Glitchy as hell and flat story, nah this aint it. AC2, brotherhood and 4 were amazing games in every respective
After constant glitches Arno being boring nah I am good I skipped Unity. I will always like the Ezio trilogy, Black Flag, Rogue, Odyssey, Syndicate. I use to love the franchise but now it feels stale and boring. But my list of favorite entries into the franchise will vary from other players favorite entries.
It’s funny because, at launch, it was universally panned for being unplayable. It’s a great game that holds up today. I’m glad they fixed it.
The only good things i remember from Unity are pretty graphics and really good descending mechanics (even though it sometimes didn't make much sense, when your character can drop down from like 10 meter height onto a flagpole perfectly).
Game is glitchy to this day, i was playing in it years after the release date (with all the DLCs) and it's still broken. You had to reload missions too often for my taste (characters do not spawn, you fall through the floor, getting stuck in falling/sitting/aiming animation, hidden blade stop working, assassination target running away at the start of the mission). Story was meh, searching for all the treasures wasn't enjoyable at all. Coop was pretty much useless, i've beaten every coop mission in solo. Helix rifts were awful as well.
Not saying i hate this game or anything, but it got too many problems.
Assassin's Creed (i know it's a controversial opinion) and Assassin's Creed 2 are still great to this day.
Its a two week delay to make the game better. I wish people would stop whining about two weeks.
So, 30,000 AI, seamless indoor/outdoor exploration, seamless online co-op free roam, totally revamped parkour and combat mechanics, and the sheer size of the map itself are not enough to consider this title as next-gen? :/
Also, they delayed the launch by two weeks, not one month. I doubt they could dramatically change any core mechanics in such a short window of time; they basically need that time for polishing. Besides, no one has played the game yet, so there's no base to say that the AI is totally dumb and that that should deem it unworthy as a next-gen title. (You can't really judge the AI on current gameplay missions as most are earlier builds)
I feel like the author's opinion on the matter shifts multiple times in the same article (Look at this awesome next-gen feature! But Ubisoft should delay until it's next-gen!)
Poor guys at Ubi can't win I guess...
Alright guys,
As I said in the post. I love the AC series. My point was simple; I would like Ubisoft to take their time (as much as needed). Not saying I hate the game. I know the game has many next-gen features. Additionally, I said the development team has an extra month based on when the game goes gold. The first sentence refers to the extra couple of weeks we have to wait.
In short, delay until they truly believe they have the next-gen game. If that is Nov 11, then it will be awesome!
Keep gaming
-Kilo