60°

The Witcher 3 Gamescom 2014 Interview by PakGamers

Wajhi Jafri from pakgamers.com interviews Polish developer CD Projekt Red about their upcoming action RPG The Witcher III: Wild Hunt.

Read Full Story >>
pakgamers.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZNw9IzDkck&list=UUoPfWWdL0OaghS_HxfQKr6Q&index=17
lazyboyblue3958d ago

Really torn over this game. I really want the PC version for the graphics but I also really want the PS4 version for the trophies. Cant afford both.

FalloutWanderer20773958d ago

To each their own. Me? PC all the way. I wouldn't give it a second thought. If trophies mean that much to you then get it on the PS4. However, if you have a gaming PC that will potentially do Witcher 3 justice, there is absolutely no reason to get it on any other platform but PC.

If not for the better performance & visuals then at least for the mods that will eventually come out after release. Oh, there is a very good chance TW3 will have achievements through gog galaxy and steam as well. win/win situation if I ever saw one.

Meltic3958d ago (Edited 3958d ago )

Lol the ps4 version is almost the same as PC. Same experience but the PC has a Little more better Graphics. Ps4 is like high settings and PC is Ultra. The only thing better in PC is the mods that will come later.

bloodybutcher3957d ago

I cannot choose, for I own only a ps4. However, in your case, you should go for a pc version without any doubt.

lazyboyblue3957d ago

Im leaning more toward ps4 version. I have a gtx 770 machine so I doubt I'll see ultra setting and ps4 is said to be high setting equivalent anyway.

FalloutWanderer20773956d ago (Edited 3956d ago )

I have a GTX 770 as well and I'm hoping it fairs well. I'd think if the consoles are pushing PC high then at the very least a gtx 770 should be doing the same @ 60fps with maybe a few toggles set higher.

A good CPU & GTX 770 Combined with at least 8gb ram is vastly superior to what the consoles can do on paper.I presently have a i5-4670k with a modest OC @ 4.0ghz

I'm waiting for pricing & performance of the GTX 880 and if it exceeds the 780 ti AND the price is better or close to the same, I may just sell my 770 for one of those or I will keep the 770 as a dedicated physX card.

My easiest option would be buying my little brothers 660 at a really good price for dedicated physX for an extra boost in performance until I can upgrade my card. It might not give me miracles but it will certainly help with the hardware physX that Witcher 3 will have. I'm primarily upgrading for TW3 only.

70°

The Witcher 4 tech demo interview: Building a world that will be very rich and interactive'

This week CD Projekt Red teased its next project, The Witcher 4, with a tech demo in Unreal Engine 5, showing off some of the technology powering the Polish com

170°

CD Projekt RED History Suggests The Witcher 4 Demo May Be More Marketing Than Gameplay

The history of CD Projekt RED suggests that the recently shown demo for The Witcher 4 may be more marketing than actual gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Sonyslave320d ago

Not only CDPR but Epic Games as well i still haven't seen any game with that fidelty of that Ps5 tech demo .. that was 2020

VenomUK20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Digital Foundry in its reaction video said they believe the demo reflects real performance, as overstating it’s competence on PS5 could bring significant risks to Epic Games’ shareholders and legal risks.

https://youtu.be/5PIyPpB83V...

Eonjay19d ago

Actually Horizon Forbidden West exceeds this in image quality. So it seems very plausible. Intergalactic is actually beyond this presntation in IQ, RT and resolution and thats locked 60FPS as well. As far as the usage of hardware RT in UE, they were able to reduce the CPU overhead.

This was a tech demo for UE 5.6. That was clearly stated and is evident by the presentation itself where several of the new features of UE are highlighted

This article title is inaccurate because this was not a demo for Witcher 4. It was a technical demonstration of Unreal Engine 5.6.

Christopher20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

***Cyberpunk 2077’s gameplay features that were showcased in initial footage but never made it into the final game***

They literally made a big deal of telling everyone that they changed the gameplay of CP2077 during development and then did a new demo of the game with the new gameplay. There was no hiding this to the public. CP2077's problem with the buggy as heck and obviously too early release.

This is really bad journalism to promote this line of thinking. It's an attempt to rewrite history. You can definitely say you preferred the initial demo, but they were very open and clear when they moved from third-person to first-person that it would include major changes in gameplay and showed those off multiple times a year prior to the game's release.

---

As to the point of this article? Yeah, the whole event is a marketing event. I don't trust anything until it's released, tbh. No matter who is making it. I can still be excited by what I see, but it's not going to get me to pre-order a game or get me to go out there and sell what I saw as if it will be just like that in the full release.

neutralgamer199220d ago

What about the fact CDPR showed gameplay behind closed doors which wasn't real? They dusnt allow anyone to bring their phones or any tech so once media came out of that gameplay reveal CP2077 was hyped to the moon and back. CDPR didn't show console gameplay so let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game

Christopher20d ago

You mean rumors? You want me to comment on rumors from Bloomberg? We arguing the belief of rumors now and not news?

Here's that fake demo - https://www.youtube.com/wat...

If you've played the game, you know how much that lines up with the final product. That's what I know.

***let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game***

They literally re-demoed the game with the change, so they were transparent. You're just acting like they weren't when in 2018 they literally demoed the new gameplay. That's 2 years prior to release.

I don't know what they 'lied at launch of the game' is supposed to mean.

-

This game had enough wrong with it at release that we don't need to be arguing rumors and online hatred of the gameplay changes shown in 2018.

neutralgamer199220d ago

Christopher, just to clarify — I'm not trying to be overly negative or dismissive. I fully acknowledge that CD Projekt Red was transparent when they switched from third-person to first-person and even re-demoed the game to reflect that. Credit where it’s due — they did show that change publicly.

But the real issue for me is how the game launched. Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions and still charged full price for something that was nowhere near ready. That’s where trust was broken. The game was released in a clearly unfinished and broken state, and it took years to get it into a playable condition. That goes beyond mistakes — that’s a serious failure in leadership and consumer respect.

So when I see something like the Witcher 4 tech demo — and yes, I understand it’s Epic showcasing Unreal Engine 5 — I can’t help but approach it with caution. It’s not blind skepticism, but earned skepticism. A lot of the original developers have left CDPR, so we can’t assume this next game will automatically reach Witcher 3 levels of excellence.

I want it to be amazing. We all do. But I’m not going to fully believe the hype until independent gamers and trusted content creators — people with a reputation for honesty and not being paid off — get their hands on it and say, “Yes, this is great.” Until then, it’s just marketing.

They built up enormous goodwill after The Witcher 3 and the free DLCs — but they lost much of that with Cyberpunk's release. Even platform holders like PlayStation and Xbox, who once trusted CDPR to self-certify, don’t anymore. That alone speaks volumes.

Again, it’s not hate — it’s caution born from experience

CrimsonIdol20d ago

"Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions"
It was a multiplatform release, and yes they botched it, but clearly consoles weren't lead development platform, PC was. They clearly were hoping that they could get everything together by launch, and this was a mistake. I think them showing this running on a PS5 is a clear indicator that they've learnt from this.

But there are plenty of reasons not to get too excited about this, and it's not hidden behind any lies, it's right there watermarked on the footage. this is a technical presentation of the Unreal 5 engine, running on the PS5 at 60fps. This is technology that may be in the Witcher, this is not the Witcher.

Lightning7720d ago

Because it is marketing. Epic did the flying sand girl in 2020 now this with Witcher. I still wanna see what games shows the original showing of Unreal 5? It's been 5 years exactly.

Michiel198920d ago

ofc it is, no real gameplay suddenly xrays a horse to show how its muscles are moving realistically.

CrimsonIdol20d ago

It literally had text telling you it wasn't gameplay.

Extermin8or3_19d ago

They were literally showing off the fact it seamlessly can transition from gameplay to ctsceme those aspects of presentation were clear cutscenes....

Show all comments (23)
70°

CDPR aims to stay "focused" on RPGs like The Witcher 4 and Cyberpunk 2

Even if tempted by other genres: "We cannot do so many things we would love to do."

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com