120°

Console Exclusives Are More Important Than Ever and Here's Why

While console exclusivity has a long history in the console industry, this current generation of consoles and gamers sees a surprising change that may make this variation of console exclusives a defining mark of the current-gen.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
FITgamer3953d ago

I don't see Rise of the Tomb Raider, boosting X1 sales much, if at all. If anything it gives gamers who are not X1 owners another reason to dislike Microsoft.

Geekman3953d ago

It's just business. And if people already disliked Microsoft they would've continued disliking them if the game was multiplat or PS4 exclusive.

FITgamer3953d ago

Yeah it's shady business.

UltimateMaster3953d ago

Microsoft keep penny pinching their moneybag exclusive to the point where exclusive developers like Crytek can't pay their employees.

sonarus3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

Well lets wait and see how it performs before we speculate too much about sales. Rise of Tomb Raider is still first good tomb raider in a while. I didn't even bother with it when it first came out but decided to try it when i had the chance on PS4 due to lack of better games.

I actually disagree almost completely with this titles. Exclusives are great and all but to be completely realistic, the highest selling games on ps3 and Xbox 360 are multiplatform. Currently, Highest selling game on PS4 and Xbox 1 is multiplatform. Best selling game at the end of this yr will likely be multiplatform (Destiny is my guess). All this evidence tells me is that the argument that exclusives are the primary determinant for console sales is wrong. I believe it has more to do with price factor and which games are my friends playing on.

Now if a major multiplatform title like COD or grand theft auto went exclusive. That would likely shift substantial consoles. Anything else is likely minimal (titanfall for instance)

SaveFerris3953d ago

It will be interesting to see if MS continues this practice with other franchises this gen, because SONY will likely have to do the same to counter it but they don't have the same financial resources.

DanielGearSolid3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

Sony might not have as much as MS but I'm sure they can afford deals like this. They're still a multi billion dollar company

If they do it, I hope its for new IPs.
Taking multiplats away from fans on other platforms is just slimy

Manic20143953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

Well, you still can't overlook Sony from doing this, they have done it before, they may do it again (SoulCalibur III). though with all this backlash i think this would be the last deal we see, hopefully.

Elda3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

Sony doesn't have to do anything this is why PS has made a name for itself by being in it's own box serving originality & diversity.With Sony's 1st party studios & slew of independent dev throwing exclusives on their platform there is no need for Sony to waste their money to buy multi-plat games to make exclusive or timed exclusive.Those practices are worthless,selfish & desperate.

Manic20143953d ago

You realise Sony had done this type of deal, way before MS did? No matter who does this, it's a horrible practice.

BitbyDeath3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

@Mmehta, not saying you are wrong or anything but links to backup your statements would be nice, might get more agrees then ;-)

Manic20143953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

@BitbyDeath
No problem, It's been ten years could not find much on the situation, but considering the SC games prior to Soul Calibur 3 were multiplatform, then this was a lifetime exclusive on PS2, it's pretty clear Sony bought exclusive rights.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

SaveFerris3953d ago

Call it fanboy thinking, but I don't think SONY are the kind of company that would've done the same deal for ROTTR if offered. Sure, they have secured exclusivity for smaller games with Indie developers but many of these games are also coming to PC with some releasing at the same time. Microsoft indie titles for the most part seem to be Xbox only.

As you have mentioned, SONY is bringing a wide variety of games to the PS3 and PS4 and that is why there are courting indie developers, even partnering with some for exclusivity.

I don't think SONY tries to buy up every indie ip, and I think they don't seem to mind it ending up on PC, but they do try to prevent it coming out on Xbox (sometimes timed exclusive). I guess it comes down to the deal made with the developer.

BitbyDeath3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

@saveferris, Sony don't need to. If they were in MS position then they might.

@mmehta, just read those links but none state they were paid by Sony. Being a Japanese game may equate to why this title went exclusive. Any others?

Manic20143953d ago

@BitbyDeath
That does not really matter, Even MS has not stated they did not pay, but they had an agreement. Being a Japanese game does not really make sense for them to restrict the game to one platform same goes for RoTR. It's obvious Sony paid for the exclusive at the time. Same goes for MGS4, Kojima stated that the data in the game is to enormous, but yet they still are making MGS5 for 360.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3953d ago
nippletwister3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

Because we can't compare consoles anymore between which one has free online and which doesn't, and other anti-consumer shit, due to both manufacturers following the other in anti-consumer decisions/practices one way or another?
(Yes, i am ignoring Nintendo, fug you Wii U)

colonel1793953d ago

The only two exclusives that I wish PS4 had are Final Fantasy XV and Kingdom Hearts 3. I don't care about exclusive anymore other than first party.

If you notice, all the cancer of gaming (DLC, pre-order exclusives, micro-transactions) are often much more abused by third parties. They are very greedy, so having a third party exclusive or timed exclusive from a very high profile game such as Tomb Raider, means only one thing: GREED. People is thinking that Square Enix is going to lose money by having the game exclusive to Xbox One, but really, this is not the case. On the contrary, they'll benefit from the deal money-wise, and then release it on PS4 and PC to make even more money.

Also, there's no better exclusives that the ones made by first party. They know the hardware the most and they usually have the most quality of them all. Just look at The Last of Us versus a third party game, the same even applies to Xbox.

Daniel_Potter3953d ago

It's actually more likely that FFXV and KH3 will come to pc and become fully multiplatform
Considering that both are developed on directx11 and with recent Square Enix financial problems, I doubt X1 and PS4 alone will be able to sell well enough. And considering that none will release on last gen, they will probably get released on pc.

rextraordinaire3953d ago

What would it change if xbox owners also have a way to enjoy FFXV and KH3 ?

That wouldn't prevent you from enjoying those games on ps4, would it?

edqe3953d ago (Edited 3953d ago )

I don't understand why we need exclusives bought by money. It is understandable if there are technical reasons not to publish the games to other platforms.

More games for gamers the better.

I really hope Valve is going to be successful with SteamOS and stays away from exclusives. Open platform for gamers.

incendy353953d ago

Making AAA games is an expensive and risky business. So many studios either go bankrupt for close shop lately. Microsoft offered CD a way to make their game with very little risk, hard to knock them for choosing to go that route.

Show all comments (29)
70°

It’ll Be Fine, Right? Five Games With Unfortunate Release Strategies

Mark from WellPlayed writes about five game launches that were impacted by unfortunate scheduling.

Read Full Story >>
well-played.com.au
jznrpg770d ago (Edited 770d ago )

Zero Dawn sold really well so I’m not sure this belongs. The second game released next to a big game again and it hurt it some I forget what it was though, oh yeah Elden Ring .
But a good game is a good game to me I don’t care when they release personally but they do have to think about it when you want to get more people to buy it.

250°

The Tomb Raider Survivor Trilogy's Take on Lara Croft Deserved More Recognition

The Survivor Trilogy was a drastic reimagining of Lara Croft and Tomb Raider, and it provokes changes for the character that are truly fantastic.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
isarai883d ago (Edited 883d ago )

Deserves less IMO, i think the 1st in the new trilogy was a perfect 1st step for the new direction. The next 2 games were half steps at best. Not only that, every character in the series including Lara is just annoying and doesn't make sense in terms of motive, like yes they have a motive, but none of it seems proportional to the lengths they are willing to go through for it. The most annoying thing is every one of the games say "become the Tomb Raider" yet 3 games later and we're still not there? No thanks. Then there's the mess of the 3rd game, massive skill tree that serves almost no purpose as there's literally only like 3-4 short encounters in the whole game, and they took till the 3rd game to finally manage some decent puzzles even remotely close to previous games in the series. Nah, the trilogy infuriated me to no end as a long time fan of the series, i hope we get better going forward cause that crap sucked.

Army_of_Darkness881d ago

The first in the trilogy was my favorite. I thought they were going into the right direction with that one until the second one came out and seemed like a graphical downgrade but the gameplay was okay. As for the Third, Graphics were really nice but it was kinda boring me to death with its non-stop platforming and exploring with not enough action! Well, for me anyway...

DeathTouch881d ago

Graphics on the 3rd one were abysmal. It’s more colorful and has more variety, but everything else was a noticeable downgrade.

The more open world with NPC quests was also handled very poorly, to the point I missed Angel of Darkness.

thesoftware730881d ago

I know it is your opinion, but she did progress as a character in each game, she even got more muscular and seasoned.

That is the thing, people first complained that there was not enough platforming and actual tomb raiding in the first and second games. Shadow remedied that and kept the combat elements.

3-4 encounters? huh? did we play the same game? there was plenty of combat and, the skill tree did matter, like being able to hang enemies from trees, set explosives traps on bodies, being able to counter, and that are just a few of the combat skills. The skill tree also had things like being able to hold your breath underwater longer, crafting upgrades, zipline upgrade, and climbing upgrades that all changed how you can approach situations.

Not knocking your opinion, but we definitely had different experiences. I had 98% completion on the shadow.

SoulWarrior881d ago (Edited 881d ago )

Sorry but i'm with him about the low number of encounters, the game throws loads of weapons and skills you're way with a comparatively low amount of places to actually use them, so they felt under utilised.

-Foxtrot883d ago

Yeah...no

It was awful, for THREE GAMES it was "become the Tomb Raider" where she went back to square one after each game. Not to mention after a huge reaction of killing someone for the first time she then becomes Rambo straight after and goes on a slaughter spree without a single other reaction. Her development was all over the place.

She was whiney, weak and in later game a little arrogant and selfish

Oh and the voice actress compared to the previous ones was not as good

Lara Croft deserved better and while they are decent games as they are, we deserved actual Tomb Raider games, we could have had better survival games if they just stuck with the original Lara Crofts origin about her plane going down. Surviving 2 weeks in the Himalayas...I'd have liked to seen that, who knows what mystical threat she could have faced in the mountains or underground some secret concealed cave.

Tacoboto881d ago

I thought Shadow of the Tomb Raider had better gameplay than Rise, but it annoyed me the most of the trilogy when I stopped to think about the story.

It's like they deliberately decided to make her unlikeable and did nothing to make the character you're playing as likeable or have even one sign of humility.

SoulWarrior883d ago

2013 I thought was a fine entry, but Rise and especially Shadow were painfully mediocre follow ups imo, I really didn't like how selfish and angry her character was in those two.

Terry_B882d ago

No. Please forget the crap completely.

northpaws881d ago

First one was decent, played through it twice.
Second one was okay, played through it once.
Third one was really bad, tried twice a year apart, still can't get through the first two hours, it is just really bad.

thesoftware730881d ago

Honest question, what did you find bad about it? the opening 2 hrs of Shadow were fantastic imo.

The opening was very similar to the first 2, what did you find really bad?

Not looking for an argument, just an honest question.

Starman69881d ago

3rd one just didn't feel like a tomb raider game. Possibly because the development was passed to another development team. Big mistake! Microsoft killed tomb raider making the first game a timed exclusive. Never recovered after that.

Show all comments (45)
200°

Get three Tomb Raider games free at Epic Games Store

Starting today, Tomb Raider, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Rise of the Tomb Raider are free at Epic Games Store. The free game offers run until January 6 at 11 AM Eastern. Once you claim them, they’re yours to keep.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
CrimsonWing691262d ago (Edited 1262d ago )

They're all solid games, but nothing quite matched the epicness of the first one for me. I think the 3rd one started off strong but once you got to that Peruvian area it took a massive nose dive for me.

lelo2play1262d ago (Edited 1262d ago )

You got to be kidding!
The first one was great at the time... but this latest trilogy of Tomb Raider games are also great.

LiViNgLeGaCY1262d ago

I think he means the first one in the new trilogy.

CrimsonWing691262d ago

I meant the first of the new trilogy.

Furesis1262d ago

yeah i remember liking the first one when it came out, so i tried the second one sometime after release and i just could not get into it, i couldn't finish it. So i might try the 3rd now that i got it for free but ehh. But i do remember enjoying the first one, i wonder if i'd feel the same way if i played it today? Better not taint those memories lol

ANIALATOR1361261d ago

I was the same for some reason. Never finished the second one. I got like half way through maybe.

ActualWhiteMan1261d ago (Edited 1261d ago )

The first one of the latest trilogy is a masterpiece

Fishy Fingers1262d ago

I'll take a copy of Shadow... Cheers.

Profchaos1262d ago

Great games I've played them all on ps4 but it'll be good to finally try shadow on my rtx card.

Double_O_Revan1262d ago

Trying to claim them and the store keeps crashing. lol.

gamefreaks3651262d ago

EGS has been having issues all day.

RedDevils1262d ago

Weird I don't has that issue.

Double_O_Revan1262d ago

I finally got it after a while. But it was real bad for a while.

PeeShuter1262d ago (Edited 1262d ago )

Claim games by going to the website and login using ur credentials. I did the same as i couldnt use epic launcher. Also try reinstalling Epic Launcher I did it and it worked.

Double_O_Revan1261d ago

I always go through the website. It was all just down for a while yesterday it seems.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1261d ago
Show all comments (19)