Approvals 10/3 ▼
TheDude79 (2) - 3551d ago Cancel
DaveyB (1) - 3551d ago Cancel
BlueCroup (2) - 3551d ago Cancel
fonger08 (1) - 3551d ago Cancel
xHeavYx (2) - 3551d ago Cancel
XiNarutoUzumaki (1) - 3551d ago Cancel
UnderpaidTurtle (1) - 3551d ago Cancel
230°

The Last Of Us: Remastered - HD Revelation Or Ripoff?

There's been a lot of chatter about whether or not the remastered release of 'The Last of Us' is a worthy purchase. Much like when the TombRaider Definitive Edition came out consumers wonder if it's nothing more than a cheap cash grab. We break down TLOU Remastered completely and give you our thoughts.

Read Full Story >>
canadianonlinegamers.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3551d ago
Mr-Dude3551d ago

I wonder of all these articles will appear when other remaster editions are out.. Like GTA and MCC..

Digital_Anomaly3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

YES.

When people are paying near full price for something they may have already played it's a fair question to ask.

EDIT: It seems you guys think I'm saying I think it's a ripoff. I bought it! I love it! Simmer down! Haha Also, keep in mind that only Gamestop has the 50% deal. Not everyone can get that price so a lot of people paid full value.

XiNarutoUzumaki3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

TLOU is $50 bucks with 25% off if you trade in the PS3 copy? How isn't that a good deal?

So NO! People aren't playing full price for this. Mind you, I've got my money worth in this game. That MP at 60FPS is just so good.

randomass1713551d ago

And saying no it's not a ripoff is a fair answer.

xHeavYx3551d ago

Agreed with.. Ahem... Naruto... it is a great deal
You get all the DLC and the remastered game for just $50 ($25 if you trade), compare that to the price of the new game for PS3 ($40) and the DLC ($15 for Left Behind plus whatever the season pass costs, I think I paid $20 for it) and you'd be paying over $70

DVS-Zev3551d ago

"When people are paying near full price for something they may have already played it's a fair question to ask"

I assume you bring up this same silly arguement every time a game comes out with their game of the year edition (with all their DLC etc) a year later.Right?

I see games that get 6-7's across the board and still come out with a "GOTY" edition a year later.TLOU:R is basically that.Only they made it for PS4.Why the fuss? Why are certain people acting like this is some sort of first ever thing? Hell, i better look back at the Tomb raider definitive edition comments and see everyone frothing at the mouth or there is some serious double standards.

Mr Pumblechook3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

Not another one of these click baits!

* It's the game with the highest Meteoritic rating of 2013 AND 2014.

* It has an additional single player DLC pack and multiplayer DLC included that previously retailed separately.

* It retails for less than the price of a standard game on PS4/XB One.

* It's a bargain but if doesn't interest you that's perfectly okay because not everyone has the same taste. But don't write a poem about it!

Spotie3551d ago

People aren't paying near full price, since it's less than full price but includes content that would cost more on top of that.

As for "something they may have already played," that's a personal choice, especially with this not being made for those people, but for ether millions who didn't have a PS3 last gen or otherwise didn't okay the game.

Basing your answer on an unintended crowd is pretty silly.

DanielGearSolid3551d ago

I dont understand how someone can say a game they CHOSE to buy again is ripoff

Especially when the seller, CLEARLY details what is included in your purchase

A ripoff would be, if the name of the game was The Last of Us 2, and the Sony never showed any footage of it. And when ppl buy it they find out its just TLOU Remastered...

THAT would be a ripoff...
Its sucks how bloggers can start these websites but can't even use simple words and phrases in the right context

LordMaim3551d ago

Easy Pumblechook. They ruled that it was *not* a ripoff. :)

joab7773551d ago

I got it for almost nothing and I love it. Damn...u think ppl would be happy. U don't have to buy it if u own it on ps3. Those who don't or want the remaster have the option...and there's plenty of good deals.

Antnee5343551d ago

What I didn't understand is why people don't realize this is just hold over till the big games come out. This a 10 out of 10 game that scored big last year, but the thing that's different about this from other remasters/remakes is that this was exclusive to the ps3 and a lot of people from 360 and wii made the switch to ps4 so this is really just a gift for them and at 50 this game comes with a 20 dollar season pass included so this is a great deal for anyone especially if you were on the other consoles last gen.

Ezz20133550d ago

i will say this
because those articles
i'm for now on will show no mercy for any one saying they are buying MCC or GTA5 AGAIN

NeoTribe3550d ago

Dude, its 49.99 with ALL the dlc. The ps3 version without dlc is 39.99 still..... how in gods name is it a bad price? Its prolly the best deal on a new game ive ever seen...

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3550d ago
XiNarutoUzumaki3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

Don't bother waiting. It is not going to happen. This happens only to TLOU because of the Exclusive curse and the overwhelming reception of the game.

Nobody talks about the other remasters or the GOTY editions. The Last of Us and Sony are the only sinners here.

aceitman3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

ur right there was no one bashing tombraider , and tlou has done a better job with it.

joab7773551d ago

I agree. Everyone will be zero excited for GTA5. It isn't just an exclusive thing though as no one who has spent a gazillion dollars on Halo is gonna ask for a free copy of MCC.

Antnee5343551d ago

Naruto you talk a good point but shouldn't you be out there saving the world by beating up on black zetsu

Lawboy23551d ago

Tbf....MCC is a different animal...Gta and tomb raider on the other hand I feel there should be articles like this

Mr-Dude3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

Could you ellaborate on that? I mean, for me the MCC is a remake, but for you the fans it's like TLOU remasterd for us

Xb1ps43551d ago

Mr dude

Does he really have to elaborate on that? I mean you are getting so much more with mcc...

Ezz20133550d ago

please tell me

TLOU alone on ps3 cost what now ?!!
TLOU DLCs cost what now on Ps3 ?!!
what the total of TLOU and all it DLCs on ps3 ?!

each one of the 4 Halo games cost what now on xbox360 ?!

i will wait for an answer

ThePope3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

@EZZ

Haha you're such a fool. Are you honestly comparing TLoU RM to the MCC collection, as if TLoU is bringing more value to the table!?!?

The MCC is a compilation of one of the best series of all time.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3550d ago
ThePope3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

Halo: MCC is not the same these other games. It has games some may not have played in 10 years. Plus it as a TON of value, the most in the history of gaming.

Please people stop talking about TLoU remastered meta critic. If you were to review ONLY the parts that are different from the original you'd see a very different review. I bought it for my PS4 and am enjoying it, but it's not a whole new game.

hkgamer3551d ago

tomb raider got it, i must admit it looked significantly better.

tlou, havent played the ps4 version yet. looks great but maybe the ps3 version just looked too good.

gtaV, well that seems to have improved a lot more.

mcc, well its actually halo 2 hd with 3 other other ports. it does significantly imptove on halo2. but that was released ages ago. it is also a collection, definitely worpth the price.

no matter how you see it, tlou seems like it has done less. but its for fans to decide if they want tp buy again or for newcomers to play an amazing game.

harrisk9543551d ago

I agree... I don't recall as many articles about Tomb Raider being re-released for this gen... there were a few, but not like this.

Death3551d ago

The Master Chief Collection is the remastered versions of all 4 Halo games. It's much more like the God of War collection than Tomb Raider or TLOU on the PS4.

As for TLOU on PS4, the value is determined by the end user. If you never played the PS3 version, it's a great game and a good deal. If you played through multiple times, bought the DLC, and didn't trade it in, the value drops for what you get.

There is no right or wrong answer for this. Some will find tremendous value, some won't. The only differance between this and other games is it has had extremely good reviews.

memots3550d ago

No they wont have that many articles. Only Sony is not allowed, so much hate

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3550d ago
Lawboy23551d ago

U know....at first I was skeptical...not knowing if it was good as all the hype surrounding but now I'm a believer....just finished the campaign on survivor a few days ago....was my first time ever playing...and boy was that game extremely good...got frustrated towards the end because it was so difficult but it is a great game...the graphics at the beginning of the game were mind blowing and the story was riveting....started my grounded play through so wish me luck....also have been playing a lot of the mp which is fun but I don't feel it lives up to the hype...really enjoy it but it's not as good as advertised...all and I am so glad I purchased and thankful Lukas convinced me to make it a priority

Mr-Dude3551d ago

I'm jealous... The feeling you played it the very first time. What where your thought about Joel and Ellie? And the clickers?

LordMaim3551d ago

God is Grounded mode ever barren of helpful items. You thought Survivor was hard. You have to make every brick, every bottle, every scrap of useful material count.

MilkMan3551d ago

Yes, this and any other game that was made last year, that gets a "special" HD release is a ripoff as well.
Its what they call double dipping.
If this was the intent always then they should have made these plans known from the beginning so that consumers could make an informed decision as to where they want to spend their dollars.
Not all this hush sh!t, then its
"SURPRISE! Guess what? Last years game, is this years port into your new shinny console.
Whats that? You want new games? We know. But its easier to give you a copy of this game that's sitting on our server than to make new games. See we don't really have any new ones made yet. So we'll just stretch things out here as much as we can.
Sorry."

xHeavYx3551d ago

I'm sure all those people who didn't have a PS3 agree with you, also all those other people who bought the game at gunpoint, because we all know how people are forced to buy games, right?

WeAreLegion3551d ago

Let's assume for a second that Naughty Dog had started work on the PS4 version before the PS3 version. They didn't, but let's pretend. Here is how that "promotion" would have gone.

"Hey, everyone! This new game that's coming out as a massive system seller will also be released on our more powerful platform in a year. You should wait to buy that version."

Freaking brilliant marketing, right? -_-

These games aren't holding back other games. They're just rereleases to capture a new audience. The same goes for HD remasterings on all systems. Wind Waker deserved a larger audience. I never got to play it. So, I bought the Wii U version. I love it! The same goes for many people with The Last of Us. You don't HAVE to buy it, dude.

Even if you did buy the PS3 version, you could have sold it for around $35 in-store credit when the PS4 version was announced. That's what I did. So, I got the PS4 version for $15, really.

Roccetarius3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

The Gaming industry is pretty much becoming more and more like the Movie / Music industry. Double dipping everywhere, and consumers are not taking a stance against it.

Same thing with Tomb Raider, and GTA was obviously coming to other platforms. Rockstar is smart when it comes to milking a platform first, then moving on.

hkgamer3551d ago

why not port something to another console?

fuck me, we get complete editions with all dlc all the time and no one complains and its on the same co sole. just because a game gets released, does not mean u have to buy or play it.

Death3550d ago

The issue some have isn't that the game was ported, the issue they have is with Sony denying that a port was being worked on. Given the choice some people would rather have waited and bought the game once on the PS4. It would have been a nice gesture by Sony for their fans that pre-ordered the PS4 and didn't buy the game yet. The choice to make an informed decision is all people are asking. Instead of having the ability to choose, Sony clearly stated a port wasn't being made effectively eliminating choice from the equation. http://www.videogamer.com/p...

It shouldn't be the difficult to see why these people would be less than thrilled.

Mr-Dude3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

@Death
"The issue some have isn't that the game was ported, the issue they have is with Sony denying that a port was being worked on"

Isn't this what 75% of the gamedev do? If some people are angry (which this Gen they are very very quickly), then they should be very pissed at Rockstar, they denied the GTAV port for X1, PC and PS4 for nearly a year...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3550d ago
Show all comments (71)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community494d ago
shinoff2183494d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012494d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee494d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard494d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal494d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12494d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard494d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red494d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot494d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90494d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot494d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90494d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno494d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot494d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright493d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow493d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright493d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 493d ago
ChubbyBlade494d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno494d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183493d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 493d ago
dmonee494d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012494d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee494d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012494d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community652d ago
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community656d ago