Overhype The Last of Us: Remastered PS4, Where is the Actual Gameplay running at 1080p/60 FPS

The Last of Us on Playstation 3 was a masterpiece, graphics/visuals, storyline, gameplay in every aspect it was perfect. Naughty Dog once again showed why they are the best in business and what exactly is raising the bar for them in gaming industry. Few months after the launch of The Last of Us on Playstation 3, Naughty Dog announced a remastered HD port for Playstation 4, "The Last of Us: Remastered". At the time of official announcement, Naughty Dog stated that the studio is targeting "60 FPS" for Playstation 4.

[F4sterTh4nFTL]

They will still be making improvements on it till the last second and I am sure when they will feel completely satisfied they will show us something.

[ZodTheRipper]

Yep, judging by tweets from Naughty Dog they are all working very hard on it. This is not traditional game development - they are porting a finished game over to completely new hardware, it's probably looking better/running more stable every day so they don't want to show the unfinished thing. We will get some footage soon enough, don't worry.

[christian hour]

How did this person ever survive in the days when you saw very little, if nothing at all, of a game before you actually picked it up bar a few pictures and a write up in a magazine?

Growing up in the late 80's/early 90's, I found out about games through word of mouth and would know very little about them going in. I miss those times :(

It surprises me that there are still people out there that don't have faith in Naughty Dog despite their 20+ year track record of quality and never over promising and under delivering. The game will run as smooth as they say it will, and they'll show us it when they're ready to, they don't need to go in to a PR frenzy months long hype train like an EA/UBI/ACTI title, not for a polished and refined port anyway.

Todays gamers are an entitled bunch :P

[nix]

this website should be renamed "gamepurr.com"

[Army_of_Darkness]

How dare he question naughty dog!!!

[Eonjay]

"Where is the Actual Gameplay running at 1080p/60 FPS"

Wait what? You think that it doesn't exist? Man, you guys make ND's job too easy...

[Crazyglues]

@ Army_of_Darkness

Yes in Naughty*Dog we trust.. but it is weird that they have not shown it yet....

I'm sure we will get some footage soon, but My guess would be the team that makes that call (to show it or not) is trying to make sure they show it in the best light -(meaning give you some screens that show it off the best)- this is a big project and the team probably worked really hard on it..

So you don't want to mess it up by just rushing to show screens... your going to take your time and present it in it's best light.

I'm sure it will look fine, nothing too amazing it's just a re-make, but I'm sure it will look as good as tomb-raider...

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

[morganfell]

Are Gamepur really this imperceptive?

Where are the majority of game videos posted? Even by Sony on their own official blog?

Youtube. 30 FPS and low bitrate.

Do you think it will compare well and show off its best side with a bunch of youtube videos? How many people really understand the negative impact this would have on the Remastered version.

It is fairly apparent Gamepur doesn't understand this fact. Though they mention the need for direct feed in their article, a hugely valid reason, they minimalize this truth and ignoring their own remark go on to whine beneath their hit inducing title 95% of the time. Gamepur, you seriously have zero credit as a reporting entity.

Sony has a duty to its developers, its investors and even its fans to protect its products. No matter where they release a direct feed video it will wind up on youtube where 99/100 people that see the video will view it.

Naughty Dog has access to 60fps Youtube but it is still low bitratye. And when 1000 people reupload the video it will be cut to 30fps which really does then make the video a lie.

Could you just be a little bit more even keeled and common sense in the next attempt Gamepur? These ill-conceived articles are really getting old.

[Darkstares]

Not knocking Naughty Dog but it seems to be the common theme now to just show trailers or clips without actual gameplay. It's what we saw of a lot at E3. Even Uncharted showed a clip that was rendered on the hardware but not actual gameplay. It wasn't just Sony's show but also Microsoft's E3 as well. I want to see people playing the game on the hardware.

[Crazyglues]

@ the Disagrees...

Now I'm really laughing, it seems lately, especially on this site there is a quick to go Flame On' the second someone says anything..

I said I'm sure they will show it, it's not like you can hide it the game will have to come out.. LoL (and you people flame me)

Come on' what's with all the flaming, morganfell made a good point, and I was just about to agree when I saw him saying use "common sense" - What? So a website is not allowed to make a mistake or over look something, there suppose to be perfect... Come on' people, You do realize this is a gaming site, right?

I just think people are too quick to go Flame On' --> I bet half of the disagrees I got didn't even read my full comment..

But whatever - Flame On!

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

[Sevir]

Its funny people call it overhyped. They did a similar tactic with the games multiplayer suit which didn't get any actual footage until the game was reviewed and on store shelves when it released last year. And they were bragging about how epic it was for months on end. And every news outlets had no play time with it until they received final review/retail copies.

I have a feeling this is similarly how they're doing everything with this. We haven't seen anything other than the cinematic trailers remastered, and they'll likely keep it till the game releases this month.

[morganfell]

@Crazyglues,

Websites are allowed to make a mistake but an entire misdirected article? This wasn't just one line or sentence where something was incorrect. No, it was 95% of the article. The worst part is they have the solid reason IN THE ARTICLE ITSELF. But they ignore that. They make 1, 2, 3, 4 wrong assumptions.

And we have to take them on the whole. Recently they have issued a slew of ill-formed deductions. So you see, this is not the matter of a single mistake or even two. That is certainly forgiveable. Instead what we have here is a pattern and it is a disservice to the game community.

[alexkoepp]

I don't know about overhyped, people are excited but nothing near the Master Chief Collection on the X1.

It is strange though there was the announcement trailer, a little e3 footage and nothing else. Games due out in 3 weeks so it's odd but you are just showing off an already released game with sharper graphics and a higher frame rate. We don't really need to see anything to know the effects of your standard remaster.

[C-H-E-F]

This article is like saying... GTAV was overhyped and info faked because they didn't release any footage of the game actually running... LIKE UGH.... there's a reputation system to uphold in this line of work. Naughty Dog is a prestige studio with grade A developers. At this point if you don't take their word for it then I suggest you retire from gaming. Based on how great the original was... there's no need to question the quality of the port. I don't see anyone questioning Rockstar for the GTAV PS4 port. And that one has more variables of consistency to uphold because of the multiplatform architecture of the dev. process. smh... STOP JUST STOP!!

[Kavorklestein]

There isn't 400 articles per second about GTA V remastered, so it's a lot easier to give it slack, and also we saw the Amazing trailer Rockstar put out that showed things all around the city of Los Santos, with MAJOR improvements. Not slightly less aliasing, and a barely relevant 60 fps scene with hardly any characters and almost ZERO movement like TLOU:R's "trailer" had. It's not that anyone DOUBTS Naughty Dog, it's just we want to see some substantial gameplay or diversity.

GTA V DOES have a tougher job to remaster than TLOU ever will. Are we even comparing the difficulty of porting from 2 consoles to 2 new consoles to 1 to 1?

[AngelicIceDiamond]

Hopefully it comes soon. I wanna see ND create magic again.

[UltraNova]

Personally I want to see ND make a borderlands-fallout hybrid fps rpg...

Dreams..

[Sayai jin]

I hope those buying this game, enjoy it...game on!

On topic, overhyped? I am pretty sure ND will deliver!

[TheSaint]

Agreed, if anyone can do it it's ND.

[showtimefolks]

so let's see. B**** and Moan about not seeing gameplay, Its ND afterall. Don't they deserve our trust? seriously guys

why are gamers so quick to jump on every little thing, don't you think we will see gameplay before the game releases?

Kojima
ND
Valve
R*
Bungie
Rocksteady
etc,

i will always give some of these developers the benefit of the doubt till they mess up. Until than STHU. Its not like the game is out and we don't have any gameplay videos, developers are trying to rip us off or something

wait and we get exactly that plus more,

[Fishy Fingers]

'Gamers' aren't, two bit websites looking for some easy traffic are.

[snookiegamer]

Overhype who?? Who's overhyped TLOU-R? Naughty Dog only confirmed 1080/60fps, and they delivered, so where is the overhype?

Forget these two-bit wannabe-a-writer articles...they only serve to discredit. What kind of idiot questions the integrity and honesty of a studio like Naughty Dog?

ND always deliver, yet these whinning negative gamer barons continue to...ah whatever, I'm sick of negativity for just about every/any game this gen. Please just go F ya'selves you sad bunch of sacks.

[SilentNegotiator]

I'm pretty sure we can give Naughty Dog, of all studios, the benefit of the doubt.

Unless they're outright lying - highly unlikely - it's just a remaster and there's not really much to worry about.

[assdan]

When HD says something, I trust it. They're one of the only compaines I can say that about.

[FayZ_]

how hard is it to turn up some fps & res settings like a pc game?

[FanboyKilla]

lol yeah we want to see it. are you serious? it looks amazing, its next gen, looks like it was made for ps4. all these words no action. cmon everyone here knows why they havent shown the game. the internet is going to put it through the ringer. compare it to this and that.

im with nd here. why show it when we told them its amazing and they ran with it? preordered anyone? and these guys on here want to attack peope that want to see it. also defending a game that devs wont let them see but will let you preorder. wow you sony fans never cease to amaze me how far and low you will go for sony. smh i bet you aren't this loyal to family and friends when they screw you over. lol most of you guys make other sony supporters look bad. and gamers in general.

[jebabcock]

Coherent sentences go a long way in helping people understand what you are trying to say...

[reko]

@typicalxboxleechfanboy

LMAO LMAO gtfo!

[fluffydelusions]

We knew nothing about the MP in the game till the last week of release. In ND I trust.

[l-Mc-I]

Exactly. I wasn't expecting much of the multiplayer for the Last of Us since they hadn't shown anything, but I was treated to one of the best competitive multiplayer experiences of last gen.